http://www.newswithviews.com/Kincaid/cliff421.htm
By Cliff Kincaid
May 28, 2010
NewsWithViews.com
[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]There is a simple reason why the gay rights lobby is trying to rush through repeal of the Pentagons homosexual exclusion policy. They know that a comprehensive review of a proposed change would disclose the substantial evidence that admission of open and active homosexuals would put our troops in further danger through exposure to tainted blood. In fact, evidence to this effect is already in the hands of top military commanders and Pentagon officers.[/FONT]
[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]The Pentagon understands that 19,000 soldiers already have HIV/AIDS and that some -- if not most -- came down with the deadly disease through prohibited gay sexual conduct. It is common sense that opening the ranks to open and active homosexuals would only increase this problem.[/FONT]
[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]Heres another critical fact that a comprehensive review would disclose --there is no blood test that can be guaranteed to screen HIV and other deadly diseases out of the blood supply once the gay males, who are currently prohibited from donating blood, are welcomed into the services.[/FONT]
[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]Meantime, Peter Sprigg of the Family Research Council reportsin a blockbuster new study that the evidence indicates that a disproportionate number of assaults in the military are committed by homosexuals.[/FONT]
[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]The evidence, in short, already demonstrates a significant problem of homosexual misconduct in the Armed Forces, even though such behavior is supposed to be prohibited.[/FONT]
[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]Oblivious to the demonstrated need to tighten up rather than loosen the current policy, the Washington Post has editorializedin favor of a quick congressional vote, saying it is reprehensible to keep homosexuals out of the military. One of the Posts leading editorial writers, Jonathan Capehart, is a homosexual activist who used to cover gay sex clubs.[/FONT]
[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]The gay rights lobby is labeling as offensive a new video that exposes homosexual misconduct in the Armed Forces and wants it taken down from YouTube. They have not pinpointed one factual inaccuracy in the film or in the heavily documented 60-page report by Dale OLeary that forms the basis of it.[/FONT]
[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]Their desperation is being guided by the realization that male homosexual conduct is directly linked to tainted blood and deadly diseases such as HIV/AIDS, and that no cure or vaccine has yet been found.[/FONT]
[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]They dont want the public to learn about cases such as Johnnie Lamar Dalton, a soldier who came down with HIV and then infected a boy he met in a gay online chat room. Dalton went to prison, but homosexuals in the Armed Forces coming down with HIV/AIDS cost at least $18,000-$20,000 a year per patient.[/FONT]
[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]A comprehensive review, which would also take into account the views of our soldiers currently fighting two wars, was promised to our troops before any legislative action was to be taken. The comprehensive review was to be completed by December and was part of the questionable deal that Defense Secretary Robert Gates made in order to accommodate President Obamas irresponsible campaign pledge to admit open gays, no matter what the consequences to military readiness, order, and discipline.[/FONT]
[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]The promise to our troops would be broken if the Congress votes now to admit open and active homosexuals into the ranks.[/FONT]
[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]The gays and their allies, however, dont care about the troops. They want their rights and they want them now. They simply dont care if a premature policy change causes thousands of our soldiers to leave the Armed Forces in disgust and dismay and thousands more never to sign up because they dont want to room or shower with individuals sexually attracted to them[/FONT][/FONT]
[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]SAVING SOLDIERS FROM GAY DEATH
By Cliff Kincaid
May 28, 2010
NewsWithViews.com
[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]There is a simple reason why the gay rights lobby is trying to rush through repeal of the Pentagons homosexual exclusion policy. They know that a comprehensive review of a proposed change would disclose the substantial evidence that admission of open and active homosexuals would put our troops in further danger through exposure to tainted blood. In fact, evidence to this effect is already in the hands of top military commanders and Pentagon officers.[/FONT]
[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]The Pentagon understands that 19,000 soldiers already have HIV/AIDS and that some -- if not most -- came down with the deadly disease through prohibited gay sexual conduct. It is common sense that opening the ranks to open and active homosexuals would only increase this problem.[/FONT]
[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]Heres another critical fact that a comprehensive review would disclose --there is no blood test that can be guaranteed to screen HIV and other deadly diseases out of the blood supply once the gay males, who are currently prohibited from donating blood, are welcomed into the services.[/FONT]
[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]Meantime, Peter Sprigg of the Family Research Council reportsin a blockbuster new study that the evidence indicates that a disproportionate number of assaults in the military are committed by homosexuals.[/FONT]
[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]The evidence, in short, already demonstrates a significant problem of homosexual misconduct in the Armed Forces, even though such behavior is supposed to be prohibited.[/FONT]
[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]Oblivious to the demonstrated need to tighten up rather than loosen the current policy, the Washington Post has editorializedin favor of a quick congressional vote, saying it is reprehensible to keep homosexuals out of the military. One of the Posts leading editorial writers, Jonathan Capehart, is a homosexual activist who used to cover gay sex clubs.[/FONT]
[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]The gay rights lobby is labeling as offensive a new video that exposes homosexual misconduct in the Armed Forces and wants it taken down from YouTube. They have not pinpointed one factual inaccuracy in the film or in the heavily documented 60-page report by Dale OLeary that forms the basis of it.[/FONT]
[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]Their desperation is being guided by the realization that male homosexual conduct is directly linked to tainted blood and deadly diseases such as HIV/AIDS, and that no cure or vaccine has yet been found.[/FONT]
[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]They dont want the public to learn about cases such as Johnnie Lamar Dalton, a soldier who came down with HIV and then infected a boy he met in a gay online chat room. Dalton went to prison, but homosexuals in the Armed Forces coming down with HIV/AIDS cost at least $18,000-$20,000 a year per patient.[/FONT]
[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]A comprehensive review, which would also take into account the views of our soldiers currently fighting two wars, was promised to our troops before any legislative action was to be taken. The comprehensive review was to be completed by December and was part of the questionable deal that Defense Secretary Robert Gates made in order to accommodate President Obamas irresponsible campaign pledge to admit open gays, no matter what the consequences to military readiness, order, and discipline.[/FONT]
[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]The promise to our troops would be broken if the Congress votes now to admit open and active homosexuals into the ranks.[/FONT]
[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]The gays and their allies, however, dont care about the troops. They want their rights and they want them now. They simply dont care if a premature policy change causes thousands of our soldiers to leave the Armed Forces in disgust and dismay and thousands more never to sign up because they dont want to room or shower with individuals sexually attracted to them[/FONT]
