UK Man Wins Court Case Against BBC For 9-11 WTC 7 Cover Up

[mr.pti]

Tony Rooke refused to pay a TV license fee because the BBC intentionally misrepresented facts about the 9/11 attacks, he alleged. It is widely known that the BBC reported the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 over 20 minutes before it occurred. WTC 7 was a 47-story skyscraper that was not hit by a plane on 9/11 but collapsed at free-fall speed later that day.


So Rooke said the BBC had to have had prior knowledge to a terror attack making them complicit in the attack. He presented the BBC footage to the judge along with a slew of other evidence, and the judge agreed that Rooke had a reasonable case to protest. Rooke was found not guilty and he was not fined for failure to pay the licensing fee.

For all intents and purposes a UK ccourt has just ruled that the BBC was complicit in the september 11th, 2001 attacks in the United States. Fantastic. A small victory but a huge symbolic victory and one you would have never otherwised have heard of. So I suggest to you the reader to get the word out on this one. Spread it far and wide. This is big ifonly symbolic. -Mort

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=358542797613966

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=358542797613966

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=358546144280298

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=358546144280298


http://beforeitsnews.com/9-11-and-g...&utm_campaign=&utm_term=http://b4in.info/fITL

 

[Muhkam]

[h=1]Mysterious Deaths of 9/11 Witnesses (MUST SEE)[/h]

 

[Wadaich]

A stunning slap on the face of the false flag "Zionist media branded" intellectuals and the traitors in our ranks like Hamid Meer Jaafar and his cahoots who tow the propaganda line of their master by rejecting every truth from the alternate media as "Conspiracy Theory".

 

[lurker]

"For all intents and purposes a UK ccourt has just ruled that the BBC was complicit in the september 11th, 2001 attacks in the United States. Fantastic. "

That's not true. The UK Court specifically said that it is ill equipped to adjudicate the evidence Tony Rooke was presenting and the Judge said that this is not a 9/11 investigation hearing. Infact all the witnesses Tony Rooke wanted to bring were not even called for by the Judge. He didn't even see or hear his witnesses. The Judgement was that Tony Rooke had reasonable suspicion to withhold payment of a TV License as a protest and therefore found Not Guilty.

What this really means is that now you can possibly all NOT pay a TV license by using the same Law Tony Rooke was leveraging off of. ;)

 

[Ali raza babar]

[MENTION=8740]awan4ever[/MENTION]

Brother is there enough evidence for you now or you are still waiting?

 

[awan4ever]

@awan4ever

Brother is there enough evidence for you now or you are still waiting?

Why are are referring to me about something that happened in the US?
I dont think I have ever sided with US policies on WoT...

Although Im wondering just how many people exactly knew about the 'inside job'....there were the 3000 jews, all of CIA/FBI, all the US media and now a big chunk of the UK media too.

So like a few hundred thousand people knew about what was going to happen on 9/11? Is that how 'secret ops' are carried out? By letting people in the media know before hand and then hope they will all help in the cover up?

 

[Ali raza babar]

Why are are referring to me about something that happened in the US?
I dont think I have ever sided with US policies on WoT...

Although Im wondering just how many people exactly knew about the 'inside job'....there were the 3000 jews, all of CIA/FBI, all the US media and now a big chunk of the UK media too.

So like a few hundred thousand people knew about what was going to happen on 9/11? Is that how 'secret ops' are carried out? By letting people in the media know before hand and then hope they will all help in the cover up?

I referred to you because we had a furious debate over the issue quite some time ago , And i Said to you , Time will tell , Only time will tell.

Please get rid of your EGO , and Face the Reality , Get a red pill brother.

 

[awan4ever]

I referred to you because we had a furious debate over the issue quite some time ago , And i Said to you , Time will tell , Only time will tell.

Please get rid of your EGO , and Face the Reality , Get a red pill brother.

Im sorry I dont really remember.

I have always held a skeptical view of both sides assertions.

Its a devious world of espionage and nothing is certain. Im the one without any ego on this issue because im not taking sides. You have made up your mind that it is a conspiracy so you are more biased than me.

This video you just posted..I have to say proves absolutely nothing.

 

[Ali raza babar]

Im sorry I dont really remember.

I have always held a skeptical view of both sides assertions.

Its a devious world of espionage and nothing is certain. Im the one without any ego on this issue because im not taking sides. You have made up your mind that it is a conspiracy so you are more biased than me.

This video you just posted..I have to say proves absolutely nothing.

First of all i didnt post the video , Second of all , its not a proof , its a verdict , Proofs were presented in the Court

And third of all ,

The only Proof a person would like to have is the picture in which the News Anchor is Describing the Fall of Building seven the Same way it fell , BUT , Quite a Few minutes Earlier , I didnt Know that Gabriel Still Visits People , Specially News Casters , So please have a Skeptical view of that as well.

 

[awan4ever]

First of all i didnt post the video , Second of all , its not a proof , its a verdict , Proofs were presented in the Court

And third of all ,

The only Proof a person would like to have is the picture in which the News Anchor is Describing the Fall of Building seven the Same way it fell , BUT , Quite a Few minutes Earlier , I didnt Know that Gabriel Still Visits People , Specially News Casters , So please have a Skeptical view of that as well.

The building was already reported to be structurally compromised (im not saying it was or wasnt..just saying that the report was already out that building7 was also damaged)..So most likely in the heat of the news moment they misreported it. There are always more than one possible and equally likely reasons for something.

Its like the news calls out who has won the election on a certain seat before official results.

I already said I have a skeptical view but Im not going to blame all our ills on what the US is doing or has done in the international political arena.

 

[Ali raza babar]

The building was already reported to be structurally compromised (im not saying it was or wasnt..just saying that the report was already out that building7 was also damaged)..So most likely in the heat of the news moment they misreported it. There are always more than one possible and equally likely reasons for something.

Its like the news calls out who has won the election on a certain seat before official results.

I already said I have a skeptical view but Im not going to blame all our ills on what the US is doing or has done in the international political arena.

WHat ??????????????/ WHAT ???????????

I seriously Didnt Expect THIS. atleast from you , PLEASE , How low are you gonna go ?

Assalam O alaikum.

No more Debate.