India's Defense Budget 3rd Largest Despite High Poverty

RiazHaq

Senator (1k+ posts)
In 2016, India surpassed Saudi Arabia and Russia to claim the 4th spot among the top five defense spenders globally for the first time, according to Jane's Defense. India, a country with 33% of the world's poor, is projected to surpass the United Kingdom to rise to the 3rd spot for defense spending by 2018.

[TABLE="class: tr-caption-container"]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]
Defense-Poverty%2BCharts.png
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: tr-caption, align: center"]Sources: FT/IHS Jane's (Defense Budgets) and World Bank (Poverty)[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

India's military spending has grown rapidly from $38.17 billion in 2010 to $50.7 billion in 2016. It is projected to rise further to $56.5 billion in 2018 and $64.07 billion in 2020, according to Jane's. For comparison, India's south Asian neighbor Pakistan's defense budget for 2016 is only $8 billion.

India's rapid rise to the list of world's top defense spenders stands in sharp contrast to the reality that it remains home to the world's largest population of poor, hungry and illiterate citizens. India also leads the world for lack of hygiene, disease burdens and open defecation.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi's rule has seen dramatic growth of wealth inequality in India. Top 1% of Indians now own 58.4% of India's wealth, up from 49% in 2014 when Mr. Modi was elected Prime Minister, according to Credit Suisse Global Wealth Report 2016.

Median wealth data compiled by Credit Suisse for 2016 shows that average Pakistani adult is 20% richer than an average Indian adult and the median wealth of a Pakistani adult is 120% higher than that of his or her Indian counterpart, according to Credit Suisse Wealth Report 2016. Average household wealth in Pakistan has grown 2.1% while it has declined 0.8% in India since the end of last year.

CS Wealth Report 2016 indicates that 50% of Pakistanis own more than $1,180 per adult which is 120% more than the $608 per adult owned by 50% of Indians.

The Credit-Suisse report says that the richest 1% of Indians own 58.4% of India's wealth, second only to Russia's at 74.5%. That makes India the 2nd biggest oligarchy in the world.

The CS wealth data, particularly the median wealth figures, clearly show that Pakistan has much lower levels of inequality than India.

Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (OPHI)'s MPI, multi-dimensional poverty index, brings together 10 indicators, with equal weighting for education, health and living standards. In South Asia region, Afghanistan has the highest level of destitution at 38%, according to OPHI's MPI index. This is followed by India at 28.5%. Bangladesh (17.2%) and Pakistan (20.7%) have much lower levels.

Rapid growth in India's defense expenditures conveys Prime Minister Modi's priorities. It seems that he believes the way for India to achieve great power status is through building a massive military regardless of the deep deprivations of the Indian people.

Mr. Modi's massive military buildup poses a serious threat to its neighbors, particularly Pakistan, a much smaller country which was invaded and split in two by the Indian military in 1971. The Indian invasion resulted in the creation of Bangladesh.

Source
 
Last edited by a moderator:

jimpack

Minister (2k+ posts)
Pakistanis - case of sour grapes - how much Pakistanis care about India??. Worry about your Panama PM.duffer
 

Humi

Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
Just 10% of Global military budget could end world's poverty but it is more important to line the pockets of predatory capitalists in the military industrial complex instead!
 

ramlal

Banned
Forget about Arms race India should worry about toilets ------ there biggest problem(bigsmile)(bigsmile)

tum india ke arms budget ki khabar parh lia karo , apne aap dar se nikal jayegi ,toilet jaane ki jarurat nahi hogi ........:lol::lol::lol:
diaper pahan kar khabar parhna .(bigsmile)
 
Last edited:

ramlal

Banned
Pakistanis - case of sour grapes - how much Pakistanis care about India??. Worry about your Panama PM.duffer


parosi bare beqar mil gaye hai yaar ,terrorist hai . upar se besharm bhi ,1948 ,65,71 , 85,98, me maar khai phir bhi baaz nahi aate .
 

ramlal

Banned
Just 10% of Global military budget could end world's poverty but it is more important to line the pockets of predatory capitalists in the military industrial complex instead!

pakistani elite class aur army apne hi mulk par qabza rakhne ke liye india ka dar dikha kar pakistan ki mazloom awam ko darata hai .
 

RiazHaq

Senator (1k+ posts)
India's Obsessive Spending on Defence by Phiroze Vasunia


http://www.ndtv.com/opinion/indias-obsessive-spending-on-defence-756591


Arms manufacturers of the world, rejoice. The government of India is your loyal friend. Not just this government, but the previous government too - the UPA as well as the NDA.


According to a study conducted by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, India topped the list of weapons importers and accounted for some 15 per cent of worldwide arms imports from 2010 to 2014. Five of the 10 biggest arms importers in this period were in Asia, including China (5%), Pakistan (4%), South Korea 3%), and Singapore (3%). Imports are only part of the picture of the global arms industry, of course, and the countries that had the highest levels of military expenditure in 2014 were the USA, China, and Russia. India was placed seventh on that list, with spending at $50 billion or 2.4 per cent of GDP, an increase of 39% between 2005 and 2014.


Signs of the government's thirst for arms acquisitions were evident when Narendra Modi declared during his visit to France that India would purchase a number of Rafaele jets for roughly $4.3 billion. On the heels of that development came the disclosure that the US Secretary of Defence, Ashton Carter, would be flying in to New Delhi in May to close the sale of Apache and Chinook helicopters, worth some $2.5 billion. The figures are staggering, though not by the standards of military expenditure, and there will be other such announcements in the months and years ahead since India cannot manufacture the weapons that its leaders insist upon.
 

fannekhan

Banned
India's Obsessive Spending on Defence by Phiroze Vasunia


http://www.ndtv.com/opinion/indias-obsessive-spending-on-defence-756591


Arms manufacturers of the world, rejoice. The government of India is your loyal friend. Not just this government, but the previous government too - the UPA as well as the NDA.


According to a study conducted by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, India topped the list of weapons importers and accounted for some 15 per cent of worldwide arms imports from 2010 to 2014. Five of the 10 biggest arms importers in this period were in Asia, including China (5%), Pakistan (4%), South Korea 3%), and Singapore (3%). Imports are only part of the picture of the global arms industry, of course, and the countries that had the highest levels of military expenditure in 2014 were the USA, China, and Russia. India was placed seventh on that list, with spending at $50 billion or 2.4 per cent of GDP, an increase of 39% between 2005 and 2014.


Signs of the government's thirst for arms acquisitions were evident when Narendra Modi declared during his visit to France that India would purchase a number of Rafaele jets for roughly $4.3 billion. On the heels of that development came the disclosure that the US Secretary of Defence, Ashton Carter, would be flying in to New Delhi in May to close the sale of Apache and Chinook helicopters, worth some $2.5 billion. The figures are staggering, though not by the standards of military expenditure, and there will be other such announcements in the months and years ahead since India cannot manufacture the weapons that its leaders insist upon.

this is all because of pakistan .
 

RiazHaq

Senator (1k+ posts)
Myth of #India as an Upcoming Asian #Economic Powerhouse. Rising #Poverty and Social Inequality. #Modi https://shar.es/18TzGH via @grtvnews

India is no doubt one of the biggest democracy in the world; because it has the highest population, Simple! (China highly populist, and officially “communist”). India is the second biggest nation in the world in terms of population and seventh largest in terms of area. According to the IMF as of 2015, the Indian economically nominally worth US$ 2.182 trillion, it, it’s the eleventh largest economy in terms of market exchange rates at US$ 8.027 trillion, third largest by PPP, with an annual GDP growth of last decade’s 5.8%.[1]

These numbers in retrospect are nonsense which feed the illusion to the general public so they can keep on living like they are in a hope that their life will get better.

These numbers do not represent the true picture of the country, not only India`s but any country. Like GDP can be a good indicator, but the real measure is GDP per capita. Which measures how a single person achieves the share of income among its citizens. When it comes to India the GDP is $2.182 trillion, but per capita income is only $1581 which is not much higher than Bangladesh`s $1086 and Pakistan’s $1316 per capita, but less among many African countries, like Nigeria $3203, South Africa $6,482, Zambia $1721, Sudan $1875, Namibia $5408, Ghana $1441, Djibouti $1813, Botswana $7123 and many more to mention here.[2] In fact, India is like “ticking time bomb” by 2026 the world population will be 1.5 billion largest in the world and the economy is not growing enough to meet the demands to create 20 million jobs per year.[3]

Yes, I know India is part of BRICS and they have announced in creating their own kind of bank but then what? India still owes money to the IMF; their public debt to GDP is nearly 70%,[4] Likewise, India is worst in terms of BRIC countries when it comes to GDP per capita, human development, education, poverty and so forth. India is lagging behind in BRIC countries. And Yes, then there is IT, the huge investments in India by the foreign companies just because those corporation can have cheap labor rather than paying their people in home countries with high wages. The beauty of globalization which no body mentions and no one talks all they care to show people the random numbers and apathy of people to consent without barely eliciting a yawn.

One of the main hurdles in the progress of India is poverty, poverty which should have been brought under control, but in India it is more or less same ratios of poverty post-independence.


[5]

The figure shows the total population every decade with poverty in percentage and how much the poverty has declined in India, the percentage may have decreased, but the total number of people living under the poverty line has been more or less same.

To combat poverty the country introduced anti-poverty policies, to help people living under the poverty line but according to World Bank report in some states more than 50% were misclassified as poor in other words they were not poor but reaped full benefits from these polices, but still by no means can these policies achieve their true objective, even without corruption free. How anti-poverty policy can and will work which make the poor`s dependents on government`s mercy rather than concentrating on human development by educating poor people, training and developing them so they can take care of themselves, the government chose spoon feeding. Human development is not alien Jerry Sternin owner of an NGO based in the United States helped Vietnam reduce malnourishment in 1990s without bringing a single dollar in the country, his work was finished in 6 months or so. Seeing good things in anti-poverty policy is like a finding a needle in a needle box with a needle.



The figure shows two very important things how India fare among BRIC countries and Second the working poor in India out of Total Employed working in India. Many poor people are not those who don’t have job, in fact some poor are with jobs but their wages are low compared to International standards and it becomes difficult for them to increase their living standards.

The mistake which people generally make is when they start comparing India with Pakistan or Bangladesh, this is incorrect for many reasons, India is an enormous big country, its market share, volume is big, its population is big it should be compared more with China. China went in more difficult level in combating poverty than India, but being a communist, it has reduced poverty effectively. It’s also true that in China the gap between Rich and Poor is widening but better to have that gap rather than letting your people live in poverty.



Since 1980 China has significantly brought people out of poverty where India has failed to achieve substantial reduction

In retrospect, not in even the next two decades, India can reduce poverty, for many reasons; first, the policies they have introduced which I have discussed earlier are still in practice. Second, the focus of these policies as I have mentioned earlier is not sincere and not focused on human development; the nuisance still and will continue. Third, even they all of a sudden change the policy, let’s say tomorrow and bring fair policy with no corruption; even then it will take decades to achieve and reduce levels of impoverishment. This melancholy reality gives the notion of hubris and musing thinking that prevails in the country which is heedless in their direction unfortunately.


 

RiazHaq

Senator (1k+ posts)
Just 10% of Global military budget could end world's poverty but it is more important to line the pockets of predatory capitalists in the military industrial complex instead!

Lack of toilets contributing to rise of #rape in #India – University of Michigan Study. , #opendefecation http://www.rt.com/news/370425-india-toilets-women-rape/#.WFTPBWX7tQ4.twitter

Women in India who don’t have adequate access to sanitation facilities and are forced to openly defecate are more likely to experience sexual violence, according to a new study.
Approva Jadhav, a researcher from the University of Michigan, said that “open defecation places women at uniquely higher risk of type of sexual violence: non-partner” in the co-authored report.

In their findings, researchers said it was twice as likely for women without access to “household toilets” to face sexual violence than women who do have such access, suggesting that improvement of infrastructure and access to toilets would provide a safer environment for women.

“Women who use open defecation sites such as open fields or the side of a railway track are twice as likely to get raped when compared with women using a home toilet,” the study stated.

“Our findings provide further rationale for NGO’s and the Indian government to expand sanitation programs, and raise new questions about the potentially protective role of sanitation facilities in other contexts beyond India,” the research found.

Almost half of India’s population do not have access to basic sanitation and have to defecate in public and women appear to be affected the most.

“This is an urgent need that cannot be ignored anymore,” Ms Jadhav, lead author of the report, told NDTV. “We need more than anecdotes to bring a policy change.”


By analyzing data from the Indian National Family Health Survey along with an overall representative sample of 75,000 women who answered questions on accessibility to toilets in their homes and experiences of various types of violence, the researchers found that previous sanitation studies did not examine the synonymous link between the two.

The issue of India’s sanitation crisis being linked to sexual violence came to light in 2014 when two teenage girls were raped and hanged in Uttar Pradesh while they were making their way to fields to defecate.

In the slums of Delhi, where communities often have to share public toilets, girls under the age of 10 have been found to be at risk of “being raped while on their way to use a public toilet,” according to a BBC report, which also states that around 300 million women and girls in the country defecate in the open.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5100257/
 

tomcat

Banned
Lack of toilets contributing to rise of #rape in #India University of Michigan Study. , #opendefecation http://www.rt.com/news/370425-india-toilets-women-rape/#.WFTPBWX7tQ4.twitter

Women in India who dont have adequate access to sanitation facilities and are forced to openly defecate are more likely to experience sexual violence, according to a new study.
Approva Jadhav, a researcher from the University of Michigan, said that open defecation places women at uniquely higher risk of type of sexual violence: non-partner in the co-authored report.

In their findings, researchers said it was twice as likely for women without access to household toilets to face sexual violence than women who do have such access, suggesting that improvement of infrastructure and access to toilets would provide a safer environment for women.

Women who use open defecation sites such as open fields or the side of a railway track are twice as likely to get raped when compared with women using a home toilet, the study stated.

Our findings provide further rationale for NGOs and the Indian government to expand sanitation programs, and raise new questions about the potentially protective role of sanitation facilities in other contexts beyond India, the research found.

Almost half of Indias population do not have access to basic sanitation and have to defecate in public and women appear to be affected the most.

This is an urgent need that cannot be ignored anymore, Ms Jadhav, lead author of the report, told NDTV. We need more than anecdotes to bring a policy change.


By analyzing data from the Indian National Family Health Survey along with an overall representative sample of 75,000 women who answered questions on accessibility to toilets in their homes and experiences of various types of violence, the researchers found that previous sanitation studies did not examine the synonymous link between the two.

The issue of Indias sanitation crisis being linked to sexual violence came to light in 2014 when two teenage girls were raped and hanged in Uttar Pradesh while they were making their way to fields to defecate.

In the slums of Delhi, where communities often have to share public toilets, girls under the age of 10 have been found to be at risk of being raped while on their way to use a public toilet, according to a BBC report, which also states that around 300 million women and girls in the country defecate in the open.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5100257/

janab i wala ,ankhen kholiye ,america me rah kar bhi aap america ki samajh se door hi rahe ,
shabbas hai aisi soch par ,dunia dekh li phir bhi kuch nahi seekha ,wohi purani pakistani soch .

rape , child abuse , gays , bachabazi ,drug addiction , honour killing yeh sari jahalat aap jahan chhor kar gaye the pakistan me us se bhi jyada jahalat barh gayi hai .
law and order , corruption ,rishwatkhori ,crime ,smuggling , human trafficking ,and terrorism me dunia me no.1 ho gaye hai .
dusaro se kya compare karna ?
a perfect example of pathetic and severe case of inferiority complex.

illegal pakistani immigrants aur asylum seekers se dunia pareshan hai , kuwait has fully stopped pakistanis .



Abandoned by world, low-grade petrol runs Pakistan - The Express ...

tribune.com.pk Pakistan


Sep 13, 2016 - Use of low-octane petrol leads to engine knocking. While fuel pumps across Pakistancontinue to sell RON 87 petrol as the standard, the world ...

Pakistan's average 3G speed one of lowest in world at 3.33Mbps - Dawn

www.dawn.com/news/1278816

Aug 20, 2016 - A global report published by OpenSignal has stated Pakistan as having an overall average connectivity of 3G and 4G networks at 3.33Mbps, ...



Unwanted asylum seekers: Sri Lanka court gives green light to deport ...

tribune.com.pk Pakistan
Sep 2, 2014 - COLOMBO: A Sri Lankan court on Monday gave permission to authorities to send back scores of Pakistani asylum seekers, after the ...


Deportation Failed: Pakistan Sends Migrants Back To Europe - Breitbart

www.breitbart.com/london/.../pakistan-refuses-take-back-europes-rejected-migrants/
Dec 4, 2015 - The move follows an accusation by the Pakistan government last month that European states were deporting unwanted migrants to Pakistan ...


Australia offers Pakistani asylum-seekers $3k to return home: report ...
www.dawn.com/news/1114234
Jun 21, 2014 - SYDNEY: Australia is offering Pakistani asylum-seekers in its Pacific ..... Two things emerge: 1)Pakistanis are unwanted and 2) We are the ...

 
Last edited:

Back
Top