Deconstructing Zaid Hamid by Abdul Majeed Abid

awan4ever

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Tipu sultan was the greatest visionary of 18th century. He was the pioneer of Rocket Technology and also created a military industrial complex in maisore

http://www.viewpointonline.net/deconstructing-zaid-hamid.html


Zaid Hamid is a media phenomenon popularized by his programs Brass Tacks and later Iqbal ka Pakistan. He has been frequently criticised in the mainstream media due to his espousal of conspiracy theories about global domination of Jews and their economic policies.


No one in the mainstream media has taken the threat posed by Zaid Hamid and people of his ilk, seriously (except by Fasi Zaka in 2 of his articles, which can be viewed here and here). Nadeem Farooq Paracha observed how such propaganda gained ground in apolitical Private educational institutions and not in the Public Universities.


He was repulsed initially(in 2009/10) by the dangerous Khatme Nabuwwat people and very few people raised the objection that just by labeling him a heretic would do him no harm in the long run. He came back with a bang riding on shoulders of Ali Azmat and Maria B. A detailed study of the problems posed by Zaid Hamid is required.
Recently Ayesha Siddiqa commented that liberals fail to ask themselves is that in the absence of any legwork to eradicate growing radicalism, such as having the will to change the curriculum or creating a social agenda tied with political objectives, how can anyone even begin to change the mindset of Zaid Hamid followers?
Zaid Hamid during the show Iqbal ka Pakistan, distorted facts and narrated awrong history. As a student of history, I observed that Zaid Hamid twisted the facts for his own convenience and played with the emotions of ummah in the name of Islam. Below is my discourse analysis of his programme Iqbal Ka Pakistan.


Episode 1
ZH:- Tipu sultan was the greatest visionary of 18th century. He was the pioneer of Rocket Technology and also created a military industrial complex in maisore.Comment: . I have 2 issues with these statements.
i) Based on which criteria is a Military ruler of a small south-indian state a bigger visionary than Voltaire, Rousseau, Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin(authors of the Legendary Declaration of Independence which begins as When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.),Adam smith, Goethe(who had more influence on Iqbal's philosophy than tipu).?? All these people lived in the 18[SUP]th[/SUP] century.
2. Tipu sultan didn't 'invent' rockets, the Chinese did. Instead he introduced metal-coated rockets which were improved by a British scientist William Congreve.


ZH: Tipu Ki rocket batteries main pani mila dia gya.(Translation:- Tipus Rocket Batteries were rendered ineffective by adding water to them)
Comment:- This is scientifically absurd. John Volta, an Italian physicist invented the commonly used batteries in 1801.!! And which primitive rockets ran on batteries.? Which batteries.? How did water change the chemical composition.?


ZH:-East India Company was financed by Jewish Rothschilds.
Comment:- This is an established fact that Nathan Rothschild invested in East India Company. Problem is that ZH got the time-line wrong. East India Company was formed in 1600 A.D. Rothschilds started their business in 18[SUP]th[/SUP] century. Who financed the company before that.?


ZH:-30 million people(Muslims/Indians)were slaughtered by East India Company and there is no trace in history of that.Comment:- How awfully convenient in that.!! This pretty much sums up the authenticity of ZHs own claim. There actually is no proof of any such genocide in history books.


ZH:-The mutiny of 1857 was a war of Independence and there was a 'massive uprising'.Comment:- As I have mentioned in my article 10 historical facts our textbooks forgot to mention The 1857 mutiny was no more than a localized uprising in some parts of india.Surendra Nath Sen, in his Eighteen Fifty Seven(Calcutta,1958) says Outside Oudh and Shahbad there are no evidences of that general sympathy which would invest the Mutiny with the dignity of a national war. R.C Majumdar, in his The Sepoy Mutiny and the Revolt of 1857(Calcutta,1963) declares that it cannot be regarded as a national rising, far less a war of independence, which it never professed to be.
Reference:- KK Aziz, Murder of History, Sang-e-meel Publishers, Chapter 2, p149


ZH:- 1857 kay baad Musalmano ki masjidain ghoron ki astabl banay(After war of 1857,Mosques were used as stables)
Comment:- This also is a fact that has been modified for the sake of convenience. This indeed happened after the fall of Baghdad by forces of Halaku Khan and in Punjab during reign of Ranjit Singh(much before 1857).


ZH:- Forces of Napoleon were defeated at Waterloo because the Brits had rocket technology that they stole from Tipu Sultan.Comment:- Lying about probably one of the most documented war of the modern times is easier said than done.ZH was not deterred by this minor fact though. Tipu Sultan died in 1799, Waterloo happened in 1815, Napoleon was defeating forces left right and centre for more than 12 years before Waterloo happened, why did the rocket technology used against him so late? In fact there was a war between Napoleon and English forces in 1805, Why were the stolen rockets not used then.?


ZH:-Noam Chomsky is Amriki Taliban.Comment:- Noam Chomsky is Professor of Linguistics at MIT, one of the top universities in World today. According to the Arts and Humanities Citation Index in 1992, Chomsky was cited as a source more often than any other living scholar from 1980 to 1992. He is also the eighth most cited source of all time, and is considered the "most cited living author". He is also famous for his critique of US Foreign Policy and its imperialism. Comparing such a figure to Taliban is not only stupid, it also explains how little ZH knows about the Taliban(while ZH also claims to have fought alongside such people).He is confusing John Walker Lindh with Chomsky.


Episode IIZH:-The whole world became Darul kufr after 1st World War.
Comment:- This claim is wrong. Afghanistan still had a Muslim ruler, as did Iraq.
A similar fatwa was passed by Maulvi Abdul Bari, the secretary of Jamiat Ulema Hind in 1920 stating that India was a Darul harb and that they should migrate to Dar ul Islam i.e countries with a Muslim ruler. Muslims from all over India sold their lifelong homes and set out for Afghanistan, some went to Turkey. The ruler of Afghanistan denied entry to most of these people. According to official estimates, between 5 to 30 lac people died due to this disastrous proclamation. (Reference: Hasan Jaafer Zaidi,Hamari Taareekh fehmi aur hamara fikri bohran, published in Adab e Latif magazine in 2009)


ZH:-'Larkian parh rahi hain angrezi, Seekh li qaum ne falaah ki raahComment:- Allama Iqbal, in this couplet used satire that just because women were getting education didnt mean every think was hunky dory now. ZH used it in the wrong context.


ZH:-Afghan Taliban are good because they didnt follow International banking system, not corrupted by western civilization..Comment:- According to the book My Life with the Taliban by Mullah Abdus Salam Zaeef, he has explained how as part of the Taliban govt he used to work at the Central bank of Afghanistan and its setup was very much like traditional banks. Glorifying backwardness and tribalism speaks much about the mindset of Mr. Zaid Hamid.


ZH:-Iqbal was a great visionary as he believed, Afghanistan main aman ho ga to Asia main aman ho ga. (Iqbal believed that If there were peace in Afghanistan, there would be peace in Asia)Comment:- Iqbal was a great visionary but this is very bad logic. Granted that after 1979, Afghanistan has come to be known as the buffer state but before that, or at least at the time of Iqbal, Afghanistan was not involved in any active war. Also, there was no peace in Asia in the 1940s(2 atom bombs were dropped in Japan for gods sake, where is the basic geography.!!!), the Long March in China caused a considerable loss of life, Burma and Singapore became theatres of war, while Afghanistan was peaceful. Pakistan and India fought two wars in 1965 and 1971 while Afghanistan was peaceful. There goes the logic. Also, Iqbal was not the only one with this much hindsight, Lord Curzon speaking at the annual dinner of the Royal Asiatic Society, London in 1908 said "If the Central Asian Society exists and is meeting in fifty or a hundred years hence, Afghanistan will be as vital and important a question as it is now". Reference: Ahmed Rashid, Descent into Chaos, Penguin Books, Newyork, 2009.


ZH:-Afghan war is about oil.Comment:- This is a favorite narrative of conspiracy theorists of this country. Another variation is that US invaded Afghanistan because of the minerals. The point is, where is that oil.? Since 2001, American forces have been present on Afghan soil, when and where did they export oil to.? Is there a secret pipeline between lets say Kandahar and Washington.? Might be, if you listen to ZH.


ZH:-Mullahs have resisted Imperial forces in last 200 yr.s.Comment:- The same Mullahs fought from 1979-1989 for an imperialist force and many of them considered Iqbal a heretic.


ZH:-1860s, 1870s main Congress bani(Translation:-Congress was formed in 1860s,1870s).Comment:- ZH cant even get the date/year/decade of formation of Indian National Congress right. It was formed in 1885.


ZH:-Muhamadan School later became 'Sir Syed University'.Comment:- While it is a fact that Mohammedan Angelo-Oriental College became a university and its students played a prominent role in the Pakistan movement. It is the only India-based University that was pivotal in the Pakistan movement but ZH still cant name it right. Its name is Aligarh University and even students of 9[SUP]th[/SUP] class can tell that.


ZH:-Iqbal ne ibtadai talim angrezi main he hasil ki(Translation:- Iqbal acquired his early education in English medium).Comment:- Allama Iqbal started his formal education at Scotch Mission High School located in Sialkot Cantt. He also learnt Arabic and Persian from Maulvi Mir Hassan, one of his famous teachers.
The writer is a final year medical student from Lahore, interested in current affairs, political economyand Literature.

4dEb2.png

 

janbazali

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
such a false and rubbish post

Zaid Hamid sb is a true patriot and AAshiq e Rassool

jis ko dekh ker aur sun ker apnay Nabi Pak SAW say IShaqq berhta hai aur Pakistan say piyar berhta hai wo kesay ghalat ho skta hai

he is a true Mujahid


"shikwa agar be jaa bhi ho tu lazim hai shaoor"
jazakAllah khair
 

biofilm

MPA (400+ posts)
Here you go!!!
such a false and rubbish post

Zaid Hamid sb is a true patriot and AAshiq e Rassool

jis ko dekh ker aur sun ker apnay Nabi Pak SAW say IShaqq berhta hai aur Pakistan say piyar berhta hai wo kesay ghalat ho skta hai

he is a true Mujahid


"shikwa agar be jaa bhi ho tu lazim hai shaoor"
jazakAllah khair
 

shaheedchoudry

Minister (2k+ posts)
Why should we believe this guy ?
a final year med student, and all he does is find flaws in someone else's speeches.
Good point janab. But this guy is not requesting to be trusted. He has given some realistic and non emotional answers to ZH. You have right to reject or accept. Why don't you counter question him. Lets see how do you do.
 

karachiwala

Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
ZH is an opportunist. He will twist any and all facts to suit his needs. But the writer also looks like an American paltu to me as are the people trying to start something with this thread.
 

shamsheer

Senator (1k+ posts)
Awan bhai! I am so surprised to know that you being an educated individual, just in your enmity towards Zaid you did not even try to critically check what ever this guy (final year student) has provided. in order to malign zaid he just twisted words and used dirty tactics to prove Ziad's inferiority and his Superiority. I expected that you guys would atleast do some research before posting such informaiton. I have only done some small research on the fallacy of the facts that he has provided and I found it an absurd attempt only to provde that my opinoin is better than yours. I do not condone Zaid but there were few facts that I knew that prompted me to post this message and there are many litterary flaws in the rebuttal that need to be highlighted.

Episode 1
ZH:- Tipu sultan was the greatest visionary of 18th century. He was the pioneer of Rocket Technology and also created a “military industrial complex” in maisore.Comment: . I have 2 issues with these statements.
i) Based on which criteria is a Military ruler of a small south-indian state a bigger visionary than Voltaire, Rousseau, Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin(authors of the Legendary Declaration of Independence which begins as “When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation”.),Adam smith, Goethe(who had more influence on Iqbal's philosophy than tipu).?? All these people lived in the 18[SUP]th[/SUP] century.
2. Tipu sultan didn't 'invent' rockets, the Chinese did. Instead he introduced metal-coated rockets which were improved by a British scientist William Congreve.

Playing around with facts does not make one more legit. Being a pioneer does not mean the inventor. A pioneer is somebody who put things in use most successfully for the first time.
Military use of rockets
Main article: Mysorean rockets

Tipu Sultan organized his Rocket artillery brigades known as Cushoon's, Tipu Sultan expanded the number of servicemen in the various Cushoon's from 1500 to almost 6000. The Mysorean rockets utilized by Tipu Sultan, were later updated by the British and successively employed during the Napoleonic Wars.
Tipu Sultan's father had expanded on Mysore's use of rocketry, making critical innovations in the rockets themselves and the military logistics of their use. He deployed as many as 1,200 specialized troops in his army to operate rocket launchers. These men were skilled in operating the weapons and were trained to launch their rockets at an angle calculated from the diameter of the cylinder and the distance to the target. The rockets had blades mounted on them, and could wreak significant damage when fired
en masse against a large army. Tipu greatly expanded the use of rockets after Hyder's death, deploying as many as 5,000 rocketeers at a time. The rockets deployed by Tipu during the Battle of Pollilur were much more advanced than the British East India Company had previously seen, chiefly because of the use of iron tubes for holding the propellant; this enabled higher thrust and longer range for the missile (up to 2 km range).[SUP][18][/SUP]
British accounts describe the use of the rockets during the third and fourth wars. During the climactic battle at Seringapatam in 1799, British shells struck a magazine containing rockets, causing it to explode and send a towering cloud of black smoke with cascades of exploding white light rising up from the battlements.
After Tipu's defeat in the fourth war the British captured a number of the Mysorean rockets. These became influential in British rocket development, inspiring the Congreve rocket, which was soon put into use in the Napoleonic Wars.[SUP][18][/SUP]
Link- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tipu_Sultan

ZH: Tipu Ki rocket batteries main pani mila dia gya.(Translation:- Tipu’s Rocket Batteries were rendered ineffective by adding water to them)
Comment:- This is scientifically absurd. John Volta, an Italian physicist invented the commonly used batteries in 1801.!! And which primitive rockets ran on batteries.? Which batteries.? How did water change the chemical composition.?

It does not matter when the word battery was officially used. Now the whole world accept that the fundamental component of Piston was first invented by muslims but it was not introduced to the world until very late. Above logic presented is absurd.

ZH:-East India Company was financed by Jewish Rothschild’s.
Comment:- This is an established fact that Nathan Rothschild invested in East India Company. Problem is that ZH got the time-line wrong. East India Company was formed in 1600 A.D. Rothschild’s started their business in 18[SUP]th[/SUP] century. Who financed the company before that.?


Why what ever this guy is presenting is an established fact and whatever zaid presented is not a fact? Again an absurd argument. The word Financed does not mean established. No matter when it was established it could be financed and taken to a different level by Rothschild’s any time. It is a lame argument.

ZH:-30 million people(Muslims/Indians)were slaughtered by East India Company and there is no trace in history of that.Comment:- How awfully convenient in that.!! This pretty much sums up the authenticity of ZH’s own claim. There actually is no proof of any such genocide in history books.
-Zaid is not the only person who believes this. Go through the following documentary.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eRyW23059aM&feature=player_embedded


ZH:-The mutiny of 1857 was a war of Independence and there was a 'massive uprising'.Comment:- As I have mentioned in my article “10 historical facts our textbooks forgot to mention” The 1857 mutiny was no more than a localized uprising in some parts of india.Surendra Nath Sen, in his Eighteen Fifty Seven(Calcutta,1958) says “Outside Oudh and Shahbad there are no evidences of that general sympathy which would invest the Mutiny with the dignity of a national war”. R.C Majumdar, in his The Sepoy Mutiny and the Revolt of 1857(Calcutta,1963) declares that “it cannot be regarded as a national rising, far less a war of independence, which it never professed to be”.
Reference:- KK Aziz, Murder of History, Sang-e-meel Publishers, Chapter 2, p149

The Indian Rebellion of 1857 began as a mutiny of sepoys of the British East India Company's army on 10 May 1857, in the town of Meerut, and soon erupted into other mutinies and civilian rebellions largely in the upper Gangetic plain and central India, with the major hostilities confined to present-day Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, northern Madhya Pradesh, and the Delhi region.[SUP][3][/SUP] The rebellion posed a considerable threat to Company power in that region,[SUP][4][/SUP] and it was contained only with the fall of Gwalior on 20 June 1858.[SUP][3][/SUP] The rebellion is also known as India's First War of Independence, the Great Rebellion, the Indian Mutiny, the Revolt of 1857, the Uprising of 1857, the Sepoy Rebellion, and the Sepoy Mutiny.
Other regions of Company-controlled India—Bengal province, the Bombay Presidency, and the Madras Presidency—remained largely calm.[SUP][3][/SUP] In Punjab, the Sikh princes backed the Company by providing both soldiers and support.[SUP][3][/SUP] The large princely states, Hyderabad, Mysore, Travancore, and Kashmir, as well as the smaller ones of Rajputana did not join the rebellion.[SUP][5][/SUP] In some regions, such as Oudh, the rebellion took on the attributes of a patriotic revolt against European presence.[SUP][6][/SUP] Rebel leaders, such as the Rani of Jhansi became folk heroes in the nationalist movement in India half a century later;[SUP][3][/SUP] however, they themselves "generated no coherent ideology" for a new order.[SUP][7][/SUP] The rebellion led to the dissolution of the East India Company in 1858, and forced the British to reorganize the army, the financial system, and the administration in India.[SUP][8][/SUP] India was thereafter directly governed by the Crown in the new British Raj.[SUP][5][/SUP]
Link- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Rebellion_of_1857


ZH:- 1857 kay baad Musalmano ki masjidain ghoron ki astabl banay(After war of 1857,Mosques were used as stables)
Comment:- This also is a fact that has been modified for the sake of convenience. This indeed happened after the fall of Baghdad by forces of Halaku Khan and in Punjab during reign of Ranjit Singh(much before 1857).

Again absurd argument. Does that mean things only happens once and then they are not repeated. He did not provide any proofs for his claim that it did not happen again.

ZH:- Forces of Napoleon were defeated at Waterloo because the Brits had rocket technology that they stole from Tipu Sultan.Comment:- Lying about probably one of the most documented war of the modern times is easier said than done.ZH was not deterred by this minor fact though. Tipu Sultan died in 1799, Waterloo happened in 1815, Napoleon was defeating forces left right and centre for more than 12 years before Waterloo happened, why did the rocket technology used against him so late? In fact there was a war between Napoleon and English forces in 1805, Why were the stolen rockets not used then.?

Tipu Sultan organized his Rocket artillery brigades known as Cushoon's, Tipu Sultan expanded the number of servicemen in the various Cushoon's from 1500 to almost 6000. The Mysorean rockets utilized by Tipu Sultan, were later updated by the British and successively employed during the Napoleonic Wars.
For details check the link that I have provided above.

ZH:-Noam Chomsky is Amriki Taliban.Comment:- Noam Chomsky is Professor of Linguistics at MIT, one of the top universities in World today. According to the Arts and Humanities Citation Index in 1992, Chomsky was cited as a source more often than any other living scholar from 1980 to 1992. He is also the eighth most cited source of all time, and is considered the "most cited living author". He is also famous for his critique of US Foreign Policy and its imperialism. Comparing such a figure to Taliban is not only stupid, it also explains how little ZH knows about the Taliban(while ZH also claims to have fought alongside such people).He is confusing John Walker Lindh with Chomsky.

Not convincing logic.

Episode IIZH:-The whole world became Darul kufr after 1st World War.
Comment:- This claim is wrong. Afghanistan still had a Muslim ruler, as did Iraq.
A similar “fatwa” was passed by Maulvi Abdul Bari, the secretary of Jamiat Ulema Hind in 1920 stating that India was a “Darul harb” and that they should migrate to “Dar ul Islam” i.e countries with a Muslim ruler. Muslims from all over India sold their lifelong homes and set out for Afghanistan, some went to Turkey. The ruler of Afghanistan denied entry to most of these people. According to official estimates, between 5 to 30 lac people died due to this disastrous proclamation. (Reference: Hasan Jaafer Zaidi,Hamari Taareekh fehmi aur hamara fikri bohran, published in Adab e Latif magazine in 2009)

Stupid argument. I do not know how you guys can buy these arguments. Listen to his speech complete. It is about the most prevalent system in the world and it is his opinion and any body can have difference on that.


Looking at above facts it is very clear that is was just an attempt to prove enmity and not a logical debate. People who dislikes Zaid are expected to love it without confirming the actual facts. I was not expecting that from some of the forum members but sigghss. I on the other hand does not like biased approaches. The article written by the guy is celarly biased and in his bias he used only selective source of information and tried to decieve the audience. Anyway, it makes rest of his story made up too.
 
Last edited:

Wadaich

Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
Awan bhai! I am so surprised to know that you being an educated individual, just in your enmity towards Zaid you did not even try to critically check what ever this guy (final year student) has provided. in order to malign zaid he just twisted words and used dirty tactics to prove Ziad's inferiority and his Superiority. I expected that you guys would atleast do some research before posting such informaiton. I have only done some small research on the fallacy of the facts that he has provided and I found it an absurd attempt only to provde that my opinoin is better than yours. I do not condone Zaid but there were few facts that I knew that prompted me to post this message and there are many litterary flaws in the rebuttal that need to be highlighted.



Playing around with facts does not make one more legit. Being a pioneer does not mean the inventor. A pioneer is somebody who put things in use most successfully for the first time.
Military use of rockets
Main article: Mysorean rockets

Tipu Sultan organized his Rocket artillery brigades known as Cushoon's, Tipu Sultan expanded the number of servicemen in the various Cushoon's from 1500 to almost 6000. The Mysorean rockets utilized by Tipu Sultan, were later updated by the British and successively employed during the Napoleonic Wars.
Tipu Sultan's father had expanded on Mysore's use of rocketry, making critical innovations in the rockets themselves and the military logistics of their use. He deployed as many as 1,200 specialized troops in his army to operate rocket launchers. These men were skilled in operating the weapons and were trained to launch their rockets at an angle calculated from the diameter of the cylinder and the distance to the target. The rockets had blades mounted on them, and could wreak significant damage when fired
en masse against a large army. Tipu greatly expanded the use of rockets after Hyder's death, deploying as many as 5,000 rocketeers at a time. The rockets deployed by Tipu during the Battle of Pollilur were much more advanced than the British East India Company had previously seen, chiefly because of the use of iron tubes for holding the propellant; this enabled higher thrust and longer range for the missile (up to 2 km range).[SUP][18][/SUP]
British accounts describe the use of the rockets during the third and fourth wars. During the climactic battle at Seringapatam in 1799, British shells struck a magazine containing rockets, causing it to explode and send a towering cloud of black smoke with cascades of exploding white light rising up from the battlements.
After Tipu's defeat in the fourth war the British captured a number of the Mysorean rockets. These became influential in British rocket development, inspiring the Congreve rocket, which was soon put into use in the Napoleonic Wars.[SUP][18][/SUP]
Link- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tipu_Sultan



It does not matter when the word battery was officially used. Now the whole world accept that the fundamental component of Piston was first invented by muslims but it was not introduced to the world until very late. Above logic presented is absurd.




Why what ever this guy is presenting is an established fact and whatever zaid presented is not a fact? Again an absurd argument. The word Financed does not mean established. No matter when it was established it could be financed and taken to a different level by Rothschild’s any time. It is a lame argument.


-Zaid is not the only person who believes this. Go through the following documentary.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eRyW23059aM&feature=player_embedded




The Indian Rebellion of 1857 began as a mutiny of sepoys of the British East India Company's army on 10 May 1857, in the town of Meerut, and soon erupted into other mutinies and civilian rebellions largely in the upper Gangetic plain and central India, with the major hostilities confined to present-day Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, northern Madhya Pradesh, and the Delhi region.[SUP][3][/SUP] The rebellion posed a considerable threat to Company power in that region,[SUP][4][/SUP] and it was contained only with the fall of Gwalior on 20 June 1858.[SUP][3][/SUP] The rebellion is also known as India's First War of Independence, the Great Rebellion, the Indian Mutiny, the Revolt of 1857, the Uprising of 1857, the Sepoy Rebellion, and the Sepoy Mutiny.
Other regions of Company-controlled India—Bengal province, the Bombay Presidency, and the Madras Presidency—remained largely calm.[SUP][3][/SUP] In Punjab, the Sikh princes backed the Company by providing both soldiers and support.[SUP][3][/SUP] The large princely states, Hyderabad, Mysore, Travancore, and Kashmir, as well as the smaller ones of Rajputana did not join the rebellion.[SUP][5][/SUP] In some regions, such as Oudh, the rebellion took on the attributes of a patriotic revolt against European presence.[SUP][6][/SUP] Rebel leaders, such as the Rani of Jhansi became folk heroes in the nationalist movement in India half a century later;[SUP][3][/SUP] however, they themselves "generated no coherent ideology" for a new order.[SUP][7][/SUP] The rebellion led to the dissolution of the East India Company in 1858, and forced the British to reorganize the army, the financial system, and the administration in India.[SUP][8][/SUP] India was thereafter directly governed by the Crown in the new British Raj.[SUP][5][/SUP]
Link- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Rebellion_of_1857




Again absurd argument. Does that mean things only happens once and then they are not repeated. He did not provide any proofs for his claim that it did not happen again.



Tipu Sultan organized his Rocket artillery brigades known as Cushoon's, Tipu Sultan expanded the number of servicemen in the various Cushoon's from 1500 to almost 6000. The Mysorean rockets utilized by Tipu Sultan, were later updated by the British and successively employed during the Napoleonic Wars.
For details check the link that I have provided above.



Not convincing logic.



Stupid argument. I do not know how you guys can buy these arguments. Listen to his speech complete. It is about the most prevalent system in the world and it is his opinion and any body can have difference on that.


Looking at above facts it is very clear that is was just an attempt to prove enmity and not a logical debate. People who dislikes Zaid are expected to love it without confirming the actual facts. I was not expecting that from some of the forum members but sigghss. I on the other hand does not like biased approaches. The article written by the guy is celarly biased and in his bias he used only selective source of information and tried to decieve the audience. Anyway, it makes rest of his story made up too.

It is too bad brother... .... .... U punctured the peanut heads of the Tom scholars too early. U would have let them revel. Stooges have dead minds. Once too bad I am really annoyed. Meray bhaaiyoon ka dil dukha diya. :13::13::13: Ab woh marvi anti ko shikayat karein gay.:lol: Baqi cheerleaders ki to khair hay magar aap nay meray [MENTION=5038]karachiwala[/MENTION] bhaai ko Jamia-Alrasheed ki documentory refer kar kay mushkil mein daal diya hay.:(
 
Last edited:

shamsheer

Senator (1k+ posts)
It is too bad brother... .... .... U punctured the peanut heads of the Tom scholars too early. U would have let them revel. Stooges have dead minds. Once too bad I am really annoyed. Meray bhaaiyoon ka dil dukha diya. :13::13::13: Ab woh marvi anti ko shikayat karein gay.:lol: Baqi cheerleaders ki to khair hay magar aap nay meray @karachiwala bhaai ko Jamia-Alrasheed ki documentory refer kar kay mushkil mein daal diya hay.:(

I apologize If I knew you are working on it I would have kept quite. Please do reply. I believe you are better than me about facts.
 

jimz84

Senator (1k+ posts)
is failed student ka missile launch hone sa pehle hi phuss ho gia....apne masters indians ki tarha..so sad..like that
31f76da026fd764b3710156e163ab55f.jpg
 

Wadaich

Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
I apologize If I knew you are working on it I would have kept quite. Please do reply. I believe you are better than me about facts.
U are right but tell me does it deserve response.. ... .... .... the one who is inspired by the jesters like N.F.Paracha and Fasi Zaka... .. .. ... ... just imagine the level of the stooge and liberal fascist terrorists of musharfi tribe the cheerleaders sex and drug stuff the Enlightened moderates.:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol: So let them have dance of free desi Kupi mixed hard earned drops of some vilaaiti stuff. .:lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
Last edited:

awan4ever

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Awan bhai! I am so surprised to know that you being an educated individual, just in your enmity towards Zaid you did not even try to critically check what ever this guy (final year student) has provided.

Does Zaid Hamid critically check all his facts when he is making his fiery speeches? Are you ever appalled at his twisted logic?

in order to malign zaid he just twisted words and used dirty tactics to prove Ziad's inferiority and his Superiority.

Why are all you ZH fans consumed by this superiority/inferiority complex? Why cant you just accept that this guy had a problem with ZHs facts and he presented his views on it. Why does there have to be an angle of superiority with everything ZH says?

I expected that you guys would atleast do some research before posting such informaiton.

The purpose of the thread was to start a debate and make people realize that it is important to check facts for themselves instead of blindly believing their mentors or icons. Clearly you have tried to check the facts so that is a positive.

Playing around with facts does not make one more legit. Being a pioneer does not mean the inventor. A pioneer is somebody who put things in use most successfully.

I agree with your assertion. So Tipu is a 'pioneer' when he improves upon the original idea but when the English do it they are 'thieves' ? How do you explain that logic?

It does not matter when the word battery was officially used.

The writer raised a question based on what the speaker has said. You cannot call him out for that if what the speaker is saying is technically wrong even if he meant to say something else. The question asked is not wrong.

Why what ever this guy is presenting is an established fact and whatever zaid presented is not a fact? Again an absurd argument. The word Financed does not mean established. No matter when it was established it could be financed and taken to a different level by Rothschild’s any time. It is a lame argument.

The Rothschilds were investors. yes I know about all the conspiracies involving them but they doesnt mean they were not in the business of making money. East India Company was a legit organization to invest in back then and it was a major brand before they invested in it. It wasnt even dwindling on bankruptcy that the Rothcschilds bailed it out and made it their b*tch to do their bidding. Im guessing they just invested to make money off their exploits. So why bring up the Rothschilds name without any direct proof of their dirty play?
Anyway you said they mioght have 'taken it to the next level' ? And you yourself quoted the wikipedia article saying the EI Co. was dissolved in 1858 after the Rebellion? SO what next level did they take it to? Oblivion?

Zaid is not the only person who believes this. Go through the following documentary.

I tried watching it but it is full of self pity and I dont like self pitying history. Please tell me where it gives solid references for 30 million killed and i will skip to that part.

The Indian Rebellion of 1857 began as a mutiny of sepoys of the British East India Company's army on 10 May 1857, in the town of Meerut, and soon erupted into other mutinies and civilian rebellions largely in the upper Gangetic plain and central India, with the major hostilities confined to present-day Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, northernMadhya Pradesh, and the Delhi region.[SUP][3][/SUP] The rebellion posed a considerable threat to Company power in that region,[SUP][4][/SUP]

I think you are agreeing with the writer rather than refuting him here.

Again absurd argument. Does that mean things only happens once and then they are not repeated. He did not provide any proofs for his claim that it did not happen again.

The writer did not deny that this did not happen. he only said it happened in a different era i.e of the Sikh rule. The burden of proof lies not on the writer but on ZH who made the original claim. Can you tell us which masjid was made a stable under the English?

Not convincing logic.
Why not?

Stupid argument. I do not know how you guys can buy these arguments. List to his speech complete. It is about the most prevalent system in the world and it is his opinion and any body can have difference on that.

1. People who buy Zhs arguments should not be pointing at others.
2. The writer is calling out his use of the term Dar-ul-Harb and why it is not a relevant term in the context of times.
3. If anybody can have a difference of opinion then ZH fans should stop calling everyone WHO HAS A DIFFERENT opinion as rafidis/takfiris/RAW/CIA agents with illuminated tails and sh*t.
 

awan4ever

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
[MENTION=17576]shamsheer[/MENTION]

As you can already see some 'great practicing muslims' are terming us as alcoholics and sex maniacs ONLY because we disagree with ZH as if that assh*le is some sort of holy avatar!

And then you talk of 'having a different' opinion' is ok!!

(thumbsdown)
 

Back
Top