Wah g kia dalil ha k Junejo k saath resign nahein kia is liey ab kar dein. Yeh babay b dour k korian la k dehari guzar rahey hein.
Tere dimaag mein gobar bhara hoya hea:lol:
Wah g kia dalil ha k Junejo k saath resign nahein kia is liey ab kar dein. Yeh babay b dour k korian la k dehari guzar rahey hein.
![]()
![]()
sir would you care to comment on this? where is the proof that he said he had? where is the money trail that the supreme court bench ordered him to present? why no document has been given except for qatri letter? where are the dalaail? the supreme court bench had declared that the burden of proof is on sharif family so why is sharif family asking for immunity from disqualification already before even presenting the evidene?
If SC thinks he is guilty, why don't they convict him.
sir you are purposely avoiding my questions. i am aware that you dont like giving answers of tough questions so i wont ask again. the answer to your question is because the supreme court has to let the prime minsters team finish their defense, which can take 5 hearing minimum. but for the past 3 days the PM's lawyer has not provided a single document of money trail which the PM claimed that he had in his possessions and are now infact hiding behind article 248 of parliamentary immunity? this is where i will refer to my previous post of 2 pictures. why is PM taking a u-turn from his previous stance that he will not take any astasna at all??? can u also tell me what do you think about the fact that the first document which was shown in the parliment was the dubai steel mill documents and the pm claimed that after selling this steel mill, they used to money to buy the flats, how can u sell a steel mill that is in a loss and gain millions of dollars from a deficit earning business and then buy luxury flats from them?? this is quite a strange form of maths
Actually this case is a big thing about nothing. PM's name is not even there in Panama papers. Why should he provide any documents and about what. They should ask the owners of property in question about documents and they will provide or they will be convicted. What do they want the PM to be tried or investigated for. They have not even framed a legal question or a charge. Plaintiffs have not provided any evidence of their allegations. I think all these trash allegations should be thrown out, but Judges like the limelight, the will continue this show for some time.
If SC thinks he is guilty, why don't they convict him.
سپريم کورٹ کي نظر کيا قوم کي نظر ميں شريف قصوروار ثابت ہوچکے ہيں اگر سپريم کورٹ نے انصاف نہ کيا تو کسي بھي وقت قوم تمام اشرافيہ کا انصاف کردے گي
صاحب آپ کو جو درد قولنج ہورہا ہے وہ اسي لئے ہے کہ شريفوں سے يہ پوچھ ليا گيا ہے کہ جو پيسے انہوں نے باہر بھيجے وہ کہاں سے آئے سورس آف انکم پوچھنے پر يہ تکليف ہوئي ہے
Source of income sahi maanay mein tau Ikram Niazi k thee, Sharifoon ne tau kabi Ittefaq mein loha koota, kabi Dubai aur kabi Jeddah, rishwat lee hauti tau Bhonkay Khan k tarah akar k pir rahey hautay.
Source of income sahi maanay mein tau Ikram Niazi k thee, Sharifoon ne tau kabi Ittefaq mein loha koota, kabi Dubai aur kabi Jeddah, rishwat lee hauti tau Bhonkay Khan k tarah akar k pir rahey hautay.
جس طرح عمران خان گنجے کو کان سے پکڑ کر عدالت لے گیا ہے تم بھی اسکو لے جاؤ خالی باہر بیٹھ کر ٹاؤں ٹاؤں مت کرو
الزام لگانے کي بجائے يہ بتائيں کہ شريفوں نے پيسہ کس طرح باہر بھيجا جب آپ عدالت ميں بھي يہ ثابت نہيں کرسکتے تو ٹاؤں ٹاؤں کرنے کي بجائے اپني شکست تسليم کريں اگر عقلمند ہوتے تو نواز شريف کو کہتے کہ وذارت عظمي سے استعفي دے دو ليکن اس کي بجائے ٹاؤں ٹاؤں کرنا منظور کيا ہے تو اب بھگتو
Kia hua, Ikaramullah Niazi k haram k kamaee p Bhonkay Khan k palnay k zikar p aap k cheexein kion nikal rahee hein. Kaho na Bhonkay Khan ko apnay baap k haram k kamaee k hisab de.
© Copyrights 2008 - 2025 Siasat.pk - All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Disclaimer|