Indian Occupation Of Junagadh: Policy Options For Pakistan

nepali.nationalist

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Indian Occupation Of Junagadh: Policy Options For Pakistan

indian-occupation-of-junagadh-seminar.jpg


Date: November 15, 2016Author: Believer

Pakistan should raise the case of Junagadh at international forums again.

Indian Occupation on Junagadh is illegal.

Junagadhs Instrument of Accession to Pakistan is an international binding.

Young generation should be made aware of the Junagadh issue.

Junagadh state should be shown in every map of Pakistan.

indian-occupation-of-junagadh-audience.jpg


According to the instrument of accession, Junagadh is legal part of Pakistan which is under illegal Indian occupation. Pakistan should revive the case at international forums. The Indian occupation on Junagadh is illegal and violation of instrument of accession that Nawab of Junagadh signed with Pakistan. Speakers at the seminar stressed that Pakistan should fight the case of Junagadh on international forums. The event was organized by MUSLIM Institute and Centre for International Peace and Stability, NUST titled Indian Occupation on Junagadh: Policy Options for Pakistan.

Prominent among those who addressed the event included the Nawab of Junagadh State H. E. Nawab Jahangir Khanji, Vice Chancellor of Air University Air Vice Marshal (R) Faaiz Amir, Chairman MUSLIM Institute Sahibzada Sultan Ahmad Ali, Associate Dean CIPCS NUST Dr. Tughral Yamin, Expert on International Law Mr. Ahmer Bilal Soofi, Assistant Professor Dept. of History QAU Dr. Farooq Ahmad Dar, Lt. Gen. (R) Saeed Zafar, Professor of Preston University Dr. Z A Qureshi and Research Associate of Research Society of International Law Mr. Abeer Mustafa.

The speakers in the seminar said that in case of Junagadh, young generation should be made aware of this important cause. Nawab of Junagadh Nawab Mahabat Khanji decided to accede to Pakistan because he was very impressed with the policies of Quaid-e-Azam. On September 15, 1947 Nawab of Junagadh opted to accede to Pakistan and signed the letter of accession. Defence, communication and foreign affairs were under responsibility of government of Pakistan.

Junagadh became first such state to accede to Pakistan. The decision of Nawab was in consultation with the state council which included Hindu as well as Muslim members. India didnt accept this decision and economically sieged the country and violated human rights. On November 9, 1947 India occupied the Junagadh state by military offensive. According to May 12, 1946 declaration, accession of Junagadh is legal. Quaid-e-Azam made it clear that Indian occupation on Junagadh was unacceptable and thus Pakistan took the case to United Nations where it is still unresolved.


According to June 3 Plan, Quaid-e-Azam gave the option wholeheartedly to all the princely states whether to join Pakistan or Indian or to remain independent. He was very clear in his policy that the states which will accede to Pakistan, those will be given choice to decide about terms of accession and the method of governance. Perhaps this was the reason that many princely states were willing to accede to Pakistan. In contrast, Congress and Nehru opposed the independence of states.

Gandhi even said that independence by any state will be declared as act of war. On that occasion, Lord Mountbatten sided with India instead of remaining unbiased and especially he forced many states to join India. Kashmir, Junagadh and Hyderabad are those big examples where India broke the Independence act and international law and occupied the states. Nehru and Patel tried hard to prevent the states from opting to accede to Pakistan. British government also didnt take any action against those illegal actions of India. India is even today carrying on the same aggressive policy and is involved in destructive activities in the region including spreading of terrorism.

Speakers further said that the instrument of accession has the status of treaty in accordance with international law. Pakistan can approach Secretary General of United Nations to take action under article 99 and the instrument of accession can be presented to him as a legal document. Pakistan should include Junagadh state in its every map. Pakistan should build itself economically stronger so that it can force international community to take the actions against Indian occupation. Young generation should raise the issue on social media as well.

Diplomats, academicians, politicians, journalists, researchers and people from different walks of life participated in the seminar.

Source
 
Last edited by a moderator:

UNITED STATES OF KASHMIR

Voter (50+ posts)
Pakistan needs to speed up efforts for its state in junagadh...:biggthumpup:

sab kuchh karo , apni auqat se jyada karo ,

azad jammu and kashmir zindabad
lekin hamare mulk kashmir par jo tum logo ne nazayaz qabza kar rakha hai use khali kar do , nahi to hume tum logo ke sath nahi rahna ,
tum log paidayashi terrorist ho . hum log secular democratic qaum hai ,dahashatgrdi hume pasand nahi.



 

ramlal

Banned
Pakistan needs to speed up efforts for its state in junagadh...:biggthumpup:

Junagardh, hahahaha Pakistani joke


le lo bhai jaan junagarh , koi jhola le aye ho ? usi me rakh lo .


:lol:
chup raho yar inse darna chahiye . , inke pass nuclear bomb hai .:lol::lol::lol:

inke pass tactical nuke hai , jisko chalane par sirf indian mar jaate hai , pakistani ko kuchh nahi hota .

bhai jaan jao le lo junagarh ......:lol::lol:


giphy.gif

 
Last edited:

nepali.nationalist

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
adha to lay liya hai baqi adha bhi lay laingay :biggthumpup: ..tumein haath jore ker kashmir dena hai ...jub chahain gay lay laingay

[h=2]"Go Back Indian Dog" shout Kashmiris against Indian Army : Indian Media[/h]
Indian Army in Kashmir fighting people shouting go back Indian dogs slogan

army1-16-1460746931-12-1468278980.jpg


Anantnag (Jammu and Kashmir), July 12: "Go back Indian dogs, Go back Indian dogs... In front of our establishment people are shouting," says Raghu G C, Engineer, Boarder Road Organisation who was a month back deputed by the Indian Army to currently conflict-ridden Jammu and Kashmir. The saffron party (BJP) that stepped into the legislative assembly seems forgotten the long history of people-army conflict in the region. Or thought of found a way of dealing the problem to make separatists declare "we are integral part of India." As assembly elections in the valley signalled the 'Modi wave'. Two houses of Kashmiri Pundits have been torched. And this is after eight years. In no clashes this was happened after 2008. The encounter of Hizbul Mujahideen commander, Burhan Wani who is social media savvy and poster boy of Kashmir broke this brief eight years of history.

Both the BJP and the PDP (People' democratic Party) are in a worry on taking control of situation as civilians have took to streets fighting the Indian Army. Indefinite curfew has been imposed in many parts of the Kashmir. After 36 hours, BSNL network is functioning in the valley. After the government found there was no let-up in the spiralling of the violence, mobile services were stopped. However after 36 hours of the stoppage BSNL is operating for communication. The OneIndia spoke to a BSLN user, Raghu and Engineer working for Indian Army, to put out the perceptive of army man before the readers outside Jammu and Kashmir.

From past 36 hours he remained out of touch with his family. "People are staging demonstration infront of our army quarters," said Raghu who is seeing this phenomenan with his new eye as he started working in the state recently. Raghu, whose residing establishment is just 4 KMs away from popular Jawaharlal tunnel; wondered why Kashmiri people are shouting a slogan 'go back Indian dogs' and treating Indian army men as foreigners. He ironically laughed before making a statement "protesters consider Indian army as outsiders and not one among them." Raghu further speaking said Wani was killed at Bumdoora village of Kokernag which is also close to his resting base. "It is said that while Wani was returning from a mosque offering prayers he was killed.

His visit to the mosque was the information gathered by Intelligence Bureau, is what believed among the mass here," Raghu added. Brother of Wani too was killed in a same manner by the army while Wani was 15 and this led him to join Hizbul Mujahideen. When asked has army was not meticulous in dealing with Wani's case and caused violence, Raghu opined "you talk about civilians killed by the paramilitary but why there is no debate on duty men killed by separatists?" Raghu questioned. OneIndia News


Read more at: http://www.oneindia.com/india/indian...s-2150481.html


[FONT=&quot]

Indian Army in Kashmir fighting people shouting go back Indian dogs slogan By: Shreyas [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Updated: Tuesday, July 12, 2016, 4:58 [IST] Anantnag (Jammu and Kashmir), July 12: "Go back Indian dogs, Go back Indian dogs... In front of our establishment people are shouting," says Raghu G C, Engineer, Boarder Road Organisation who was a month back deputed by the Indian Army to currently conflict-ridden Jammu and Kashmir. The saffron party (BJP) that stepped into the legislative assembly seems forgotten the long history of people-army conflict in the region. Or thought of found a way of dealing the problem to make separatists declare "we are integral part of India." As assembly elections in the valley signalled the 'Modi wave'. Two houses of Kashmiri Pundits have been torched. And this is after eight years. In no clashes this was happened after 2008. The encounter of Hizbul Mujahideen commander, Burhan Wani who is social media savvy and poster boy of Kashmir broke this brief eight years of history. Both the BJP and the PDP (People' democratic Party) are in a worry on taking control of situation as civilians have took to streets fighting the Indian Army. Indefinite curfew has been imposed in many parts of the Kashmir. After 36 hours, BSNL network is functioning in the valley. After the government found there was no let-up in the spiralling of the violence, mobile services were stopped. However after 36 hours of the stoppage BSNL is operating for communication. The OneIndia spoke to a BSLN user, Raghu and Engineer working for Indian Army, to put out the perceptive of army man before the readers outside Jammu and Kashmir. From past 36 hours he remained out of touch with his family. "People are staging demonstration infront of our army quarters," said Raghu who is seeing this phenomenan with his new eye as he started working in the state recently. Raghu, whose residing establishment is just 4 KMs away from popular Jawaharlal tunnel; wondered why Kashmiri people are shouting a slogan 'go back Indian dogs' and treating Indian army men as foreigners. He ironically laughed before making a statement "protesters consider Indian army as outsiders and not one among them." Raghu further speaking said Wani was killed at Bumdoora village of Kokernag which is also close to his resting base. "It is said that while Wani was returning from a mosque offering prayers he was killed. His visit to the mosque was the information gathered by Intelligence Bureau, is what believed among the mass here," Raghu added. Brother of Wani too was killed in a same manner by the army while Wani was 15 and this led him to join Hizbul Mujahideen. When asked has army was not meticulous in dealing with Wani's case and caused violence, Raghu opined "you talk about civilians killed by the paramilitary but why there is no debate on duty men killed by separatists?" Raghu questioned.

[FONT=&quot]Read more at: [/FONT]http://www.oneindia.com/india/india...ple-shouting-go-back-indian-dogs-2150481.html[/FONT]

sab kuchh karo , apni auqat se jyada karo ,

azad jammu and kashmir zindabad
lekin hamare mulk kashmir par jo tum logo ne nazayaz qabza kar rakha hai use khali kar do , nahi to hume tum logo ke sath nahi rahna ,
tum log paidayashi terrorist ho . hum log secular democratic qaum hai ,dahashatgrdi hume pasand nahi.



 

nepali.nationalist

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Jo log ladakh per chamaat kha lay tay hain ..unsay kiya darna ??

Musharaaf nay 10 ratein India mein guzari theen ...tub bhi app dekhtay rahay ....[hilar][hilar] ...aur 337 kilometer to bhoolta nahi ....1000 saal kay baad ab llagta hai phir say hindustan per hakumat kay din aanay walay hain.

Tabhi ch@ddi aj kal boht beqraar ho raha hai

giphy.gif



le lo bhai jaan junagarh , koi jhola le aye ho ? usi me rakh lo .


:lol:
chup raho yar inse darna chahiye . , inke pass nuclear bomb hai .:lol::lol::lol:

inke pass tactical nuke hai , jisko chalane par sirf indian mar jaate hai , pakistani ko kuchh nahi hota .

bhai jaan jao le lo junagarh ......:lol::lol:



 

nepali.nationalist

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Wesay to sara endia hi humara hai ...luknow, hyderabad aur Junahgadh/munwadar to fihaal ka agenda hai mgar us say agaye bhi jaingay ...hum to ziada ter endia per hi hakumat kertay hain ...yeh ab waqt ki baat hai kay sara laingay kay pieces mein :lol::lol:


20 JULY 2016NATIONAL

There Should be 'Plebiscite' in Kashmir, Says Scindia


Scindia_20140716_600_855.jpg

FILE-PTI PHOTO

Congress leader Jyotiraditya Scindia today said in Lok Sabha that there should be "plebiscite" in Kashmir as the situation in the Valley has deteriorated and the PDP-BJP government has "insulted" the "crown" of India.

"In Kashmir today, there is a need for plebiscite," he said using Urdu word 'rai shumari' while initiating a discussion in the House on Kashmir situation.

"PDP-BJP government has shed all the principles. Administration is divided and the government, which should support people, is using weapons against them," Scindia said, adding "the wounds there can be healed only through humanity."

While attacking the Centre and state government, the Chief Whip of Congress said, "There is a need to create an environment of peace and tranquality; growth and development."

Describing Kashmir as "an important part of the heart of every Indian", he said, "but today that crown is being insulted. This I feel is irresponsible."

He said the UPA government had created an environment of peace and harmony by taking everybody along.

"The reality is that there is a marriage of convenience in Jammu and Kashmir," Scindia said referring to the alliance between PDP and BJP.

"The reality is that there is an identity crisis in the state government...Today it is ckear that there is a political upheavel and terrorism is flourishing in Jammu and Kashmir. 60 per cent population in the state is below 30 years of age. If we are not able to create opportunities for them, we would be pushing them towards militancy," the Congress leader said.

He said the central government has failed to provide safety and security to the people of the Valley.

In the last two years, infiltration has increased by 65 per cent and killing of soldiers has increased by 47 per cent, he said, asking the government, "secure our borders, secure our people before it is too late. We are with you. But act, act with a plan".

"The central government is sitting like a silent spectator. The government has miserably failed to control the power of foreign militants," he said.

The Congress leader said the incident of June 25 in Pampore, where eight CRPF soldiers died, was third such case.

"This is true that this happened because of inadequate security arrangements and it reflects failure of the administration," he said.

Scindia said after killing of a terrorist on July 8, an atmosphere of fear and tension has been created and subsequently 44 people have lost their lives while 3140 people, half of them security personnel, have been injured.

As far as the state government is concerned, the surprising thing is that the whole media has been banned there.

"The fourth pillar of democracy is being stangulated. 12th day, the curfew is on. People are not getting ration, food products and medicine....What was the reason behind that no representative from the central government visited the Valley," he said.


READ MORE IN:

http://www.outlookindia.com/newswire...scindia/947442


kaho to tumhare sar par lucknow aur allahabad bhi ladwa de , junagarh ke sath lete jao humare mohazir bhai usi me rah lenge .

 

nepali.nationalist

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
1000 years mughal rule ??[hilar][hilar]

but here is your permanent auqaat


Indian Youth held for 90-year-old blind womans rape






handcuffed-man.jpg

Deputy commissioner of police Sangramsinh Nishandar said Nadar has been booked for rape. (Representative image)







MUMBAI: Suspecting his friend of having stolen his wallet, a 27-year-old man allegedly raped the friend's 90-year-old grandmother in a drunken stupor at her home in a chawl in Chembur on Friday. The woman, who is visually challenged, has been admitted to a hospital, said the police, adding that her condition is stable.

The accused Prabhu Nadar gagged and trussed up the woman, who was asleep, before raping her repeatedly. He was arrested the same day. The woman stays with her grandson who is a labourer.

In her police complaint, she has said that the door to her house had been kept slightly ajar due to the sweltering heat. "I tried to fight him but he overpowered me. When I tried to scream, he gagged me and tied me up," states the complaint.

The survivor, who tried for at least four hours to wriggle free, managed to call out to her sons who live in adjacent houses. Senior inspector Bhagwat Sonawane of Tilak Nagar police station said she has sustained injuries and swelling on the private parts.

A police officer said that the blind woman was unable to give a description of the accused. "But she told us that the man was reeking of alcohol. We learnt that a few men in the locality had had a drinking binge the previous night. Our inquiries led us to Nadar who confessed to the crime," said this officer, adding that Nadar had dozed off by the roadside near the chawl.

Deputy commissioner of police Sangramsinh Nishandar said Nadar has been booked for rape. He has been sent to custody.



http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...ld-blind-womans-rape/articleshow/44808149.cms







Surrender2.jpg



auqat ? .................(bigsmile)(bigsmile)(bigsmile)(bigsmile)
 

ramlal

Banned
yeh bhi hagay ga to teray ser per hi ...kiyonkay endia mein toilet nahi hai [hilar][hilar][hilar]


kammi kamino ki chhichhori baten ........:lol::lol::lol:

lower caste ke logo ko muh nahi lagana chahiye buzurgo ne kaha hai .(bigsmile)(bigsmile)(bigsmile)
 
Last edited:

nepali.nationalist

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
to phir yahan g@@nd denay kiyoon ata hai ??[hilar][hilar][hilar]

yeh bhi bazurgon nay kaha hoga ...mu mut lagana mager baki sub kuch dey dena [hilar][hilar][hilar][hilar]


kammi kamino ki chhichhori baten ........:lol::lol::lol:

lower caste ke logo ko muh nahi lagana chahiye buzurgo ne kaha hai .(bigsmile)(bigsmile)(bigsmile)
 

nepali.nationalist

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
arey yeh to TAKLA hai teri terha ch@ddi [hilar][hilar][hilar]...yeh haramdev ko ser per utha ker kiya field mein jarahay ho ??[hilar][hilar]

Ab to Junagadh ka nawab bhi Pakistan ki baat ker raha hai !


Illegal occupation: Nawab of Junagadh urges Pakistan to revive accession case

[FONT=&amp]By Our Correspondent
[FONT=&amp]Published: September 23, 2016




1186708-nawabPHOTOJUNAGADHSTATEWEBSITEx-1474581076-215-640x480.jpg
[FONT=&amp]Case is legally valid as the instrument of accession is still intact. PHOTO: ONLINE


ISLAMABAD: The government of Pakistan should revive the accession case of Junagadh state at various international forums, including the United Nations, as the instruments of accession are still intact.

This was stressed by speakers, including included the Nawab of Junagadh State Nawab Jahangir Khanji and former minister for law Ahmer Bilal Soofi, at a round-table titled Accession of Junagadh to Pakistan: An Analysis in Islamabad.
They pointed out that historically and legally Junagadh is a part of Pakistan. However, the matter has not only lost its importance in the international arena, but also in the country itself.

The speakers highlighted that the Indian occupation of Junagadh was illegal and violated the instrument of accession that the then Nawab of Junagadh had signed with Pakistan. They said this case is unique as the Nawab lost the territory, but has all the legal rights.

With the case is currently pending at the UN, speakers emphasized that Pakistan has all moral and legal rights to defend their stance. They lamented that as the state slowly faded away from the memory of those in power in Pakistan, it had adversely impacted cases progress at the UN.

Speaker-at-the-event.jpg

At the time of partition, Lord Mountbatten had initially declared that the states would be independent to decide which side they choose. According to the June 3 Plan, Nawab Mahabbat Khan signed the instrument of accession with Governor General of Pakistan, Muhammad Ali Jinnah and the Pakistani flag was raised in the princely state.
However, when the Nawab came to Karachi to discuss matters with Jinnah, civil unrest was orchestrated in the princely state by India who ultimately sent in troops to occupy Junagardh, leaving the Nawab in exile.
Proactive approach
With successive governments failing to present the case of Junagadh in front of the media and international forums, Pakistan now needs to build a strong narrative for Junagadh and fight the case proactively, speakers urged.
They added that the Junagadh case should be taken forward along with Kashmir and other such cases. We should fight the case of Junagadh and highlight the issue. The Nawab of Junagadh is leading the cause and we should support him as he remains the legal heir, said one of the speakers.
They urged the government to build monument over Junagadh in Islamabad and make a committee to inform the international community about its illegal occupation by India. Diplomats, academicians, politicians, journalists, researchers and people from different walks of life participated in round table discussion.
Published in The Express Tribune, September 23[SUP]rd[/SUP], 2016.
[/FONT]
[/FONT]
[/FONT]


lo bhai junagarh to mil gaya isko ,lekin bewaqoof sar par utha kar le ja raha hai ..[hilar][hilar][hilar]


bara pyar karta hai juna se


F0BO3kl.png
 

nepali.nationalist

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Haan to in ceo naukeron say kaho na ...Junagadh jo kay Pakistan ki territory hai us mein kaam kerain...khud to yeh saray foreign countries mein kaam ker rahay hain [hilar][hilar]

Junagadh: Legally Pakistan

[FONT=&amp]Yaqoob Khan Bangash March 2, 2014 16 Comments[/FONT]

A historical account of how the state of India manoeuvered to get hold of princely states after the partition

Bangash.jpg

By the last week of September 1947, Junagadh and India were close to a confrontation.
Share !
  • [FONT=&amp]



  • in[COLOR=#FFFFFF !important]Share
[/FONT]


[/COLOR]


Junagadhs accession to Pakistan on September 15, 1947 was the first test of the Indian Independence Act of July 1947, which allowed the princely states to accede to either of the two dominions. Junagadh was the premier state in the western Kathiawar region of India, commanding great strategic importance as a maritime state. It was bound on three sides by territory that had acceded to the Dominion of India, and its only free outlet was to the Arabian Sea. In 1941 it had a population of 670,000, of which over 80 per cent were Hindus, ruled over by a Muslim Nawab.
Being the premier state in the region, the Nawab had great interest in maintaining the unity of the region. A press statement to the effect on April 11, 1947 read: What Junagadh pre-eminently stands for is the solidarity of Kathiawar and would welcome the formation of a self-contained group of Kathiawar states. As noted by Menon, till mid-1947 Junagadh had been hinting that it would join India, rather than Pakistan.
But the Dewan, Abdul Kadir Hussein, a Muslim Leaguer, had already been working on the Nawab, trying to make him accede to Pakistan. Journalist Mosley noted: Hussein now went to work on the Nawab and soon convinced him that the Congress would kill off his beloved dogs [he has a penchant for dogs he had hundreds of them!], curb his passion for cruel sports, ration his concubines and rationalise the gir lions. The result of these arguments was that the Nawab was not able to make up his mind by the lapse date and thus Junagadh went on to become a technically independent state on August 15, 1947. Menon still thought that Junagadh would accede to India, but the new Dewan, Sir Shah Nawaz Bhutto, a staunch Muslim-Leaguer, had by September 15, and persuaded the Nawab to accede to Pakistan.
The notification of this accession in the newspapers outraged New Delhi which simply could not allow the presence of Pakistani territory deep inside India. Nehru wrote to Liaquat Ali Khan that in case Junagadh became a part of the federation of Pakistan, Government of India cannot be expected to acquiesce to such an arrangement. Jinnah, being a constitutional layer himself, was simply struck by such a statement from Nehru and wrote to Mountbatten saying that Nehrus objection was totally inconceivable and untenable.the position of Indian states is very clearly defined and it was repeatedly accepted that after the lapse of paramountcy, every Indian state is independent and sovereign and free to join Pakistan or India Dominion. Menon too, was surprised by the accession of Junagadh to Pakistan and noted that Junagadh was an economic and administrative unit embedded in and deriving its sustenance from Kathiawar. Its detachment would turn it into a hothouse plant with no powers of survival.
The government of India took over the administration of the state on November 9, 1947, under the pretext of restoring law and order. The government of Pakistan reacted strongly to this action.

Together with protesting the accession of Junagadh to Pakistan, the government of India took steps to ensure a bleak future for the state. On September 17, 1947, the Indian cabinet decided to disperse troops around Junagadh, with the pretence of ensuring peace in the region. V.P. Menon was also sent to meet the Nawab so that he could bring him into the Indian fold. Menon could not see the Nawab on September 19, for he had been taken ill, but did have discussions with the Dewan, Sir Shah Nawaz Bhutto, in which he emphasised the linked nature of Junagadh with India, asking the Nawab to reconsider his decision.
This mission proved to be futile for neither could the Nawab see Menon and nor could the Dewan take any decisions over the issue. As a result, the government of India resorted to two other tactics in order to bring Junagadh into line. The first was an economic blockade of the state, which choked the state of food and materials by the end of October 1947. The second tactic was the Arzi Hukumat (Provisional Government), which was set up under the leadership of Samaldas Gandhi, a nephew of Mahatma Gandhi, under the auspices of the government of India in Bombay.
The Arzi Hukumat, urged by the government of India, started agitating for the accession of Junagadh to India both inside and outside the state. The government of India too recognised this government as the constitutional government of the state by the September 25, 1947 declaration that the Nawab of Junagadh by transferring allegiance of his Hindu subjects against their wishes to Pakistan has forfeited his claim to the allegiance of his subjects, and that the Dominion of Pakistan by accepting the Nawabs Instrument of Accession had violated the principle of self-determination.
Along with this, India also placed huge contingents of State and Dominion troops along the border with Junagadh, ready to jump in at a moments notice. Jinnah vehemently protested to such moves and wrote to Mountbatten that any encroachment on Junagadh sovereignty or its territory would amount to hostile act. Mountbatten replied with a threat saying Each acceptance of accession by Pakistan cannot but be regarded by Government of India as an encroachment on Indias sovereignty and territory and inconsistent with friendly relations that should exit between two dominions. Thus, the issue had reached stalemate with neither side willing to compromise with a looming Indian attack on the virtually defenceless Junagadh.

As heated discussions continued between Karachi and New Delhi, the contested accession of two feudatory states to India, Babariawad and Mangrol, gave New Delhi the prime pretext on which to send troops into the region. The states in the Kathiawar region had for long been a source of confusion with regards to jurisdictions, for many of them had territorial pockets deep inside each others territory. The whole region, with a total area of 22,000 square miles and a population of four million comprised 14 salute states, 17 non-salute states and 191 other jurisdictions. Under these circumstances judging which states had sovereign rights to accede to either dominion was at best difficult, if not impossible.
The three states of Manavadar, Babariawad and Mangrol, were in different degrees tied to Junagadh state under the 1943 Political Department Attachment Scheme. Menon held discussions with the Khan of Manavadar, but despite his exhortations, the Khan acceded to Pakistan on September 24, 1947. Further complications set in when the Sheikh of Mangrol, who had been under the suzerainty of Junagadh, acceded to India on September 20, with the agreement that New Delhi recognise Mangrol as independent from Junagadh. However, within two hours the Sheikh retracted his accession, but now the Government of India refused to accept the retraction, contending that the accession had already been accepted by the Governor-General a mere two hours after it was signed hundreds of miles away from New Delhi. As a result, Junagadh became cautious of the activities of its vassals, and sent troops into another vassal territory, Babariawad, on September 21, 1947.
The deteriorating security, food and economic situation of Junagadh made it easier for India to take over the state.

Apparently, the leaders of the 51 villages that constituted the Babariawad territory had already declared their accession to India and as such the Government of India decided to take action. New Delhi maintained that with the lapse of paramountcy, the attachment schemes and vassal status of these states had also lapsed and as such they were no longer bound to Junagadh, and her decisions.
By the last week of September 1947, Junagadh and India were close to a confrontation, with both asserting their claims to Mangrol and Babariawad. Already, the Indian cabinet on September 17 had decided to put troops very near the Junagadh territory, the Kathiawar Defence Force, so that they could move in at a short notice.
Nehru tried to have some negotiations with the Pakistanis on the issue, but as he constantly insisted on the legality of the accession of the feudatory states to India, nothing concrete could be achieved. Thus, the government of India decided to take unilateral action and sent in troops to occupy Babariawad on November 1, 1947. This action increased unrest in Junagadh and Manavadar, where the elements of the Provisional Government, now encouraged by the nearby Indian troops, began to take over leading to a complete breakdown of law and order in the state.
The deteriorating security, food and economic situation of Junagadh made it easier for India to take over the state. The Nawab, together with his household and most of the state treasury fled the state by the end of October to Karachi, leaving the stateadministration in the hands of the Dewan, Sir Shah Nawaz Bhutto. Sir Shah Nawaz tried desperately to shore up defences but the tightening blockade of the state left few options for him. He wrote to Liaquat:
The Indian Dominion seem to have made out a perfect plan of strangling Junagadh on all fronts, internal and external, with the help of our own feudatorieswho have been bought over with promises of independence and aggrandisement.our supplies are being cut offNon-Muslims are leaving Junagadh territory by sheer fright of threatened conflict.Muslim refugees from disturbed parts of upper India are pouring in.I earnestly appeal to the Pakistani Government for help.
Pakistan, too, could not provide much help, due to its own administrative and refugee problems, and even the grain rations and seven companies of police it did provide were not enough for the rapidly deteriorating economic and law and order situation of Junagadh. Though highly unlikely and untenable as Junagadh had already acceded to Pakistan in terms of Foreign Affairs and Defence, Menon argues that the Nawab gave the Dewan full authority to decide the future of the state, which he did by calling upon the Government of India to take over the administration of the state.
Sir Shah Nawaz thus wrote to Buch, the Regional Commissioner, The Junagadh Government, therefore, have requested that in order to avoid bloodshed, hardship, loss of life and property and to preserve the dynasty, you should be approached to give your assistance to the administration.
Thereafter, the government of India took over the administration of the state on November 9, 1947, under the pretext of restoring law and order. The government of Pakistan reacted strongly to this action and Liaquat sent a telegram to Nehru protesting such blatant occupation of a state that had legally acceded to Pakistan. He wrote, Your action in taking over the State Administration and sending Indian troops to the State without any authorisation from Pakistan Government and indeed without our knowledge is a clear violation of Pakistan territory and breach of international law. Nehru, arguing the need to regional stability refused the demands made by Liaquat for the withdrawal of Indian troops but promised a plebiscite on the issue.
The resulting plebiscite on February 20, 1948, under the aegis of the Indian army, was in favour of India with the official count noting that out of a total of 1,90,870 votes cast, only 91 cast their votes in favour of Pakistan. Thus, for India the matter was finally settled by this Indian administered plebiscite, whereas Pakistan never accepted these results and to date considers Junagadh a legal part of Pakistan.

http://tns.thenews.com.pk/junagadh-legally-pakistan/#.WFAQv-YrJhE




aapki auqat to dunia janti hai.....................................:lol::lol::lol::lol:


CkIP5Kb.jpg
 

Back
Top