PM ne adalat mein koi aisi baat nahi kahi - MushahidUllah PM ke wakeel ki baat se hi Mukhar gae

mubarik Shah

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
15442143_711928912292141_5040594139241038726_n.jpg
 

Haris Abbasi

Minister (2k+ posts)
اگر کسی طالبعلم نے اسائنمنٹ نہ کرنے کی صورت میں ٹیچر سے جھوٹ بولنا ہو یا پھر کسی شخص نے آفس لیٹ آنے کی صورت میں باس سے جھوٹ بولنا ہوتو ایک مرتبہ نون لیگ کے تمام لیڈرز کے متضاد بیانات سن کر حوصلہ ضرور بڑھائیں ،شکریہ :)
 

Talwar Gujjar

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Mushahidullah is right on. PM neither appeared in court nor he made a statement. His attorney made an argument about the case, he did not make a particular statement. You should go summon the attorney and question him about what he said, not the PM.
 

paki__

MPA (400+ posts)
Mushahidullah is right on. PM neither appeared in court nor he made a statement. His attorney made an argument about the case, he did not make a particular statement. You should go summon the attorney and question him about what he said, not the PM.

i have just one question for you: are you patwaris born without brains or do PMLN suck out your brain after you join them?
 

paki__

MPA (400+ posts)
If you have any brains, make an argument against what I said, don't make monkey faces.

there is no point in arguing with an idiot, but i'll try it anyway. PM's lawyer was probably told by the PM to say what to say and if that wasn't the case, then in the next hearing PM should have gone to court and said that his lawyer is incapable and lied about the facts
 

Talwar Gujjar

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
there is no point in arguing with an idiot, but i'll try it anyway. PM's lawyer was probably told by the PM to say what to say and if that wasn't the case, then in the next hearing PM should have gone to court and said that his lawyer is incapable and lied about the facts

No idiot, it is a question of strategy in court case. You give out the minimum that will work for you. May be, they thought they could do without giving out anymore documents.
 

abdullah.drs

Senator (1k+ posts)
Mushahidullah is right on. PM neither appeared in court nor he made a statement. His attorney made an argument about the case, he did not make a particular statement. You should go summon the attorney and question him about what he said, not the PM.

Why do u make fun of urself by saying such things? Whatever a lawyer says in court of law on behalf of his client is taken as an answer by the client himself. Plz read some books before making such silly posts
 

Talwar Gujjar

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Why do u make fun of urself by saying such things? Whatever a lawyer says in court of law on behalf of his client is taken as an answer by the client himself. Plz read some books before making such silly posts

It is still a technical argument, not necessarily a factual statement on the client. Plus, you have to first bring the attorney to state what he said or meant before you go after the client. Remember, it is the attorney speaking not the client. You cannot prosecute a client because of an attorney's statement or an argument.
 

Back
Top