Imran Khan Exclusive Interview with Absaar Aalam on Aaj TV
- Thread starter Nice2MU
- Start date
K
kashiuk
Guest
Imran Khan the great
enigma_1357
MPA (400+ posts)
i used to think that this anchor is sensible. but in this programme he proved that he is the most stupid person of the world.
dagreat123
Siasat.pk - Blogger
anchor was a freaking EDIOTT,I JUST LOVE IMRAN KHAN!!!HE IS THE BEST!!NEVER 4 ONE SECOND HE GT AFRAID OR DEFENSIVE!!!HE IS JUTS AWESOME!!!
saadkiakaray
Minister (2k+ posts)
imran khan was very sensible,calm and clear in his views.he handled that goof person nicly.khan is always great MASHALLAH.(clap)
Farooq Khan
MPA (400+ posts)
Pakistani people are simple and the anchor person was an IDIOT and his main focus was fixed on one point Personal life of Imran Khan nothing else i would say another scum like naji the scum. may be anchor was thinking to provoke Imran khan handle this really good like a statesman i am sure about other politicians they do not allow this kind of hard and personal questions well done may Allah SWT give Imran khan wisdom and protection Aameen.
staray khaatir
Minister (2k+ posts)
This guy IK really wants to do something for the pakistani nation.
Desienglishman
Senator (1k+ posts)
Imran Sahib please don't waste your precious time and effort with low life's like this man.
Raaz
(50k+ posts) بابائے فورم
What a stupid person he was, I thought he is good. but he is terrible.
msmirza007
MPA (400+ posts)
oh meray bhaio preshan mut ho,, yaar yeh reporter tha pehlay, ab aapay say bahir ho raha hai.
I just dont get it, the country is full of corrupt people , who have not one ,not two but time and again looted the country but they never have to answer any question, while Imran is constantly asked. The first thing they will attack is saying that he is **** and all that. While they dont see that what do we have in the parliament, who is there who does not drink and commit adultery.
The Prime minister is setting up fake flood camps for photo sessions, and here they are asking if Imran is benefiting from Pukar. Somehow, we are people who want criminals and corrupt to rule over us and we cannot stand any sincere person.. such is our tragedy....
The Prime minister is setting up fake flood camps for photo sessions, and here they are asking if Imran is benefiting from Pukar. Somehow, we are people who want criminals and corrupt to rule over us and we cannot stand any sincere person.. such is our tragedy....
When you offer yourself for leadership of the nation, each and every segment of your life becomes a part of public property. In that case, the people have the right to put questions on it.
You do not have a right to draw a line saying - this is private and this is public. This would not be a right interpretation of what you did or what you will do. This is Mr. Zardari's interpretation and Mr. Imran Khan's too. Your whole life has to become a part of discussion because you have offered yourself for the leadership of the nation and the people have a right on it.Difference between personal and public is only for an ordinary citizen and between two ordinary citizens and between the people and their leader.
If you put restrictions on it, you put restrictions on freedom of opinion.
What is the gaurantee, you will not revert to it when the people have placed a trust on you.
This means you are still having a safe way out of it of which you do not want to be responsible for neither in the past, nor to-day nor in the time to come.
What is difference between you and Mr. Zardari. This has been a right question. Mr. Zardari is claiming exemption under the constitution you are doing the same under the garbs of private life and Toba of your sins. Your life as a whole is in the public domain - you have to answer all types of questions otherwise tomorrow you will do a big wrong as a leader and will claim another exemption. No member of the public would let you have the right to make decisions of your own when you have already done something wrong. This right transfers to the courts of law when something has been done and no more with youself.
In the case of Haqooq-ul-Ebad, which is in the case of your daughter - Seeta White, Even God will give judgement in favour of your daughter as it is not a question of Haqooq-ullah but of Haqooq -ul-ebad. No Toba is Toba for Haqooq-ul-ebaad. Toba is only for Haqoo-ullah i.e. five time prayers, Zakat, Hajj, Kalima and other ebadaat for Allah SWT. I hope you will understand my point of view.
As a leader, what you have to be is you must be completely answerable to whatever segments of your life.
If law can hold you responsible for something for example on the question of Seeta White why you say you must not be held responsible for. At the same time you say - you believe in the Rule of Law. what type of the rule of law you believe in when you say you would not answer to questions on Seeta White.
Islam is very clear on the rights of your children. How can you denoy it just by saying this is your personal matter. Nothing of a public leader is a personal matter. He must be like an open book. The reason is the nation has to follow him.
He must make an open appology on the question of his daughter seeta white and must give her all the rights which she deserves as his daughter or present himself to a court to decide how the matter should be resolved by upholding the rule of law.
You do not have a right to draw a line saying - this is private and this is public. This would not be a right interpretation of what you did or what you will do. This is Mr. Zardari's interpretation and Mr. Imran Khan's too. Your whole life has to become a part of discussion because you have offered yourself for the leadership of the nation and the people have a right on it.Difference between personal and public is only for an ordinary citizen and between two ordinary citizens and between the people and their leader.
If you put restrictions on it, you put restrictions on freedom of opinion.
What is the gaurantee, you will not revert to it when the people have placed a trust on you.
This means you are still having a safe way out of it of which you do not want to be responsible for neither in the past, nor to-day nor in the time to come.
What is difference between you and Mr. Zardari. This has been a right question. Mr. Zardari is claiming exemption under the constitution you are doing the same under the garbs of private life and Toba of your sins. Your life as a whole is in the public domain - you have to answer all types of questions otherwise tomorrow you will do a big wrong as a leader and will claim another exemption. No member of the public would let you have the right to make decisions of your own when you have already done something wrong. This right transfers to the courts of law when something has been done and no more with youself.
In the case of Haqooq-ul-Ebad, which is in the case of your daughter - Seeta White, Even God will give judgement in favour of your daughter as it is not a question of Haqooq-ullah but of Haqooq -ul-ebad. No Toba is Toba for Haqooq-ul-ebaad. Toba is only for Haqoo-ullah i.e. five time prayers, Zakat, Hajj, Kalima and other ebadaat for Allah SWT. I hope you will understand my point of view.
As a leader, what you have to be is you must be completely answerable to whatever segments of your life.
If law can hold you responsible for something for example on the question of Seeta White why you say you must not be held responsible for. At the same time you say - you believe in the Rule of Law. what type of the rule of law you believe in when you say you would not answer to questions on Seeta White.
Islam is very clear on the rights of your children. How can you denoy it just by saying this is your personal matter. Nothing of a public leader is a personal matter. He must be like an open book. The reason is the nation has to follow him.
He must make an open appology on the question of his daughter seeta white and must give her all the rights which she deserves as his daughter or present himself to a court to decide how the matter should be resolved by upholding the rule of law.
Classified
Senator (1k+ posts)
second that ! actually i was thinking of writing the same but you made it easy for me too ! :D thank you .
First of all good show . This is positive part of media of how it can bring anyone infront of whole nation and then a little trial would bring the crap out of anyone who thinks he or she is above the law or he or she will not answer any (ANY) question which brings no good or whatever the hell the excuse they give .
For example Imran Khan , having a flawless "bay-daagh" career in cricket , my own Favourite in cricket , an extremely charming good looking personality even in his late 50's , a figure a whole nation was behind him when he was doing campaign for Cancer Hospital , myself in my childhood used to carry the Tickets(made to raise fund for the hospital) in my pocket and i use to sell those to my relatives :-) so whole nation was behind him suddenly decides to enter in Politics , have tried and still trying his best to give his best to the people of Pakistan for more than a decade now , thinks he is not questionable . i mean why dont he answer it ? i am citizen of Pakistan , tax payer and i have a right to ask anyone who try to be a political figure that how much he or she holds moral ground . koi case to nahin hara ? koi muqadma to nahin hay ? agar hay to kis baat par hay ? kyun hay ? i have every right to ask him . i think rest what i had in mind was already written by Mr. M.Javed (thank you again) . Even in America , politician literally go door to door to get the voters and not just get the votes , they explain everyone their policies and everything from A to Z which anyone asks or question about . this is definetly not a good answer "kisi ko vote dena hay to day " ! Thats not how you win hearts !
Baghairat Clinton was in illegitimate relations , and how did that end ? He made an apology to the whole nation and then what happend ? WHOLE nation accepted it and forgave him . thats how you roll and thats how you can rock !
ye to koi baat nahin hui kay i am allowed to drink whisky and can do rough sex with anyone all around the world But as i am helping the nation so nation should not ask or question about it because its something which is personal !!
PTI_Lover
MPA (400+ posts)
Cases hongay, but not of murders, not of riots, not of bhatta khori, clowns like you are trying their best to justify thousands of murders while referring other cases of other natures
my friend, there is nothing more important than a human life on this planet, being a muslim you cant kill an ant, look at my signature, answer is right there
chacha jee
MPA (400+ posts)
.lafafa anchore talking to mentaly upset person.
Mr. PTI-Lover - yours is not an answer.
Everybody must be responsible for what he/they did.
There is no justification - if one did commit an offence - this itself is not a justification for others to do another wrong and then hide behind the offence which was committed by somebody else. This attitude actually multiplies commission of offences like an epidemic and no law on the earth supports this type of justication.
There is no question how big or small the offence is or was.
If your point of view is accepted - there will be no end to the commission of offences. Purpose must be no tolerance and a society free of any offences.
It looks to be a childish argument that: as the others did it that's why I did it.
Let us not make a difference who did it and what did it. Let us say I did it and I am responsible for it and no shifting of blames to the fellow beings.
This is what Zardari and CO is trying to establish as a rule i.e if somebody from the high elite does a wrong he must not be held accountable for and if an ordinary person does it, he must face to rotten in a prison. This type of attitude gives rise to violance and abnormalities in the society, All of us are equal pakistanies - no difference on the basis of race, laguage, caste, provincialism, wealth or how high position you hold.
All our problems will vanish quickly if we start delivering justice on these lines.
Everybody must be responsible for what he/they did.
There is no justification - if one did commit an offence - this itself is not a justification for others to do another wrong and then hide behind the offence which was committed by somebody else. This attitude actually multiplies commission of offences like an epidemic and no law on the earth supports this type of justication.
There is no question how big or small the offence is or was.
If your point of view is accepted - there will be no end to the commission of offences. Purpose must be no tolerance and a society free of any offences.
It looks to be a childish argument that: as the others did it that's why I did it.
Let us not make a difference who did it and what did it. Let us say I did it and I am responsible for it and no shifting of blames to the fellow beings.
This is what Zardari and CO is trying to establish as a rule i.e if somebody from the high elite does a wrong he must not be held accountable for and if an ordinary person does it, he must face to rotten in a prison. This type of attitude gives rise to violance and abnormalities in the society, All of us are equal pakistanies - no difference on the basis of race, laguage, caste, provincialism, wealth or how high position you hold.
All our problems will vanish quickly if we start delivering justice on these lines.
@Absaar Alaam,
Even the "enmity" needs to have certain limitations/principles. I wonder how much
you were paid by MQM or any other party's media wing, to play havoc on Imran.
You like it or not, but Absaar, you were cleaned bowled by Imran. Or Absaar
do a thing, search some "born prophet" for this country, perhaps that will meet
your criteria. You were not fair in your anchorship and were on some "agenda",
more voting for Imran, take it granted. Imran is day by day becoming people's voice.
Even the "enmity" needs to have certain limitations/principles. I wonder how much
you were paid by MQM or any other party's media wing, to play havoc on Imran.
You like it or not, but Absaar, you were cleaned bowled by Imran. Or Absaar
do a thing, search some "born prophet" for this country, perhaps that will meet
your criteria. You were not fair in your anchorship and were on some "agenda",
more voting for Imran, take it granted. Imran is day by day becoming people's voice.
