After NATO tax, when is coming Drone tax?

[mehar ali]

As with smile in his face Imran Khan announced to levy tax on NATO Supply so when will he announce with further smiling face to levy tax on Drone attacks?

Is this not U-Turn....??? in past Imran Khan did dharna to stop the Nato supply but now when he can stop...no dharna rather tax...means legitimate permission to let NATO supply move.....Imran khan is saying with confident that it is our Govt so we can do what we want as NATO supply will move from our province so we can tax them ....how shameful this is ??? why did then he fool people to stop NATO supply in past & protested ???..................Is this not a "Sharamnaak" ???

in next version ...when Imran Khan will tax drone attacks as they are fired in his province?????

 

[rtabasum2]

LOL ur worried he is going to Tax this container that is why ur so angry LOL Don't worry, TUQ would never visit KPK

 

[ranaji]

Drone tax noora lohaar aur kiyani dono ke swiss accounts mai jamma ho raha hai

 

[AhsanAltaf1]

kabootar aa aa aa , TUQ ka kabootar aa aa aa , phir phurrr ker kai urr jaaa , LOL

 

[mehar ali]

I can give u reply in the way you did but it is better to talk with logic.............PTI supporters should answer my question...............

LOL ur worried he is going to Tax this container that is why ur so angry LOL Don't worry, TUQ would never visit KPK

 

[miafridi]

Nato will be leaving Afghanistan and it will surely bring down the drone attacks in pakistan, so its perfectly good enough to help them withdraw from Afghanistan. Besides taxing them will be a bonus for the revenue boost instead of begging and getting a coalition support fund, which the US reminds in every programe(that they have given aid to Pakistan and still Pakistan is not recognizing that US has done something for them like drama). If Pakistan had charged them taxes right from the start it won't have needed the Aid and perhaps would have got more than the got in the aid and also wouldn't be considered as a beggar as they do now.

 

[HowDoUDo]

iss main shameful ki kiya baat hai, KPK governement ek service provide kar rahe hain, paise to un ke bante hain.
Aur jahan tak drone ki baat hai mujhey bohot afsos howa keh aap ka taluq ek islami jamat se hai laikin aap conspiracy theory, rumors, jhoti batain karne se baaz nahin ate.

 

[rtabasum2]

I can give u reply in the way you did but it is better to talk with logic.............PTI supporters should answer my question...............

OK why does not TUQ come to KPK, when was the last time he crossed ATTock, is ur message only for PUNJab and all the Fatwas for KPK, LOL

 

[Khalid]

beta yeh dekhna zara .... Is this not a "Sharamnaak" ???

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=331992886910262

 

[mehar ali]

Again, i request you to be to the point as per my question....u r PTI supporter...should answer as this was the PTI policy stance in past to stop NATO by any way...has PTI ever given their stance to tax NATO supply ???

OK why does not TUQ come to KPK, when was the last time he crossed ATTock, is ur message only for PUNJab and all the Fatwas for KPK, LOL

 

[falcons]

if you have watched the program then you had seen JC asked isn't it federal matter. IK said construction and maintenance of road is provincial jurisdiction so we have right to tax. while giving the route to any other country or using the road as trade route by other countries are under federal jurisdiction.
Province cannot stop someone from using route or border if alowed by federal autorites.

 

[mehar ali]

My concern is not to blame someone or degrade nor I am making any conspiracy theory......but to realize that how this corrupt system is compelling to make different compromises even those were never announced before not were the policy...????

iss main shameful ki kiya baat hai, KPK governement ek service provide kar rahe hain, paise to un ke bante hain.
Aur jahan tak drone ki baat hai mujhey bohot afsos howa keh aap ka taluq ek islami jamat se hai laikin aap conspiracy theory, rumors, jhoti batain karne se baaz nahin ate.

 

[optimistic]

But you said he should stop it means he should collide with a federal decision being a part of parliament or head of a party governing a Province, NATO supply is a federal issue and so are drones and it should be solved under the federal jurisdictions and not with dharnas but using legal platforms since PTI is in govt now, which i hope he will do, dharnas are only suited to the parties outside of the parliament such as....

 

[crowbar]

Oh bahi ! jin ki rozi roti America se ati ho who American supply or drone rukwane me kabhi serious nahi ho sakte. kyon shah mehmud qureshi ,Qasuri aor Azam swati ki rozi roti per lat marne lagay ho. Election ke liye drama material chahiye ta wo NATO SUPPLY +DRONE ki shakal mein mil gaye. un ko khob uchala . kam ban giya to ab na drone na nato supply ............

 

[miafridi]

My concern is not to blame someone or degrade nor I am making any conspiracy theory......but to realize that how this corrupt system is compelling to make different compromises even those were never announced before not were the policy...????

Please reply my post. My comment is 5th on this thread and i would love to indulge in logical debate with you which you are looking for.

 

[HowDoUDo]

My concern is not to blame someone or degrade nor I am making any conspiracy theory......but to realize that how this corrupt system is compelling to make different compromises even those were never before announced...????

Aap ki baat bilkul darust hai keh khan saab ne drone ke khilaaf dharna diya tha, aur ab woh tax lagoo karne ki baat kar rahe hain. Laikin aap yeh bhi to daikhain keh halaat mukhtalif hain. Us waqat Nato supply ka asar bohot bura tha ( terrorist attack) aur hum jang ke darmiyan main thay. Ab jabke jang khtam hone wali hai, plus hakoomat ne muzakrat karne ka irada kar liya hai to kam az kam munfi asrat to bohot hi kam hon gay; aur sab se barh kar KPK hakoomat karza nahin laina chahti hai aur na hi awaam peh tax barhana chahti hai, laikin paise ki zaroorat hai, to yeh faisla agar iss zawiye se dekhain to bilkul dirist hai.

jahan reh gai drones ki baat, us par IK abhi bhi kaim hain aur Inshallah rahain gay, yeh to aap ne apne se thread kholne ka bhana dhonnda hai.

aap ne apni dalil ko dramatise karne key khail main us ko red main likha hai, laikin aik baat janiye keh aap kay thread main thoos sabooton ka fuqdan hai

 

[crowbar]

But you said he should stop it means he should collide with a federal decision being a part of parliament or head of a party governing a Province, NATO supply is a federal issue and so are drones and it should be solved under the federal jurisdictions and not with dharnas but using legal platforms since PTI is in govt now,which i hope he will do, dharnas are only suited to the parties outside of the parliament such as....

If NATO supply is a federal issue then how come IK can levy tax on NATO supply.Doesn't it mean a head on collision with the federal government. Further, may be siraj ul haq is not in agreement with IK decision because JI and JUI F along PML Q were the signatiaries on the agreement with America during Musharaf regime regarding NATO SUPPLY,DRONES,LOGISTICS AND USE OF AIR FIELDS.

 

[kaalashaa]

Hahaha they easily make fools. Just wait n see.

Nato will be leaving Afghanistan and it will surely bring down the drone attacks in pakistan, so its perfectly good enough to help them withdraw from Afghanistan. Besides taxing them will be a bonus for the revenue boost instead of begging and getting a coalition support fund, which the US reminds in every programe(that they have given aid to Pakistan and still Pakistan is not recognizing that US has done something for them like drama). If Pakistan had charged them taxes right from the start it won't have needed the Aid and perhaps would have got more than the got in the aid and also wouldn't be considered as a beggar as they do now.

 

[zhohaq]

If NATO supply is a federal issue then how come IK can levy tax on NATO supply.Doesn't it mean a head on collision with the federal government. Further, may be siraj ul haq is not in agreement with IK decision because JI and JUI F along PML Q were the signatiaries on the agreement with America during Musharaf regime regarding NATO SUPPLY,DRONES,LOGISTICS AND USE OF AIR FIELDS.

Nato supplies may be a federal issue but roads are a provincial subject.

The province can have a poll tax of roads which are worst affected by the NATO container carriage.

 

[fnoman]

Again, i request you to be to the point as per my question....u r PTI supporter...should answer as this was the PTI policy stance in past to stop NATO by any way...has PTI ever given their stance to tax NATO supply ???

There is no such thing link U-Turn here, Imran Khan has always said we will help NATO in exiting from Afghanistan. As the withdrawal process is approaching this statement is rather an alarm, if NATO doesn't pay taxes they will not get route from KPK. Means NATO containers will be blocked. It is rather a political move since NATO supplies land at Karachi and go through KPK. If KPK Gov. If NATO supplies needs to be stopped it must be stop in Karachi, not in the middle.