35 Puncture Audio Tape Is In Real - Faisal Javed (PTI)
Abdullah.
Banned
- Featured Thumbs
- http://i59.tinypic.com/2md2p3a.png
-----------------------
In all other countries around the world the police and investigating agencies investigate criminal acts.Pakistan must be the only country where people have to play the role of police or and give proof to the courts.If you cant prove then confuse it :)
In all other countries around the world the police and investigating agencies investigate criminal acts.Pakistan must be the only country where people have to play the role of police or and give proof to the courts.
Its almost impossible for a member of the public to provide proof in such cases because the criminals are not stupid.They do their home work before they commit criminal acts.In Pakistan even if you are caught red handed nothing is done.It was proved in a court that Nawaz took bribes from ISI.Was any action taken against him ? He should have been sent to jail and disqualified from politics.I guess you will say there was no massacre in model town either .Where is the proof? .kea other countries mein koi ilzam lagata hai bagair saboot kai??
do you want police to find saboot of 35 puncture ....?? why don't you provide it to police and make life easy for everyone??
Its almost impossible for a member of the public to provide proof in such cases because the criminals are not stupid.They do their home work before they commit criminal acts.In Pakistan even if you are caught red handed nothing is done.It was proved in a court that Nawaz took bribes from ISI.Was any action taken against him ? He should have been sent to jail and disqualified from politics.I guess you will say there was no massacre in model town either .Where is the proof? .
I thinlk your concept of proof is different from everyone else.I will give you an example.Allegations were made against a journalist in UK that he was hacking peoples mobile phones.After looking into allegation the police filed a case against him.The police did ask anyone for proof first.t was proved in a court that he did hack the phones and the judge jailed him.The police investigates and then if it thinks there is a case to be answered the public prosecutor charges the person.Its up to the courts to decide if anyone is guilty or not.In Pakistan the police is not independent so it will never act without the permission of government.anyways i don't agree...you just can't blame anyone without proof....:)
I thinlk your concept of proof is different from everyone else.I will give you an example.Allegations were made against a journalist in UK that he was hacking peoples mobile phones.After looking into allegation the police filed a case against him.The police did ask anyone for proof first.t was proved in a court that he did hack the phones and the judge jailed him.The police investigates and then if it thinks there is a case to be answered the public prosecutor charges the person.Its up to the courts to decide if anyone is guilty or not.In Pakistan the police is not independent so it will never act without the permission of government.
anyways i don't agree...you just can't blame anyone without proof....:)