Is Col. Qaddafi, a Dictator? NO!

abdulruff

Politcal Worker (100+ posts)
[FONT=&quot]Is Col. Qaddafi really a dictator?[/FONT]
-DR. ABDUL RUFF

----------



The unilateral USA is world's largest terrorist state threatening the world peace and the global dictator that promotes terrorism in order to purse its illegal objectives world wide - now is entirely focused on oil rich Mideast to effect puppet regimes changes to suit US agendas.



Generally speaking, the CIA has taken it its prerogative to certify whose regime has legitimacy and whose is not and also who is a dictator and who is a democrat. Those who promote US imperialism and capitalism are certified as democrats and who do not are automatically the dictators. Earlier, Iraqi President was known as a dictator and now Libyan leader Col. Qaddafi is being referred to as"dictator". The whole idea behind such "marking" is to make them unpopular by the corporate media so as to make it easier for the CIA henchmen to assassinate them. Saddam Hussein was brutally murdered by CIA and now Col. Qaddafi and his people are being unnecessarily terrorized by the CTO (composite terror organizations) like UNSC and NATO to enable the CIA to loot and ship Libyan energy resources to USA by employing the rebel terrorists in Libya as helpers.



USA and CIA are the global dictators forcing weak nations to surrender to American threats. Col. Qaddafi has never been a dictator as the CIA and its paid agents now claim. Even the CIA had not called Col. Qaddafi a dictator until the “uprising” it unleashed in sovereign Libya failed. When it became clear that Col. Qaddafi is not duty bound to flee his nation at the UNSC-NATO joint threat by following the Tunisia experiment or quit the presidency as Egyptian president Mubarak did, the CIA nuts changed their version by throwing away the “dictator” term. . .

USA has divided the world nations into two categories- pro-America and anti-America and deals with each nation according to this simple formula worked by the die-hard strategists.

Iraqi president Saddam Hussein was targeted by CIA-Pentagon not because he was against democracy - after all Hussein was brought to Vice-President's office by the CIA in the first place, to help USA advance its illegal energy objectives. But, chiefly because once assumed the presidency of Iraq, Hussein began a truly Arab, truly pro-Iraqi program of defending sovereignty of Iraq and resources of Arab world.

And this new Saddam policy was viewed as anti-American in essence. CIA-Pentagon quickly planned for a Iraqi attack of Kuwait so that NATO could, in alliance with Arab nations, attack Iraq and end Saddam rule and life. And that happened as quickly as CIA planned. Now USA rules Iraq.

It has been a policy of CIA to name any leader of the world who refuses to buy buy US gimmicks or refuses the IMF loans to cripple the economies. Col. Qaddafi of sovereign Libya refused to obey CIA orders and refused to take IMF loans with awful conditions attached.

American anger towards Saddam Hussein was hastened by Iraqi decision to prefer Euro to US dollar which Washington saw as a war on US dollar. In the absence of any support from Euro nations, Saddam Hussein was murdered in the most heinous manner by Bushom rouges.

Col. Qaddafi's decision to prefer Euro to US dollar coupled with his refusal to take IMF loans have angered the western terrocracies to invade sovereign Libya under the NATO banner led by the USA-UK terror twins. The terrorist rebels in Libya have been roped in the CIA scheme for looting Libyan oil resources and destabilizing the nation.

So, the CIA shamelessly quickly called President Qaddafi a dictator as a pure gimmick however, now it doe snot use the term for Col. Qaddafi , but those pro-US agents who just borrow CIA/Neocon lords' expressions freely continue use the term dictator to describe A people's leader like Col. Qaddafi.



It is yet another international shame. Qaddafi has provided more comforts and provisions to Libyans than any other ruler in the region or elsewhere.

Most of the Muslim rulers are corrupt and criminals, but Col. Qaddafi is a rare exception who, since he came to power through a real revolution, has done every thing possible for his people and for Libya. .

Col. Qaddafi is till reluctant to remove the CIA made rebel terrorists in Libya stock and barrel, despite all subversive terror strategies of rebel terrorists who are under control of notorious CIA-NATO networks now led by Obama. The anti-Islamic strategists, including in Muslim nations, who work for CIA claim that Obama is not a dictator but President Qaddafi is - how?

Who is a dictator and who is not? By simply calling an independent leader like Col. Qaddafi a dictator, the CIA and allies cannot make him one either. Now tell me, is Col. Qaddafi a dictator? If so, are a part of notorious US Neocon nuts?
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]--------
د. عبد راف
Dr. Abdul Ruff, Specialist on State Terrorism;Chancellor-Founder of Centor for International Affairs(CIA); Independent Columnist-Analyst;Chronicler of Foreign occupations& Freedom movements(Palestine,Kashmir, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Xinjiang, Chechnya, etc);Former university Teacher;
Global media today, even in Muslim nations, are controlled by anti-Islamic agencies.

Terrorism is caused by anti-Islamic forces. Fake democracies like USA and India have zero-tolerance to any criticism of their anti-Muslim and other aggressive practices.Anti-Muslimism and anti-Islamism are more dangerous than "terrorism".Anti-Islamic forces & terrorists are using criminal elements for terrorizing the world and they in disguise are harming genuine interests of ordinary Muslims. /http://abdulruff.wordpress///91-9961868309
 
Last edited:

abdulruff

Politcal Worker (100+ posts)
Is Col. Qaddafi, a Dictator?


[FONT=&quot]Is Col. Qaddafi, a Dictator?[/FONT]
-DR. ABDUL RUFF

----------
USA and CIA are the global dictators forcing weak nations to surrender to American threats. Col. Qaddafi has never been a dictator as the CIA and its paid agents now claim. Even the CIA had not called Col. Qaddafi a dictator until the uprising it unleashed in sovereign Libya failed. When it became clear that Col. Qaddafi is not duty bound to flee his nation at the UNSC-NATO joint threat by following the Tunisia experiment or quit the presidency as Egyptian president Mubarak did, the CIA nuts changed their version by throwing away the dictator term. . .

USA has divided the world nations into two categories- pro-America and anti-America and deals with each nation according to this simple formula worked by the die-hard strategists.

Iraqi president Saddam Hussein was targeted by CIA-Pentagon not because he was against democracy - after all Hussein was brought to Vice-President's office by the CIA in the first place, to help USA advance its illegal energy objectives. But, chiefly because once assumed the presidency of Iraq, Hussein began a truly Arab, truly pro-Iraqi program of defending sovereignty of Iraq and resources of Arab world.

And this new Saddam policy was viewed as anti-American in essence. CIA-Pentagon quickly planned for a Iraqi attack of Kuwait so that NATO could, in alliance with Arab nations, attack Iraq and end Saddam rule and life. And that happened as quickly as CIA planned. Now USA rules Iraq.

It has been a policy of CIA to name any leader of the world who refuses to buy buy US gimmicks or refuses the IMF loans to cripple the economies. Col. Qaddafi of sovereign Libya refused to obey CIA orders and refused to take IMF loans with awful conditions attached.

American anger towards Saddam Hussein was hastened by Iraqi decision to prefer Euro to US dollar which Washington saw as a war on US dollar. In the absence of any support from Euro nations, Saddam Hussein was murdered in the most heinous manner by Bushom rouges.

Col. Qaddafi's decision to prefer Euro to US dollar coupled with his refusal to take IMF loans have angered the western terrocracies to invade sovereign Libya under the NATO banner led by the USA-UK terror twins. The terrorist rebels in Libya have been roped in the CIA scheme for looting Libyan oil resources and destabilizing the nation.

So, the CIA shamelessly quickly called President Qaddafi a dictator as a pure gimmick however, now it doe snot use the term for Col. Qaddafi , but those pro-US agents who just borrow CIA/Neocon lords' expressions freely continue use the term dictator to describe A people's leader like Col. Qaddafi.



It is yet another international shame. Qaddafi has provided more comforts and provisions to Libyans than any other ruler in the region or elsewhere.

Most of the Muslim rulers are corrupt and criminals, but Col. Qaddafi is a rare exception who, since he came to power through a real revolution, has done every thing possible for his people and for Libya. .

Who is a dictator and who is not? By simply calling an independent leader like Col. Qaddafi a dictator, the CIA and allies cannot make one either. Now tell me, is Col. Qaddafi a dictator? If so, are a part of notorious US Neocon nuts?
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]--------
د. عبد راف
Dr. Abdul Ruff, Specialist on State Terrorism;Chancellor-Founder of Centor for International Affairs(CIA); Independent Columnist-Analyst;Chronicler of Foreign occupations& Freedom movements(Palestine,Kashmir, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Xinjiang, Chechnya, etc);Former university Teacher;
Global media today, even in Muslim nations, are controlled by anti-Islamic agencies.

Terrorism is caused by anti-Islamic forces. Fake democracies like USA and India have zero-tolerance to any criticism of their anti-Muslim and other aggressive practices.Anti-Muslimism and anti-Islamism are more dangerous than "terrorism".Anti-Islamic forces & terrorists are using criminal elements for terrorizing the world and they in disguise are harming genuine interests of ordinary Muslims. /http://abdulruff.wordpress
 

abdulruff

Politcal Worker (100+ posts)
[FONT=&quot]Is Col. Qaddafi really a dictator?[/FONT]
-DR. ABDUL RUFF

----------



The unilateral USA is world's largest terrorist state threatening the world peace and the global dictator that promotes terrorism in order to purse its illegal objectives world wide - now is entirely focused on oil rich Mideast to effect puppet regimes changes to suit US agendas.



Generally speaking, the CIA has taken it its prerogative to certify whose regime has legitimacy and whose is not and also who is a dictator and who is a democrat. Those who promote US imperialism and capitalism are certified as democrats and who do not are automatically the dictators. Earlier, Iraqi President was known as a dictator and now Libyan leader Col. Qaddafi is being referred to as"dictator". The whole idea behind such "marking" is to make them unpopular by the corporate media so as to make it easier for the CIA henchmen to assassinate them. Saddam Hussein was brutally murdered by CIA and now Col. Qaddafi and his people are being unnecessarily terrorized by the CTO (composite terror organizations) like UNSC and NATO to enable the CIA to loot and ship Libyan energy resources to USA by employing the rebel terrorists in Libya as helpers.



USA and CIA are the global dictators forcing weak nations to surrender to American threats. Col. Qaddafi has never been a dictator as the CIA and its paid agents now claim. Even the CIA had not called Col. Qaddafi a dictator until the “uprising” it unleashed in sovereign Libya failed. When it became clear that Col. Qaddafi is not duty bound to flee his nation at the UNSC-NATO joint threat by following the Tunisia experiment or quit the presidency as Egyptian president Mubarak did, the CIA nuts changed their version by throwing away the “dictator” term. . .

USA has divided the world nations into two categories- pro-America and anti-America and deals with each nation according to this simple formula worked by the die-hard strategists.

Iraqi president Saddam Hussein was targeted by CIA-Pentagon not because he was against democracy - after all Hussein was brought to Vice-President's office by the CIA in the first place, to help USA advance its illegal energy objectives. But, chiefly because once assumed the presidency of Iraq, Hussein began a truly Arab, truly pro-Iraqi program of defending sovereignty of Iraq and resources of Arab world.

And this new Saddam policy was viewed as anti-American in essence. CIA-Pentagon quickly planned for a Iraqi attack of Kuwait so that NATO could, in alliance with Arab nations, attack Iraq and end Saddam rule and life. And that happened as quickly as CIA planned. Now USA rules Iraq.

It has been a policy of CIA to name any leader of the world who refuses to buy buy US gimmicks or refuses the IMF loans to cripple the economies. Col. Qaddafi of sovereign Libya refused to obey CIA orders and refused to take IMF loans with awful conditions attached.

American anger towards Saddam Hussein was hastened by Iraqi decision to prefer Euro to US dollar which Washington saw as a war on US dollar. In the absence of any support from Euro nations, Saddam Hussein was murdered in the most heinous manner by Bushom rouges.

Col. Qaddafi's decision to prefer Euro to US dollar coupled with his refusal to take IMF loans have angered the western terrocracies to invade sovereign Libya under the NATO banner led by the USA-UK terror twins. The terrorist rebels in Libya have been roped in the CIA scheme for looting Libyan oil resources and destabilizing the nation.

So, the CIA shamelessly quickly called President Qaddafi a dictator as a pure gimmick however, now it doe snot use the term for Col. Qaddafi , but those pro-US agents who just borrow CIA/Neocon lords' expressions freely continue use the term dictator to describe A people's leader like Col. Qaddafi.



It is yet another international shame. Qaddafi has provided more comforts and provisions to Libyans than any other ruler in the region or elsewhere.

Most of the Muslim rulers are corrupt and criminals, but Col. Qaddafi is a rare exception who, since he came to power through a real revolution, has done every thing possible for his people and for Libya. .

Col. Qaddafi is till reluctant to remove the CIA made rebel terrorists in Libya stock and barrel, despite all subversive terror strategies of rebel terrorists who are under control of notorious CIA-NATO networks now led by Obama. The anti-Islamic strategists, including in Muslim nations, who work for CIA claim that Obama is not a dictator but President Qaddafi is - how?

Who is a dictator and who is not? By simply calling an independent leader like Col. Qaddafi a dictator, the CIA and allies cannot make him one either. Now tell me, is Col. Qaddafi a dictator? If so, are a part of notorious US Neocon nuts?
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]--------
د. عبد راف
Dr. Abdul Ruff, Specialist on State Terrorism;Chancellor-Founder of Centor for International Affairs(CIA); Independent Columnist-Analyst;Chronicler of Foreign occupations& Freedom movements(Palestine,Kashmir, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Xinjiang, Chechnya, etc);Former university Teacher;
Global media today, even in Muslim nations, are controlled by anti-Islamic agencies.

Terrorism is caused by anti-Islamic forces. Fake democracies like USA and India have zero-tolerance to any criticism of their anti-Muslim and other aggressive practices.Anti-Muslimism and anti-Islamism are more dangerous than "terrorism".Anti-Islamic forces & terrorists are using criminal elements for terrorizing the world and they in disguise are harming genuine interests of ordinary Muslims. /http://abdulruff.wordpress///91-9961868309