Flaw in chain of scientific evidence taking in some recent court sentencing in Rape and Torture cases

shaikh

Minister (2k+ posts)
The case of death sentence to rapist of a young girl in Punjab , and then the enhanced sentencing of a judge of Islamabad by high court for torturing a girl in house have one thing in common .

The principle of following and connecting chain of scientific evidence seems not to have been done . It is assumed in courts that a testimony of a medicolegal doctor on DNA evidence or torture is enough . This is not so in science .

For DNA evidence for example courts need to take evidence of

Man who took blood sample of suspect .

Man who sent the samples

Man who transported the sample

Man who recieved the sample

Man who put sample in analyzer machine

Person who read the results

Person who calibrated the machine

Machine capability and pitfalls managers

One independent person to analyze the whole .


Without above death sentence on Scientific evidence alone is not safe . If there is no witness .

Similarly in torture cases , the chain of person who saw first , the radiographer who took photos , the doctor who examined the child , and a neutral second opinion on the whole evidence is needed .

A psychological examination of accused is some times needed as well and best is done in henious crimes
 

BrotherKantu

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
پاکستان میں غریب آدمی کا ڈی این اے ہر چیز سے میچ کر جاتا ہے۔


ُ
 

Back
Top