Amazing facts for PMIK!! 100 yrs history!!

[stargazer]

Listen to an amazing research revealing astounding facts about PTI/PMIK.
Kudos to Fayyaz Raja!

 

[Eyeaan]

Perhaps a bit misleading -
Over a span of 100 years with new and different constituent assemblies, it is like comparing apple and oranges. Please at least don't call it "sciensee tajzia."

 

[stargazer]

Perhaps a bit misleading -
Over a span of 100 years with new and different constituent assemblies, it is like comparing apple and oranges. Please at least don't call it "sciensee tajzia."

He is providing facts and you are conjecturing, now! that is called comparing oranges to apples. Just saying.

 

[Eyeaan]

He is providing facts and you are conjecturing, now! that is called comparing oranges to apples. Just saying.

It is not about "facts" or "numbers" but comparison of one data set with other data sets and drawing conclusions (or making claims) from these comparison.
Different data sets should be comparable or inter-related for this purpose - otherwise one may compares only the parts of data sets which are of the same category and comparable, and not the aggregate data. Second, specific conclusion may be drawn, even if only relevant data is selected. when justified beyond raw data and numbers. This is basics of science His "data analysis" fails on other counts as well. Nevertheless he is calling it "sciencee tajzia" which rather provoked me. Perhaps he is not good at the subject of Data Analysis (which is not an easy subject and often a source of erroneous conclusions. ).
I'm all for PMIK and his popularity but an arguments should be rightly justified and ."journalistic" pieces shouldn't be called "scientific."

 

[stargazer]

It is not about "facts" or "numbers" but comparison of one data set with other data sets and drawing conclusions (or making claims) from these comparison.
Different data sets should be comparable or inter-related for this purpose - otherwise one may compares only the parts of data sets which are of the same category and comparable, and not the aggregate data. Second, specific conclusion may be drawn, even if only relevant data is selected. when justified beyond raw data and numbers. This is basics of science His "data analysis" fails on other counts as well. Nevertheless he is calling it "sciencee tajzia" which rather provoked me. Perhaps he is not good at the subject of Data Analysis (which is not an easy subject and often a source of erroneous conclusions. ).
I'm all for PMIK and his popularity but an arguments should be rightly justified and ."journalistic" pieces shouldn't be called "scientific."

I agree with your specificity and that is a pet peeve of mine also but it seems generality has become the norm. The important thing is it is a good effort to help compare at some level some facts by a journalist in a country where the only thing journalists nowadays do is host a talk show on useless allegations, ridiculous statements of irrelevant people.

 

[concern_paki]

Forget about data, numbers or science, Imran Khan is the most popular leader after Jinnah for the Muslims of South Asia, and obviously population of Jinnah Era is very less as compared to today, so Imran Khan is the most popular in public by numbers than Jinnah and he also lives in the heart of the peopleike Jinnah or Iqbal