چیف جسٹس کا بس یہی کام ہے کہ وہ تزئین و آرائش اور چونا کرا دیں

[Arshad Chachak]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1856379588471103984

 

[ranaji]

اور جو شکل اور اوقات اور پرسنالٹی سے خود چونا کرنے والا نظر آتا ہے اسکو آئینی چونے والی کوچی کا سربراہ بنا دیا ہے
اور اب وہ چونے کرنے والا اس چیف جسٹس سے چونا کر ا رہا ہے بس چونا ابھی تک انیس سو اٹھاون والی مارشل لائی پرانے طرز کی کوچی سے ہورہا ہے جبکہ ساری دنیا رولر اور سپرے یا برش پر آگئی ہے لیکن سپریم کوچی ابھی تک ایوبی ضیا ئی اور مشرفی طرف کی کوچی چل رہی ہے اور یحئی تو چیف جسٹس خود ہی ہے

 

[crankthskunk]

Why the fcuk did he accept the position? If he didn't the story would have been different. They had to appoint either the first two most senior judges or go to Aminuddin Khan. In that case, they have to appoint someone else to become the chief of the judicial committee/court.

 

[Wake up Pak]

The Fucking moron is pleased that the title "chief justice of Pakistan" is associated with him. He possesses no authority whatsoever.

 

[Husain中川日本]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1856379588471103984

تھوڑے دن ایسے ہی چلا تو یہ جرنیلوں کو سانڈے کا تیل بھی دیا کریں گے

 

[Taimur.javed]

Why the fcuk did he accept the position? If he didn't the story would have been different. They had to appoint either the first two most senior judges or go to Aminuddin Khan. In that case, they have to appoint someone else to become the chief of the judicial committee/court.

What makes you think situation would've been different? Then Aminuddin would be both Head of Constitutional Bench and CJP (both). There is no law that CJP cannot be head of constitutional bench. All Gov members had to do was say that both persons should be same, we have kept unity of power in SC etc.

What YA could've done was constituted full court to look at 26th Amendment before calling meeting on constitutional bench formation. Another thing Mansoor & CO. could've done was formation of Full Court to review Presidential Ordinance that brought Aminuddin to Practice & Procedure commitee in place of Muneeb Akhtar BEFORE hearing on 63-A was started. Then 63A wouldn't have been reversed and no 26th Ammendment.

They miss all the boats in effort to avoid confrontation and this is where we are today. Pity the fools, they can't even standup for themselves

 

[Mocha7]

What makes you think situation would've been different? Then Aminuddin would be both Head of Constitutional Bench and CJP (both). There is no law that CJP cannot be head of constitutional bench. All Gov members had to do was say that both persons should be same, we have kept unity of power in SC etc.

What YA could've done was constituted full court to look at 26th Amendment before calling meeting on constitutional bench formation. Another thing Mansoor & CO. could've done was formation of Full Court to review Presidential Ordinance that brought Aminuddin to Practice & Procedure commitee in place of Muneeb Akhtar BEFORE hearing on 63-A was started. Then 63A wouldn't have been reversed and no 26th Ammendment.

They miss all the boats in effort to avoid confrontation and this is where we are today. Pity the fools, they can't even standup for themselves

Please do let me know ye ahmaqana batein youthees ko kon batata hai. Batana zaroor where did you derive this wisdom from.

What YA could've done was constituted full court to look at 26th Amendment before calling meeting on constitutional bench formation.

There was only one way to form a full court bench and that was to give all judges the status of a constitutional bench. But after the twenty-sixth constitutional amendment, this authority is not vested with the Judges Committee but with the Supreme Judicial Council. When a vote was taken on the formation of a full court bench, five members, including the Chief Justice, voted in favor and all the other members voted against.

Another thing Mansoor & CO. could've done was formation of Full Court to review Presidential Ordinance that brought Aminuddin to Practice & Procedure commitee in place of Muneeb Akhtar BEFORE hearing on 63-A was started.

Please do let me know when an ordinance effectively pull out Munib out of the judges committee, how can he and Mansoor form a full member bench to review the merits of the ordinance.

 

[Taimur.javed]

Please do let me know ye ahmaqana batein youthees ko kon batata hai. Batana zaroor where did you derive this wisdom from.

There was only one way to form a full court bench and that was to give all judges the status of a constitutional bench. But after the twenty-sixth constitutional amendment, this authority is not vested with the Judges Committee but with the Supreme Judicial Council. When a vote was taken on the formation of a full court bench, five members, including the Chief Justice, voted in favor and all the other members voted against.


Please do let me know when an ordinance effectively pull out Munib out of the judges committee, how can he and Mansoor form a full member bench to review the merits of the ordinance.

Barrister Salahuddin and other legal minds say that majority of Supreme Court judges can call a full court session. They don't need CJP or Practice committees approval.

 

[Mocha7]

Barrister Salahuddin and other legal minds say that majority of Supreme Court judges can call a full court session. They don't need CJP or Practice committees approval.

I don't expect such idiocy from Barrister Salahuddin. Even pro PTI Aitizaz Ahsan is of the same view as I have mentioned above. Can you share the video of him saying that?

 

[Taimur.javed]

I don't expect such idiocy from Barrister Salahuddin. Even pro PTI Aitizaz Ahsan is of the same view as I have mentioned above. Can you share the video of him saying that?

I will when I have time. I heard it myself. It is not idiotic

 

[ranaji]

ویسے حرامئ قاضئ فراڈ عیسئ تو پوری قوم کو چونا لگاتا رہا۔ سارا وقت

 

[fnaeem]

Koiloon ki dalali main moon Kala
Khakioon ki dalali main moon splooged