Supreme Court Panama Case judgment available online - Please do read!

[ConcernedPaki]

سپریم کورٹ کے آج کے فیصلے کی کاپی ویب سائٹ پر موجود ہے- میری سب دوستوں سے گزارش ہے کہ اس فیصلے کو پڑھیں- ضیاء کے پلید تخم میاں نواز کو الٹا لٹا کر چھتر مارے ہیں- مقدس عرف ملک بوٹا جیسے نسل در نسل غلام بھی اگر ایک بار فیصلہ پڑھ لیں تو شاید ڈوب مریں


یہ ضرور ہے کہ یہاں اگر پیپلز پارٹی کا وزیر اعظم ہوتا تو اب تک نا اہل ہو گیا ہوتا- آخری تجزیہ میں بہر حال ضیاء کا نجس تخم میاں نواز بچ نکلے گا کیونکہ جے آئ ٹی سے آج تک کچھ نہیں نکلا-


واہ رے میاں نواز اپنے مارے ہوے باپ کی بھی منہ کالا کروا دیا

http://www.supremecourt.gov.pk/web/user_files/File/Const.P._29_2016.pdf
​

 

[wasiqjaved]

download hee nahi ho rahi ... Thanks PTCL

 

[ConcernedPaki]

مریم کے کتورو پڑھو یہ ابھی صرف ایک پیراگراف ہے- مٹھایاں بانٹو کے حرام خور میاں نواز عدالت سے سرخرو ہو کر نکلا ہے

​

:lol::lol:​

Paragraph 79


Respondent No. 1 and his children have maintained beforethis Court that a factory in Dubai was set up by respondent No. 1sfather namely Mian Muhammad Sharif through his Benamidar andnephew namely Mr. Tariq Shafi in the year 1974 and then it wassold by him in parts in the years 1978 and 1980 through the saidMr. Tariq Shafi fetching about 33.37 million Dirhams (about 9million US Dollars) and it is claimed by respondent No. 1 and hischildren that the relevant properties in London had been acquiredin the year 2006. No record has been produced before us to showhow much money was available for setting up the factory in Dubai,how that money was transferred to or arranged in Dubai, whathappened to the 33.37 million Dirhams received by respondent No. Constitution Petition No. 29 of 2016,Constitution Petition No. 30 of 2016 &Constitution Petition No. 03 of 2017821s father upon sale of the factory in Dubai, how funds weregenerated for setting up the factory in Jeddah, what happened tothe 64 million Riyals (about 17 million US Dollars) received uponsale of the factory in Jeddah in June 2005, how funds weretransferred to London for purchase of the relevant properties inLondon and through which legal instrument the said properties orthe offshore companies owning them were acquired. It is ironicalthat on the one hand respondent No. 1 as well as respondent No. 7had claimed that the entire relevant record was available and thesame would be produced when required but on the other handexcept for a copy of a Share Sale Contract in the year 1978, a copyof the Tripartite Sale Agreement pertaining to the factory in Dubaiin the year 1980 and an affidavit of Mr. Tariq Shafi datedNovember 12, 2016 no record whatsoever had initially beenproduced establishing any connection between the proceeds ofsuch sale in the years 1978 and 1980 and acquisition of therelevant properties in London in the year 2006. Apart from that themoney fetched by sale of the factory in Dubai belonged torespondent No. 1s father who had a reasonably large familyconsisting of his own children and nephews who were all statedlyinvolved in almost all the businesses of the family. How muchshare of the money received in the years 1978 and 1980 fell to theshare of respondent No. 1 and then to the share of his childrenand was that share enough to purchase the relevant properties inLondon in the year 2006, i.e. after 26 years are also questionswhich have remained abeging an answer in this case. Somematerial was subsequently brought on the record of this case bythe children of respondent No. 1 but the same shall be attended toa little later in this judgment. Another remarkable feature of thiscase is that the whole case is about legitimate acquisition of someproperties but no detail of any bank account, any bankingtransaction or any money trail has been brought on the record ofthe case by respondent No. 1 or his children. We have beeninformed that Mr. Hussain Nawaz Sharif started doing his ownbusiness after the year 2000 when respondent No. 1 had gone inexile to Saudi Arabia. Nothing has been brought on the record of Constitution Petition No. 29 of 2016,Constitution Petition No. 30 of 2016 &Constitution Petition No. 03 of 201783this case by Mr. Hussain Nawaz Sharif to show as to when he hadstarted his own business and as to how sufficient funds generatedthrough his own business were available with him in the year 2006so as to purchase the relevant four properties in London. It maybe pertinent to mention here that respondent No. 1 hadcategorically maintained before the National Assembly that thesaid properties in London had been purchased through proceedsof sales of the factories in Dubai and Jeddah (and not through anyprivate resources of Mr. Hussain Nawaz Sharif or through anysettlement of an investment of his grandfather in Qatar).Respondent No. 1s father namely Mian Muhammad Sharif haddied in the year 2004 and the relevant properties in London hadstatedly been acquired in the name of Mr. Hussain Nawaz Sharif inthe year 2006. Upon the death of Mian Muhammad Sharif in theyear 2004 all his assets had automatically devolved upon all hislegal heirs including respondent No. 1 and if the properties inLondon had been acquired through the funds generated throughsale of the factories in Dubai and Jeddah then the said fundsbelonged to respondent No. 1 and the other heirs of late MianMuhammad Sharif. It is, thus, evident from the stands ofrespondent No. 1 and his children themselves that funds belongingat that time to respondent No. 1 had been utilized for acquisition ofthe said properties in London in the year 2006 establishing anundeniable connection between respondent No. 1 and the relevantproperties, a connection which has not been explained by the saidrespondent at all. The record produced before the Court showsthat inheritance of Mian Muhammad Sharif was settled amongsthis heirs through an agreement dated January 01, 2009.Respondent No. 7 namely Mr. Hussain Nawaz Sharif was not anheir of his grandfather namely Mian Muhammad Sharif.

 

[PappuChikna]

I can vomit looking at the celebrating noon supporter's faces.

itnay baighayrat ****** dunya mein kisi ne nahi dekhay hongay

surkhroo?? are you serious? you have to be baighayrat times infinity to call this surkhroo.

If awam still support these shareefs then write my words, allah naa karay hamari qismat mein sirf allah ka azaab likha hia

 

[ConcernedPaki]

میں اس تھریڈ میں فیصلہ کے اقتباسات پیش کروں گا- ابھی تک جتنا پڑھا ہے یقین کیجئے کسی کتے کو بھی اس طرح دھتکارا جاتا تو کبھی دوبارہ چوکھٹ کا رخ نہ کرتا- مٹھایاں بانٹو نون لیگ کمی کمینو، نواز شریف قسطنطنیہ فتح کرآیا ہے
​

[hilar]​

 

[mubarik Shah]

 

[wasiqjaved]

Official Link : http://www.supremecourt.gov.pk/web/user_files/File/Const.P._29_2016.pdf
Google Link : https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxRA6teW2ENUaUwtcUhqeTVybFU/view?usp=sharing
Scribd Link : https://www.scribd.com/document/345763363/Const-P-29-2016

 

[ConcernedPaki]

قطری خط میاں نواز کے منہ پر مار دیا گیا ​

Paragraph 86: Qatari Letter :lol:
The above mentioned statement from Qatar has multipleother problems with it as well. It is obvious from that statementitself that the maker of the statement did not have personalknowledge of most of the critical things stated therein and even forthe remaining things stated he was evasive at best. He had failedto disclose how the requisite funds were transferred by respondentNo. 1s father from Dubai to Qatar. He had not referred to any dateor place of the transactions mentioned. He had failed to stateabout any document executed in furtherance of such transactionsand he had also omitted to mention as to how the relevant fundswere dealt with. No detail of the real estate business of Al-Thanifamily in Qatar was provided nor any record of investment in such Constitution Petition No. 29 of 2016,Constitution Petition No. 30 of 2016 &Constitution Petition No. 03 of 201799business by respondent No. 1s father had been referred to. Thestated settlement of accounts in the year 2006 was mentioned inmost unspecific terms with no details thereof having been providedand even the representative of Mr. Hussain Nawaz Sharifmentioned in the statement was not identified. The stated wish ofrespondent No. 1s father regarding his grandson being thebeneficiary of the investment was spoken about in that statementin most generalized terms without any exactitude and withoutreference to any formal or informal instrument having beenexecuted in that respect. As already mentioned above, respondentNo. 1s father namely Mian Muhammad Sharif had died in the year2004. If that were so then no will of late Mian Muhammad Sharifwas brought on the record of this case on the basis of which hisinvestment in Qatar could be settled in the year 2006 in favour ofone of his grandsons to the exclusion of all the legal heirs,particularly when that grandson was not even an heir. The makerof the above mentioned statement had never claimed in thatstatement that the two offshore companies which owned therelevant four properties in London were owned by Al-Thani familyof Qatar and all that had been maintained in that statement wasthat the bearer share certificates of such companies were kept atthat time in Qatar. No record of the relevant offshore companieswas produced to show as to how and when Al-Thani family ofQatar had allowed the family of respondent No. 1 to use the saidproperties and then how those companies and properties weretransferred to the ownership of a son of respondent No. 1. Asalready observed above, the said statement from Qatar has gone along way in irretrievably damaging the earlier stands of respondentNo. 1 and in fortifying the impression that he has not made a cleanbreast of himself and with every varying stance he has exposedhimself further.

 

[Haris Abbasi]

Note: First 265 pages have dissenting note of Justice khosa

 

[ConcernedPaki]

Note: First 265 pages have dissenting note of Justice khosa

Justice Khosa has really cracked the whip on Mian Nawaz!

 

[Citizen X]

I just finished reading, well kind of skimming through it, hard to read all 549 pages in such a short, but yeah very interesting, the judges have basically blow apart every single word offered by the defense even going to the TV interviews and NS's speeches. Don't even start on the Qatari letter, I can't remember which judge said that who ever advised NS to submit that letter did more damage to their case than anything and more than they can ever imagine.

Basically the two senior judges came to the conclusion that not having a single piece evidence in their defense is enough to disqualify NS. While the 3 junior judges in my opinion erring on the side of caution have decided to get to the bottom of the matter as to who really owns the flats, and other said businesses in Saudia and Dubai and how the Sharifs accumulated such a fortune, where are these 100s of millions of rupees coming from that every other his sons sends as "gifts" to his father.

Aab aye ga aasli maza, sahi media circus lagi gi, roz raat to talkshows ki mehfilan laagi gi aur in ki mazeedi bizti hogi agaly 60 dinno ke liye. Hudiabiya Mills ka case khulaya, yaani safdar aur ishaq dollar ki class bi lagi ki.

Aabi to party shuru hui hai ;)

 

[armani]

Important parts of the decisions:

1- All allegations still need to be investigated. Nawaz and all other respondents HAVE NOT been in cleared in any case.
2- NAB chairman appears indifferent and unwilling to perform his part, since JIT will be constrained.
3- Seven days have been given to the heads of 6 institutions to nominate the names of nominees for the JIT for approval by the court.
4- Nawaz, Hussain and Hassan Nawaz would appear before the JIT if asked to.
4- The JIT will submit its periodical reports every two weeks before a supreme court bench.
5- Final report must be submitted with in 60 days.
6- Disqualification of Nawaz will be considered based on biweekly or final report.

 

[Amal]

 

[Dr Adam]

I just finished reading, well kind of skimming through it, hard to read all 549 pages in such a short, but yeah very interesting, the judges have basically blow apart every single word offered by the defense even going to the TV interviews and NS's speeches. Don't even start on the Qatari letter, I can't remember which judge said that who ever advised NS to submit that letter did more damage to their case than anything and more than they can ever imagine.

Basically the two senior judges came to the conclusion that not having a single piece evidence in their defense is enough to disqualify NS. While the 3 junior judges in my opinion erring on the side of caution have decided to get to the bottom of the matter as to who really owns the flats, and other said businesses in Saudia and Dubai and how the Sharifs accumulated such a fortune, where are these 100s of millions of rupees coming from that every other his sons sends as "gifts" to his father.

Aab aye ga aasli maza, sahi media circus lagi gi, roz raat to talkshows ki mehfilan laagi gi aur in ki mazeedi bizti hogi agaly 60 dinno ke liye. Hudiabiya Mills ka case khulaya, yaani safdar aur ishaq dollar ki class bi lagi ki.

Aabi to party shuru hui hai ;)

You know when a person passes away in a family you might have noticed that initially though the family mourns but not to that extent. The medical explanation is that -- for a week or so they are in a state of utter Shock and they do not realize what has happened? But once they get out of that Shock then they start realizing as to WHAT have they LOST. And then permanent scars on the heart start developing and they start feeling great hurt, pain and a loss.

Its the same situation here with sharifs and their patwaris.
Make no mistake they will start feeling the excruciating pain of this judgement, sooner than later.

 

[دوسرا_سوال]

download hee nahi ho rahi ... Thanks PTCL

https://www.docdroid.net/38AuyFO/panama-leaks-case-verdict.pdf.html

 

[دوسرا_سوال]

Important parts of the decisions:

1- All allegations still need to be investigated. Nawaz and all other respondents HAVE NOT been in cleared in any case.
2- NAB chairman appears indifferent and unwilling to perform his part, since JIT will be constrained.
3- Seven days have been given to the heads of 6 institutions to nominate the names of nominees for the JIT for approval by the court.
4- Nawaz, Hussain and Hassan Nawaz would appear before the JIT if asked to.
4- The JIT will submit its periodical reports every two weeks before a supreme court bench.
5- Final report must be submitted with in 60 days.
6- Disqualification of Nawaz will be considered based on biweekly or final report.

...this is after a new bench is constituted. None of this, even the bi-weekly reports will be made to the same bench.


What you guys are not understanding is that yesterday, the bench has concluded its job and thrown the ball back to JIT who will find answers in 60 days for things which are not even possible for CIA, MI5 or institutions of that level.


The practical point to note in all of this is that where the wording of the judgement seems legally fair, practically speaking it is nothing but a "truck ki batti".

 

[sabbor]

First step to prove in the judgement would have been to substantiate that the petitioners had a prima facie evidence that an offence has been committed. Mr. khosa's remarks does not mention or avoids to mention anything like that.

Mr. Khosa depended on all what was being said in the media and did not base on matters of fact or trustworthy evidence.

To give a dissenting judgement, he must have analysed the documentary evidence which was produced by the respondents which he did not. Should he was to derive inference to the contrary, he must straight away have gone for an independent commission or given benefit of doubt to the respondents. His reference to a naval quotation shows he has tried to give a moral rather than a legal judgement. He looks like Nazir Naji, Mobashar Luqman, an ARY analyst, an abuser of siasat.pk, or an editor of a biased news paper rather a Supreme Court judge. In fact, he has attempted to further destabilize the politics in the country.To my opinion he was biased to the respondents in the entirety of his minority remarks. He has misused his position as a judge of the Supreme Court and a reference must be filed against him in the supreme Judicial Council.

 

[SahirShah]

میں اس تھریڈ میں فیصلہ کے اقتباسات پیش کروں گا- ابھی تک جتنا پڑھا ہے یقین کیجئے کسی کتے کو بھی اس طرح دھتکارا جاتا تو کبھی دوبارہ چوکھٹ کا رخ نہ کرتا- مٹھایاں بانٹو نون لیگ کمی کمینو، نواز شریف قسطنطنیہ فتح کرآیا ہے
​

[hilar]​

Note: First 265 pages have dissenting note of Justice khosa

I just finished reading, well kind of skimming through it, hard to read all 549 pages in such a short, but yeah very interesting, the judges have basically blow apart every single word offered by the defense even going to the TV interviews and NS's speeches. Don't even start on the Qatari letter, I can't remember which judge said that who ever advised NS to submit that letter did more damage to their case than anything and more than they can ever imagine..................................Aabi to party shuru hui hai ;)

Important parts of the decisions:

1- All allegations still need to be investigated. Nawaz and all other respondents HAVE NOT been in cleared in any case.
2- NAB chairman appears indifferent and unwilling to perform his part, since JIT will be constrained.
3- Seven days have been given to the heads of 6 institutions to nominate the names of nominees for the JIT for approval by the court.
4- Nawaz, Hussain and Hassan Nawaz would appear before the JIT if asked to.
4- The JIT will submit its periodical reports every two weeks before a supreme court bench.
5- Final report must be submitted with in 60 days.
6- Disqualification of Nawaz will be considered based on biweekly or final report.

You know when a person passes away in a family you might have noticed that initially though the family mourns but not to that extent. The medical explanation is that -- for a week or so they are in a state of utter Shock and they do not realize what has happened? But once they get out of that Shock then they start realizing as to WHAT have they LOST. And then permanent scars on the heart start developing and they start feeling great hurt, pain and a loss.

Its the same situation here with sharifs and their patwaris.
Make no mistake they will start feeling the excruciating pain of this judgement, sooner than later.

بہت سخت ججمنٹ ہے
بہت ہی سخت
اتنی سخت کہ اگر کوئی عزت دار شخص ہوتا تو خود کشی کی کوشش کر چکا ہوتا

لیکن سو باتوں کی ایک بات یہ ہے کہ نواز شریف بچ گیا

چلو دو منٹ کے لئے مان لیا کہ فیصلہ بغیر کسی دباؤ کے کیا گیا
چلو یہ بھی مان لیا کہ وزیر اعظم کے عہدے پر موجود شخص کو نااہل کرنے کے لئے مزید تحقیقات کی ضرورت سمجھی گئی

لیکن یہ کیسے مان لیں کہ عدالت نے جے آئی ٹی کی تحقیقات تک نواز شریف کو عہدہ چھوڑنے کی سفارش تک نہ لکھی؟
کیسے مانیں کہ انیس گریڈ کے تین بیورو کریٹ نواز شریف کی تلاشی لیں گے، جبکہ وہ وزیر اعظم کے عہدے پر موجود ہوگا ؟
کیسے مانیں کہ کلثوم نواز کا قریبی رشتہ دار ڈی جی آئ ایس آئ نوید مختار بٹ ، خالو جان پر کوئی آنچ آنے دے گا ؟
میں نہیں مانتا، میں نہیں مانتا

لخ دی لعنت تہاڈے تے ججوں
شیخ عظمت سعید پر سپیشل لعنت، پورے کیس کے دوران سب سے زیادہ بڑ بڑ یہی کرتا تھا
ریمارکس پاس کروا لو انسے جتنے مرضی، اور وقت آنے پر فیصلہ کرنے کیبجاۓ ٹٹی کر دی​

 

[akmal1]

...this is after a new bench is constituted. None of this, even the bi-weekly reports will be made to the same bench.


What you guys are not understanding is that yesterday, the bench has concluded its job and thrown the ball back to JIT who will find answers in 60 days for things which are not even possible for CIA, MI5 or institutions of that level.


The practical point to note in all of this is that where the wording of the judgement seems legally fair, practically speaking it is nothing but a "truck ki batti".

پہلے کورٹ میں دو فریق تھے. جس نے پٹیشن کی تھی اور جسکے خلاف پٹیشن ہوئی تھی. اب جے آئی ٹی میں صرف ایک فریق ہے اور ثبوت دینے کا سارا بوجھ صرف اور صرف ملزم پر ہے. مزید یہ کہ ملزم کا پیش کیا گیا تمام دفاع خارج کر دیا گیا ہے اسکا مطلب کہ اب تحریک انصاف نے حرام ثابت نہیں کرنا. نواز شریف نے اپنی دولت کو حلال ثابت کرنا ہے

 

[دوسرا_سوال]

پہلے کورٹ میں دو فریق تھے. جس نے پٹیشن کی تھی اور جسکے خلاف پٹیشن ہوئی تھی. اب جے آئی ٹی میں صرف ایک فریق ہے اور ثبوت دینے کا سارا بوجھ صرف اور صرف ملزم پر ہے. مزید یہ کہ ملزم کا پیش کیا گیا تمام دفاع خارج کر دیا گیا ہے اسکا مطلب کہ اب تحریک انصاف نے حرام ثابت نہیں کرنا. نواز شریف نے اپنی دولت کو حلال ثابت کرنا ہے

You're wrong and talking out of your wishes rather than facts.


If what Nawaz provided was to be considered, then what he provided (or didn't) to this bench was enough to convict him.


Now, the JIT has been formed to find answers of the questions like who is the beneficial owner of Nescol/Neilson, how Flagship Investment Ltd was funded, the explanation about millions of Rs. of gifts from son to Nawaz etc. etc.


For these questions, the onus of finding the facts (NOT OPINION) is on JIT. Nawaz & Sons will be called and but if they still don't given anything which the law doesn't compel them to, then JIT can't force them. Then, the JIT will simply state that we could not find facts because none were made available and the the SCP will form a bench to decide based on that.


The point to note is that there is no compulsion on Nawaz to provide evidence for more than 5-6 years (as per the law of Pakistan) and from his sons no Pakistani authority can ask questions about their overseas assets because the sons are not resident in Pakistan for a very long time, and no one can ask any questions to Nawaz's father for the obvious reason.


Please stop hoping against hope. Realise the truck ki batti which you people have been shown and stop running after it.