At Conquest of Mecca, Prophet ﷺ Thanked Allah

[Altruist]

At this time of triumph,
we must look back and reflect on what the Prophet ﷺ did when he conquered Mecca.

When he entered,
he bowed his head so low on his camel that his forehead nearly touched the saddle.
Despite the overwhelming victory, this posture symbolized

deep humility and thankfulness to Allah

He expressed not in arrogance or triumphalism,
but in worship, mercy, and praise of the One who granted the victory —
Allah.



لَا إِلَهَ إِلَّا اللَّهُ وَحْدَهُ صَدَقَ وَعْدَهُ وَنَصَرَ عَبْدَهُ وَهَزَمَ الْأَحْزَابَ وَحْدَهُ



"There is no god but Allah alone. He fulfilled His promise, granted victory to His servant, and defeated the Confederates alone."

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GqltfyXWcAAWMif.jpg

 

[Wake up Pak]

The question remains: did Pakistan win the war, or back out at the request of the US?

 

[Altruist]

The question remains: did Pakistan win the war, or back out at the request of the US?

..
..

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GqltfyXWcAAWMif.jpg

..
..

https://twitter.com/x/status/1921215448890126602

 

[Wake up Pak]

..
..

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GqltfyXWcAAWMif.jpg

..
..

https://twitter.com/x/status/1921215448890126602

https://twitter.com/x/status/1921223089980854438

 

[Not_Guilty]

..
..

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GqltfyXWcAAWMif.jpg

..
..

https://twitter.com/x/status/1921215448890126602

Napaak yahodi fooj followed its yahodi masters orders and not take revenge of 26 innocent pakistanies killed

 

[Altruist]

Pakistan walks away with its territorial integrity, military assets, avionics edge, and morale.

Adil Raja is a lunatic who thinks Pakistan approached the US for the ceasefire. If Pakistan was going to do that, then it would have done so in the first three days while India was doing relentless missile attacks. When Pakistan finally decided to react then India realized it couldn't walk over Pakistan and better to end it now before it gets worse.

 

[Citizen X]

Pakistan walks away with its territorial integrity, military assets, avionics edge, and morale.

Adil Raja is a lunatic who thinks Pakistan approached the US for the ceasefire. If Pakistan was going to do that, then it would have done so in the first three days while India was doing relentless missile attacks. When Pakistan finally decided to react then India realized it couldn't walk over Pakistan and better to end it now before it gets worse.

Still drinking that ISPR Kool-Aid I see.

 

[Altruist]

Still drinking that ISPR Kool-Aid I see.

India is 4 times bigger than Pakistan.

GDP of India is 800% greater than that of Pakistan.

(Don't argue the facts)

If you wake up from your dreams, then think through how the unelected government and the corrupt establishment of Pakistan could have won the war?

At the end, Pakistan put out a great show, India flinched, and that was the best time to agree to a ceasefire.

Pretty stupid to think, if India was winning and everyone on its TV was screaming to wipe out Pakistan, it would have agreed to a ceasefire.

 

[Citizen X]

India is 4 times bigger than Pakistan.

GDP of India is 800% greater than that of Pakistan.

(Don't argue the facts)

If you wake up from your dreams, then think through how the unelected government and the corrupt establishment of Pakistan could have won the war?

At the end, Pakistan put out a great show, India flinched, and that was the best time to agree to a ceasefire.

Pretty stupid to think, if India was winning and everyone on its TV was screaming to wipe out Pakistan, it would have agreed to a ceasefire.

Keep drinking that ISPR Kool Aid. This whole thing was nothing but a Noora Khusti with each harami on its side getting what they wanted

 

[Altruist]

Don't like talking to people who are blind and keep repeating the same mantra. Come with some facts or shut up.

 

[jigrot]

The question remains: did Pakistan win the war, or back out at the request of the US?

Pakistan didn’t back out, Pakistan stood firm and responded with strength and strategic clarity. This war, by many accounts, was orchestrated to corner and weaken Pakistan, giving India what was seen as an opportunity to "fix" its adversary. But what followed shocked many: Pakistan's response was not just resilient, it was calculated, unified, and far more effective than expected.

Initially, major powers hesitated to intervene, believing the conflict would quickly tilt in India’s favor. But as the battlefield dynamics evolved and Pakistan held its ground with remarkable resolve, the narrative started to shift. It became clear that this war was not going to end as expected. That’s when calls for mediation began—not because of concern, but because the West and its allies realized the conflict might produce results they hadn't anticipated.

More importantly, this conflict marked a geopolitical shift. The age of unilateral dominance by Western powers is waning, and the rise of multipolar influence—especially with China's growing presence has changed the global balance. Testing Pakistan at this time, when regional alliances are strengthening and new centers of power are emerging, was a strategic miscalculation.

In the end, it’s not about who called for ceasefire, it's about who came out more respected, more united, and more strategically relevant. India and its allies may have initiated the conflict expecting submission. Instead, they encountered resistance, resilience, and a nation unwilling to back down. In that sense, Pakistan not only won the war militarily, but also morally and diplomatically.

 

[Altruist]

Pakistan didn’t back out, Pakistan stood firm and responded with strength and strategic clarity. This war, by many accounts, was orchestrated to corner and weaken Pakistan, giving India what was seen as an opportunity to "fix" its adversary. But what followed shocked many: Pakistan's response was not just resilient, it was calculated, unified, and far more effective than expected.

Initially, major powers hesitated to intervene, believing the conflict would quickly tilt in India’s favor. But as the battlefield dynamics evolved and Pakistan held its ground with remarkable resolve, the narrative started to shift. It became clear that this war was not going to end as expected. That’s when calls for mediation began—not because of concern, but because the West and its allies realized the conflict might produce results they hadn't anticipated.

More importantly, this conflict marked a geopolitical shift. The age of unilateral dominance by Western powers is waning, and the rise of multipolar influence—especially with China's growing presence has changed the global balance. Testing Pakistan at this time, when regional alliances are strengthening and new centers of power are emerging, was a strategic miscalculation.

In the end, it’s not about who called for ceasefire, it's about who came out more respected, more united, and more strategically relevant. India and its allies may have initiated the conflict expecting submission. Instead, they encountered resistance, resilience, and a nation unwilling to back down. In that sense, Pakistan not only won the war militarily, but also morally and diplomatically.

Very well articulated.

 

[Wake up Pak]

In the end, it’s not about who called for ceasefire, it's about who came out more respected, more united, and more strategically relevant. India and its allies may have initiated the conflict expecting submission. Instead, they encountered resistance, resilience, and a nation unwilling to back down. In that sense, Pakistan not only won the war militarily, but also morally and diplomatically.

Who initiated the cease-fire & asked the West & the US to intervene?
How has Pakistan won the war since the ceasefire took place?
No one has won the war, but saying that Pakistan has won militarily, morally & diplomatically is just satisfying one's ego, nothing more.
By the way, you only win a war when the enemy surrenders.

 

[jigrot]

Who initiated the cease-fire & asked the West & the US to intervene?
How has Pakistan won the war since the ceasefire took place?
No one has won the war, but saying that Pakistan has won militarily, morally & diplomatically is just satisfying one's ego, nothing more.
By the way, you only win a war when the enemy surrenders.

Wars between two nuclear-armed nations, full surrender isn’t a practical outcome. There are limits both sides won’t cross. I think India initiated the ceasefire, just as it has in past conflicts, when momentum shifted. History shows that when things don’t go as planned, India turns to diplomacy. So, arguing over who called for intervention is pointless. In this context, victory isn’t just about forcing a surrender, it’s about achieving strategic objectives, defending sovereignty, and reshaping narratives. Pakistan did exactly that. It resisted pressure, exposed India’s limits, and maintained deterrence. That in itself is a significant win.

 

[Wake up Pak]

Wars between two nuclear-armed nations, full surrender isn’t a practical outcome. There are limits both sides won’t cross. I think India initiated the ceasefire, just as it has in past conflicts, when momentum shifted. History shows that when things don’t go as planned, India turns to diplomacy. So, arguing over who called for intervention is pointless. In this context, victory isn’t just about forcing a surrender, it’s about achieving strategic objectives, defending sovereignty, and reshaping narratives. Pakistan did exactly that. It resisted pressure, exposed India’s limits, and maintained deterrence. That in itself is a significant win.

You believe India has initiated the ceasefire, but India claims that Pakistan initiated it. How has Pakistan achieved its strategic objectives?
The Indus Waters Treaty is suspended, and Mosques, madrasas, and homes were destroyed; nearly 30 Pakistanis were killed, and several were injured. Cruise missiles were fired at three airbases, etc.
Pakistan had an opportunity to finish the job, but backed out under US pressure.
Claiming that Pakistan has won the war is somewhat delusional. I approach this issue not emotionally, but with a pragmatic mindset.