BOE WARNS UK BANKs NEED MORE CAPITAL: SOLUTION QE

crankthskunk

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
An+elderly+man+holds+cash+in+his+hands



I introduce two recent stories from the UK. First BOE warning that UK Banks are short of Capital to withstand any blow back from Eurozone crisis.

No surprise, most exposed is Barcalys. It has 170% exposure to loans and sovereign debts, compare to its Capital. Meaning if it has to meet all of his liabilities at once, it wouldn't be able to meet them with current level of Capital its hold.

In simple terms, the UK banks face sever liquidity problems. The BOE suggest different ways for banks to increase their capital. One of them is debt-to-equity swaps.

These swaps work both ways, i.e. equity-to-debt swaps and debt-to-equity swaps. BOE suggesting, debt-to-equity swaps for the UK Banks, when the debts is exchange for a predetermined amount of equity or stock. So what BOE is suggesting that the banks should swap their debts with offer of shares in the banks. This way the debts of the banks are transferred to the public/investors in lieu of offers of stock/shares.

Bank of England warns UK banks need more capital

Britain's banks do not have enough capital to withstand an escalation in the eurozone crisis, the Bank of England has warned.

By Philip Aldrick, Economics Editor

4:00PM BST 06 Jul 2012

Members of the Financial Policy Committee (FPC), the Bank’s risk regulator, “judged that the overall capitalisation of the banking system was unlikely to be sufficient for stability to be assured” if there were “severe but plausible” developments in the sovereign debt crisis, according to minutes of last month’s meeting.

The committee was also sufficiently concerned about weak lending in the UK to consider suspending the rules governing how much banks must hold in cash and other liquid assets to get credit flowing again. The rules may have “pushed up the pricing of loans” and, by relaxing them, funds “supporting liquid assets could potentially be used instead to finance lending”, the minutes said.

Both issues were addressed in last week’s Financial Stability Report, when banks were told to continue building up their capital levels and liquidity regulations were relaxed slightly instead of suspended. Analysis of the report showed that easing the liquidity rules could release as much as 150bn for lending to small businesses and households.

Banks had been hoping for the capital rules to be loosened as well, but the FPC decided the risks to financial stability and the economy were too great, even though UK lenders are “reasonably well placed” to meet new standards that begin coming into effect next year.

“The committee was concerned that in especially severe, but plausible, adverse scenarios in the euro area some UK banks could face large losses,” the FPC said. Although “the position of individual institutions varied significantly”, the overall health of the banks was too weak and threatened “the supply of financial services to the economy”.

Barclays is the most exposed of all UK lenders to the eurozone periphery, with loan and sovereign debt exposures equivalent to 170pc of its entire equity capital. Royal Bank of Scotland also has dangerously large total exposures to the region.

Banks have increased their capital levels by 90bn since the crisis but they have been broadly flat since last year. To boost their capital, the FPC said banks now need to issue equity or contingent capital because “the weak profit outlook for banks would make it difficult to raise sufficient additional capital solely by limiting cash dividends and compensation”. Debt-for-equity swaps should also be considered, it said, which could raise 8bn.

Some of the extra capital could also be used to “support lending immediately” but the bulk would be to “enhance market perceptions of resilience and reduce funding costs”.

The Bank has been taking drastic measures to rekindle growth in the UK. Last month, it unveiled a “funding for lending” scheme to boost the supply of credit to businesses and families and lower borrowing costs, as well as an emergency liquidity facility to underpin confidence in the banks.

It has since loosened the liquidity rules and injected another 50bn of stimulus into the economy through quantitative easing, which is now due to hit 375bn or almost 40pc of the entire stock of national debt. The Bank has grown particularly concerned that rising borrowing costs could trigger defaults that cause bank losses to mount, setting off “an adverse feedback loop” that would “weigh on economic growth and threaten the health of the financial system as a whole".

 
Last edited:

crankthskunk

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
The above story mentions 50 billion quantitative easing by the BOE. This story provides what pitfalls would be for the poor and elders in the Country, most exposed to injection of freshly printed money in to the economy by BOE. The pension bonds prices would go up hitting the pensioners, and price inflation would hit the poor.

[h=1]Pensioners victims of Bank of England 50bn printing money bid[/h]The latest round of quantitative easing will buy up bonds linked to pensions and push their prices up

A record wave of new OAPs could be plunged into poverty by the Bank of England’s desperate decision to pump another 50billion into the battered economy.
The latest round of quantitative easing – effectively printing new money – will buy up bonds linked to pensions and push their prices up.
Families will also be hit hard because flooding the economy with fresh cash is set to raise inflation.
And savers will suffer because the rising cost of living erodes the pitiful returns they get from low interest rates.
There are also fears banks will just use the latest money to fatten their cash balances rather than boost lending. Saga has now sounded a warning about the buy-up of government and company bonds having the knock-on effect of reducing annuity rates – fixed income bought by private pension pots.
It says before QE started three years ago, an OAP could get around 7,800 a year from 100,000 of pension savings. Now a 100,000 fund will buy only around 5,800.
The group claims a record number will be affected this year as a wave of baby boomers, born after the Second World War, retire.
Saga director-general Ros Altmann said: “The Bank of England is permanently impoverishing a cohort of older people.”
She added: “Following fresh banking scandals this week, it is especially difficult to understand why we are doing more easing, which benefits the banks more than any other area of the economy.”
In a separate move, interest rates were again left at 0.5%.
 

Back
Top