Empty vessels make the loudest sound
it was shameful to see that three grown mullahs a.k.a. “the bearded brigade” tried to pull wool over the eyes of the innocent, by pointlessly lying and bluntly referring to text which either did not exist or was taken out of context. Henceforth it was nothing but a waste of breath without any facts.
Which texts you’re referring to? The ones whose authorship is from the deranged loony of a ridiculous cult or the holy texts of Islam? But anyhow reading between the lines of your rationale here I think you’re pointing towards the material of that heretic scoundrel Ghulam Ahmad Qadiyani. So take the liberty of the judiciary of Pakistan and challenge those publishers and distributors who are according to you misrepresenting the views and works of your satanic master who tried to create schism on the bulwark of Muslim unity when it was at its most vulnerable stage in the nineteenth century.
Now following are the facts which these mullahs should answer for,
1. was it Ahamadis who gave the fatwa that if any Muslim wear trousers and shirt and speaks English or learn in English is out of Islam, which generated a whole generation of illiterate Muslims speaking Persian and urdu in an English governed state and gave a head start to Hindus to progress in society so they can monopolize all important positions in the government.
Answer : no it wasn't the Ahamadis who gave this fatwa but the forefathers , Peers and founders of these mullahs school of thought so in other words what we can say is their forefathers were working hand-in-hand with Hindus to bring Muslim nation down as whole.
So according to your pretence just by ignoring to adopt the cultural values of the aggressive colonial British forces Muslims of the subcontinent just failed to acquaint and learn the physical sciences of that era along with other branches of knowledge which impeded their progress in that set up? I think that would be a gross stupidity and fickleness from your part to pinpoint naively this misleading claim as the main cause of Muslims backwardness. Any idea about the reports of Lord Macaulay one of the influential members of your spiritual; masters, who served as the member of the Supreme Council of India back in 1834, which applauded and mentioned the high levels of literacy among the Muslim populace of the then decaying state of Indian subcontinent.? So what sort of illiteracy and intellectual bankruptcy of Muslims you falsely trying to paint here? So like many of the ignorant of this modern age maybe you’re also trying to imply this proposition that by learning English alone one can make sure of gaining the lost pearls of wisdom and high branches of knowledge and all other languages have no worth at all in this regard then surely I can only laugh at your deceptive analysis.
2. Who declared India as Daraul azaab in late 1880s and asked Muslims to migrate out of India to a neighboring Muslim country which a lot of Muslim family did migrated to Afghanistan where the men were slaughtered the women raped and sold as sex slaves and their property looted.
Answer: the forefathers , Peers and founders of these mullahs school of thought and not Ahamadis.
First of all the Muftis of the then Indian subcontinent termed it as Daar ul Harab (The land under the control of the enemies of Muslims which have declared war and sedition against their homeland) not Azaab, I think you need to brush up your knowledge when you deal with such technical terms of Islamic Shariah and then to further contemplate the religious and political connotations which was laid by the most influential juristic scholars of Islam ever since the promulgation of the message of Islam in the holy region of Hijaaz, in current day’s Saudi Arabia. One can call that decision of the then clerics of enslaved India as a blunder or non awareness of the political and social environment of the then world, when they issued that Fatwa of migration from the heartlands of India but surely the honest rationale and intention can’t be questioned here as one has to know the implications of living under the rule of the enemies of Allah SWT and His exalted Messenger SAW.
3. Who called Pakistan Kafaristan and Quaid e azam Kafar e azam and joined as members of Congress which was a Hindu dominated political party. Who opposed the formation of Pakistan and a separate state for Muslims.
Answer: the forefathers , Peers and founders of these mullahs school of thought and not Ahamadis.here is another factual example of " Hindus ka khud kashta podha"
And who welcomed and supported that movement for the liberation of Pakistan of course a good number of Islamic scholars as well. Why just you’re selectively picking the one halve of the Ulemas who opposed the creation of Pakistan and not the other halve of the polarised Ulemas of India at that time? Surely the hypocrisy and distortion of facts can be learned effectively from the “Ahmadis” like you who just don’t want to represent the whole exhibit in their analysis and critique.
To me they do all the evil against the Muslims in India and Pakistan and then blame it on Ahamadis what a wonderful way to go .
Surely Qadiyanis can’t be blamed to get the support of the British colonialists and trying to suckle up the fluid of unity and brotherhood of the Muslim populace of this region and joined hands with the enemies of their own community. Do you have any ounce of shame and remorse left in your dead consciousness to condemn such traitors of Islam and other communities of Indian subcontinent? What Ulemas have done to cause this misery and discomfort for the Muslims of this region< Surely your critique will not encompass the ills of the collaborator seditionists of Qadeyanis who have become the perfect exposition of hidden serpents among the ranks of Muslims, which will leave no stone unturned to bite and inject the deadly venom of their deceit, destruction and treachery into the veins of Muslim Ummah of this region in particular.
Then in 1973 all the 72 sects declared that” we represented by all the 72 sects of Islam declared Ahamadis as non-Muslims in full agreement”
Are you that dumb and intellectually incapacitated as you’re posturing in your verbal bouts or it’s just a quintessential feature of your feigned mentality which don’t have any hope of its treatment. Do you really know the meaning and differentiation of Sects and Schools of thoughts in the realm of religion? Islamic religious thought surely have suffered the difference of opinion and as result defragmented in to many units some of them merely on the basis of dogma and religious rulings, whilst others totally become a as an independent religious ideologies which then have nothing to do with the mainstream of Islamic ideology. The blessed Prophet SAW surely referred to those deviant groups which alienated themselves through their deceptive and deviant line of thought aided by their extreme violent practises not those factions which tends to hold difference of opinion only on the issues of Mutashabihat (The issues which posses more dimensions for explications and usually have an esoteric meanings known only to Allah SWT and through His selective slaves) and not on Muhakimat ( The exact and appropriate meaning from its face value which require no further elucidation from through the divine channel). And of course some of those legal issues of Shariah which comes under the domain of non established edicts of Islam which does not have clear and unequivocal explications from its authentic sources. So don’t tend to confuse and deceive yourself and other novices on such issues and matters, in relation to which you don’t have any clue and worth of knowledge.
on the other hand what I see is a Hadith of Holy Prophet (peace be upon him) declaring the fatwa as
Al-Tirmidhi HadithHadith 171 Narrated byAbdullah ibn Amr
Allah's Messenger (peace be upon him) said: There will befall my Ummah exactly (all those) evils which befell the people of Isra'il, so much so that if there was one amongst them who openly committed fornication with his mother there will be among my Ummah one who will do that, and if the people of Isra'il were fragmented into seventy-two sects my Ummah will be fragmented into seventy-three sects. All of them will be in Hell Fire except one sect. They (the Companions) said: Allah's Messenger, which is that? Whereupon he said: It is one to which I and my companions belong.Transmitted by Tirmidhi.
The heretics, imposters and deviators don’t deserve to quote and explicate the meanings of Hadith or Quranic literature of Islam and therefore I don’t require your opinion on the legal matter of this particular Hadith, the explanation of which I’ve provided to you in my immediate above paragraph.
Now who do you think I should listen to these bearded brigades or Holy Prophet (peace be upon him) to me the word of Allah's Messenger weighs more than my parents my children or these bearded brigades their forefathers etc. All the praise to Allah who with his eternal wisdom has so kindly made this fatwa so true that this was unanimously printed in all the media to see.though ironically they never published and will not publish the proceedings of 1973 things that make you go ???