Imran khan has apparently called for a New APC (All parties conference) on the issue of insurgency while simultaneously casting doubt on intentions of organizers of the previous APC by saying that it appeared as if the previous one was meant to create atmosphere for a new military offensive.
This statement in essence means that what Imran khan is saying is several fold :
a) There are forces who plot against talks with Taliban.
b) There was no substance in the previous APC and it was to create stage for superficially announcing peace moves and but was infact all
set to get them rejected by "Taliban" to show to public that war cannot end.
c) The murder of a senior army man could have been arranged by the threatrics.
d) Political parties if they serious in ending this "War on Terror" should now speak openly for it in a new APC and indirectly directly challenge "Perpetual war" lobby.
e) He is casting doubt on the integrity of PMLN and Kiani
f) He is distancing himself from utter committment to peace moves with Taliban .
g) He is taking on Kiani's , start-stop-reverse endlessly approach to talks issue .
Imran khan was put in a tight position , JI is talking double on peace issue , JUI ideologically is on same wavelength on Talks issue as Imran but its local objectives and culture is different.
PHC is making decisions about army deployment at behest of God knows whom , army or whoever. Most Pakistanis support peaceful negotiation and my own impression is that only POWER raw and Naked works and Nisar ali Khan's strategy chose (Full) War or chose (Full) peace is correct.
Imran should avoid going to courts on local bodies election issue unless other parties accompany PTI. Leaving a lot to judges is no good , they too like Maulvis are supposed to know all but know little as being not really field workers but page surfers.
Last edited by a moderator: