The COVID-19 Virus May Have Been in Humans For Years, Study Suggests

WatanDost

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
CoronavirusUnspecifiedTypeCDC-replacement-image_1024.jpg

The COVID-19 Virus May Have Been in Humans For Years, Study Suggests
JACINTA BOWLER
30 MARCH 2020

As COVID-19 has hitchhiked around the globe, causing lockdowns, pneumonia and fear, scientists have been racing to determine where the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus has come from.

While we don't have all the answers yet - including whether it came from an animal reservoir - a new analysis has definitively put to rest the conspiracies that claim it's a lab-made disease.


The study raises some interesting possibilities regarding the origin of the new coronavirus. One of the scenarios suggests the virus may have been circulating harmlessly in human populations for quite a while before it became the pandemic that's now stopped the world in its tracks.

"It is possible that a progenitor of SARS-CoV-2 jumped into humans, acquiring [new genomic features] through adaptation during undetected human-to-human transmission," the team from the US, UK and Australia writes in the study.

"Once acquired, these adaptations would enable the pandemic to take off and produce a sufficiently large cluster of cases."

The researchers analysed genomic data available from SARS-CoV-2 and other similar coronaviruses, showing that the receptor-binding domain (RBD) sections of SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins were so effective at binding to human cells, they had to be caused by natural selection.

"By comparing the available genome sequence data for known coronavirus strains, we can firmly determine that SARS-CoV-2 originated through natural processes," said one of the researchers, immunologist Kristian Andersen at Scripps Research.

"Two features of the virus, the mutations in the RBD portion of the spike protein and its distinct backbone, rules out laboratory manipulation as a potential origin for SARS-CoV-2."


With 'laboratory experiment gone wrong' out of the way, the team explored two viable hypotheses. First, that the natural selection occurred in an animal host before the virus was transmitted to humans. The team explains that although samples of coronaviruses in bats and pangolins have shown similar genomes, none of them fit perfectly just yet.

"Although no animal coronavirus has been identified that is sufficiently similar to have served as the direct progenitor of SARS-CoV-2, the diversity of coronaviruses in bats and other species is massively undersampled," the researchers write.

The second hypothesis is that the natural selection happened in humans - after the virus was transmitted from an animal host.

"The second scenario is that the new coronavirus crossed from animals into humans before it became capable of causing human disease," director of the National Institute of Health, Francis Collins explains on the NIH blog.

"Then, as a result of gradual evolutionary changes over years or perhaps decades, the virus eventually gained the ability to spread from human-to-human and cause serious, often life-threatening disease."

Although we don't yet know which of the two hypotheses is correct, the researchers think that more evidence might tip the scales in favour of one or the other - but we'll have to wait for that research to be done.

In the meantime, wash your hands, stay home, and help with the effort if you can.

The correspondence has been published in Nature Medicine.


Learn More





NOTE: It is certain that there is something fishy behind this Pandemic. Now they , I mean team of US, Uk n Australian scientist claiming after 4 months that it wasn't "BAT" caused virus means clean chit for main accuser CHINA, why?
Maybe the one's who launched this deadly biological weapon are afraid of future investigation which may leads to Actual Originater of Covid-19 and get FKD by effected nations jointly. Best timings to turn the direction of investigation towards a totally wrong track which leads the humanity to nowhere at the end of the day.

TARGET ACHEIVED, HUMAN SUFFERINGS OCCURED, FILE CLOSED
 
Last edited by a moderator:

A.jokhio

Minister (2k+ posts)
CoronavirusUnspecifiedTypeCDC-replacement-image_1024.jpg

The COVID-19 Virus May Have Been in Humans For Years, Study Suggests
JACINTA BOWLER
30 MARCH 2020

As COVID-19 has hitchhiked around the globe, causing lockdowns, pneumonia and fear, scientists have been racing to determine where the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus has come from.

While we don't have all the answers yet - including whether it came from an animal reservoir - a new analysis has definitively put to rest the conspiracies that claim it's a lab-made disease.


The study raises some interesting possibilities regarding the origin of the new coronavirus. One of the scenarios suggests the virus may have been circulating harmlessly in human populations for quite a while before it became the pandemic that's now stopped the world in its tracks.

"It is possible that a progenitor of SARS-CoV-2 jumped into humans, acquiring [new genomic features] through adaptation during undetected human-to-human transmission," the team from the US, UK and Australia writes in the study.

"Once acquired, these adaptations would enable the pandemic to take off and produce a sufficiently large cluster of cases."

The researchers analysed genomic data available from SARS-CoV-2 and other similar coronaviruses, showing that the receptor-binding domain (RBD) sections of SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins were so effective at binding to human cells, they had to be caused by natural selection.

"By comparing the available genome sequence data for known coronavirus strains, we can firmly determine that SARS-CoV-2 originated through natural processes," said one of the researchers, immunologist Kristian Andersen at Scripps Research.

"Two features of the virus, the mutations in the RBD portion of the spike protein and its distinct backbone, rules out laboratory manipulation as a potential origin for SARS-CoV-2."


With 'laboratory experiment gone wrong' out of the way, the team explored two viable hypotheses. First, that the natural selection occurred in an animal host before the virus was transmitted to humans. The team explains that although samples of coronaviruses in bats and pangolins have shown similar genomes, none of them fit perfectly just yet.

"Although no animal coronavirus has been identified that is sufficiently similar to have served as the direct progenitor of SARS-CoV-2, the diversity of coronaviruses in bats and other species is massively undersampled," the researchers write.

The second hypothesis is that the natural selection happened in humans - after the virus was transmitted from an animal host.

"The second scenario is that the new coronavirus crossed from animals into humans before it became capable of causing human disease," director of the National Institute of Health, Francis Collins explains on the NIH blog.

"Then, as a result of gradual evolutionary changes over years or perhaps decades, the virus eventually gained the ability to spread from human-to-human and cause serious, often life-threatening disease."

Although we don't yet know which of the two hypotheses is correct, the researchers think that more evidence might tip the scales in favour of one or the other - but we'll have to wait for that research to be done.

In the meantime, wash your hands, stay home, and help with the effort if you can.

The correspondence has been published in Nature Medicine.


Learn More





NOTE: It is certain that there is something fishy behind this Pandemic. Now they , I mean team of US, Uk n Australian scientist claiming after 4 months that it wasn't "BAT" caused virus means clean chit for main accuser CHINA, why?
Maybe the one's who launched this deadly biological weapon are afraid of future investigation which may leads to Actual Originater of Covid-19 and get FKD by effected nations jointly. Best timings to turn the direction of investigation towards a totally wrong track which leads the humanity to nowhere at the end of the day.

TARGET ACHEIVED, HUMAN SUFFERINGS OCCURED, FILE CLOSED
Link given is not available....
 

Vitamin_C

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
With global warming and destruction of wildlife habitats. There will be more such epidemics in future.
 

arafay

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
At first I was also of the opinion that virus came from china but now I have some doubts about its origin. I still believe 80% that covid-19 came from wuhan china but there is some evidence that covid-19 was present among flu patients that died in USA in 2019 flu season.
 

Citizen X

(50k+ posts) بابائے فورم
NOTE: It is certain that there is something fishy behind this Pandemic. Now they , I mean team of US, Uk n Australian scientist claiming after 4 months that it wasn't "BAT" caused virus means clean chit for main accuser CHINA, why?
Maybe the one's who launched this deadly biological weapon are afraid of future investigation which may leads to Actual Originater of Covid-19 and get FKD by effected nations jointly. Best timings to turn the direction of investigation towards a totally wrong track which leads the humanity to nowhere at the end of the day.

TARGET ACHEIVED, HUMAN SUFFERINGS OCCURED, FILE CLOSED

O just great just what we need, another conspiracy theorist!
 

Citizen X

(50k+ posts) بابائے فورم
With global warming and destruction of wildlife habitats. There will be more such epidemics in future.
Or maybe if the Chinese stopped eating fuckin' bats and all other sorts of feked up creepy crawlies which man was never supposed to be eatin' !
 

kayawish

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Or maybe if the Chinese stopped eating fuckin' bats and all other sorts of feked up creepy crawlies which man was never supposed to be eatin' !
since when chinesse eating bats and rats ? and since when COVID virus exists ? be practical , chinesse eating bats since 1000 years or may be more so why COVID before why now ?
 

Vitamin_C

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Viruses evolve over time to become strongner against our immune or mutate to be able to infect humans. Thats why I said there will be more infuture.

Just search about 1918 Spanish flu it killed more people in 18 months than 10 years of both world war 1 and 2 combined. World didnt even have air travel in 1918. Imagine if something like that happen today.

since when chinesse eating bats and rats ? and since when COVID virus exists ? be practical , chinesse eating bats since 1000 years or may be more so why COVID before why now ?
 

WatanDost

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Or maybe if the Chinese stopped eating fuckin' bats and all other sorts of feked up creepy crawlies which man was never supposed to be eatin' !
The team explains that although samples of coronaviruses in bats and pangolins have shown similar genomes, none of them fit perfectly just yet.

"Although no animal coronavirus has been identified that is sufficiently similar to have served as the direct progenitor of SARS-CoV-2, the diversity of coronaviruses in bats and other species is massively undersampled," the researchers write.