Panama Case was about London flats and the decision came over Iqama - Justice Qazi Faiz Eisa's remar

[tarzanfaridi]

????? ???? ??? ??? ???? ?? ?????? ????? ???? ?? ??? ???? ????? ?? ??????? ?? ????? ???? ?? ??? ??? ?? ?? ??? ????? ????? ?? ??? ??? ?? ? ???? ???? ???? ?? ??? ?? ?? ??? ?????? ??? ????? ??? ??? ???? ?????? ?? ????? ?? ?? ???? ????? ?????? ??? ??? ?????? ???? ????? ?? ??? ?????? ????? ?? ????? ??????? ??? ?? ?????? ???? ?? ??? ???? ?? ???? ?????? ??????? ????? ?? ???? ??? ?? ?

???? ??? ???? ???? ?? ??????? ??? ??? ???? ??? ?? ???????? ????? ?? ???? ???? ?? ????? ?? ? ??????? ???? ???? ????? ?? ???? ?? ????? ?? ????? ?? ??? ???? ?? ?????? ??????? ??? ????? ?????? ???? ????? ????? ?? ??? ??? ???? ?? ???? ???? ???? ??? ????? ??? ?? ?? ? ???? ???? ???? ???? ?? ??????? ??? ?? ???? ???? ??? ??? ???? ?? ????? ?? ????? ?????? ???? ???? ???? ? ??????? ???? ?? ???? ?? ??? ?? ??? ???? ?? ???? ???? ???? ?? ?? ???????? ???? ??? ???????? ??? ???? ???? ???? ???? ??? ????? ??? ?? ???? ?? ??? ???

???? ???? ??? ????? ?? ???? ???? ?? ?????? 983 ????? 17 ???? ????? ???????? ???? ???? ???? ?? ????? ?? ??? ?? ?? ??? ???? ?? ????? ???? ?? ?????? ?? ?? ? ??????? ?? ?? ????? ???? ?? ???? ??? ?? ??? ???? ?? ????? ?????? ?? ?? ?????? ?? ???? ??? ??? ???? ?? 4 ???? ??? ???? ?? ??? ?? ??? ???? ?? ???? ???? ???? ??? ???? ?? ????? ???? ??? ????? ??? ???? ????? ???? ??? ??? ???? ?? ???? ??????? ?? ??? ???? ??? ??? ????? ?? ?????? ???? ????? ? ???? ???? ??? ??? ?? ????? ?? ??? ?? ?? ???? ?? ??? ???? ?? ???? ???? ??????? ???? ???? ??? ?

??????? ?? ?? ????? ???? ????? ?? ???? ?? ????? ?? ?????? ?? ?? ??? ???? ?? ??? ????? ??? ??? ?????? ??? ????? ??? ??? ??? ????? ?? ?????? ?? ????? ??? ?? ? ???? ???? ???? ?? ??????? ??? ?? ?? ???? ????? ??? ?? ???? ??? ?? ???? ????? ?????? ??? ?? ????? ?? ?? ?????? ?? ??? ???? ???? ???? ?? ??????? ?????? ??? ??? ???? ???? ?? ??? ?? ???? ???? ??? ?????? ???? ???????? ?????? ?? ?????? ???? ?? ??? ?? ????? ??? ?????? ??? ??? ??? ?????? ???? ?????? ????????????? ??? ??? ??? ???? ?? ???? ??? ??? ??? ?? ? ???? ?? ??? ?? ????? ??????? ????? ?? ??? ????? ? ???? ???? ???? ?? ??????? ??? ?? ??? ?????? ??? ??? ??? ?? ???? ????? ?? ????

???? ?? ???? ?? ???? ??? ?? ??? ???? ??? ?? ????? ??????? ???? ???? ???? ?? ??????? ??? ?? ??? ?????? ??? ????? ??? ??? ???? ?????? ?? ????? ?? ?? ???? ????? ?????? ??? ??? ?????? ???? ????? ?? ??? ?????? ????? ?? ????? ??????? ??? ?? ?????? ???? ?? ??? ???? ?? ???? ?????? ??????? ????? ?? ???? ??? ??? ?????? ??? ???? ??? ?? ???? ?????? ???? ???? ???? ?? ??? ???? ???? ??? ??????? ??? ??? ??? ???? ?? ????? ???? ???? ??? ???? ?? ?? ?? ??? ?????? ??? ?? ??? ?? ??? ??? ???? ????? ?? ?? ????? ???? ?? ????? ??????? ?? ?? ????? ????? ?? ??????? ????
??? ??? ???? ?? ???? ?? ????? ???? ?? ??? ????? ????? ?? ??? ?

Source ​

 

[Navash]

Re: Justice Qazi Faiz Eisa bashes Panama Decision in open court

Meet justice faiz Isa, the judge who shut down one of the biggest corruption cases in Pakistan: Hudabya.

 

[ThirdUmpireFinger]

Re: Justice Qazi Faiz Eisa bashes Panama Decision in open court

Meet justice faiz Isa, the judge who shut down one of the biggest corruption cases in Pakistan: Hudabya.

What was corruption in hudebia paper mill case? There was no public money involve and it was not Justice Faiz issa but Lahore high court ordered to close that case many years ago and then SC maintained that order. Also, justice faiz isa was not alone in that bench but there were other judges too. judges begged NAB to tell judges what was corruption charges in Hudebia case but NAB could not provide any answer.

Having said all this this whole supreme court is a monkey show and should be thrown in a big black bin. full of jokers destroying country for cheap popularity.

 

[Sheikhys]

Re: Justice Qazi Faiz Eisa bashes Panama Decision in open court

This justice Faiz-ool Isa seems a dubious and shady character. He seems to be corrupt to the core. Thats probably the reason why he threw out the Hudabya case. ****** insaan

 

[latif mk]

Re: Justice Qazi Faiz Eisa bashes Panama Decision in open court

Jo dil main tha wo bahir aaya, isliye isne hudabiya case close kiya

 

[RashidAhmed]

Re: Justice Qazi Faiz Eisa bashes Panama Decision in open court

جیو نے ریمارکس کو ٹوئیسٹ کیا ہے۔ جسٹس قاضی فائز عیسیٰ نے یہ کہا ہے کہ نوازشریف کی نااہلی اثاثے چھپانے پر ہوئی ہے اور نااہلی ہوئی پانامہ کی بجائے اقامہ اور ملازمت چھپانے پر ۔ نوازشریف کی اقامہ پر نااہلی اسلئے ہوئی کیونکہ تنخواہ نوازشریف کا اثاثہ تھی۔

ایکسپریس نیوز ، نیوزون اور دنیا نیوز پر ٹکرز مختلف ہیں

 

[mercedesbenz]

Re: Justice Qazi Faiz Eisa bashes Panama Decision in open court

فائز عیسیٰ دوسرا جسٹس قیوم ھے اسکو اندر سے نوازےکی فکر رھتی ھے۔گندھلا بندہ ھے یہ۔

 

[Navash]

Re: Justice Qazi Faiz Eisa bashes Panama Decision in open court

What was corruption in hudebia paper mill case? There was no public money involve and it was not Justice Faiz issa but Lahore high court ordered to close that case many years ago and then SC maintained that order. Also, justice faiz isa was not alone in that bench but there were other judges too. judges begged NAB to tell judges what was corruption charges in Hudebia case but NAB could not provide any answer.

Having said all this this whole supreme court is a monkey show and should be thrown in a big black bin. full of jokers destroying country for cheap popularity.

Dar confession detailing the corruption, judgment from an english court. Yet this judge (with one another judge) shut down Hudabiya on a technicality, when there were precedents of other cases to go further. Now these statements. Put one and one together.

 

[Muhammad Jibran]

Re: Justice Qazi Faiz Eisa bashes Panama Decision in open court

Dar confession detailing the corruption, judgment from an english court. Yet this judge (with one another judge) shut down Hudabiya on a technicality, when there were precedents of other cases to go further. Now these statements. Put one and one together.

فائز عیسیٰ دوسرا جسٹس قیوم ھے اسکو اندر سے نوازےکی فکر رھتی ھے۔گندھلا بندہ ھے یہ۔

جیو نے ریمارکس کو ٹوئیسٹ کیا ہے۔ جسٹس قاضی فائز عیسیٰ نے یہ کہا ہے کہ نوازشریف کی نااہلی اثاثے چھپانے پر ہوئی ہے اور نااہلی ہوئی پانامہ کی بجائے اقامہ اور ملازمت چھپانے پر ۔ نوازشریف کی اقامہ پر نااہلی اسلئے ہوئی کیونکہ تنخواہ نوازشریف کا اثاثہ تھی۔ایکسپریس نیوز ، نیوزون اور دنیا نیوز پر ٹکرز مختلف ہیں

This justice Faiz-ool Isa seems a dubious and shady character. He seems to be corrupt to the core. Thats probably the reason why he threw out the Hudabya case. ****** insaan

Jo dil main tha wo bahir aaya, isliye isne hudabiya case close kiya

Justice Faiz Essa is the one who is listening "Faizabad Dharna" case :) I was amazed why he is not asking government why they made changes in the declaration of the FInality of Prophet صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم. That's why he is angry at agencies to provide him proof so that he could end the chapter of khadim hussain rizvi once and for all.

 

[aamir_uetn]

Re: Justice Qazi Faiz Eisa bashes Panama Decision in open court

اور مزید دلچسپ بات یہ ہے کہ اس سے نا تو نااہلی ختم ہو گی نا ہی میاں صاحب کی چیخیں ، تو دل کے خوش رکھنے کو غالب یہ خیال برا ہے

 

[malik1c]

Re: Justice Qazi Faiz Eisa bashes Panama Decision in open court

Raseedain dikhaoo jaan chiraoo (bigsmile)

 

[Birdie101]

Re: Justice Qazi Faiz Eisa bashes Panama Decision in open court

Bikao maal.

 

[akmal1]

Re: Justice Qazi Faiz Eisa bashes Panama Decision in open court

What was corruption in hudebia paper mill case? There was no public money involve and it was not Justice Faiz issa but Lahore high court ordered to close that case many years ago and then SC maintained that order. Also, justice faiz isa was not alone in that bench but there were other judges too. judges begged NAB to tell judges what was corruption charges in Hudebia case but NAB could not provide any answer.

Having said all this this whole supreme court is a monkey show and should be thrown in a big black bin. full of jokers destroying country for cheap popularity.

حدیبیہ کیس میں لندن کی جائیدادیں جو آپ کے لیڈر نے ٢٠٠٦ میں حاصل کیں وہ ٩٠ کی دہائی میں گروی رکھوائی گئیں
سوال یہ ہے کہ جب جائیدادیں خریدی ہی ٢٠٠٦ میں گئیں تو ٩٠ کی دہائی میں کیسے گروی رکھوا دیں؟
ظاہر ہے کہ ملکیت شریف خاندان کے پاس تھی
٩٠ کی دہائی کے ٹیکس گوشوارے یہ ظاہر کرتے ہیں کہ اس وقت شریف خاندان کے پاس اتنی دولت نہیں تھی
لہٰذا دولت کہاں سے آئی؟ لندن کیسے گئی؟ اور اگر دولت تھی تو اس پہ ٹیکس کیوں نہیں دیا؟

 

[surfer]

Re: Justice Qazi Faiz Eisa bashes Panama Decision in open court

What was corruption in hudebia paper mill case? There was no public money involve and it was not Justice Faiz issa but Lahore high court ordered to close that case many years ago and then SC maintained that order. Also, justice faiz isa was not alone in that bench but there were other judges too. judges begged NAB to tell judges what was corruption charges in Hudebia case but NAB could not provide any answer.

Having said all this this whole supreme court is a monkey show and should be thrown in a big black bin. full of jokers destroying country for cheap popularity.

Easiest way for sharifs to throw them in a big black bin....show the money trail and prove them wrong. If sharif's are innocent, then this is the easiest thing to do.

But if they have used dormant law firms in uk to verify fake trust deeds, maybe not so easy ;)

 

[Chaudhry_1960]

justice is different for Punjabi and non punjabi leaders.

 

[Admiral]

قانون کا کیلا نواز شریف کے منہ میں جانے لگا ہے،، روک سکے تو روک لو

چاہے سارے مخالفوں کو بھی نااہل کروا لو، لیکن نااہلی کا یہ کیلا نہیں رک سکتا
:lol:

 

[ranaji]

قانون کا کیلا نواز شریف کے منہ میں جانے لگا ہے،، روک سکے تو روک لو

چاہے سارے مخالفوں کو بھی نااہل کروا لو، لیکن نااہلی کا یہ کیلا نہیں رک سکتا
:lol:

لعنتی غلیظ نیچ چور فراڈیا گندی نالی کا غلیظ کیڑا نواز شریف بچپن سے ہی بہت بڑا اور ٹرینڈ ڈیپ تھروٹ ہے گل خان کی وجہ سے

 

[RajaRawal111]

Justice Isa says SC's ruling on Panamagate based on iqama instead of London flats

ISLAMABAD: Many were left surprised when during the hearing of a case on Tuesday a Supreme Court judge wondered that the Panama Papers case involved the Sharif family-owned four upscale Avenfield flats in London, but former prime minister Nawaz Sharif was disqualified for holding an iqama (work permit) of the United Arab Emirates (UAE).
“The Panama Papers case was about London flats, but the judgement came on the iqama,” observed Justice Qazi Faez Isa, who is a member of the three-judge Supreme Court bench which has taken up an appeal of Shakeel Awan, a Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) member who lost the 2013 elections from Rawalpindi’s NA-55 constituency against Awami Muslim League head Sheikh Rashid Ahmed.
The bench is headed by Justice Sheikh Azmat Saeed.
The court, however, reserved its ruling after hearing both sides.

Justice Qazi Faez Isa says Panama Papers case was about London flats, but judgement came on UAE Iqama
​

Justice Isa’s observation came when Advocate Sheikh Ilyas, representing Mr Awan, mentioned the last year’s Panama Papers judgement to bolster his arguments against Mr Ahmed.
The apex court disqualified Mr Sharif as member of the National Assembly in the Panama Papers case by invoking Article 62(1)(f) of the Constitution.
The last time the Panama Papers verdict was highlighted was when the Sup­reme Court heard PML-N leader Hanif Abbasi’s petition in which he sought disqualification of Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf chairman Imran Khan and secretary general Jahangir Khan Tareen.
Mr Tareen was eventually disqualified by the apex court.
Advocate Ilyas argued that the case involved concealment of assets by Mr Ahmed who mentioned in his nomination papers for the 2013 general elections that he owned 983 kanals of land although he actually owned 1,081 kanals of land.
Similarly, he said, Mr Ahmed showed the purchase of one kanal of land in the Bahria Gold City for over Rs10 million when the booking price of the land was over Rs48m whereas the current market price of the same land was Rs60m.
The lawyer further said that Mr Ahmed had shown rent of his properties as his source of income in addition to Rs2.2 million profit from his bank accounts. But, he added, his bank statement reflected Rs5.3m from which Rs2.2m profit was not plausible.
He contended that the Representation of Peoples Act, 1976, obligated all intending candidates to disclose their entire assets.
He said the Supreme Court judgement in the Panama Papers case was the latest verdict over the concealment of assets in which Mr Ahmed was also one of the petitioners.
At this, Justice Saeed observed that the court was waiting for the mentioning of the Panama Papers case judgement.
Whether the concept of strict liability had been settled in the Panama Papers case judgement, wondered Justice Isa, saying would not the principles and guidelines laid down in the verdict also apply in other cases.
Justice Saeed, however, asked whether the respondents in the Panama Papers case had ever accepted their mistake.
If the rule of strict liability was to be followed then Mr Ahmed would also stand disqualified, observed Justice Isa, saying that the Panama Papers case judgement did not discuss or had any mention about accepting mistake or error.
“Are you saying that if Mr Ahmed committed a mistake, we should disqualify him following Panama verdict,” the court inquired.
Advocate Abdur Rashid Awan who represented Mr Ahmed, however, disputed that his client had ever concealed any assets, saying that it could be a miscalculation.
He said his client had mentioned all details of his properties, including his agriculture lands, in his nomination papers. But, he added, errors did take place while filing nomination papers.
The Panama Papers case judgement concerned concealment of assets, but in this case his client never concealed any assets, he claimed.
On this Justice Isa observed that the document he was mentioning was never referred to or discussed. He regretted that contesting elections in Pakistan was becoming tougher and difficult day by day and the most difficult aspect was filing of nomination papers.
The judge also referred to a recent statement in which US President Donald Trump had stated that he would never show his income tax returns.
Published in Dawn, March 21st, 2018


ADVERTISEMENT

 

[RajaRawal111]

Re: Justice Isa says SC's ruling on Panamagate based on iqama instead of London flats

جسٹس قاضی نے جو کچھ بھی کہا - اور جس مقصد سے بھی کہا - حقیقت میں یہ لوگ خود بھی پریشان ہیں کہ نواز کو ہم نے کیوں نکالا
یہ بلکل وہی کچھ ہو رہا ہے جیسے آج تک جوڈیشری اب اپنے جیوڈیشل مرڈر کے گناہ پر نادم ہے - اسی طرح ان میں مونہوں سے آھستہ آھستہ نکلنا شروع ہو ہی جاۓ گا کہ انہوں نے کیا کیا ہے

 

[mubarik Shah]

Re: Justice Isa says SC's ruling on Panamagate based on iqama instead of London flats