Petrified Jihadi John ABANDONS ISIS

[Smiter]

A 'khabees' running from 'khabaasat'?! (clap)
Now it is his own neck that is on the altar.

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/59...azi-Abandon-ISIS-SAS-Iraq-Syria-Islamic-State

It is thought Emwazi, dubbed Jihadi John, left the terror group several weeks ago and went on the run in Syria - reportedly trying to head to North Africa.
A source claimed ISIS would drop him "like a stone or worse if they feel he is no longer of any use to them".

They said: "So it is possible he will end up suffering the same fate as his victims".

The British terrorist, from London, is said to have been terrified by the publicity after he was identified as the sick murderer of British and American hostages - and fears being hunted down by British and US special forces in Iraq and Syria.

One priority of the allied forces is to track the 26-year-old and either bring him to justice or kill him.
Emwazi, who gained notoriety beheading innocent Western victims in ISIS propaganda footage, is also believed to fear his unmasking has diminished his value as an ISIS killer.

He is also apparently concerned that jealous fellow ISIS members might plot against him.
The computer science graduate may have teamed-up with a less well-known jihadist group somewhere in Syria, to try to keep a low profile.

A schoolfriend of the cold killer blasted Emwazi as "not a good Muslim" during his school years.

She said: "He smoked drugs, drank and was violent towards other boys," the anonymous friend said. "The fact he portrays himself as a strict Muslim is laughable and shameful.

"I never saw him pray or wear Islamic dress - he would not even mention religion at all.
"Being a Muslim myself I was very aware of it at the time. We had a gang and he was very much a part of it - which shows he is a total hypocrite."

 

[Diriyah]

When all this is over.... WE would account this as one of the lowest point in our Islamic History.

Same as the time in Hazrat Ali Razi-allah hu Anhu. When he was fighting not one but a handful of Traitors in Islamic uniform.

I do hope we learn, from this current experience.

 

[Diriyah]

ISIS supporter Under the Radar.

Old news ..but this is odd, kind of went under the Radar.


MaryamRajavi a Shia from Iran.

RaghadHussein Daughter of Saddam a know Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party,possible a Sunni.

TheMojahedin Khalq (Rajavi cult) and Saddams daughter supportthe Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIS)


An articlepublished on the Mojahedin Khalqs official website exposes thegroups affinity with the gruesome Islamic State of Iraq and theLevant (ISIS) in Iraq.


The firstpage of their site (see picture below) says in Farsi, Revolutionaryforces in Iraq have captured parts of Mosul after fighting withMalikis forces. Referring to the Islamic State of Iraq and theLevant as Revolutionary forces is something the MEK haveinvented to demonstrate its solidarity with the group. The articlegoes on, The revolutionaries have announced that Malikis forceshave run away, and quotes from ISIS itself, we didnt letanyone survive except those who surrendered to us. According tothe MEK, the ISIS statement goes on, We inform all governmentforces they should surrender otherwise they will be killed.

>>>>> Saddam Husseins daughter in Jordan,with whom the MEK are in close collaboration, went furtherand thankedthe Saudi government for supporting ISIS. <<<<<




Reportsfrom Baghdad say the Government of Iraq has evidence the MEK hascollaborated with ISIS. The Iraqi Government revealed evidence thatequipment which went missing from Camp Ashraf after the main group ofresidents were transferred to Camp Liberty, is now being used byISIS. The equipment includes military vehicles with gun mounts. AhmadAl-sharifi, a prominent security analyst in Baghdad has published theevidence, and says there is no doubt some equipment currently used byISIS is that previously used by the MEK. He goes on to say the sourceof support for ISIS is clear for those in the region, and only asmall part of this support comes from the MEK.


>>>>MEK leader Massoud Rajavi expressedhis solidarity withthe Saudi backed Jaish-ul-Adl terrorist group based in Iran/Pakistan <<<<

Referring to the execution of 16 men affiliated to Jaish-ul-Adlterrorist group Masoud Rajavi described them as martyrs andbrothers.


Earlier inOctober 2013, Maryam Rajavi, the co-leader of the MEK, also releaseda statement condemning the execution of terrorists, while a group ofIranian border guards were killed in cold blood close to the Iranianborder with Pakistan.

http://www.ncr-iran.org/en/news/iran-resistance/18801

 

[Ibrahim92]

Koi haqeeqat main EVIDENCE bhi hay yaaa wohi purana TAQIYYAHH pay hi kaaam chala rahay ?

 

[OnlyPK]

Re: ISIS supporter Under the Radar.

Execute all IS supporters :angry_smile:

 

[Pukaar]

Koi haqeeqat main EVIDENCE bhi hay yaaa wohi purana TAQIYYAHH pay hi kaaam chala rahay ?

Its Daaish Media vs Western Media. And Western Media is winning.

 

[adslpxp2]

What is the source of this rumour ;)

 

[Smiter]

Koi haqeeqat main EVIDENCE bhi hay yaaa wohi purana TAQIYYAHH pay hi kaaam chala rahay ?

What is the source of this rumour ;)

Taqiyyah-baazi is a known trait of these Wahhabis. Taqiyyah was when this Wahhabi was slaughtering innocent people with his face HIDDEN. ;)

And if this news is false or a rumor then why does not this animal come out and squeak again in the face of camera?

 

[Smiter]

Turkey's 200-Year War against 'ISIS' (that is Wahhabis)

This article also shows that ISIS is nothing but the Wahhabi ideology which started in the nineteenth century.
Hopefully, it will help people understand ISIS' ideological genesis, and they understand that ISIS cult is not new. It is the continuation of Wahhabi ideology of Saudi Nejadis.
Saudi Nejadis were obliterated by Sunni Ottomans. And they gained prominence only after Ottomans were defeated in the World War 1 when Saudis made alliance with the British.

http://nationalinterest.org/feature/turkeys-200-year-war-against-isis-13412

In 1818, Amir Abdullah bin Saud was taken to Istanbul for execution. This was no ordinary prisoner. He was leader of a rebellion that had occupied the two holy cities of Islam for a decade and had dared to declare the Ottoman sultan, Caliph of the Faithful, an unbeliever. Among the various public humiliations before ibn Saud’s execution—since his strict Wahhabi interpretation of Islam forbade music—the Ottomans made him listen to the lute. But the cruelest punishments were reserved for the rebels’ religious leaders, some of whom were stuck into the muzzles of cannons and mortars and blown to pieces.
The rebellion clearly struck a nerve with the Ottomans. The rebels belonged to the Salafi tradition of Sunni Islam, meaning that they believed in a literal reading of the earliest Islamic texts. The mainstream Anatolian Sunnis of Turkey on the other hand, belong to the Hanafi-Maturidi tradition, which goes into textual interpretation to attain the true meaning of the Prophet’s teachings. It sprang out of an age of enlightenment, when Islamic civilization reached its zenith in mathematics, medicine, astronomy and the arts. The Ottomans saw themselves as the heirs of Islam’s natural evolution towards a higher civilization. They did not care to be called infidels.

Salafism had a marginal place in politics for much of the time since its 14th century beginnings when it was influenced significantly by the works and students of the prominent scholar Ibn Taymiyyah. It only started to gain a foothold when Ottoman rule slackened in the 19th century. At this time, a Salafist scholar named ibn Wahhab made a pact with Abdul Aziz, a tribal chief with ambitions to exert influence over Arabia. The two made Salafist ideology into their weapon in the form of the Ikhwan, an elite fighting force known for its religious zeal and brutality (no affiliation with the Egyptian group of the same name, Ikhwan al-Muslimun, the Muslim Brotherhood). The Ikhwan began to raid neighboring villages and eventually Iraq, on the pretext that anyone not of the Salafist creed was non-Muslim, and hence their “life and property was halal [religiously sanctioned].” The Ikhwan massacred women and children, and destroyed shrines, graves and works of art, all of which are offensive to the Salafist tradition. In 1803, Abdul Aziz entered the Holy City of Mecca. In the subsequent decade, his tribe would rule over an area roughly the size of present day Saudi Arabia.


The Ottoman government tasked the Egyptian army—then subservient to Istanbul—to squash the rebellion. The Egyptians took some time to get into gear, but in 1812, they defeated the Ikhwan and recaptured Mecca and Medina. That’s when Abdullah bin Saud was sent to Istanbul to be executed.
But the Ikhwan did not disappear. In some sense they are the rational consequence of Salafi ideology, supported by a historical pattern. They represent a violent urge that is repressed and resurfaces throughout the decades. The Ikhwan came back onto the scene during World War I, when the British were supporting the Arab revolts against the Ottoman Empire. They helped the al-Saud family establish the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and wanted to push into Iraq, just as their ancestors had done, to “cleanse” the Shia. Even the Saudi king was disturbed by their zeal, and soon realized that they were incompatible with his alliance with the British. In a brief civil war, his forces ended up mowing down the Ikhwan with European machine guns. In 1979, a group of armed extremists stormed the Grand Mosque in Mecca because they believed that the Saudi monarchy had deviated from the path of its founders. After a two week siege, hundreds of dead, more injured, and three French commandos briefly converted into Islam in order to enter the holy city, the remaining militants surrendered. They said they were Ikhwan.

More than any other group however, ISIL is truly the sword of Salafism. Among the genocidal, slave-trading Salafis of today, only it occupies territory and is building a state on it, just like the Ikhwan have always tried to do.

 

[such bolo]

Re: Turkey's 200-Year War against 'ISIS' (that is Wahhabis)

typical sofi Brelvi propaganda thread...full of lues and distorted facts

 

[Smiter]

Re: Turkey's 200-Year War against 'ISIS' (that is Wahhabis)

typical sofi Brelvi propaganda thread...full of lues and distorted facts

Typical Wahhabi/Salafi response.

Wahhabis called non-Wahhabis non-Muslims, including Ottomans. Ottomans fought and destroyed their first kingdom. Their second kingdom was established after Ottoman defeat in World War 1 with British help to Nejadi Wahhabis.
Present-day ISIS has the same ideological genealogy as Saudi Wahhabis.

Show where are lies and distortion.

----

Here is an article which shows Saudi dilemma to fight their ideological "cousins":
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/alastair-crooke/isis-wahhabism-saudi-arabia_b_5717157.html
"You Can't Understand ISIS If You Don't Know the History of Wahhabism in Saudi Arabia

"

----

Another good read:
http://www.newstatesman.com/world-affairs/2014/11/wahhabism-isis-how-saudi-arabia-exported-main-source-global-terrorism
[h=1]Wahhabism to ISIS: how Saudi Arabia exported the main source of global terrorism[/h][h=1]Although IS is certainly an Islamic movement, it is neither typical nor mired in the distant past, because its roots are in Wahhabism, a form of Islam practised in Saudi Arabia that developed only in the 18th century.



[/h]

 

[tz00007]

Re: Turkey's 200-Year War against 'ISIS' (that is Wahhabis)

i can show u wahabis who call ISIS kafir.. i know many saudis whose interpretation is not what ISIS and terrorists do.. terrorism has no religion... even if ur a salafi, what justifies beheading and burning muslims??? what justifies calling everyone kafir but urself???


the problem with people is you people GENERALISE... u cannot judge a whole nation or sect by the actions of few... this is the biggest stupidity in our nation.. they generalise... paint a whole group with one colour.. that is wrong.. every person is unique..

 

[Smiter]

Re: Turkey's 200-Year War against 'ISIS' (that is Wahhabis)

i can show u wahabis who call ISIS kafir..

I know that there are Wahhabis who don't support ISIS terrorism. For example, al-Qaeda leaders and others like Abu-Sayyaf in Jordan who have called ISIS barbarism unIslamic.

But the point of this article is that ISIS follow the same ideology as Nejadi Wahhabis. They are the result of Nejadi export of Wahhabism around the world, even if there are some disagreements on certain punishments.
And recent Turkish attacks are nothing new because Turks/Ottomans have been fighting this ideology since 200 years.

 

[such bolo]

Re: Turkey's 200-Year War against 'ISIS' (that is Wahhabis)

I know that there are Wahhabis who don't support ISIS terrorism. For example, al-Qaeda leaders and others like Abu-Sayyaf in Jordan who have called ISIS barbarism unIslamic.

But the point of this article is that ISIS follow the same ideology as Nejadi Wahhabis. They are the result of Nejadi export of Wahhabism around the world, even if there are some disagreements on certain punishments.
And recent Turkish attacks are nothing new because Turks/Ottomans have been fighting this ideology since 200 years.

whose ideology Asif Ali Zardari follows??
whose ideology Bashaar Alasad follows??
whose ideolgy Nori Almalki who murdered thousands of Sunnis follows?
whose ideology Nawaz Shareef follows??
whose ideology Sheikh Hasina Wajid follows?

by the way they all are not Salafis...and call themselves Muslim/Hanafi/Shia etc

whats your take now

 

[Ibrahim92]

Stories of Expansion,Liberation of Yarmouk Camp

 

[staray khaatir]

Re: Stories of Expansion,Liberation of Yarmouk Camp

What a bunch of savages calling themselves MUJAHIDEEN.The are worst than IRANI MULLAH & THIER PROXIES,who are at least openly fighting for the dominance of Shiaism.
these IS animals destroyed thousands of years old history and artifacts of Palmyra.
May Allah curse both IRANI MULLAHS & IS SAVAGES.

 

[Ibrahim92]

Re: Stories of Expansion,Liberation of Yarmouk Camp

What a bunch of savages calling themselves MUJAHIDEEN.The are worst than IRANI MULLAH & THIER PROXIES,who are at least openly fighting for the dominance of Shiaism.
these IS animals destroyed thousands of years old history and artifacts of Palmyra.
May Allah curse both IRANI MULLAHS & IS SAVAGES.

MURTADENNN Musalmano ko mar rahay aur tumhey ARTIFACTS ki fiqar parii hui ? Wasay iss khabar ka koi EVIDENCE ? aur Evedence yeh na ho k kisi nay kahin pay kuch likh dia ?

jasay Iss uper SHARE ki hui video main Evedence hay k NEUTRAL Analysts kia kah rahay IS k control areas main Musalman kasay Khush hain aur YARMOUK CAMP ki misaaal sab k samnay hay jo pichlay 3 saal taak SEIGE main tha IS nay issey azad karwaya aur loogo ki zindagi wapis normal ho rahi.

Video dakhi hay ya phir TITLE dakh ky hi NAFRAT ka izhaaar kar dia ?

 

[tz00007]

Re: Turkey's 200-Year War against 'ISIS' (that is Wahhabis)

u seem to be koovey ka mendak... i doubt if u havve ever met anyone other than somone from ur pind... go outside n see the world.. saudis are one of the fastest modernising ppl... common wahabis are very modern though they never miss their prayers.. i have known hundreds of arabs and they were salafis but never saw any hint of extremism in them.. infat they were very logical..

u can take an ideology and twist it... after all its one Quran and everyone believes in it.. yet so many sects... shia who have their weird beliefs derive from Quran.. Qadiyani also derive things from QUran.. .so does deobandi, barelwi and wahabis..... so what does that mean????

turkey reluctantly attacked ISIS because they dint want to enter the fight.. but they also attacked kurdish PKK.. attacking ISIS gave them legitimacy to attack PKK as well.. dont try to link 200 years old things with todays stuff.. this is not a movie or a fairy tale.. this is modern world.. and turkey is saudi ally... they support the kingdom..

what about the shia terrorists who kill sunnis in lebanon and iraq?/ all those extremist shia militias??? mostly used by iran... even in iran balochistan they have wiped all the sunnis.. arent they animals??? wat about punjabi barelwi taliban?? they are as real as any other militants..

again i would say.. terrorism has no religions.. see hindu extremist terrorists.. they kill others too.. see tamil tigers.. they did suicide bombings too... i would suggest u to get urself educated..

I know that there are Wahhabis who don't support ISIS terrorism. For example, al-Qaeda leaders and others like Abu-Sayyaf in Jordan who have called ISIS barbarism unIslamic.

But the point of this article is that ISIS follow the same ideology as Nejadi Wahhabis. They are the result of Nejadi export of Wahhabism around the world, even if there are some disagreements on certain punishments.
And recent Turkish attacks are nothing new because Turks/Ottomans have been fighting this ideology since 200 years.

 

[staray khaatir]

Re: Stories of Expansion,Liberation of Yarmouk Camp

MURTADENNN Musalmano ko mar rahay aur tumhey ARTIFACTS ki fiqar parii hui ? Wasay iss khabar ka koi EVIDENCE ? aur Evedence yeh na ho k kisi nay kahin pay kuch likh dia ?

jasay Iss uper SHARE ki hui video main Evedence hay k NEUTRAL Analysts kia kah rahay IS k control areas main Musalman kasay Khush hain aur YARMOUK CAMP ki misaaal sab k samnay hay jo pichlay 3 saal taak SEIGE main tha IS nay issey azad karwaya aur loogo ki zindagi wapis normal ho rahi.

Video dakhi hay ya phir TITLE dakh ky hi NAFRAT ka izhaaar kar dia ?

main nay pori video daikhi hai,magar ye tou IS ke propaganda video hai,es ko aap kaisay evidence bana rahay hain?Allah karay aap ka anjaam bhi IS waloun k saath ho,aur aap ke family bhi woh sab kuch face karay jo syria aur iraq main logoun ke families face ker rahi hain IS k haathoun.Ameen zaroor kehna plz

 

[allahkebande]

Re: Stories of Expansion,Liberation of Yarmouk Camp

MURTADENNN Musalmano ko mar rahay aur tumhey ARTIFACTS ki fiqar parii hui ?

ابھی تک تو مسلمانوں کو صرف داعش نے مارا ہے ۔ ورنہ پہلے کون سر قلم کرنے کی ویڈیو بناتا تھا