foqia khan
MPA (400+ posts)
Security and stability are basic human needs, no less important than food and clothing. Without security and stability, a human being is not able to properly conduct his daily life, let alone come up with new ideas or contribute to the development of a high level of civilization.
The ultimate objective of Islamic law and its every legal injunction is to secure the welfare of humanity in this world and the next by establishing a righteous society. To build a civilization wherein every human being can live in a climate of peace, justice and security that allows a person to fulfill his every spiritual, intellectual, and material need and cultivate every aspect of his being.
Philosophy of punishment :
Sins or crimes can be divided into two categories. There are those things that remain an issue between a person and Almighty God, without affecting other human beings. Then there are those things that have a clear impact on other individuals, or on society as a whole that cannot be forgiven by repentance alone.
Object of Islamic Justice and Penal system :
Punishment has always played an integral part in the concept of justice. We all know or at least expect that if you do something wrong you are subject to punishment in some way or another. This is only fair. Humankind is charged with the responsibility for the choices they make. This is because they are created with the freedom of choice and granted the moral sense of right and wrong. Accordingly, one is not to be punished for the actions of others, or for acts done under duress or because of insanity. All people are equal and innocent until proven guilty: only then punishment is considered.
First of all, clearly it would be an injustice and lack of mercy to society as a whole if criminals were left alone to do as they wish. The rights of the criminals as human beings must of course be kept in mind, but cannot be allowed to outweigh the interests of the majority of people, or the well-being of the nation.
The object of all penal systems is to punish the offender and protect society from reoccurrence of the crime. Punishment serves as an educational purpose, as well as a form of crime deterrent and prevention and the system used must achieve this aim. However, if societies were to rely only upon their systems of punishment, they would fail miserably. An environment of healthy morality and faith must be the norm, where to do right is encouraged by all and to do wrong is discouraged and found difficult. In fact, encouraging right and forbidding wrong is a foremost duty in Islam.
Most penal systems in today's societies are based and dependent on the current social sentiment. In Islamic law, punishment is based upon divine revelation. There is no leeway for sentiment or possibility of change. These laws were established by the Creator who is Infinitely Wise and Merciful, who knows the true affairs of the world better than humankind. To seek justice without recourse to divine help would be tragic, as all other sources of knowledge and theory are flawed by human imperfection.
It is unfortunate that the people with the impact of media's propaganda on their minds criticise Shariah as a 'harsh and brutal' legal system,and have not been given an opportunity to understand the Islamic, Legal System.
For a moment, the Western sociologist forgets the heinous deeds of the criminals, their impact on the society and prescribes lighter punishments with all politeness which obviously evokes unnecessary sympathy, not for the victums but the for criminals ,For example, most of the European countries have abolished the death penalty for a murderer. Instead, he will be awarded life imprisonment and it has also been reduced to 15 to 20 years. There is also the facility of getting released on assurance.
Contrary to it, Islam imposes a rigid code of punishment for the microscopic minority of criminals and ensures an atmosphere of peace and security for the rest of the society. It is common knowledge that if crimes are not countered with serious punishments, then society will be in grave danger.
If this basic difference is kept in mind while striking a comparison between the two, the whole matter can be understood easily.
Crimes and punishments have their own long history behind them. From inhuman punishments of the monarchical past to the soft policy of the present-day democratic age, the punishments have been showing an upward trend. This is how the so-called humanising process has yielded results. The spurt in crimes following the economic boom in the West has brought its own strange interpretation from the Western sociologists, who, till only a few days back were ascribing unsatisfactory economic and social conditions to the increasing criminal mentality. The very sociologist now harps a different tune. He unabashedly calls the criminal mentality an essential element of human nature. This clear succumbing to the situation that has come as a result of the West's failure to dam the advancing wave of crimes.
More sorrowfully the West has committed the folly of taking a few retrograde steps, so to say, to improve the situation merely on the paper. This has been done in order to cut down the burden on national exchequer; which has been claiming an increasingly bigger slice of the financial cake for the maintenance of Police, Jails, and Courts. This foolish tampering with the situation has been affected mindless of the future repercussions by de-listing a few crimes.
West Legalise those things where their socail system n law fail :
For example, Norway and Sweden have stolen the march by legalising homosexuality and lesbianism. West Germany and almost all the Scandinavian countries have respectively lifted the ban on import and circulation of pornographic literature. England and Italy have allowed abortions (either for a mother or spinster). The fresh blow to the existing ethical values has come from Spain where, according to an approved bill of cabinet, adultery will no longer be a crime. Means where their system fails ,they legalise those things.In sharp contrast to this situation, the Islamic world presents a peaceful and much cleaner society. When we cast a glance at the Muslim countries where the Islamic punishment are awarded, the rate of crime has been minimised. This can wholly be attributed to the deterrent punishments of Islam. Turning a blind eye to these facts, the West is solely guided in its criticism by the superficial understanding of Islamic code.
The detailed study of the Shariah penal system reveals a few more salient features of it which are unique in their character and kind that marked difference from the European legal system.In order to avoid any discrimination between rich and poor,or on base of ties fostered by the kinship of blood, racial superiority, linguistic arrogance, and economic privileges,Shariah enjoins similar treatment to all in the event, of crimes of social and moral nature. Islam does not prescribe monetary fines or penalties. Had this been the case, the wealthy people would have easily got rid of punishments after paying the required sum as fine. It could have promoted criminal mentality among wealthy sections of the society. This equality before the law in Islam has deterred even the rich people to indulge in crimes. Western society today suffers from the same deficiency. The provisions of their legal system have given the rich society a license for crimes.
Jail punishment:
Another disapproved form of punishment is imprisonment. which is in fact a barbarity that man has invented for himself. It is therefore not expected from an Islamic government to include it in its penal code. No doubt, dark cells, underground dungeons and castle turrets have always existed in the known history of mankind. The Prophet Joseph’s tale of imprisonment has been narrated both in the Qur’an and in the Bible. The historian’s pen also bears witness to the tragic deaths of two great scholars of Islam, Imam Abu Hanifah (d:767 AD) and Imam Ibn Taymiyyah (d:1327 AD), both of whom died in captivity. But it must be borne in mind, that before the eighteenth century jails were only used as temporary lock ups. Criminals were usually detained in them during the course of their inquiry and investigation, or when they awaited the infliction of punishments like whipping, execution and other similar sentences. The concept of confining an offender behind bars for two, four or ten years as a penalty for a crime, has originated and gained acceptance only in the past few centuries. It is now a fairly common practice to punish most criminals in this manner.
The ultimate objective of Islamic law and its every legal injunction is to secure the welfare of humanity in this world and the next by establishing a righteous society. To build a civilization wherein every human being can live in a climate of peace, justice and security that allows a person to fulfill his every spiritual, intellectual, and material need and cultivate every aspect of his being.
Philosophy of punishment :
Sins or crimes can be divided into two categories. There are those things that remain an issue between a person and Almighty God, without affecting other human beings. Then there are those things that have a clear impact on other individuals, or on society as a whole that cannot be forgiven by repentance alone.
Object of Islamic Justice and Penal system :
Punishment has always played an integral part in the concept of justice. We all know or at least expect that if you do something wrong you are subject to punishment in some way or another. This is only fair. Humankind is charged with the responsibility for the choices they make. This is because they are created with the freedom of choice and granted the moral sense of right and wrong. Accordingly, one is not to be punished for the actions of others, or for acts done under duress or because of insanity. All people are equal and innocent until proven guilty: only then punishment is considered.
First of all, clearly it would be an injustice and lack of mercy to society as a whole if criminals were left alone to do as they wish. The rights of the criminals as human beings must of course be kept in mind, but cannot be allowed to outweigh the interests of the majority of people, or the well-being of the nation.
The object of all penal systems is to punish the offender and protect society from reoccurrence of the crime. Punishment serves as an educational purpose, as well as a form of crime deterrent and prevention and the system used must achieve this aim. However, if societies were to rely only upon their systems of punishment, they would fail miserably. An environment of healthy morality and faith must be the norm, where to do right is encouraged by all and to do wrong is discouraged and found difficult. In fact, encouraging right and forbidding wrong is a foremost duty in Islam.
Most penal systems in today's societies are based and dependent on the current social sentiment. In Islamic law, punishment is based upon divine revelation. There is no leeway for sentiment or possibility of change. These laws were established by the Creator who is Infinitely Wise and Merciful, who knows the true affairs of the world better than humankind. To seek justice without recourse to divine help would be tragic, as all other sources of knowledge and theory are flawed by human imperfection.
It is unfortunate that the people with the impact of media's propaganda on their minds criticise Shariah as a 'harsh and brutal' legal system,and have not been given an opportunity to understand the Islamic, Legal System.
For a moment, the Western sociologist forgets the heinous deeds of the criminals, their impact on the society and prescribes lighter punishments with all politeness which obviously evokes unnecessary sympathy, not for the victums but the for criminals ,For example, most of the European countries have abolished the death penalty for a murderer. Instead, he will be awarded life imprisonment and it has also been reduced to 15 to 20 years. There is also the facility of getting released on assurance.
Contrary to it, Islam imposes a rigid code of punishment for the microscopic minority of criminals and ensures an atmosphere of peace and security for the rest of the society. It is common knowledge that if crimes are not countered with serious punishments, then society will be in grave danger.
If this basic difference is kept in mind while striking a comparison between the two, the whole matter can be understood easily.
Crimes and punishments have their own long history behind them. From inhuman punishments of the monarchical past to the soft policy of the present-day democratic age, the punishments have been showing an upward trend. This is how the so-called humanising process has yielded results. The spurt in crimes following the economic boom in the West has brought its own strange interpretation from the Western sociologists, who, till only a few days back were ascribing unsatisfactory economic and social conditions to the increasing criminal mentality. The very sociologist now harps a different tune. He unabashedly calls the criminal mentality an essential element of human nature. This clear succumbing to the situation that has come as a result of the West's failure to dam the advancing wave of crimes.
More sorrowfully the West has committed the folly of taking a few retrograde steps, so to say, to improve the situation merely on the paper. This has been done in order to cut down the burden on national exchequer; which has been claiming an increasingly bigger slice of the financial cake for the maintenance of Police, Jails, and Courts. This foolish tampering with the situation has been affected mindless of the future repercussions by de-listing a few crimes.
West Legalise those things where their socail system n law fail :
For example, Norway and Sweden have stolen the march by legalising homosexuality and lesbianism. West Germany and almost all the Scandinavian countries have respectively lifted the ban on import and circulation of pornographic literature. England and Italy have allowed abortions (either for a mother or spinster). The fresh blow to the existing ethical values has come from Spain where, according to an approved bill of cabinet, adultery will no longer be a crime. Means where their system fails ,they legalise those things.In sharp contrast to this situation, the Islamic world presents a peaceful and much cleaner society. When we cast a glance at the Muslim countries where the Islamic punishment are awarded, the rate of crime has been minimised. This can wholly be attributed to the deterrent punishments of Islam. Turning a blind eye to these facts, the West is solely guided in its criticism by the superficial understanding of Islamic code.
The detailed study of the Shariah penal system reveals a few more salient features of it which are unique in their character and kind that marked difference from the European legal system.In order to avoid any discrimination between rich and poor,or on base of ties fostered by the kinship of blood, racial superiority, linguistic arrogance, and economic privileges,Shariah enjoins similar treatment to all in the event, of crimes of social and moral nature. Islam does not prescribe monetary fines or penalties. Had this been the case, the wealthy people would have easily got rid of punishments after paying the required sum as fine. It could have promoted criminal mentality among wealthy sections of the society. This equality before the law in Islam has deterred even the rich people to indulge in crimes. Western society today suffers from the same deficiency. The provisions of their legal system have given the rich society a license for crimes.
Jail punishment:
Another disapproved form of punishment is imprisonment. which is in fact a barbarity that man has invented for himself. It is therefore not expected from an Islamic government to include it in its penal code. No doubt, dark cells, underground dungeons and castle turrets have always existed in the known history of mankind. The Prophet Joseph’s tale of imprisonment has been narrated both in the Qur’an and in the Bible. The historian’s pen also bears witness to the tragic deaths of two great scholars of Islam, Imam Abu Hanifah (d:767 AD) and Imam Ibn Taymiyyah (d:1327 AD), both of whom died in captivity. But it must be borne in mind, that before the eighteenth century jails were only used as temporary lock ups. Criminals were usually detained in them during the course of their inquiry and investigation, or when they awaited the infliction of punishments like whipping, execution and other similar sentences. The concept of confining an offender behind bars for two, four or ten years as a penalty for a crime, has originated and gained acceptance only in the past few centuries. It is now a fairly common practice to punish most criminals in this manner.
Last edited: