Nawaz Sharif ki Indian Wafad se Mulaqat...Comments about Religion,Culture,and Two Nation Theory.

GraanG2

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Ok here is the clips of What Nawaz Sharif said while addressing the delegation from India.Decide for yourself...I think He was trying to be over friendly.Please avoid abusive language ,just analyze and let the members decide.Thanks.

 

hamza100

Councller (250+ posts)
what do you want from India?? wars??

want to hear the truth.the truth is we lost all war with india. we were not able to achieve our target(kashmir) in a single war.
instead we have lost half of our country .
 

fahid_asif

Senator (1k+ posts)
Cow-gomatha_vishnu.gif
 

ealtaf

Minister (2k+ posts)
PTIs Vice President for PP, ND & FA, Dr. Shireen Mazari Criticizes Nawaz Sharif's Recent Statements on India

PRESS RELEASE

Puppets on US strings
August 16, 2011



PTIs Vice President for Policy Planning, National Security and Foreign Affairs expressed amusement at the manner in which PML-N Chief, Mian Nawaz Sharif, was seeking to toe the US line on India and other issues thereby sending a confused message to the country and his own supporters.
PTI seeks peace in the neighbourhood but it realizes that a durable and just peace can only come when the very real political conflicts that exist between neighbours are resolved through dialogue based on principles of justice and fair play. PTI feels the Security Route to cooperation similar to the origins of the EU in the European Coal and Steel Community is the best way to dtente and lasting peace in the region since it focuses on conflict resolution not conflict management.
On the other hand, it is clear that as the PML-N continues to see its popularity falling rapidly, its leader has revealed a desperation in trying to gain US support as an alternative to the support of his own people.
Asif Zardari has openly and brazenly continued to follow US diktat on all foreign policy issues, including in the context of India one aspect of which has been the continuing delays on dealing with Indias increasing theft of Pakistani waters. It has also been in the Zardari regime that the highest number of US citizens have received Pakistans national state awards. Now, Nawaz Sharif has also decided to jump on the US bandwagon in the vain hope that that would bring him closer to power again in Pakistan. Most recently this was reflected in a speech he made at a SAFMA function in Lahore in the presence of visiting Indians.
Unfortunately for Nawaz, his efforts in this speech, to create a new perspective on India, and his strange response to a critique of it by a major media chief, have only resulted in absurdities and confusion as well as creating a total backtracking of some of Muslim League policies.
For instance, he actually thanked India for, as he put it, playing a major role in making Pakistan an atomic state. Given how earlier he had not only claimed sole credit for the decision for Pakistan to go nuclear what was Indias major role in assisting Pakistan? Did India provide technical assistance or major political and economic support to Pakistan? Certainly Indian tests in 1998 were a major incentive for Pakistan to also go overtly nuclear but the fact is that Pakistan already had a clandestine nuclear weapons capability much before 1998. He also expressed regret over both Pakistan and India taking the overt nuclear step in 1998 which again is in total contradiction to the Muslim League and Pakistans position supporting a nuclear capability for the country to counter the conventional strategic military imbalance and continuing external threats.
Even more bizarre are Sharifs claims that had he been allowed to complete the Motorway up to Tashkent and India had taken the same Motorway to Calcutta (Kolkata) trade and business would have been carried out and automatically the Jammu and Kashmir issue would have been resolved. Clearly, in his eagerness to appeal to the US, he has chosen to forget what the Kashmir dispute is all about. Factually, the Kashmir dispute is neither about trade or commerce nor about mere territory. It is about the right of the Kashmiri people to self-determination a principle enshrined in the UN Charter and reiterated in UN Security Council resolutions on Kashmir. Additionally, Pakistans legitimacy as a party to the dispute also rest on UNSC resolutions. To reduce resolution of the Dispute simply to increased trade and business is to insult the Kashmiri martyrs who have generation after generation laid down their lives for their right to self determination.
Nawaz Sharif seems to now also be confused over the culture and heritage of Pakistan as a whole since he declared at the SAFMA function that Pakistanis and Indians are members of the same society and share the same background, culture and even the dishes and vegetables. A little study of our history would have shown that Muslims and Hindus in India never lived as one society since the Hindu society was and continues to be caste ridden. Even more pertinent, while some segments of Punjab and Sindh may have common cultural and historic links with northern India, the people of southern Punjab, Balochistan and Khyber Pukhtunkhwa have greater cultural, historic and linguistic links with Iran and Afghanistan. Most critical, generations of Pakistanis born after 1947 do not have any cultural or societal links with India and the historic links are those of oppression, wars and breaking up of the country.
Finally, one wonders why Mr Sharif did not form a Kargil Commission when he was still in power? After all, he had ample opportunity when he went to Washington in July or when he came back and ordered the withdrawal. He was, as he liked to claim, a PM with a heavy mandate. After all, the Indians formed their Commission immediately. Sharifs present rantings against the military are sounding more like attempts to please the US rather than anything substantive.
Perhaps Mr Nawaz Sharif needs to revisit facts on some of the sensitive issues he has held forth on recently in a state of confused pandering to US diktat, which will neither result in regional stability nor will it allow those who are losing popular support to come to power.

Link: http://insaf.pk/News/tabid/60/artic...Nawaz-Sharifs-recent-statements-on-India.aspx
 

chegado

MPA (400+ posts)
Re: Nawaz Sharif at SAFMA: a bold stance

NS Zinabaad. Pakistan need you.
All these zardariiiiiiiiiiiessssssss, choudriiiiiiiiiiiiiiiesssssssssssss, altafffffffffffffffffffoooooooooooooooooooo and Imraaaaaaaaaaaaaaanoooooooooooooooooooooooo will loose against you InshaALLAH.
 

atensari

(50k+ posts) بابائے فورم
Re: Can we stop fanatics, somewhere: SAFMA

دوسروں کو انتہا پسند بنانے والے اپنے گریبان میں نہیں جھانکتے
 

Zaidi Qasim

Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
Re: Can we stop fanatics, somewhere: SAFMA

These out of space few so called philosophers in Pakistan tend to forgot that why people of Lal Masjid went out and brought this women who was busy running a brothel in the neighbourhood, in to the Lal masjid ? If the local administration could have paid attention to the petitions of the neighbours regarding this brothel house in the middle of their homes, No one would have taken the law in their own hands. When those who were implementing the laws, favours the rich and filthy in the society and allows the open brothels inside the neighbourhoods, the people will take the law in their own hands and will eradicate this filth from their neighbourhoods.
 

junaidasda

Voter (50+ posts)
Re: Nawaz Sharif at SAFMA: a bold stance

Imran only talking people will see he has no plan only blaming others thats his plan. He talk about change when you ask what change they reply everything. without any plan
 

janbazali

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Re: Nawaz Sharif at SAFMA: a bold stance

a bold stance or a bullshit talk
is bholo badshah ko koi smjhaye k aalo gosht say qoumo ki zindagia nhe chalti
we are at war with India since 1947, and we cant remain as good neighbours before the solution of Kashmir Issue
 

Aliansari

MPA (400+ posts)
Re: Nawaz Sharif at SAFMA: a bold stance

Alloo Ghusht Bachey ka Bold Stance [hilar][hilar][hilar]

SAFMA is anti Pakistan RAW funded Organization working against Pakistan.
 

rashiid

Politcal Worker (100+ posts)
You can piss off to endya if you love endya so much . go **** of leave my Pakistan alone.