India rejects Siachen demilitarisation

az.ay

Politcal Worker (100+ posts)
images


Indian Chief of the Army staff Gen VK Singh has said that General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani's remarks on Siachen could not be taken seriously.
Last month, Kayani had told media that both Pakistan and India should talk about pulling out troops from the region and spend more on the development and prosperity of their people. However, he made it clear that it should not be taken as Pakistan's weakness. In an interview to Times Now, the Indian general rejected Kayanis proposal to demilitarise the Siachen Glacier. "These are all gimmicks that keep coming from the establishment in Pakistan and we will be fools if we fall for them," Singh maintained.


"Today, your infrastructure is pretty well advanced. We are perfectly okay up there," Singh said. The Indian army chief also criticized The Indian Express report of April 4 about how troop movements near the capital on the night of January 16 - the day General Singh moved the Supreme Court - rang alarm bells in the highest levels of the government. He described the news item as part of an agenda and said the newspaper's Editor-in-Chief Shekhar Gupta, who was one of the authors of the report, had met him over lunch and asked him questions about the troop movements.

When asked if this conversation was on the record, Singh said Gupta was not recording the discussion, but he was quite sure no journalist in the world had ever been off the record." His response was No, while answering a question whether his side of the story was taken. Sindh alleged that someone in the government leaked his confidential letter to the prime minister on glaring weaknesses in defence preparedness.

When asked how it was done, Singh said neither he nor anyone close to him was the source of the leak. "In army, we don't do things like this. It is not our culture. Let us find out who leaked it," he said. When asked if somebody within the government or outside leaked the letter, he replied: "Has to be within the government, who will be outside?" Interestingly, just three days before his retirement, Singh also regretted moving Supreme Court on his date of birth issue, but questioned the manner in which the highest court of the land, and a judge on the bench, treated his petition. Nation
 

TruPakistani

Minister (2k+ posts)
Where are the SAFMA trained dogs now...?
Why are the endian crawlers not crawling here today....?
Where are the promoters of aman ki asha..?
 

only_truths

Minister (2k+ posts)
You can ask for mutual withdrawal from a position of strength. When you loose hundreds of soldiers by not providing them proper cover in the event of enemy attack or natural calamity, you are not in position of strength.
 

mkhurram

Citizen
India doesnt have any urge to with draw forces from Siachen. Indian army enjoys advantage of height there and Pakistan Army has been in very defensive and unstable position in Siachen. Pakistan could have negotiated Kashmir and Siachen disputes very easily if they could have held positions in Kargil in 1999. They lost Kargil due to ill planning and management of Pakistani Generals (including Musharraf). India knew that at that time and that was the reason, Indians fought their way up to Kargil at the cost of thousands of their soldiers. In the end they were successful because of the way they fought that war and the way Pak Generals lost it.

Now Pakistan is in no position to negotiate the region on its terms.
 

UKPakistani

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Good, they are sneaky and sly bastar*ds

No agreement means they have less chance to decieve us

I would have been worried if there was an agreement

that they would just consider it a better opportunity

to pour spies and terroris across the border