His statements are contradicting his assessment.
so he is making the argument that this guy had nothing to do with ayyan ali case
but then states that according to the customs authorities this murder doesnt seem
to be related to ayyan ali case. Why didnt the customs statement clearly say that any insinuation
that this inspector was killed because of ayyan ali case is wrong since he had nothing to do with that case.
we have heard this story before that a guy conveniently gets killed by robbers.
heck, mqm tried to pull that robber murder for imran farooq case.