Hussain Nawaz tactfully tries to remove any impression that Maryam Nawaz is Heir Apparent of Nawaz
- Thread starter shaikh
- Start date
I must say that Hussain Nawaz is clear and truthful in his impressions. He ascribes family unity to living Dadi , which means it is fragile . He in a way accepts Shehbaz the alternative Head of family if it ever is.
Mariam Nawaz has shown herself belong to category of those who try to capture power under slogan of "woman empowerment" . This is imperialist favourite as being women they all the time see to world powers for succor like Benazir did and like Hasina Wajid looks to india as if God almighty.
I have not seen Mariam Nawaz leading rally in scorching heat or such like activity , this is not a profile of a woman PM coming herself from votes .
Mariam Nawaz has shown herself belong to category of those who try to capture power under slogan of "woman empowerment" . This is imperialist favourite as being women they all the time see to world powers for succor like Benazir did and like Hasina Wajid looks to india as if God almighty.
I have not seen Mariam Nawaz leading rally in scorching heat or such like activity , this is not a profile of a woman PM coming herself from votes .
Milk Shaykh
Banned
aik 13 saal kay bachay (hussain nawaz) nay kaisay 30 million ki company start ki????? kahaan say paisay aye is 13 saal kay bahcay kay pass??? wo to apnay baap ka dependent thaa, to phir iss bachay nay kaisay 13 saal ki umar may itna zyada paisay akhatta kiya?????
aik 20 saal ki larki (mariam safdar) nay kaisay millions of dollars ki 2 company start ki jab uskay pass koi assets hi nahi thay, aur khud apnay baap ki dependen thi aur abb bhi hai???? uskay husband nay to koi company aur assets declare nahi kiye, to kahaan say itna paisa aya tha????
nawaz sharif nay puray qawm kay samnay declare kiya kay usnay london waley3 apartments 2006 may khareeday they, laikin london highcourt may documents to public hoye they usmay to likha huwa hay ke sharif family 1993 say inko own karti hai, aur Raymond Baker in his book Capitalism's Achilles jo 2005 may publish hui thi, ismay un hi flats ki baat ho rahi hai jo nawaz sharif is book kay publish honay kay aik saal baad khareeday ga. yah kaisay huwa??????
My friend If one is born in prosperity such things do not matter , I do not consider panama leaks as any substantial stuff . Most business man on whose shoulder run entire Pakistan as government is just one loss making enterprise do not bother about such issues . Capital belongs to person , not state , person earns it , not state .
So even if Hussain Nawaz transferred 100 million i do not mind as those born in prosperity see world differently, As long as a person is coming and going in Pakistan , investing and so on he is one of us we do not trail him .
State of Pakistan is too intrusive into personal and financial life of people , people are too heavily taxed , the state officials are pests , their development projects often eyewash , not a single state hospital treats patient free despite each having budgets of hundreds of crores each , not even Shaukat Khanum .
I donot know about you but those whose fathers and grandfathers were rich do not bother about others people wealth unless it is from selling heroin or selling country or outright robbing. If it is none of these , how he carried it abraod is not my business .
If a state has no responsibility to care for people from cradle to grave they have no right to excessive tax collection and asking excessively.
Milk Shaykh
Banned
you did a wonderful job of not answering a single question, but you also delfected at the topic entirely. i asked you how did hussain nawaz at the age of 13, get $30 million dollars to start a company. where did he get such a large amount when he was 13??????? considering he was dependent on his father as any 13 year old boy will be, where did he get the money???? i dont give a damn about how much money he gives his daddy now, you tried to deflect the question, but failed miserably. so please answer my question.
now i know you would claim that they did nothing illegal. but they did. hussain was depndent on his father, and hsi father didn't declare neither his son's companies not his 20 year old daughters companies who was also dependent on her father and still claims to be his dependent. therefore, nawaz sharif is guilty of not declaring companies of his family who were dependent on their father for money and other financial support. just because you pretended to speak intellectually does not hide the true nature of once speech. I've worked in the Consulate General in the UK, i know the type of speech people use to fool others. nice try, but try again to answer my first paragraph
