Its quite clear that American media is gearing up to lash out at Saudi Arabia in full swing. Back to back posts from NYPosts and other media platforms hint that something big is on its way. In the recent article titled: "How US covered up Saudi role in 9/11" the author attempts to build up argument(s) to prove how the U.S govt. deliberately blurred Saudi's possible role in the main event. I pray everything goes smooth for Ummah but signals aren't healthy enough. The Geo-political horizon is perhaps on the verge of a major shift and Pakistani leadership seriously needs to keep its eye on this in addition to CPEC, Panama and other internal issues. Some key paragraphs are exactly quoted from the article below:
Thats quite an understatement.
Actually, the kingdoms involvement was deliberately covered up at the highest levels of our government. And the coverup goes beyond locking up 28 pages of the Saudi report in a vault in the US Capitol basement. Investigations were throttled. Co-conspirators were let off the hook. Case agents Ive interviewed at the Joint Terrorism Task Forces in Washington and San Diego, the forward operating base for some of the Saudi hijackers, as well as detectives at the Fairfax County (Va.) Police Department who also investigated several 9/11 leads, say virtually every road led back to the Saudi Embassy in Washington, as well as the Saudi Consulate in Los Angeles.
Yet time and time again, they were called off from pursuing leads. A common excuse was diplomatic immunity.
Those sources say the pages missing from the 9/11 congressional inquiry report which comprise the entire final chapter dealing with foreign support for the September 11 hijackers details incontrovertible evidence gathered from both CIA and FBI case files of official Saudi assistance for at least two of the Saudi hijackers who settled in San Diego.
Some information has leaked from the redacted section, including a flurry of pre-9/11 phone calls between one of the hijackers Saudi handlers in San Diego and the Saudi Embassy, and the transfer of some $130,000 from then-Saudi Ambassador Prince Bandars family checking account to yet another of the hijackers Saudi handlers in San Diego.
An investigator who worked with the JTTF in Washington complained that instead of investigating Bandar, the US government protected him literally. He said the State Department assigned a security detail to help guard Bandar not only at the embassy, but also at his McLean, Va., mansion.
The source added that the task force wanted to jail a number of embassy employees, but the embassy complained to the US attorney and their diplomatic visas were revoked as a compromise.
Former FBI agent John Guandolo, who worked 9/11 and related al Qaeda cases out of the bureaus Washington field office, says Bandar should have been a key suspect in the 9/11 probe.
The Saudi ambassador funded two of the 9/11 hijackers through a third party, Guandolo said. He should be treated as a terrorist suspect, as should other members of the Saudi elite class who the US government knows are currently funding the global jihad.
But Bandar held sway over the FBI.
After he met on Sept. 13, 2001, with President Bush in the White House, where the two old family friends shared cigars on the Truman Balcony, the FBI evacuated dozens of Saudi officials from multiple cities, including at least one Osama bin Laden family member on the terror watch list. Instead of interrogating the Saudis, FBI agents acted as security escorts for them, even though it was known at the time that 15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudi citizens.
The FBI was thwarted from interviewing the Saudis we wanted to interview by the White House, said former FBI agent Mark Rossini, who was involved in the investigation of al Qaeda and the hijackers. The White House let them off the hook.
Whats more, Rossini said the bureau was told no subpoenas could be served to produce evidence tying departing Saudi suspects to 9/11. The FBI, in turn, iced local investigations that led back to the Saudis.
The FBI covered their ears every time we mentioned the Saudis, said former Fairfax County Police Lt. Roger Kelly. It was too political to touch.
We made an ally of a regime that helped sponsor the attacks, said Ali al-Ahmed of the Washington-based Institute for Gulf Affairs. I mean, lets face it.
Source
How US covered up Saudi role in 9/11
In its report on the still-censored 28 pages implicating the Saudi government in 9/11, 60 Minutes last weekend said the Saudi role in the attacks has been soft-pedaled to protect Americas delicate alliance with the oil-rich kingdom.
Thats quite an understatement.
Actually, the kingdoms involvement was deliberately covered up at the highest levels of our government. And the coverup goes beyond locking up 28 pages of the Saudi report in a vault in the US Capitol basement. Investigations were throttled. Co-conspirators were let off the hook. Case agents Ive interviewed at the Joint Terrorism Task Forces in Washington and San Diego, the forward operating base for some of the Saudi hijackers, as well as detectives at the Fairfax County (Va.) Police Department who also investigated several 9/11 leads, say virtually every road led back to the Saudi Embassy in Washington, as well as the Saudi Consulate in Los Angeles.
Yet time and time again, they were called off from pursuing leads. A common excuse was diplomatic immunity.
Those sources say the pages missing from the 9/11 congressional inquiry report which comprise the entire final chapter dealing with foreign support for the September 11 hijackers details incontrovertible evidence gathered from both CIA and FBI case files of official Saudi assistance for at least two of the Saudi hijackers who settled in San Diego.
Some information has leaked from the redacted section, including a flurry of pre-9/11 phone calls between one of the hijackers Saudi handlers in San Diego and the Saudi Embassy, and the transfer of some $130,000 from then-Saudi Ambassador Prince Bandars family checking account to yet another of the hijackers Saudi handlers in San Diego.
An investigator who worked with the JTTF in Washington complained that instead of investigating Bandar, the US government protected him literally. He said the State Department assigned a security detail to help guard Bandar not only at the embassy, but also at his McLean, Va., mansion.
The source added that the task force wanted to jail a number of embassy employees, but the embassy complained to the US attorney and their diplomatic visas were revoked as a compromise.
Former FBI agent John Guandolo, who worked 9/11 and related al Qaeda cases out of the bureaus Washington field office, says Bandar should have been a key suspect in the 9/11 probe.
The Saudi ambassador funded two of the 9/11 hijackers through a third party, Guandolo said. He should be treated as a terrorist suspect, as should other members of the Saudi elite class who the US government knows are currently funding the global jihad.
But Bandar held sway over the FBI.
After he met on Sept. 13, 2001, with President Bush in the White House, where the two old family friends shared cigars on the Truman Balcony, the FBI evacuated dozens of Saudi officials from multiple cities, including at least one Osama bin Laden family member on the terror watch list. Instead of interrogating the Saudis, FBI agents acted as security escorts for them, even though it was known at the time that 15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudi citizens.
The FBI was thwarted from interviewing the Saudis we wanted to interview by the White House, said former FBI agent Mark Rossini, who was involved in the investigation of al Qaeda and the hijackers. The White House let them off the hook.
Whats more, Rossini said the bureau was told no subpoenas could be served to produce evidence tying departing Saudi suspects to 9/11. The FBI, in turn, iced local investigations that led back to the Saudis.
The FBI covered their ears every time we mentioned the Saudis, said former Fairfax County Police Lt. Roger Kelly. It was too political to touch.
We made an ally of a regime that helped sponsor the attacks, said Ali al-Ahmed of the Washington-based Institute for Gulf Affairs. I mean, lets face it.
Source