Why Pakistan has to go to War now while it's still has battle hardened edge?
For the last couple of years country Pakistan has been seeing repetitive attacks all around its borders from the world coalition. Pakistan has sustained fourth-generation warfare hardness experience and it should be preparing for the fifth or sixth generation warfare. There is no doubt that there will be a war in future without blink of traffic signal changing signals. There will be a war with India but in what circumstances beneficial to advantages of Pakistanis? Or more likely to disadvantaged reasons of fighting a war with a weaker Pakistan? This is the point where our pathetic leadership of weak men are in control of civilian government.
Maybe he is a good man but not as good as compared to by any standard to General Raheel S.
That is the sole reason he was selected in the first place.
With analyzing the collateral damage one can easily see the destructive power of the united world coalition against country Pakistan to date. Therefore there is no further preventive actions taken as a back up to further escalate situation.
Nobody can tolerate the weakness of our leadership core decision making.
There was a recent established meeting held in Saudi Arabia, in which house of Al Saud will not sponsor Wahhabis Islam across the board (in other countries) as long as Pakistan has its handle to lend nuclear weapons in case of emergency.
They decided in that meeting, everything from this point onwards will, depend on major escalation or major points of interest to both Pakistan and Saudi Arabia.
So anyone supporting terrorism is "on their own" not by the current version of governments expense.
But I failed to differ because the coalition or the united world against us will always throw counterterrorism and add to the death toll of collateral damage month after month .
That is why Pakistan has to go to war to prevent humiliation later onwards. From a military point of view Pakistan has an edge "right now" if it goes to war with India decisively? But wait another 10 years Pakistan will be unfit to fight a war conventionally at any level. The only option will remain will be nuclear one.
And this after 10 years will be bad thing. But it will however be a good testing time for India reaction to conventional war now, and that reply will determine on how shallow waters they are as "strong India " or "weak India " sustained a conventional war? Wouldn't it be better to find out on what position the Indians are at??
As Zaid Hamid says, every word of his speaks truth of the current "soul of Pakistan military wise " whether for that the leadership has made good decisions or bad one on the day, a true voice of patriot Pakistan.
For the last couple of years country Pakistan has been seeing repetitive attacks all around its borders from the world coalition. Pakistan has sustained fourth-generation warfare hardness experience and it should be preparing for the fifth or sixth generation warfare. There is no doubt that there will be a war in future without blink of traffic signal changing signals. There will be a war with India but in what circumstances beneficial to advantages of Pakistanis? Or more likely to disadvantaged reasons of fighting a war with a weaker Pakistan? This is the point where our pathetic leadership of weak men are in control of civilian government.
Maybe he is a good man but not as good as compared to by any standard to General Raheel S.
That is the sole reason he was selected in the first place.
With analyzing the collateral damage one can easily see the destructive power of the united world coalition against country Pakistan to date. Therefore there is no further preventive actions taken as a back up to further escalate situation.
Nobody can tolerate the weakness of our leadership core decision making.
There was a recent established meeting held in Saudi Arabia, in which house of Al Saud will not sponsor Wahhabis Islam across the board (in other countries) as long as Pakistan has its handle to lend nuclear weapons in case of emergency.
They decided in that meeting, everything from this point onwards will, depend on major escalation or major points of interest to both Pakistan and Saudi Arabia.
So anyone supporting terrorism is "on their own" not by the current version of governments expense.
But I failed to differ because the coalition or the united world against us will always throw counterterrorism and add to the death toll of collateral damage month after month .
That is why Pakistan has to go to war to prevent humiliation later onwards. From a military point of view Pakistan has an edge "right now" if it goes to war with India decisively? But wait another 10 years Pakistan will be unfit to fight a war conventionally at any level. The only option will remain will be nuclear one.
And this after 10 years will be bad thing. But it will however be a good testing time for India reaction to conventional war now, and that reply will determine on how shallow waters they are as "strong India " or "weak India " sustained a conventional war? Wouldn't it be better to find out on what position the Indians are at??
As Zaid Hamid says, every word of his speaks truth of the current "soul of Pakistan military wise " whether for that the leadership has made good decisions or bad one on the day, a true voice of patriot Pakistan.
Last edited by a moderator:
