The Hypocrites Crying Over Aleppo

Liberal 000

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)

Though it's written by an Israeli but it's true in our case

The Hypocrites Crying Over Aleppo

Anyone who is unwilling to volunteer their own children to fight to stop the killing and liberate Syria has no right to preach morality to anyone else

Theyre the worst, the hypocrites and the self-righteous. The ones who are shocked at the scenes from Aleppo, tsking as they watch television and certain that the world has to do something. The world, but not they and not their country. Urgently, right now, without delay, but not they and not their country. They are assuaging their conscience, so beautiful, superior and moral in their own eyes. They are after all not indifferent to the horrors of Aleppo; they are people of conscience and justice and this pains them.

It pains them so much they cant sleep at night at the sight of the dead children, they think about their grandmothers and grandfathers in the Holocaust and how the world stood by and did nothing and how this must not be allowed to happen again. Never again. But not they and not their country. Somebody else. Israel, after all, cant. It is an enemy country and so it cant interfere, and its a special case and therefore it cant take in refugees, like Sweden for example.

They are the worst of all, the hypocrites and the self-righteous. People who rejoice over the scenes from Aleppo and we have those, too are preferable. At least theyre honest.

Israelis are divided over Syria. Many hope for success for all sides. Arabs killing Arabs is always good news to them. Not only because of the pleasure over the killing (of Arabs), but because this shows the true face of our enemies. Look, world, at who were dealing with. With what animals. This is what would happen to Israel if it withdrew from the Golan Heights. This is what would happen to Israel if it withdrew from the West Bank. This, too, is what will happen if it withdraws from Amona. Aleppo also serves to diminish the occupations horrors.

The second group is the indifferent people. What does all that have to do with them? Israel is not involved, and all the rest is not interesting. In fact, nothing interests them except for their own private world. Occupation-shmockupation, asylum-seekers, Syria. Just leave us alone to plan our next vacation in peace.

The third group are the people who are horrified and not willing to lift a finger. They have plenty of excuses, just like Europe had in the 1930s. They are shocked not only by the horrors but also by the worlds response. What a crappy world, they post on Facebook.

But none of this group wants their kid to go off and fight to liberate Syria. They only volunteer European soldiers and the U.S. to do it. Anyone who is unwilling to volunteer their own children has no right to preach morality to anyone else.

At least they should keep quiet in their shamefulness. Why should a mother from Connecticut agree to what a mother from Ramat Hasharon wont? The last time Jews went off to fight for someone else was in the Spanish Civil War. Worth remembering.

Instead of intervening militarily Israel should have at least opened its gates. Not to a smattering of wounded people selected according to their organizational affiliation, treated in front of the propaganda cameras and sent right back into the inferno as Israel does but to open the gate to refugees. Yes, tens of thousands of Syrians, hundreds of thousands even what would happen? should be offered asylum in Israel. It wouldnt be easy. Its not easy for Syrias other neighbors, Turkey and Jordan. Its not easy to take in millions of people. Its not easy for Sweden either.

Israel is always a special case in its own eyes. It is exempt from obligation to foreigners in distress except for building field hospitals in far-away disaster zones, and even then only for a moment and in front of the cameras. But Israel should have done something: 1. Because of the past; 2. Because it shares a border with Syria. And it is doing nothing. Not lifting a finger. In that it is no different from the locked-gate countries in Europe.

Under these circumstances at least lets not be hypocritical and self-righteous. We should admit the truth: The fate of the Syrians touches us not in the least and in no way on earth are we a moral country.

Gideon Levy
Schermata_2016-12-15_alle_20.58.24.jpg


Source
 
Last edited by a moderator:

PkRevolution

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Obama and West did massacre of Muslims of Syria. World will never forget that just due to Assad all western countries killed hundred thousands muslims.

Europe provided weapons to Rebells, they selected top terrorists and called them rebells to kill assad people.

United Nations itself is west, so no justice at all for Syrians.

This German is telling the truth:

http://www.stern.de/politik/hans-ul...xt--die-aleppo-luege-des-westens-7241872.html
 

Liberal 000

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Obama and West did massacre of Muslims of Syria. World will never forget that just due to Assad all western countries killed hundred thousands muslims.

Europe provided weapons to Rebells, they selected top terrorists and called them rebells to kill assad people.

United Nations itself is west, so no justice at all for Syrians.

This German is telling the truth:

http://www.stern.de/politik/hans-ul...xt--die-aleppo-luege-des-westens-7241872.html


But none of the Hypocrites wants their kid to go off and fight to liberate Syria. They only volunteer European soldiers and the U.S. to do it. Anyone who is unwilling to volunteer their own children has no right to preach morality to anyone else.

At least they should keep quiet in their shamefulness. Why should a mother from Connecticut agree to what a mother from Riyadh, Dubai , Istambol or Lahore won’t?
 

rizhussain44

MPA (400+ posts)
But none of the Hypocrites wants their kid to go off and fight to liberate Syria. They only volunteer European soldiers and the U.S. to do it. Anyone who is unwilling to volunteer their own children has no right to preach morality to anyone else.

At least they should keep quiet in their shamefulness. Why should a mother from Connecticut agree to what a mother from Riyadh, Dubai , Istambol or Lahore won’t?

No one is asking a mother from Connecticut to agree to anything. No one want US soldiers to do anything anywhere in the world, all what the US needs to do is stop interfering in other countries, stop trying to topple governments and quit playing its dirty games around the globe. If US is sending its troops to any part of the world it is part of its dirty game and drama so no need to potray it as if US is doing some sort of favor to a country by deploying its troops there, it is almost always the opposite.
 
Last edited:

Xiggs

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Who's duty is to save Aleppo?

Western Nations

or

Muslim World


It is the duty of those who started the unwanted war in the first place. but wait! how can they stop it when they started it and will leave no stone unturned to see more carnage. so it's gonna stop when FSA/IS/Jubha die down. but if you talk about taking down bashar, it's gona a create a lacuna like that of Libya and in-fighting will continue till only one of them (FSA/IS/Jubha) remains alive. The best possible solution is bashar staying in power but people sho started this war to remove him won't have a bit of it..
 

Liberal 000

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
No one is asking a mother from Connecticut to agree to anything. No one want US soldiers to do anything anywhere in the world, all what the US needs to do is stop interfering in other countries, stop trying to topple governments and quit playing its dirty games around the globe. If US is sending its troops to any part of the world it is part of its dirty game and drama so no need to potray it as if US is doing some sort of favor to a country by deploying its troops there, it is almost always the opposite.

What you and Muslim world did?

It was US military who came to help Bosnia and saved it

It was US military who came to help Kosovo and saved it

It was US military who came to help Kwait and liberated it from Sadam's occupation

It was US military who saved Libya from becoming another Syria otherwise Gadafi would have been butchering his people like Asad still

It was US military who liberated Afghanistan from Talibans and saved Pakistan too to be taken over by Talibans (Afghans are happy ask them)

It was US who liberated majority Iraqi Shias and Kurds from brutal rule of Sadam and his minority Sunnis. Sadam killed 3 million people during his rule. Democracy was established in Iraq, majority Shias took power and discriminated against minority Sunnis which led to the rise of ISIS but the lesson learned by Iraqi Shias and Iraq is about to stabilize and will enjoy the freedoms
 

rizhussain44

MPA (400+ posts)
What you and Muslim world did?

It was US military who came to help Bosnia and saved it

It was US military who came to help Kosovo and saved it

It was US military who came to help Kwait and liberated it from Sadam's occupation

It was US military who saved Libya from becoming another Syria otherwise Gadafi would have been butchering his people like Asad still

It was US military who liberated Afghanistan from Talibans and saved Pakistan too to be taken over by Talibans (Afghans are happy ask them)

It was US who liberated majority Iraqi Shias and Kurds from brutal rule of Sadam and his minority Sunnis. Sadam killed 3 million people during his rule. Democracy was established in Iraq, majority Shias took power and discriminated against minority Sunnis which led to the rise of ISIS but the lesson learned by Iraqi Shias and Iraq is about to stabilize and will enjoy the freedoms

We the Muslims of this era have failed to defend almost every time whenever an oppressed Muslim country needed help, no denying that and neither I made that point but US has never taken any action for the sake of humanity, if it has ever taken any action it is because of its own interests. Actually in many of the examples you have pointed out it was again US dirty games that started the conflicts in the first place, so you can blame the Muslim countries all you want but there is no need to potray the US as any sort of savior or saint!
 

Liberal 000

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
It is the duty of those who started the unwanted war in the first place. but wait! how can they stop it when they started it and will leave no stone unturned to see more carnage. so it's gonna stop when FSA/IS/Jubha die down. but if you talk about taking down bashar, it's gona a create a lacuna like that of Libya and in-fighting will continue till only one of them (FSA/IS/Jubha) remains alive. The best possible solution is bashar staying in power but people sho started this war to remove him won't have a bit of it..

Libya is a lot better place than Syria. How many Libyan cities are in ruin?
How many Libyan refugees in neighboring countries?

War was started by Asad when he opened fire on peaceful demonstrations all over the country rest is history. FSA IS Juba are the byproducts. As long as there is Asad war will continue. You cannot be remain in power after destroying your country and killing half a million people

Only solution for Syria is bifurcation otherwise this war will continue

Secular opposition coalition is being building fast under Kurds may be that's the answer for Syrian problem but only permanent solution is bifurcation
 

rizhussain44

MPA (400+ posts)
Libya is a lot better place than Syria. How many Libyan cities are in ruin?
How many Libyan refugees in neighboring countries?

War was started by Asad when he opened fire on peaceful demonstrations all over the country rest is history. FSA IS Juba are the byproducts. As long as there is Asad war will continue. You cannot be remain in power after destroying your country and killing half a million people

Only solution for Syria is bifurcation otherwise this war will continue

Secular opposition coalition is being building fast under Kurds may be that's the answer for Syrian problem but only permanent solution is bifurcation
Cut the crap that the war started by Asad when it opened fire on peaceful demonstrations. For the sake of argument even if we accept that that happened, how does opening fire on peacful protestors can turn into a war?! Unless there is someone waiting all prepared to jump into a small local conflict to turn it into full scale war by funding and arming the 'peaceful protestors'. The gov opened fire in pak on the Tahir Qadris people, did it turn into a war, could it have ever turned into war like the one in Syria?? Therefore it was not a simple case of gov opening fire on peaceful protestors, not sure how can anyone be so navie to believe that?
 

ابھی تو جنید جمشید بھائی کا صدمہ نہیں سہا گیا تھا کہ الیپو بھی داغِ مفارقت دے گیا


 

Back
Top