Naeem ul Haq replies Hussain Nawaz legal challenge to Imran Khan

Talwar Gujjar

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Sahi kehta ha, London bahut dour ha aur jhoot ko kahein b sabit karna kaafi mushkil hauta ha. Is liey IK sahib sirf wahan bhonktay hein jahan manasab hau.
 

aneeskhan

Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
Pata Nahi Pakistan Key awam Inn Haram Khoron Ke Khilaf Kab Uthhey Gay
pakistans-new-army-chief-general-raheel-sharif-speaks-with-outgoing-picture-id452450167

raheel2_080715092940.jpg

images
 

Husaink

Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
Sahi kehta ha, London bahut dour ha aur jhoot ko kahein b sabit karna kaafi mushkil hauta ha. Is liey IK sahib sirf wahan bhonktay hein jahan manasab hau.

جھوٹ کے پاؤں نہیں ہوتے لندن گئے بغیرہی سب کچھ سامنے آئے گا
 

stranger

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
jis ke saath police ho kabhi oos ka jurm bhi sabit hota hai.... iss challenge ka matlab ke kutti chorran nal ralli hoi ae te umpire v apna e ae....



Tumhara shahar, tumhi muddai, tumhi Mumsif
Hamein yaqeen tha, hamara qasoor niklega
 

Porus

MPA (400+ posts)
لندن میں کیس کرنے کی نوبت تو اس صورت میں آتی اگر یہ کوئی قانونی مسئلہ ہوتا- یہ ایک سیاسی مسئلہ ہے لہٰذا حسین نواز کی طرف سے عدالت اور مقدموں کا ذکر یہاں بے معنی ہے
 

Will_Bite

Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
Sahi kehta ha, London bahut dour ha aur jhoot ko kahein b sabit karna kaafi mushkil hauta ha. Is liey IK sahib sirf wahan bhonktay hein jahan manasab hau.

Bhai genius........Properties are in London, but the accusation on Nawaz Sharif is NOT of ownership of those properties or companies. Accusation is that they took huge loans in the 90s which were written off...That money was then sent to UK through hundi. It has already been proven that the properties were bought in the 90s. Now the only thing remaining is to prove how the money was transferred.
State Bank can easily prove that by showing the presence (or absence) of authorized transactions. But they will never do that so long as PMLN is in power.

اگر نواز شریف میں تھوڑی سی بھی شرم اور عزت نفس ہوتی، تو اپنی بیٹی کا یوں تماشا بنتا دیکھ کر آگے آتا، اور اپنا جرم قبول کر لیتا. یا اگر مجرم نہیں ہے تو اپنے خرکاروں کو ٹاک شوز میں بھیجنے کی بجاے دستاویزی ثبوت فراہم کر دیتا اور اپنی بیٹی کی جان چھڑواتا
 

hassan.te

Minister (2k+ posts)
لندن میں کیس کرنے کی نوبت تو اس صورت میں آتی اگر یہ کوئی قانونی مسئلہ ہوتا- یہ ایک سیاسی مسئلہ ہے لہٰذا حسین نواز کی طرف سے عدالت اور مقدموں کا ذکر یہاں بے معنی ہے

1993 mai yeh 17 saal ka tha, itni baali si umar mai itnay baray baray kaam. janab yeh gunj braadraan nai apnay kalay dhan ko apnay bachun k naam se daain baain kya hai....yeh bilkul qanooni masla hai, magar chunkay hmaara qanoon sattu pee chuka hai, so us nai yahan par hasb-e-tawakku maazrat kar lii hai. yeh koi siasi bayan baazi nahi, factual documents hain, jin par in sapooliyun k apnay signatures hian. abhi thora intezaar aur karain, kuch aur naam aanay dain, phir aap daikhain k kaisay saray maamlay ko sub mil kar dbaataay hian.
 
Last edited:

Talwar Gujjar

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Bhai genius........Properties are in London, but the accusation on Nawaz Sharif is NOT of ownership of those properties or companies. Accusation is that they took huge loans in the 90s which were written off...That money was then sent to UK through hundi. It has already been proven that the properties were bought in the 90s. Now the only thing remaining is to prove how the money was transferred.
State Bank can easily prove that by showing the presence (or absence) of authorized transactions. But they will never do that so long as PMLN is in power.

اگر نواز شریف میں تھوڑی سی بھی شرم اور عزت نفس ہوتی، تو اپنی بیٹی کا یوں تماشا بنتا دیکھ کر آگے آتا، اور اپنا جرم قبول کر لیتا. یا اگر مجرم نہیں ہے تو اپنے خرکاروں کو ٹاک شوز میں بھیجنے کی بجاے دستاویزی ثبوت فراہم کر دیتا اور اپنی بیٹی کی جان چھڑواتا

Wah b wah, aap k paas tau sab saboot hein. Musharraf nalaeq na hauta tau 90s k qarzay aur propertion p uon Sharifs Jedda mein badshahoon k sath gulcharray na uratay. PTI k hukumat aaey tau Bharak Khan ko sab se pehlay xud bxud Jurnail ban'nay k ehlan kerna hau g. Yeh koi naee baat nahein, Saddam Hussain b fauj mein Jurnail bharti hua tha. Ab dekhein g yeh Sharifs bach k kahan jaatey hein. BTW, yeh adjournment motion k nusxa kis ne bataya baray khan ko.
 

Will_Bite

Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
Wah b wah, aap k paas tau sab saboot hein. Musharraf nalaeq na hauta tau 90s k qarzay aur propertion p uon Sharifs Jedda mein badshahoon k sath gulcharray na uratay. PTI k hukumat aaey tau Bharak Khan ko sab se pehlay xud bxud Jurnail ban'nay k ehlan kerna hau g. Yeh koi naee baat nahein, Saddam Hussain b fauj mein Jurnail bharti hua tha. Ab dekhein g yeh Sharifs bach k kahan jaatey hein. BTW, yeh adjournment motion k nusxa kis ne bataya baray khan ko.

Perhaps you are forgetting what happened during Musharraf era. Ishaq Dar gave a signed affidavit of money laundering and loan write offs. Sharifs paid a fine of $8 million in a plea bargain for one of the cases against him...and agreed to go into exile for 10 years in return for non prosecution on the other cases.
 

Talwar Gujjar

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Perhaps you are forgetting what happened during Musharraf era. Ishaq Dar gave a signed affidavit of money laundering and loan write offs. Sharifs paid a fine of $8 million in a plea bargain for one of the cases against him...and agreed to go into exile for 10 years in return for non prosecution on the other cases.

Bilkul g, yeh Musharraf ha h dau number, Sharifoon k saath mila hua tha. Bharak Khan ne usko referendum jita dia verna pata nahein kahan bartan manj raha hauta.
 

rtabasum2

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Bhai genius........Properties are in London, but the accusation on Nawaz Sharif is NOT of ownership of those properties or companies. Accusation is that they took huge loans in the 90s which were written off...That money was then sent to UK through hundi. It has already been proven that the properties were bought in the 90s. Now the only thing remaining is to prove how the money was transferred.
State Bank can easily prove that by showing the presence (or absence) of authorized transactions. But they will never do that so long as PMLN is in power.

اگر نواز شریف میں تھوڑی سی بھی شرم اور عزت نفس ہوتی، تو اپنی بیٹی کا یوں تماشا بنتا دیکھ کر آگے آتا، اور اپنا جرم قبول کر لیتا. یا اگر مجرم نہیں ہے تو اپنے خرکاروں کو ٹاک شوز میں بھیجنے کی بجاے دستاویزی ثبوت فراہم کر دیتا اور اپنی بیٹی کی جان چھڑواتا
LOL............. he gave one of his daughter to a Sheikh in lieu of exile in Jeddah.......they r habitual haramkhor
 

pablo

Banned
bhai genius........properties are in london, but the accusation on nawaz sharif is not of ownership of those properties or companies. Accusation is that they took huge loans in the 90s which were written off...that money was then sent to uk through hundi. It has already been proven that the properties were bought in the 90s. Now the only thing remaining is to prove how the money was transferred.
State bank can easily prove that by showing the presence (or absence) of authorized transactions. But they will never do that so long as pmln is in power.

اگر نواز شریف میں تھوڑی سی بھی شرم اور عزت نفس ہوتی، تو اپنی بیٹی کا یوں تماشا بنتا دیکھ کر آگے آتا، اور اپنا جرم قبول کر لیتا. یا اگر مجرم نہیں ہے تو اپنے خرکاروں کو ٹاک شوز میں بھیجنے کی بجاے دستاویزی ثبوت فراہم کر دیتا اور اپنی بیٹی کی جان چھڑواتا

lol............. He gave one of his daughter to a sheikh in lieu of exile in jeddah.......they r habitual haramkhor
imran ki beti bhi kaalo k rahm karm par hai aajkal .....
 

Back
Top