Just a quick google search came up with two results which utterly refute the thesis of OP. Put the right words in the search tab and you would find many more such amazing results.
1. PILDAT published a report against Punjab Gov and Ejaz Chaudry of PTI is quoting PILDAT against PML-N
[h=1]
Pildat report sees through transparent government: PTI[/h]
The Newspaper's Staff Reporter Published May 08, 2015 06:41am
Whatsapp
0 Comments
Email
Print
LAHORE: Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf Punjab President Ejaz Chaudhry says the Pakistan Institute of Legislative Development and Transparency (Pildat) report has exposed the performance and governance of the PML-N.
In a statement issued here on Thursday, he said Sharif brothers always bragged about transparency but the Pildat report stated that the PML-N government was least transparent. Now the politically aware people of Pakistan would not let the political elite plunder the wealth, he said.
He said transparency and more openness was required in mega projects for curbing corruption. But in the Sharif brothers rule, he said, contracts were being awarded to Chinese and Turkish companies through their biggest crony Saifur Rehman.
He said the nation had seen Sharif brothers soaking in corruption scandals of the 90s and now the same was happening with the LNG deal with Qatar and Metro Bus projects.
PTI Punjab General Secretary Dr Yasmin Rashid said the report was the reflection of sentiments of the public and every one knew that the PML-N had badly failed to deliver in any sector. She said the economy was on downward spiral with rampant loadshedding that had destroyed the industry as well as farmers.
She said the PML-N government never shared the details of agreements and they even did not bother to consult parliament. No one knows about the Chinese investment policy whether it is investment or loan, she added. She said it was a fundamental and basic right of tax payers to be informed about where and how their tax money was being spent.
Information Secretary Andleeb Abbas said transparency had become a joke in Pakistan as shady deals of the PML-N government amounted to crime against nation and its economy. She questioned where was Adil Gilani of Transparency International and why was he not coming out and speaking about the ongoing loot and plunder of the PML-N government. She claimed that it was being reported in the news channels that Gilani was working for the Prime Minsters House. She said Sharif brothers had tarnished countrys reputation and ironically they were least interested in transparent running of government affairs. She said the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa government had revolutionised the transparency concept with its historic right to information law. Neither the federal nor other provincial governments wanted to make things more transparent, she observed.
Published in Dawn, May 8th, 2015
http://www.dawn.com/news/1180673
2. PILDAT's survey favors PTI and says that PTI has more internal Democracy than PML-N
[h=1]PTI strongest, PML-N weakest in internal party democracy: PILDAT[/h]
December 23, 2014 BY STAFF REPORT
Open, keenly contested party elections, regular core committee meetings put PTI in top slot
Lack of regular party election and party bodies meetings, dynastic party leadership, no change in top party leadership for years make PML-N weakest, PPP second weakest democratic party
In a systematic analysis evaluating internal democracy of political parties in Pakistan, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) has emerged as the most democratic party while Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) is ranked as the least democratic party.
The Pakistan Institute of Legislative Development and Transparency (PILDAT) report on Assessing Internal Democracy of Major Political Parties of Pakistan concludes that the overall score of 43 out of 100 on internal democracy in the selected eight political parties depicts that the state of internal democracy of political parties in Pakistan is weak with serious gaps.
Within this overall score, the highest score is assigned to the constitutions of the political parties. The internal democracy guaranteed by the party constitution has received 54 percent score. Regularity of parliamentary parties meetings has received a score of 53 percent second highest among the 13 indicators. Active participation of women, youth and minorities in the parties affairs has been given a score of 52 percent the third highest score.
Democratic change in the top leadership of political parties has received the least scores 30 percent indicating that seldom do political parties allow democratic change of their top leaders unless it is forced by the circumstances such as death or, in some cases, exile. In the same context, the tradition of dynastic leadership has also found disapproval with the assessors and the question of how far is this practice discouraged in parties received a score of 45 percent. Credibility of political parties statements of accounts and their funding base has also been a matter of concern for the assessors and the second lowest score i.e., 35 percent is granted to this indicator. The third lowest score is granted to the tolerance of dissent within political parties which receives 36 percent score. Internal party election, an important indicator of democracy within the parties, has received 49 percent score, which is the fourth lowest score among the 13 indicators.
Open and keenly contested party election at all levels in 2012-2013 and regular core committee meetings have apparently favoured PTI to become the most democratic party while lack of regular party election, lack of regular meetings of party bodies such as Central Working Committee and National Councils, visible trends of dynastic party leadership and no change in top party leadership for the last many years seem to be the factors which adversely affected the democratic credentials of PML-N. Almost similar credentials impacted the democratic credentials of the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) which is rated as the second least democratic party among the eight parties evaluated.
http://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/201...n-weakest-in-internal-party-democracy-pildat/