khalilqureshi
Senator (1k+ posts)
Ishaq Dar, money trail and his affidavit.
In Panama case, Ishaq dar lawyers will argue that in money laundering case charges against him have been quashed and that case is open and shut case. This case cannot be opened and affidavit given cannot be discussed because as per Pakistani law once case is decided and if not challenged in higher court within specific time, it is considered open and shut case and cannot be reopened.
By saying, this Ishaq Dar lawyers and other PMLN members are giving wrong impression. I can cite at least one example and that example is none but our PMs Conviction in plane hijacking case by anti-terrorism court and subsequently disqualification by ECP. NS counsel successfully appealed case in Supreme Court and won on the ground on the ground that at that time courts were biased against NS and that they were not expecting justice from these courts.
Now precedent is there that open and shut case can be heard by epic court but what will be the argument. Argument is opposite. That time courts were biased against NS as dictator was in power, now NS is in power and NAB chairman who is appointed by himself ie PM cannot give verdict against his finance minister. Epic court itself has shown dissatisfaction over NAB, therefore Supreme Court which is to decide mother of all cases ie Panama corruption case can reopen and discuss affidavit which provide for all Panama case money transaction trail in conjunction with Money trail provided by FIA report submitted by then FIA ADG Rehman Malik. In Panama case, Ishaq dar lawyers will argue that in money laundering case charges against him have been quashed and that case is open and shut case. This case cannot be opened and affidavit given cannot be discussed because as per Pakistani law once case is decided and if not challenged in higher court within specific time, it is considered open and shut case and cannot be reopened.
By saying, this Ishaq Dar lawyers and other PMLN members are giving wrong impression. I can cite at least one example and that example is none but our PMs Conviction in plane hijacking case by anti-terrorism court and subsequently disqualification by ECP. NS counsel successfully appealed case in Supreme Court and won on the ground on the ground that at that time courts were biased against NS and that they were not expecting justice from these courts.
Now precedent is there that open and shut case can be heard by epic court but what will be the argument. Argument is opposite. That time courts were biased against NS as dictator was in power, now NS is in power and NAB chairman who is appointed by himself ie. PM cannot give verdict against his finance minister. Epic court itself has shown dissatisfaction over NAB, therefore Supreme Court which is to decide mother of all cases ie. Panama corruption case can reopen and discuss affidavit which provide for all Panama case money transaction trail in conjunction with Money trail provided by FIA report submitted by then FIA ADG Rehman Malik.
In Panama case, Ishaq dar lawyers will argue that in money laundering case charges against him have been quashed and that case is open and shut case. This case cannot be opened and affidavit given cannot be discussed because as per Pakistani law once case is decided and if not challenged in higher court within specific time, it is considered open and shut case and cannot be reopened.
By saying, this Ishaq Dar lawyers and other PMLN members are giving wrong impression. I can cite at least one example and that example is none but our PMs Conviction in plane hijacking case by anti-terrorism court and subsequently disqualification by ECP. NS counsel successfully appealed case in Supreme Court and won on the ground on the ground that at that time courts were biased against NS and that they were not expecting justice from these courts.
Now precedent is there that open and shut case can be heard by epic court but what will be the argument. Argument is opposite. That time courts were biased against NS as dictator was in power, now NS is in power and NAB chairman who is appointed by himself ie PM cannot give verdict against his finance minister. Epic court itself has shown dissatisfaction over NAB, therefore Supreme Court which is to decide mother of all cases ie Panama corruption case can reopen and discuss affidavit which provide for all Panama case money transaction trail in conjunction with Money trail provided by FIA report submitted by then FIA ADG Rehman Malik. In Panama case, Ishaq dar lawyers will argue that in money laundering case charges against him have been quashed and that case is open and shut case. This case cannot be opened and affidavit given cannot be discussed because as per Pakistani law once case is decided and if not challenged in higher court within specific time, it is considered open and shut case and cannot be reopened.
By saying, this Ishaq Dar lawyers and other PMLN members are giving wrong impression. I can cite at least one example and that example is none but our PMs Conviction in plane hijacking case by anti-terrorism court and subsequently disqualification by ECP. NS counsel successfully appealed case in Supreme Court and won on the ground on the ground that at that time courts were biased against NS and that they were not expecting justice from these courts.
Now precedent is there that open and shut case can be heard by epic court but what will be the argument. Argument is opposite. That time courts were biased against NS as dictator was in power, now NS is in power and NAB chairman who is appointed by himself ie. PM cannot give verdict against his finance minister. Epic court itself has shown dissatisfaction over NAB, therefore Supreme Court which is to decide mother of all cases ie. Panama corruption case can reopen and discuss affidavit which provide for all Panama case money transaction trail in conjunction with Money trail provided by FIA report submitted by then FIA ADG Rehman Malik.
- Featured Thumbs
- https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B204s0MIAAEr3_I.jpg
