Who in gods name will guarantee IK will stick to an agreement?

In past one year, IK has many times laid blames and then retreated from them...but in past 3 weeks this frequency was a u turn every speech (and he made a speech every hour or so on average)...
So I wonder should NS really negotiate with this moron?
Because who is going to guarantee that whatever is decided in talks, he would stick with it...because he has turned around from his own statements in the matter of hours..

My humble request from PTI followers, be logical and think about it...is this guy mentally stable? or he is just way too much slave to his greed..

May allah help Pakistan.
 

Politcs

Minister (2k+ posts)
Re: who in gods name will gaurantee IK will stick to an agreement?

Idiot khan's own party is confused. They resign but they never resign.
 

saeenji

Minister (2k+ posts)
Re: who in gods name will gaurantee IK will stick to an agreement?

A kind request to thread starter please use capitals for ALLAH.
 

blatant

Senator (1k+ posts)
Re: who in gods name will gaurantee IK will stick to an agreement?

stuff PMLN and your moronic compromise.

be ready for

article-2230965-15F45F94000005DC-541_634x639-e1359305817849.jpg
 

Asad Khan

MPA (400+ posts)
Re: who in gods name will gaurantee IK will stick to an agreement?

Nawaz after his deal in writing said he dint do no deal and then we saw that written agreement of 10 years with Musharraf. How should we as Pakistanis believe someone who denies what he gave in writing. His finance minister gave in writing that he laundered money and now backs off from it. How should we trust these leeches ? Answer with facts, no platitudes pls.
 

Humi

Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
Re: who in gods name will gaurantee IK will stick to an agreement?

Ik's policy of u-turns is the one of the strongest criticism against him...this is why I have christianed PTI as PUT (Pakistani U Turn party)
 

salaudin

Senator (1k+ posts)
For the people of Pakistan, the problem is with Noora Nawaz. He is the one who does not stick to what he says. IK always does !!!
 
Re: who in gods name will gaurantee IK will stick to an agreement?

Nawaz after his deal in writing said he dint do no deal and then we saw that written agreement of 10 years with Musharraf. How should we as Pakistanis believe someone who denies what he gave in writing. His finance minister gave in writing that he laundered money and now backs off from it. How should we trust these leeches ? Answer with facts, no platitudes pls.

If you or IK had the proof of both of the items that you mentioned above(as you said there are written proves) Then ISN'T it your criminal negligence to not object to NS's nomination during election? IT was the best time to get NS dealt with in a legal way once for all...And since you did not do it, in common logic it only means one thing for a layman...that YOU DID NOT HAVE THE PROOF....WHICH COULD BE PRESENTED IN COURT...
If you have those proves please present them here on line and I will lodge an FIR or petition in court against NS otherwise show some imaan and be honest

I never condone any illegal action by any one that is the only reason I am against many things IK says (not all but many)
 

ejunooni

MPA (400+ posts)
Re: who in gods name will gaurantee IK will stick to an agreement?

Ik's policy of u-turns is the one of the strongest criticism against him...this is why I have christianed PTI as PUT (Pakistani U Turn party)

The funny thing is that PTI support only brings examples of PMLN U turns. I mean whats the difference then? Its all the same? The one thing going for IK was that he is straight forward and keeps to his word and he is losing that too.

Remember, two wrongs dont make a right.
 

Jazba-e-Junoon

MPA (400+ posts)
This blaming of Imran Khan as "U Turn Khan" has brought problem for PMLN trolls to this extent.. I can give couple of examples:

Example 1: Imran Khan ALWAYS warned of "Tsunami March" as his LAST resort, and in national interest he never executed that option. But because he never gave any date, he was termed as U-Turn Khan...

Example 2: Imran Khan ALWAYS said that he believed in dialogues with Taliban due to fear of civilian casualities and taking Jihad narrative away from those morons who brainwash people. But when Army started operation against Taliban, he came in full support of the operation for national interest. PMLN social media team called it a UTURN

Similarly, I can quote other examples where he has always backed off from different stances for national interest. But his critics have thought it as his weakness. Imran Khan had always said that Tsunami March (nowadays AzadiMarch) will be his last resort, and u can see that he is not backing off from it. And now he is not going to backoff. PMLN will realize NOW that how resilient/"baat ka pakka" is Imran Khan when he commits to something !!
 
Why do people want guarantees when they are making a decision on who will prove to be right or wrong in the future. Can the people themselves guarantee that they will be alive till next year or next week. Only time can tell who is right and wrong. I bet those who voted zardari in the previous elections thought that they made the right decision and time proved them wrong.
 

mubashirrao

MPA (400+ posts)
What the hell is this?

@adeel @waseem ye meri post kis aqalmand nay idhar merge ki hai?
I mean are you serious is this relevant thread to merge?
Khuda ka wasta yaar! How irresponsible and stupid moderators can be? :angry_smile:
 

Asad Khan

MPA (400+ posts)
U must joking right ? Are you saying the Proofs don't exist or they weren't taken into account at the time of his election thing? If I remember both are in the public domain, which I am sure you won't deny either. Now since your id says you are in Calgary and the last I read Canada has a robust and a pluralistic democracy, would a counsellor be able to run for office in your location even if his public image is tainted to say the least? What I really hate about those who themselves are living in democracies in the west and benefiting from it but are rooting for dynasties and a sham democracy in Pakistan. If you so love the Shareefs then it is your moral obligation to live under their rule so as to enjoy the fruits of their labour. For yourself you have chosen true democracy, fair taxation, benefits and the rule of law whilst for your Pakistani bros n sis you are hell bent on ensuring they continue with this blood wrenching system. You mate need to take a deeeeeeep look inside you unless you are really doing it for any financial gains in that case I would still think no amount of money is worth selling your soul for.
 

Humi

Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
Re: who in gods name will gaurantee IK will stick to an agreement?

The funny thing is that PTI support only brings examples of PMLN U turns. I mean whats the difference then? Its all the same? The one thing going for IK was that he is straight forward and keeps to his word and he is losing that too.

Remember, two wrongs dont make a right.

Exactly...if PTI wants to bring in revolution, it has to act better than pmln and that means u-turns are not ok...
 

Asad Khan

MPA (400+ posts)
@ Huma: There never is a U-turn. Either you are back tracking on your words for no reason and that is indefensible who ever does it at any point in time. In the second instance, you are changing your position because of some new information that you take into account, in that case its called making an informed decision. Analysts would attest to it as the continuous flow of information makes sticking to your position irrational. So unless you qualify a U-turn in specific terms you can't just blab about U-turns U-turns, it doesn't just looks silly but signals one's own irrationality.
 

Back
Top