ANP, PPP Senators call for probe into NW military operation

[Qalandari]

http://tribune.com.pk/story/647672/un-passes-resolution-against-drone-strikes-unanimously/

Liars as always.

LOL this fake news has been fed to Pakistani media by Nawaz league. Can you give me a link of any foreign reputed news agency regarding your so called imaginary resolution ?

 

[Qalandari]

The only proof you need is that it wasn't PPP that got them killed.

And waiting for you to act on your own suggestions. When is this being taken to the courts.

We have raised the issue in the parliament. Government members can refute our claims but then we will produce the relatives of the civilians killed yesterday.

 

[Qalandari]

Its been two days since the news, do you have any "reputed foreign news agency" contradicting the news? No?
In that case I'll stick to this version of the story.
As for feeding false stories to the media, its not my responsibility. All news agency's are carrying this story so I'll prefer it over your non existing refutation.

I knew you would respond like a dumb trying to spin. Below is the link to the page where all the resolutions of regular sessions of UN General Assembly are published....

http://www.un.org/depts/dhl/resguide/r68_en.shtml

Right from the horse's mouth LOL.

 

[Qalandari]

http://www.mofa.gov.pk/pr-details.php?prID=1610

Please wait for it. The resolution will be uploaded and you can rub your nose in it when it does.

I know I'm right because I seem to even know the contents of that resolution "against" drones.

Even the first sentence of the link that you gave spells it out....

The General Assembly of the United Nations unanimously adopted today a resolution which calls for measures, including the use of remotely piloted aircrafts (drones), to comply with international law.

"To comply with international law" does not mean to stop drone strikes. Give me 2 minutes and I will find you the link of some of the contents of the resolution. This resolution stressed on other war related issues and it was drafted on 21st November 2013.

 

[Qalandari]

Take all the time you need but what you mentioned above is exactly what I meant when I said "against drones." Complying with International Law is all that is required here.

No not at all. Anyways I got the highly "classified" document (lol) even before it got published on the UN resolution page. Here have a read. To cut short go straight to page 6, 1st paragraph....

http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N13/577/15/PDF/N1357715.pdf?OpenElement

 

[pak_aus]

yar ye khusra khan yani buzdil khan tu khud dehshatgardon ka tatoo hai.

 

[Qalandari]

Lol! In essence to ensure the drones are not used the way they are being currently used in FATA. That is really all one can ask for, that they follow international law, and comply with Human Rights Laws. So its a step forward. Its not going to be binding but definitely an acknowledgement that the drones need to be reigned in.

It does not stop drone strikes. Infact, it is giving a UN cover to drone attacks in the long run, you just wait and see. I don't know why the dumb Nawaz league got so excited about it. Maybe due to their poor performance they have nothing else to sell except false hopes.

 

[desan]

Well done PPP.

IK is starting to TAME the "liberal" war mongers!!!!

 

[Qalandari]

Its potential to be used as a cover by the US is clearly there but there is also an acknowledgement by the intentional community that the program needs to follow certain laws; this atleast leads to a debate on the issue, so if handled skillfully could lead to the US having to reign in the program as it exists now.

As for Nawaz League, its important for them to take the narrative away from Imran, hence the noise...

All those rules are mentioned in the same resolution. Anyways keep your false hopes high.

 

[miafridi]

Because civilians were killed yesterday.

Yes, just like IK predicted about operations. So live with it now. If a small operation can change your stance then what would a full scale operation do? You would never know when would the full country start burning. This is what we are afraid of. We don't want the operation to go in a bad way, because if it does, then there will be no reverse gear but you will only have to see another Syria.

 

[Babar Khan]

پنجاب ، کشمیر اور سندھ کے پیچھے انڈیا ہے(bigsmile)

Saray fasaad kay peechay Endia or us kay agent. musalmano main gadaroo aur baygairatoon ke kami nahi hay

 

[Qalandari]

Yes, just like IK predicted about operations. So live with it now. If a small operation can change your stance then what would a full scale operation do? You would never know when would the full country start burning. This is what we are afraid of. We don't want the operation to go in a bad way, because if it does, then there will be no reverse gear but you will only have to see another Syria.

My stance never changes. It is buzdil khan who has changed his stance.

 

[miafridi]

My stance never changes. It is buzdil khan who has changed his stance.

Joke of the century.[hilar]

 

[Qalandari]

Joke of the century.[hilar]

Wish you could've added an example.