1965 War Between Pakistan and India - Zaid Hamid

khanpanni

Minister (2k+ posts)
Keep singing your glories but the fact is that you were the looser than and are still a looser.


You listen this historical speech of General Ayub Khan. The reality of this war and I have
seen this war ? Now the war tactics have changed, against strong Atomic country Pakistan
intervention comes from backyard. In East Pakistan in the shape of Maktibahni and now TTP, BLA etc. Mr. Lal Bahodur Shastari died after the peace pact in
Tashkakent, why ?
Ayub Khan address's to the nation regarding the ceasefire of 1965 war on 22-09-1965(Urdu).wmv.
Lal Bahadur Shastri - Meeting in Tashkent 1966
 

ASQR1

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Keep singing your glories but the fact is that you were the looser than and are still a looser.

How do yiou figure that or are you pleasing yourself by baseless pride, did u guys not send a video taken in Amritsar of a stolen Lahore omni bus lieing to world media bout Lahore has fallen and embressed the whole world media.
did your gen. not boast about having tea in gymkhana, Lahore.
 

Kavalier

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Yar yeh Zaid Sahib kay Qadiyanon kay baray many kaisay khayalat hayn?? The thing is that in 1965 war, major command of armed forces was in Qadyani hands, specially in Sialkot (Chawinda)...Kuch samaj nahi aayi, Zaid Hamid sab ki.......

Baqi sari Neutral world to yehi kahti hay kay Pakistan nay war start ki Kashmir mayn lakin Zaid sab kah rahayn hayn kay raat kay andheray mayn india nay hamla kr diya..... why he is trying to distort history and teach our children to be non-realist?? Emotional Fool....apni dukan chamkanay ki pari hoi hay issay....


 

Unicorn

Banned
You listen this historical speech of General Ayub Khan. The reality of this war and I have
seen this war ? Now the war tactics have changed, against strong Atomic country Pakistan
intervention comes from backyard. In East Pakistan in the shape of Maktibahni and now TTP, BLA etc. Mr. Lal Bahodur Shastari died after the peace pact in
Tashkakent, why ?
Ayub Khan address's to the nation regarding the ceasefire of 1965 war on 22-09-1965(Urdu).wmv.

Lal Bahadur Shastri - Meeting in Tashkent 1966


Why Shastari died in Tashkant?? Heart attack. People die of it sitting on the toilet- Why?
 

khanpanni

Minister (2k+ posts)
Why Shastari died in Tashkant?? Heart attack. People die of it sitting on the toilet- Why?


There are many theories but it seems that he was removed more or less murdered by his own hindu extrimist ?
Because they did not want to persue such an agreement. You many watch the links and decide by your own ?

The Indian Conspiracy - Death of Lal Bahadur Shastri

Wikipedia Link ?
http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rc...Sn6vkw&usg=AFQjCNHRx6n3mjx8nmYqa941DSZuXOXOKQ

My way is to speak with referances and arguments if you like it or not ?
 

desicad

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
There are many theories but it seems that he was removed more or less murdered by his own hindu extrimist ?
Because they did not want to persue such an agreement. You many watch the links and decide by your own ?

The Indian Conspiracy - Death of Lal Bahadur Shastri

Wikipedia Link ?
http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rc...Sn6vkw&usg=AFQjCNHRx6n3mjx8nmYqa941DSZuXOXOKQ

My way is to speak with referances and arguments if you like it or not ?
This video talks about some conspiracy by Indira Gandhi to kill Lal Bahadur Shastri so that she can become PM sooner.........
Now for the sake of argument lets say it is true.........so what you are trying to prove regarding the 1965 war?
 

desicad

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
You must forgot 1000 year of dick slap from muslims. You still piss in your lungi when you hear Muhammad Bin Qasim, Gahuri, Babar, Ghaznawi. Time will come soon when every place will be shamshan for piss drinkers.
So what you are trying to say here?.......ok your heroes invaded, killed, looted, destroyed temples, caused mayhem......what else?.....
How many did they manage to convert through sword?.......
 

desicad

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
[MENTION=30241]Qureshi1975[/MENTION]
Just want to understand why are they your heroes....what did they do?.......there has to be some reason know.......
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Qureshi1975

Banned
[MENTION=8094]desicad[/MENTION]

The biggest achivment for them to make your forefathers human who was living a life of slum before muslim came there. You guys learn to respect (some of it) relationship. Muslim's sowrd brought stability before that you better know how stable was sub continent.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

desicad

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
The biggest achivment for them to make your forefathers human who was living a life of slum before muslim came there. You guys learn to respect (some of it) relationship. Muslim's sowrd brought stability before that you better know how stable was sub continent.
Life was good and people content and self sufficient and that is the reason Indians of those times never had to attack any other lands in search of livelihood so your claims are completely bogus.......actually the region was very rich in culture and heritage and world's first university was in the subcontinent.......basically you are saying is that your forefathers were also not humans and as soon as your heroes invaded everything fell in place.....they didn't kill, loot and cause any destruction..........as per your arguments if people of a region are living substandard lives then a stronger power should invade to make their lives better, afghanistan for example........right?
now tell me how sure are you that not a single conversion was with sword.........
 
Last edited:

ASQR1

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)

How do you figure that, in attacking on Lahore with a large strength India failed mseably and left a mark of failure on world armies as it did not even achieve more than zero. a stark failure.sent fake videos to BBC about lahore being taken, what a fake way of operating.

failuire in Sialkot, big attack with 300 tanks, 80 to 100,000 soldiers could not go beyond few miles, according to Army experts of the world, Indian should have penetrated 60 miles in to Pakistani terroty. A big failure for Indian Army and story in Khemkaran is clear, had India /army not use water but stand like good soldiers and fight but they were cowards and benefitted by letting the water flood the battlefield, what a shame.
 

Qureshi1975

Banned
Life was good and people content and self sufficient and that is the reason Indians of those times never had to attack any other lands in search of livelihood so your claims are completely bogus.......actually the region was very rich in culture and heritage and world's first university was in the subcontinent.......basically you are saying is that your forefathers were also not humans and as soon as your heroes invaded everything fell in place.....they didn't kill, loot and cause any destruction..........as per your arguments if people of a region are living substandard lives then a stronger power should invade to make their lives better, afghanistan for example........right?
now tell me how sure are you that not a single conversion was with sword.........


Which culture the one you have in a fictionery stories books like Rymain and geeta? you must be talking about culture where women was treated as an animal refering to sati which is still exist in your culture. If your culture had no flaws then why your forfathers accepts us as a ruler for 1000 years? why they did not rose against us in 1000 years? You refer it afghanistan but you forgot even though they had a sub standard living but their culture and living was and still have much higher then your forfathers.
 

Back
Top