Na Bhai Na Bhaiya Sabse Bara Indian Rupia - Zara Hat Ke Team Analysis On Facebook Removing Or Disabl

[Neutral man]

The only reason its still an international issue is because you have occupied part of kashmir which belongs to hari singh's princely state and should be allowed to rejoin with India. We are not discussing valley or any part of Indian Kashmir with you. We are discussing POK with you.
Time to get real! The last people to be talking about brutal occupation and killing are pakistanis. You know the reason very well.
Now tell us when you are vacating POK.

Agar Pakistan ne Kashmir par qabza kia hua he... to Halat tmhare han k q kharab hen,,, Freedom wahn par log q mang rahe hen???
..
ab tm ek ghatya bat kaho gi,,,, k Pakistan karwa rha he...
..
or mera jawab hoga.. K ap thek keh rahi hen,,, wo protest krne wale Kashmiri cheekh cheekh kar keh rahe hen k "Wo Pakistani hen"
... or apko Thank You.. k ap manti ho k Wo Pakistani hen,,,
,...
phir tm kaho ge k ap batt ghuma rahe hen,,, ..
... Is trah misal pakki ho jaye gi...
"ULTA CHORR(india) kotwal se"

 

[chandbibi]

Kashmir me sab log isme nahi hai, some people are involved. Waise to balochistan me bhi hota hai na aur aap log kehte ho balochis don't want freedom, isme India ka hath hai. To aap kahe to sach aur ham kahe woh jhuth, acha ji.
Kashmir me election karwa ke ab to tum logo se aur apne pair pe kulhadi mar li hai.

Agar Pakistan ne Kashmir par qabza kia hua he... to Halat tmhare han k q kharab hen,,, Freedom wahn par log q mang rahe hen???
..
ab tm ek ghatya bat kaho gi,,,, k Pakistan karwa rha he...
..
or mera jawab hoga.. K ap thek keh rahi hen,,, wo protest krne wale Kashmiri cheekh cheekh kar keh rahe hen k "Wo Pakistani hen"
... or apko Thank You.. k ap manti ho k Wo Pakistani hen,,,
,...
phir tm kaho ge k ap batt ghuma rahe hen,,, ..
... Is trah misal pakki ho jaye gi...
"ULTA CHORR(india) kotwal se"

 

[miafridi]

I suggest that you get out of this victim mentality and look at the realities of today. During partition populations moved because places could not be moved. Hindus and Sikhs moved out of pakistan and muslims from UP, Bihar, Gujrat, Rajasthan and central India moved to Pakistan.
Why did they move then? You should have allowed Lahore and nankana sahib to be part of India. why the double standards always. You only care about muslims because you are selfish and have always been. Your two nation theory was a prime example of selfishness and it is based on bloodshed and communal violence. Given your propensity to violence you are now faced with terrorism and radicalization. Give some thought why there is so much violence in pakistan despite your existence being on common religion. Your policy is to get famous by troubling others and that is called infamy. You should ask the late maharaja hari singh why he acceded his princely state to India. Your fake history may be telling you some story of victimization but the truth is out there for every sane person to see. Why should the world want another failed state on its map?

Leave selfishness and being Mahatma aside. I have asked you a question to which I didn't get an answer. As for the migration, I would say the same thing that People migrated because states as a whole were considered for partition and not villages/towns or small units. That is why when an Area was considered to be Pakistan and another Area to be India, People knew their small village won't be made Pakistan/India and so they moved to the side which they wanted to be part of.. Now Answer my questions. The question of whether a lone muslim state was successful or failed was to be found later, but why India behaved with double standards towards different states during the partition? Answer that question please..

 

[Neutral man]

Kashmir me sab log isme nahi hai, some people are involved. Waise to balochistan me bhi hota hai na aur aap log kehte ho balochis don't want freedom, isme India ka hath hai. To aap kahe to sach aur ham kahe woh jhuth, acha ji.
Kashmir me election karwa ke ab to tum logo se aur apne pair pe kulhadi mar li hai.

Nahi nahi,, wo to bas thore se lakhon log Wani k funeral me the,,, protest krne walo par apne phool barsaye the,,,
Bachon ki ankhon me apne arq e gullab dala he...
50 Kashmiris k genocide ko to ap hi k log half century kehte...
.. Well,,,my mom was Baloch... In other words,,, Maa Baloch aa” Pakistan mani jaan aa”
My papa was Mohajirs and relatives friends also love Pakistan.
Or wese b mujhe ap se koi certificate to lena nahi he,,, wo wazahaten do...
..
Or apko CPEC digest nahi ho raha.... Ye b ek wazeh sach he,,,
Ap log itna kharcha karte ho Pakistan me proxy k liye... Or milta ap ko ghanta b nahi he...

Or Kashmir Azad he,,, Azad...!!! Samjhe,,,
Majority muslims he... Or unke Pakistanion k sath sprittualy rishta qayim he.. Tm log apne mulk ko sanbhalo mat bholo sirf 3 crore punjabies hen apke han or hmare han,,, 10 crore... Ab ayen bayen shayen chor do...dalits, maos, nexuls, ko sanbhalo,,, Long Live Pakistan

 

[chandbibi]

You are obfuscating the issue because you are not able to swallow the fact that your own idiocy led to kashmir acceding to India. Again you have repeated same idiocy by having elections in a held area you claim is "Azad".
Were you given Kashmir by anyone? Did the british give you kashmir? Did he king give you kashmir? You tried to illegally occupy it, and now you are facing the result of doing that. There are many muslim majority states in this world. Why don't you claim those as yours also? Kashmir ke ruler ne India ko accede kia hai, you are nobody to claim it. Selfish to aap log hao, hindus aur sikhs ke baare me aap logo ka rawaiya achi tarah se pata hai hame. India me aaj bhi 200 million muslims hai, aur aapne sare minorities to khatm kar diya.

Leave selfishness and being Mahatma aside. I have asked you a question to which I didn't get an answer. As for the migration, I would say the same thing that People migrated because states as a whole were considered for partition and not villages/towns or small units. That is why when an Area was considered to be Pakistan and another Area to be India, People knew their small village won't be made Pakistan/India and so they moved to the side which they wanted to be part of.. Now Answer my questions. The question of whether a lone muslim state was successful or failed was to be found later, but why India behaved with double standards towards different states during the partition? Answer that question please..

 

[chandbibi]

I also hope long live pakistan magar aisa bolne ka time aya hee ku.
Balochistan ke bare me mamla garm ho jayega to tum logo ke liye mushkil ho jayegi. Valley doesn't represent Kashmir alone, there are other parts of Kashmir which are also important.
CPEC se kya ho jayega? 2030 me gwadar will be operational. Itne saal kisne dekhe bhai. Moreover sirf port nahi kafhi sara infrastructure lagta hai which nobody gonna finance for you. Apne aap hee sab karna hai. Ab tak to tumlog ye nahi tay kar paye ki ye route jayega kaha se. Aur China ke khud ke kuch ports deserted pade hai without any activity. China beech me kanni kat lega aur tumhare hath me rah jayega adha adhura bana hue kuch roads. All the best to your for CPEC, its no use to anybody else.

QUOTE=Neutral man;4071255]Nahi nahi,, wo to bas thore se lakhon log Wani k funeral me the,,, protest krne walo par apne phool barsaye the,,,
Bachon ki ankhon me apne arq e gullab dala he...
50 Kashmiris k genocide ko to ap hi k log half century kehte...
.. Well,,,my mom was Baloch... In other words,,, Maa Baloch aa” Pakistan mani jaan aa”
My papa was Mohajirs and relatives friends also love Pakistan.
Or wese b mujhe ap se koi certificate to lena nahi he,,, wo wazahaten do...
..
Or apko CPEC digest nahi ho raha.... Ye b ek wazeh sach he,,,
Ap log itna kharcha karte ho Pakistan me proxy k liye... Or milta ap ko ghanta b nahi he...

Or Kashmir Azad he,,, Azad...!!! Samjhe,,,
Majority muslims he... Or unke Pakistanion k sath sprittualy rishta qayim he.. Tm log apne mulk ko sanbhalo mat bholo sirf 3 crore punjabies hen apke han or hmare han,,, 10 crore... Ab ayen bayen shayen chor do...dalits, maos, nexuls, ko sanbhalo,,, Long Live Pakistan[/QUOTE]

 

[miafridi]

You are obfuscating the issue because you are not able to swallow the fact that your own idiocy led to kashmir acceding to India. Again you have repeated same idiocy by having elections in a held area you claim is "Azad".
Were you given Kashmir by anyone? Did the british give you kashmir? Did he king give you kashmir? You tried to illegally occupy it, and now you are facing the result of doing that. There are many muslim majority states in this world. Why don't you claim those as yours also? Kashmir ke ruler ne India ko accede kia hai, you are nobody to claim it. Selfish to aap log hao, hindus aur sikhs ke baare me aap logo ka rawaiya achi tarah se pata hai hame. India me aaj bhi 200 million muslims hai, aur aapne sare minorities to khatm kar diya.

You are just avoiding to answer my question. I have already answered the questions you are bringing up again and again. Nobody gave Kashmir to Us but being muslim Majority and contagious border, it should have been part of Pakistan and knowing that Kashmir Prince was going to accede to India(which any country would see as a conspiracy) Pakistan tried to get its rightful Area by securing it through what it felt was right, Just like India Secured Hyderabad, Manipur, Junagarh, Bantva mandavana and other places through force against the will of the Ruler.

As for you question of including each and every muslim place on earth into Pakistan, I see this argument very idiotic, because we are talking about partition of Hindustan not about partition of the world.

Now I would wait for my answer, That if you believe that Kashmir should have been given to India just because its ruler decided its fate, then why India is right in Claiming Hyderabad, Manipur, Junagarh, Banta mandavana and other places against the will of the ruler? Didn't India do unprincipled and opposite thing? Doesn't it show India didn't have a vision but only selfishly wanted more for itself?

 

[desicad]

LOL you are still debating Kashmir with these people. The Kashmir issue has been discussed to death on this forum in all these years and the same thing starts all over again whenever there is some trouble in the valley.

They always keep on harping about the UN resolutions and the funny thing is they have not even read these non binding resolutions. They only know that Nehru promised plebiscite and that's it and want the plebiscite in J&K only not in POK. These resolutions anyway have lost much of the relevance after the '72 Shimla agreement.

Now coming to the arguments like muslim majority areas going to Pakistan, etc., the fact is that the rule applied only to the regions which were not part of any of the princely states. So the argument that J&K being muslim majority state should automatically go to Pakistan is totally wrong. The fate of those states was in the hands of their rulers.

Hari Singh wanted J&K to be independent of both India and Pakistan The argument that because Hari Singh was going to accede Kashmir to India, Pakistan attacked Kashmir to secure their rightful area which I already said earlier was not rightful (muslim majority regions of princely states). It was a fear based on assumption that India will capture Kashmir. Even if for the sake of the argument we assume it to be true, the fact is India was not the aggressor and sent in its army only after the Maharaja requested for help after his state was attacked. Pakistan initiated the Kashmir war and lost it. Had they managed to capture Srinagar before the Indian army reached there they would never have given the right of self determination to the people of the state what they want from India now.

Regarding Hyderabad and Junagarh India managed to successfully assimilate these princely states into the Union, same thing Pakistan tried with J&K , but could not succeed and that is the difference. They would not have bothered about the other states had they managed to forcibly occupy the valley, the reason they are crying now is only because Pakistan failed in Kashmir.

You are obfuscating the issue because you are not able to swallow the fact that your own idiocy led to kashmir acceding to India. Again you have repeated same idiocy by having elections in a held area you claim is "Azad".
Were you given Kashmir by anyone? Did the british give you kashmir? Did he king give you kashmir? You tried to illegally occupy it, and now you are facing the result of doing that. There are many muslim majority states in this world. Why don't you claim those as yours also? Kashmir ke ruler ne India ko accede kia hai, you are nobody to claim it. Selfish to aap log hao, hindus aur sikhs ke baare me aap logo ka rawaiya achi tarah se pata hai hame. India me aaj bhi 200 million muslims hai, aur aapne sare minorities to khatm kar diya.

 

[chandbibi]

Partition of Hindustan is settled long back. Now wake up and drink some hot coffee and live in 2016.

You are just avoiding to answer my question. I have already answered the questions you are bringing up again and again. Nobody gave Kashmir to Us but being muslim Majority and contagious border, it should have been part of Pakistan and knowing that Kashmir Prince was going to accede to India(which any country would see as a conspiracy) Pakistan tried to get its rightful Area by securing it through what it felt was right, Just like India Secured Hyderabad, Manipur, Junagarh, Bantva mandavana and other places through force against the will of the Ruler.

As for you question of including each and every muslim place on earth into Pakistan, I see this argument very idiotic, because we are talking about partition of Hindustan not about partition of the world.

Now I would wait for my answer, That if you believe that Kashmir should have been given to India just because its ruler decided its fate, then why India is right in Claiming Hyderabad, Manipur, Junagarh, Banta mandavana and other places against the will of the ruler? Didn't India do unprincipled and opposite thing? Doesn't it show India didn't have a vision but only selfishly wanted more for itself?

 

[miafridi]

Partition of Hindustan is settled long back. Now wake up and drink some hot coffee and live in 2016.

So you got no answer for the Injustice India did during the partition, and no answer for force indian occupation due to which India is still struggling to get hold of Kashmir despite using hundreds of thousands of troops.:)

 

[chandbibi]

India India India, After 70 years you are still not over your India obsession. Answer can be given to some logic, if you are going on with your band who can give you answer which satisfies you? We are in the drivers seat in kashmir and not going any where. :)

So you got no answer for the Injustice India did during the partition, and no answer for force indian occupation due to which India is still struggling to get hold of Kashmir despite using hundreds of thousands of troops.:)

 

[miafridi]

India India India, After 70 years you are still not over your India obsession. Answer can be given to some logic, if you are going on with your band who can give you answer which satisfies you? We are in the drivers seat in kashmir and not going any where. :)

I suppose in your dictionary Logic means something else. All your questions are answered so far but you haven't been able to answer mine.

yes, You are an unwanted driver that is being stoned by majority of Passengers because they want their own driver to drive them to their desired destination. Due to little defenses Every stone is not reaching you, but defenses never last forever and at some point you will have to address the issues of the passengers which you have forcefully occupied to save your own self.

 

[SAIT_]

The only reason its still an international issue is because you have occupied part of kashmir which belongs to hari singh's princely state and should be allowed to rejoin with India. We are not discussing valley or any part of Indian Kashmir with you. We are discussing POK with you.
Time to get real! The last people to be talking about brutal occupation and killing are pakistanis. You know the reason very well.
Now tell us when you are vacating POK.

Thanks for accepting Kashmir as an international issue. Countries may have different point of view on such issues, India may want to discuss only Azaad Kashmir and Pakistan may want to discuss Indian Occupied Kashmir only, these issues are resolved on a table or on an international forum. As a responsible nation Pakistan is ready to exercise both options.

Your admission that Kashmir is an international issue also proves my other point that Kashmir is not an internal matter of India and Pakistan has every right to raise an international issue on international forums.