Why NAB is not challenging decisions of LHC in SC? Similarly, why Punjab govt ( read Buzdar) is not challenging bad decision of LHC in which it restored 34 corrupt DSPs who were suspended by IG about a month ago?Koi faida nai, Lohar High Court is Lohar High Court. When and if possible law should enacted that NAB should only be answerable to Supreme Court
Maybe they have something different up their sleeve, they know it would be useless to challenge these in LHC because it would just get bogged down in delays and SC court will just direct them back to LHC saying go through the appeal process there first before approaching the SC which is accurate legal way to do things.Why NAB is not challenging decisions of LHC in SC? Similarly, why Punjab govt ( read Buzdar) is not challenging bad decision of LHC in which it restored 34 corrupt DSPs who were suspended by IG about a month ago?
Naming it Lohar Hight Court wouldn’t make any difference to LHC?
Appealing in the same Court is not a legal requirement as far as High Courts are concerned. Reason is that there is always a higher forum ( SC in this case) available. However, in case of SC’s decision, there is no option but to appeal in the same court.Maybe they have something different up their sleeve, they know it would be useless to challenge these in LHC because it would just get bogged down in delays and SC court will just direct them back to LHC saying go through the appeal process there first before approaching the SC which is accurate legal way to do things.
Its becoming apparent to everyone that these noora high courts are a big hurdle in the accountability process and even development of the country. Maybe thats why there is now talks of presidential system floating around.
Hopefully soon there will be something where these criminals are not afforded protection under these noora courts.
And the Supreme Court directs it back to the High court to first exhaust the appeals process in the high court. Just like ganjus after IHC denied his appeal for bail only then it went to the Supreme Court. AFAIK you cannot skip the high court appeals process and go directly to the Supreme Court.Appealing in the same Court is not a legal requirement as far as High Courts are concerned. Reason is that there is always a higher forum ( SC in this case) available. However, in case of SC’s decision, there is no option but to appeal in the same court.
The reason why NAB is not appealing in the matters related to Shehbaz and his family is that someone else ( most probably our security establishment) is directing NAB to go soft on Shehbaz and his family. It is not a secret anymore that Shehbaz has always maintained good relations with GHQ. Our security establishment always keeps a standby player in case the main player doesn’t perform as per their wishes.
The reason why Punjab govt didn’t appeal against the restoration of 34 corrupt DSPs is that Pervez Elahi doesn’t want these DSPs to be suspended or removed. Chaudharies whole politics revolve around ‘Thana Katchehry’.
I have a question, can't they move SC on this? Can't they move his case to Islamabad as well?Koi faida nai, Lohar High Court is Lohar High Court. When and if possible law should enacted that NAB should only be answerable to Supreme Court
Only thing fishy is Justice Shazad and cronies of Lohar High Court and Justice Athar min Khota & Co of Islamacad high court. Although IHC has been slightly reeled in by the bashing it was given by the Supreme Court.I have a question, can't they move SC on this? Can't they move his case to Islamabad as well?
Ps... nevermind, I scrolled down and read the rest of replies. I smell something fishy and I pray to Allah I'm wrong.