The Interview was soft to say the least. Shahzeb Khanzada after asking the property questions to Farooq sattar then pointed out that the properties which Altaf Hussain/MQM has outside the country are still less than what the other leaders from Major Political parties have. Does this mean that because other leaders have got more properties that this somehow excuses Altaf from building properties outside the country based on other people's Income? We must look comparatively at the fact MQM only controls two cities in Pakistan mainly Karachi and Hyderabad, through which they collect extortion and that pays for Altaf's lavish living style in the UK. Had MQM ruled other parts of Pakistan such as Punjab (God Forbid), maybe Altaf would have had far more properties because his extortion base would have been much bigger. So the notion Altaf Hussain still has less properties than other leaders outside the country, is a very poor excuse for a leader who claimed to be from the lower middle class and had initially denied that he no properties there in the first place!
There was no real attempt to press Sattar on Altaf Hussain's source of Income or how has be built those properties. Then Shahzeb Khanzada cast doubt over the reports of the Intelligence agencies which had been provided to him implicating MQM.
I think it was poor show to make MQM look less bad than they really are.