bisaat
Banned
freedom of speech is the basic human right for any human being living in the world, it is protected by UN charter which Pakistan is a member of
last days when Altaf Hussain's speech got banned, it invoked a very negative reaction from the viewers of siasat.pk forum, and every body instead of condemning the move was justifying it that since Altaf Hussain criticized the Army, he was to be banned under the articles of constitution, but sane people kept repeating that it was not a conspiracy to incite war against pak army but a mere criticism which is an essential part of rights to freedom of speech, but this advice was all ignored, Nawaz Sharif's PEMRA and Lahore High Court's biased judgements got hailed as 'heroic' move
in MQM's and Altaf's enemity, every thing is jusitifed, but then siasat.pk got banned and now the same 'youthiyas' as talking about the same 'freedom of speech' which they most shamelessly opposed in MQM's leader Altaf bhai's case
now the same 'junta' is out condemning the ban on 'siasat.pk' by the same PEMRA and the same government which banned Altaf's speeches
if Altaf's speech was banned criticizing the army and the government which is an act of treason then siasat.pk since many years has advocated and supported the 'anti government' sentiments here
if criticizing the government and army is an act opf treason, siasat.pk has tolerated this treason for a long time and we should first consider Pakistan's interest before committing treason by supporting anti nawaz government?
so according to the constitution its not 'ban on freedom of speech' but ban on traitors? and is legitimate?
as we say what goes arond comes around, siasat.pk audience should not be so hypocrite and biased in their opinions, they should openly advocate for ban on siasat.pk ;)
last days when Altaf Hussain's speech got banned, it invoked a very negative reaction from the viewers of siasat.pk forum, and every body instead of condemning the move was justifying it that since Altaf Hussain criticized the Army, he was to be banned under the articles of constitution, but sane people kept repeating that it was not a conspiracy to incite war against pak army but a mere criticism which is an essential part of rights to freedom of speech, but this advice was all ignored, Nawaz Sharif's PEMRA and Lahore High Court's biased judgements got hailed as 'heroic' move
in MQM's and Altaf's enemity, every thing is jusitifed, but then siasat.pk got banned and now the same 'youthiyas' as talking about the same 'freedom of speech' which they most shamelessly opposed in MQM's leader Altaf bhai's case
now the same 'junta' is out condemning the ban on 'siasat.pk' by the same PEMRA and the same government which banned Altaf's speeches
if Altaf's speech was banned criticizing the army and the government which is an act of treason then siasat.pk since many years has advocated and supported the 'anti government' sentiments here
if criticizing the government and army is an act opf treason, siasat.pk has tolerated this treason for a long time and we should first consider Pakistan's interest before committing treason by supporting anti nawaz government?
so according to the constitution its not 'ban on freedom of speech' but ban on traitors? and is legitimate?
as we say what goes arond comes around, siasat.pk audience should not be so hypocrite and biased in their opinions, they should openly advocate for ban on siasat.pk ;)
Last edited by a moderator: