No Wonder US Forces in Morale Crisis. Muslim Slaughter Continues Under Trump.

Anuuge67

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
The U.S. military has been abused with official lies and debased to conduct heinous crimes against humanity. A coward army of Satan.
US killing hundreds of civilians in Raqqa. Syria to please it's master and owner Israhell.

No Wonder US Forces in Morale Crisis
By Finian Cunningham

August 24, 2017 "Information Clearing House" -The spate of deadly US Navy collisions is a symptom of a wider morale crisis among American military forces. Part of the reason is that American troops are simply exhausted from being abused by political masters in Washington.

“Over-stretch” is one way of putting it. American forces continue to be assigned in overseas wars and operations around the globe with no end in sight. And for no credible purpose either.This is not just a Navy problem. It affects all other branches of the US military: Army, Air Force, the Marines and National Guard.

1056636990.jpg


When President Donald Trump announced his brazen U-turn sending more American troops back to Afghanistan, the move had the backing of the Pentagon’s top brass. No doubt stock prices for US arms manufacturers spiked.

But what about ordinary American soldiers? One can imagine renewed Afghan missions are not welcome, given that the US has been fighting its longest war – 16 years – in that country known as the "Graveyard of Empires."


Any army is only as good as the morale among soldiers. Morale depends on having a respected leadership and a credible just cause. In America’s case, there are neither of these attributes, therefore it is no surprise that morale diminishes, as does fighting effectiveness. Look at the appalling record of US military defeats or failures.

The fatal collision of a US Navy guided-missile destroyer this week with an oil tanker near Singapore – in which 10 missing American crew are feared dead – was the fourth major accident involving the Pacific 7th Fleet this year alone. The admiral of the fleet has been dismissed from his command post.

Several military commentators are pointing to low morale among rank-and-file Navy members, from being forced to spend longer periods at sea on deployment, with little training and demanding work hours.

As a report in military.com noted: "Operational demand around the globe… means less time at home for rest and training; crews are therefore operating with greater stress and exhaustion levels."
The report quotes Congressman Rob Wittman, of the House Armed Services Committee, saying: "I believe that there are even more basic causes for this systematic operational failure of our fleet including a demanding operational tempo, limited training opportunities and inadequate funding to support basic needs."

But here’s the paramount issue that is not mentioned. Why are US forces being increasingly despatched to Asia-Pacific?

Of course, it is to do with US imperial objectives of confronting China over its alleged expanding influence in that region. The ramped-up tensions with North Korea are also connected to the US aim of curtailing China.

When we say the "US aim" we mean precisely the ruling class and their imperial designs. What ordinary Americans get out of this strategic "Asian Pivot" is far from certain. Combine dubious mission with dubious leadership, long months away from home under wearying conditions, and is it any wonder that morale of crew members sinks?

The problem is much bigger than the US Navy and the Asia-Pacific. The American military must be the most internally conflicted force there is. The surge in wars ever since the September 11 terror incidents in 2001 was supposed to be about "defeating terrorism."

All too often, however, that official purpose has been distorted to serve ulterior objectives, such as regime change. How must American troops, navy and air men feel when they realize that their own commanders and intelligence agencies are supporting the same terrorists that the rank-and-file soldiers are supposed to be combating?

American troops no doubt know what’s going down on the ground. They will know that the Pentagon and CIA are arming and training terrorist death squads in Syria, Iraq, and, yes, Afghanistan.

Russia’s foreign ministry reported this month that foreign jihadist fighters are being flown by “unidentified” helicopters to various parts of Afghanistan. Some Taliban units have been identified driving US Humvee military vehicles. This covert duplicity all sounds like a repeat of America’s dirty wars in Syria and Iraq, where thousands of American troops were killed or maimed for life.

Over the past century, American forces have been involved in dozens of wars around the world. A case can be made that the First and Second World Wars were a just cause for the Americans. But all the other conflicts have been simply wars of aggression, carried out for some ulterior nefarious purpose. The official pretexts for these wars are always shown eventually to be fraudulent, whether it was fighting Soviet expansionism as in Korea and Vietnam, or fighting terrorism as in Iraq and Afghanistan. Or, the biggest fraud of all, to protect human rights as in Libya and Syria.
The history of crimes and lies is catching up with American imperialism. Its never-ending need for wars around the world is no longer tenable. The US is not pursuing some noble crusade. It never has been. It is a warmongering state that is addicted to wars of conquest in order to satisfy the economic lust of its elites.

It’s easy for armchair generals like Donald Trump and his Joint Chiefs of Staff to threaten nuclear war against North Korea. But nobody of a sane mind could possibly accept this criminal recklessness.


In a recent media commentary, a former US nuclear missile launch officer, Bruce Blair, said that no-one among serving officers believes that Trump has any right to launch a pre-emptive strike on North Korea.

“Nuking another country just because it seeks to acquire nuclear weapons enjoys virtually zero support from US nuclear troops,” wrote the former missile launch officer.

The inference is that there is widespread distrust of the American leadership and its motives. That again leads back to the issue of morale crisis among America’s military forces, across all sectors.

A military force is only capable if it has the will to fight a clearly identified enemy, whom it views as a threat to their country and compatriots.

For decades the American military has been abused with official lies and debased to conduct heinous crimes against humanity. But increasingly it seems the only enemy the US armed forces are up against are the rulers in Washington, with their imperialist schemes of world domination.
More than 80 years ago, the most decorated American soldier, Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler (1881-1940), came to the stark conclusion that "war is a racket" – at least American wars are. Butler described his 34 years of service fighting wars in the Philippines, South America, the Caribbean, and China as being "a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism."

One might conjecture that this realization is dawning on more and more serving US personnel. Their operations, sacrifices and violence against others is not for any just cause. This realization inevitably leads to flagging morale among ordinary servicemen, whether they are riding in a Humvee in the Middle East, installing missile systems in NATO countries on Russia’s border, or sailing ships that threaten nuclear war with North Korea and China.

Sooner or later, the lousy paycheck and missing family at home no longer makes sense or morality. To hell with it, as Smedley Butler declared.

Source
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Anuuge67

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
The Media Swoons Over Trump: When He Embraces War

The Jewish Media Swoons Over Trump: When He Embraces War. Lust for dead Muslim blood never ends for America.

Demon cracy of America.


War is so ingrained into the US national fabric that the media class can only admire Trump when he promises a troop build-up with no end in sight

By Ross Barkan
August 25, 2017 "Information Clearing House" - On Monday night, Donald Trump spoke in front of the nation as a very serious man, reading off a teleprompter and assuming the steely gaze of TV presidents of yore. He uttered big words in measured tones and made vague pronouncements about a war in Afghanistan that promises to waste lives and money for years, if not decades, to come. A permanent conflict that is the actual Orwellian reality of America today.

No president, whether a constitutional law professor or a narcissistic reality show mogul, has the will to challenge a military-industrial complex far larger and more sinister than any British writer – or Dwight Eisenhower – dreamed of. So ingrained is war into the national fabric that our Washington media class can only think of pageantry when Trump delivers a speech about troop build-up with no end in sight.

Philip Rucker, the Washington bureau chief at the Washington Post, summed up the night as would any DC reporter grounded in political reporting’s worst traditions: “Tonight is a new President Trump: Acknowledging a flip-flop and talking about gravity of office, history & substance,” he tweeted last night.

Understandably, Trump seeming sober for a minute would trigger any observer to think this man, for a moment, was “new”. Understandably – as the 15,000 or so people who replied to Rucker’s tweet pointed out in one form or another – this is also absurd. Trump is Trump. He is not changing.

More important than the minimal substance of Rucker’s observation is why it was made at all. You have a president delivering a major address on troop deployments for the longest war in American history and reporters can only think about optics, not policy. The Twitter commentary treats Trump’s address as something like a beauty pageant. The public learns nothing.

For political reporters, the value of critiquing style instead of policy is in avoiding the nasty partisan fights that actually matter. Analyzing how something is said, rather than the meaning and impact of the words, is a supposedly objective act, allowing reporters to appear neutral.

Talk about elocution, and you’re fine. Talk about policy and you’re – gasp – biased.

War, though, triggers something else in the reporter class. As the disgraced Brian Williams, swooning over cruise missiles laying waste to a Syrian airfield, showed us a few months back, establishment journalists and talking heads haven’t met a war yet they couldn’t get behind – or at least fetishize. Washington journalists cheered on the Iraq war and reversed course when it was too late.

There is nothing quite as presidential, in Washington’s eyes, as a war. A war allows the most shallow, flailing and destructive presidencies to be redeemed in the eyes of the media, at least for a day. “War and killing are the US media’s pornography,” Glenn Greenwald of the Intercept tweeted.

‘Alt-right’ news outlet accuses president of following US generals’ wishes and ‘flip-flopping’ on campaign pledge with announcement of troop increase

The Donald Trump era has discombobulated the Washington establishment for many reasons, but perhaps most because it has shattered supposedly time-honored traditions. Trump usually doesn’t speak in platitudes or attend the White House Correspondents Dinner or comport himself like every other president. He doesn’t shoot the breeze with Colbert.

The bipartisan Washington consensus is that the Trump presidency is gross. But the policy, which is in fact retrograde and mostly gross, is secondary to how Trump acts. He is not presidential. This is the original sin.

What should terrify regular people (and even journalists) most is that Trump understands this too, as a media creature obsessed with TV punditry. He knows how he’s being reviewed. And he knows reporters and politicians in agenda-setting DC will extol him for finally getting tough, getting serious and being a president by blowing things up. He will be validated.

He will have his war.