Darwin's theory of evolution !!!

WatanDost

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)



1476341_613513752043413_2081103576_n.jpg





 

IMKKK

Minister (2k+ posts)
buri baat, as much as I dislike this person. He is still son of Adam PBUH........



jabb yeh hood apnay aap ko bandar ki aulad kehta hai tau hum kiyun issay insan kahain...pata yeh chalana hai ke yeh C class bandar ki aulad hai ya D class ki.

watadost is right at this point.
 

sshahid

Siasat.pk - Blogger

jabb yeh hood apnay aap ko bandar ki aulad kehta hai tau hum kiyun issay insan kahain...pata yeh chalana hai ke yeh C class bandar ki aulad hai ya D class ki.

watadost is right at this point.

May be he lost his faith and considers himself bandar ki aulad, Alhamdolillah I have faith and still consider him son of Adam PBUH.
 

Mughal1

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
najaane aise log kab taleem haasil karen ge jin ko itni bhi aqal nahin hai keh woh cheezun ko un ke saheeh tanaazur main dekh saken.

ajeeb baat hai baaz logoon ko is main to kuchh kharaabi nazar nahin aati keh har shai ka wajood maadi hai, chahe woh insaan ho yaa jaanwar.

bilkul isi tarah har shai zindagi ke drukht ka qudrati samar hai khawa insaan ho yaa jaanwar.

insaan ko ashraful makhluqaat is bunyaad par kaha jaata hai keh us ko jo salahiyaten di gayee hen woh kisi aur jaandaar main payee hi nahin jaatin.

kisi aik deegar makhlooq main insaani tarah ka dimaagh paaya hi nahin jaata aur na insaani jisam ki tarah ka kisi aur jaandaar ka jism hai.

agar insaan ka dimaagh gaaye bakri ko lagaa diya jaata to bhi bi gaaye bakri woh cheezen ijaad nahin kar sakti thin jin ke liye insaani tarah ka jism darkaar tha. issi tarah jin kaamu ke liye insaani dimaagh darkaar tha un ke liye insaani jism aur shaklo soorat bhi darkaar thi.

insaan hai to aik alag cheez deegar jaandarun se magar is ki takhleeq usi zindagi ke pode se hui hai jisse baaqi jaandaarun ki pedaaish hui hai.

is baat ko padhane waale ustadun aur un ke shagirdun ko achhi tarah se samajhna chahiye. kyunkeh unpadh aur ilmo fikar se door logoon ke benumyaad khayaalaat ka quran main kuchh bhi wajood nahin hai.

http://www.jangforum.net/index.php?PHPSESSID=q49fqk4jktgcutk3tfcg1t6fv3&topic=5206.0
 
Last edited:
أَفَحَسِبْتُمْ أَنَّمَا خَلَقْنَاكُمْ عَبَثًا وَأَنَّكُمْ إِلَيْنَا لَا تُرْجَعُونَ
So did you think that We created you for nothing, and that you will not be brought back to Us?.

 

Sikandar.dawood

MPA (400+ posts)
نظریہ ارتقا پر سب سے زیادہ باتیں وہی کرتے ہیں جو زمین کو ساکن ہونے پر فتوے جاری کرتے تھے . ان کو اپنا ایمان اس بات پر بھی خطرے میں محسوس ہوا کہ زمین سورج کے گرد گھومتی ہے نہ کہ سورج زمین ک گرد گھومتا ہے .



 

realitycheck

Senator (1k+ posts)
Even Qadiyani believe that we evolved from apes and monkeys .. Shame on Muslims who always lie about Mirza Sahib ... all Muslim lie that Mirza claimed to be

prophet actually he claimed to be a monkey ,,,,,,,,,




people r making fun of Science under influence of Religion. Science is more Sacred Than to Religion or Quran. There is many religion but Science is one. Prophet Muhammad Said I dont know any Science and He asked people dont make fun of science.


http://www.siasat.pk/forum/showthre...eer-is-still-monkeys-if-man-come-from-monkeys

[video]http://viooz.co/movies/22628-gravity-2013.html[/video]

????? ????? ?? ?? ?? ????? ????? ??? ???? ??? ?? ???? ?? ???? ???? ?? ???? ???? ???? ??? . ?? ?? ???? ????? ?? ??? ?? ??? ???? ??? ????? ??? ?? ???? ???? ?? ??? ?????? ?? ?? ?? ???? ???? ? ??? ?????? ?? .




?????????????? ???????? ????????????? ??????? ??????????? ????????? ??? ???????????
So did you think that We created you for nothing, and that you will not be brought back to Us?.


Aik waqt tha jab log "dunya gol hay" kehnay walay ko bhe jaahil kehtay thay.

 

realitycheck

Senator (1k+ posts)
KEEP CALM AND WATCH THIS DEBATE ITS VERY INTERESTING ,,,,,



thank you.

Oval ko Urdu mein kiya kehtay hein..ye bhe google kr lena tha..

????? ????? ?? ?? ?? ????? ????? ??? ???? ??? ?? ???? ?? ???? ???? ?? ???? ???? ???? ??? . ?? ?? ???? ????? ?? ??? ?? ??? ???? ??? ????? ??? ?? ???? ???? ?? ??? ?????? ?? ?? ?? ???? ???? ? ??? ?????? ?? .




?????????????? ???????? ????????????? ??????? ??????????? ????????? ??? ???????????
So did you think that We created you for nothing, and that you will not be brought back to Us?.


May be he lost his faith and considers himself bandar ki aulad, Alhamdolillah I have faith and still consider him son of Adam PBUH.


jabb yeh hood apnay aap ko bandar ki aulad kehta hai tau hum kiyun issay insan kahain...pata yeh chalana hai ke yeh C class bandar ki aulad hai ya D class ki.

watadost is right at this point.
 

sayjimy

Councller (250+ posts)
ننھے پپو نے اپنے ابا سے پوچھا " ابا ! انسان کہاں سے آئے ہیں؟"
ابا نے کہا " بیٹا ! اللہ نے آدم اور حوا کو پیدا کیا اور یوں ان سے انسان پیدا ہونے شروع ہوگئے"
ننھا پپو جواب سن کر دوسرے کمرے میں اپنی اماں کے پاس گیا اور یہی سوال دہرایا
" اماں ! انسان کہاں سے آئے ہیں ؟"
پڑھی لکھی ماں نے جواب دیا " بیٹا ! ڈارون کی تھیوری کے مطابق بندر کی اولاد بگڑتے سنورتے انسان بن گئی "
ننھا پپو دو مختلف جوابات سے بہت پریشان ہوا ۔۔۔ واپس ابا کے پاس آیا اور ماں سے ملنے والا جواب بتایا اور اپنی کنفیوژن بھی بتائی ۔
ابا مسکرا کے بولا :*" بیٹا ! پریشان ہونے کی ضرورت نہیں۔ ہم دونوں کو اپنے اپنے آباؤاجداد کی معلومات ہیں
 

awan4ever

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
KEEP CALM AND WATCH THIS DEBATE ITS VERY INTERESTING ,,,,,

The last video sums it up pretty well. The intelligent design supporter said he does not accept evolution as a valid theory because it doesnt convince him. If it doesnt convince him that doesnt mean it is wrong per se. Its like a guy in the 6th century debating with Pythagoras that the earth isnt round its flat. Im sure Pythagoras was not able to convince that guy but it did not make him wrong in the long run.

Also like the Christian supporter of evolution quoted the bible which said "First there was just the Word" and then goes on to say that maybe the word was "evolve" and God bade everything to start evolving into existence according to the physical Laws of the Universe which he created to govern he working of the worlds.

The same sentiment is described in the Quran as "Kun..Faykoon".

The Big Bang Theory is actually the start of evolution of the Universe and we like to say that it is mentioned in the Quran exactly how everything started from a single point, a singularity and exploded into being. Well if you can buy that evolution why cant you accept that living things on planet earth evolved in a similar form..from a single source?

BTW the intelligent design Christians also believe that the earth is only 6000 years old and that dinosaur bones were placed on Earth by God to test Man.
 

hikmat

Banned
The last video sums it up pretty well. The intelligent design supporter said he does not accept evolution as a valid theory because it doesnt convince him. If it doesnt convince him that doesnt mean it is wrong per se. Its like a guy in the 6th century debating with Pythagoras that the earth isnt round its flat. Im sure Pythagoras was not able to convince that guy but it did not make him wrong in the long run.

Also like the Christian supporter of evolution quoted the bible which said "First there was just the Word" and then goes on to say that maybe the word was "evolve" and God bade everything to start evolving into existence according to the physical Laws of the Universe which he created to govern he working of the worlds.

The same sentiment is described in the Quran as "Kun..Faykoon".

The Big Bang Theory is actually the start of evolution of the Universe and we like to say that it is mentioned in the Quran exactly how everything started from a single point, a singularity and exploded into being. Well if you can buy that evolution why cant you accept that living things on planet earth evolved in a similar form..from a single source?

BTW the intelligent design Christians also believe that the earth is only 6000 years old and that dinosaur bones were placed on Earth by God to test Man.

P must have learnt to travel in time and read Physics and astronomy on his way to the debate in the 6th century ?
 

realitycheck

Senator (1k+ posts)
Bro its been a while i have watched it ... and i dont remember what they said .... but you have intrigue me to watch it again .....


do you recognize the debaters ........ one is Michel J Behe

other one i think ... is david berlinski ...... Harun Yahya just copy and past their books

The last video sums it up pretty well. The intelligent design supporter said he does not accept evolution as a valid theory because it doesnt convince him. If it doesnt convince him that doesnt mean it is wrong per se. Its like a guy in the 6th century debating with Pythagoras that the earth isnt round its flat. Im sure Pythagoras was not able to convince that guy but it did not make him wrong in the long run.

Also like the Christian supporter of evolution quoted the bible which said "First there was just the Word" and then goes on to say that maybe the word was "evolve" and God bade everything to start evolving into existence according to the physical Laws of the Universe which he created to govern he working of the worlds.

The same sentiment is described in the Quran as "Kun..Faykoon".

The Big Bang Theory is actually the start of evolution of the Universe and we like to say that it is mentioned in the Quran exactly how everything started from a single point, a singularity and exploded into being. Well if you can buy that evolution why cant you accept that living things on planet earth evolved in a similar form..from a single source?

BTW the intelligent design Christians also believe that the earth is only 6000 years old and that dinosaur bones were placed on Earth by God to test Man.
 

ZenoInTheZoo

Minister (2k+ posts)
people r making fun of Science under influence of Religion. Science is more Sacred Than to Religion or Quran. There is many religion but Science is one. Prophet Muhammad Said I dont know any Science and He asked people dont make fun of science.


http://www.siasat.pk/forum/showthre...eer-is-still-monkeys-if-man-come-from-monkeys



[video]http://viooz.co/movies/22628-gravity-2013.html[/video]

Early life[edit]

Aisha was born in late 613 or early 614 C.E.[SUP][1][/SUP][SUP][2][/SUP] She was the daughter of Umm Rumman and Abu Bakr of Mecca, two of the Prophet's most trusted companions.[SUP][13][/SUP] The word bakr in her father's name means "virgin", in reference to Aisha's virginity.[SUP][14][/SUP] Aisha was the third and youngest wife of Muhammad.[SUP][15][/SUP] One of Muhammad's first encounters with Aisha was by her house. Muhammad found her "crying bitterly" because her parents had disciplined her. The Prophet was affected by her tears, and in an effort to stop her from crying Muhammad asked her mother to "be gentle with the child for his sake."[SUP][16][/SUP]
Marriage to Muhammad[edit]

The idea to match Aisha with Muhammad was suggested by Khawlah bint Hakim.[SUP][17][/SUP][SUP][18][/SUP] After this, the previous agreement regarding the marriage of Aisha with Jubayr ibn Mut'im was put aside by common consent. Abu Bakr was uncertain at first "as to the propriety or even legality of marrying his daughter to the Prophet."[SUP][19][/SUP] British historian William Montgomery Watt suggests that Muhammad hoped to strengthen his ties with Abu Bakr;[SUP][20][/SUP] the strengthening of ties commonly served as a basis for marriage in Arabian culture.[SUP][21][/SUP]
Age at marriage[edit]

See also: Criticism of Muhammad#Aisha and Child marriage
According to traditional sources, Aisha was six or seven years old when she was married to Muhammad and nine when the marriage was consummated.[SUP][8][/SUP][SUP][9][/SUP][SUP][10][/SUP][SUP][11][/SUP][SUP][20][/SUP][SUP][20][/SUP][SUP][22][/SUP] However, al-?abar?records that she was ten.[SUP][11][/SUP] Maulana Muhammad Ali challenged the notion that Aisha was as young as the traditional sources claim.[SUP][23][/SUP] Abu Tahir Irfani also concluded Aisha was older than the traditional sources claim.[SUP][24][/SUP] The sources do not offer much more information about Aisha's childhood years.[SUP][25][/SUP][SUP][26][/SUP]

A great majority of people are really confused about what really science is.........and it is not their fault, rather it is our system of educational instructions which mould us to think that way. We need to remember the following things:

1) That science in itself is not any subject, failed of study or knowledge. Rather it is method to discover (new) knowledge

2) Chemistry, physics or biology is not science or sciences. Rather they are subjects of study or fields of knowledge

3) Divine books given/revealed through revelations (whie) are not worldly fields of knowledge, like chemistry, economics or sociology. The Quran is a book of eternal truths (u can also say in some sense 'eternal/divine knowledge') about humans, universe and humans place relationship with the universe revealed by the Creator on His Chosen ones.

4) Science and fields of knowledge like Physics are still in their elementary staged in their long journey of discovering/uncovering the Quranic truths
 
Jis ne bandar ka bacha banana hay wo ban jaye jis ne insaan ka banana hay wo insan ka hi rahay .. iss men kia rola hay .. aur rahi baat ham Muslims ki to We firmly believe that we are the offspring of Adam and Eve.. agar atheists aur qadianio ko problem hay iss eeman se to hota rahay bhai .... inn sab ko inn ki bandar numa science mubarak hamain Ashraf-ul-makhlooqat hona mubarak.. end of story
 

Back
Top