خطرناک اسلام مخالف بل پاس

[knowledge88]

 

[knowledge88]

Only Jamat-e-Islami opposed this bill, Otherwise, PTI, PMLN, PPP supported this bill.

See this video

 

[Lubnakhan]

Domestic violence is a grave issue in society! I don’t see anything wrong in addressing this issue!

 

[Bubber Shair]

بڑا ہی حرامی مولوی ہے۔ اس نے نام پر جو طنز کیا ہے وہ انتہای گھٹیا اور شرمناک ہے۔ اپنا نقطہ نظر بیان کرے مگر کسی مسلمان کے بارے میں غلط تاثر دینا کہ شائد وہ مسلمان ہی نہیں خاص کر ایسی جگہ پر بیٹھ کر جو مسجد کہلاتی ہو۔
صادق سنجرانی کو اس پر توہین کا پرچہ کروانا چاہئے، یہ چئرمین کو ہندو بتانا چاہ رہا ہے حالانکہ سنجرانی ایک فیملی نیم ہوسکتا ہے​

 

[knowledge88]

Domestic violence is a grave issue in society! I don’t see anything wrong in addressing this issue!

The bill also prohibits a father from physically or verbally disciplining his child.

see this video

 

[knowledge88]

 

[back to the future]

Yeh pti main do chaar haramzadiyan aur ppp ki westernised liberal
Ju kbhi Israel ku Tasleem krnay ki baat krti aur kbhi qadiyanion ku main stream Muslims main laanay ki baat krti hain
Tashadud bilkul khatam hona chahyay
Laikin jhagra kbhi aik fareeq shruu nahin krta
Agar ziadti ho rhi hay isko dekhna chahyay
Laikin aik blanket cover dena society ku westernised krnay Kay brabar hain

 

[knowledge88]

Domestic violence is a grave issue in society! I don’t see anything wrong in addressing this issue!

Also see this video

 

[miafridi]

No harm in revisiting the clauses, or referring it to an Islamic body before passing any such bill. Doing so will only improve the bill as well as make it more beneficial and less controversial.

At the same time Maulvis/Muftis, and anchors should refrain from false allegations/accusations as well else they are not following proper Islam either, which has bound us to refrain from such false accusations, just for example Maulvi Naeem Butt Sahab is accusing Sadiq Sanjrani for the bill when in fact he probably has no role in it and he is bound to pass a bill if majority supports it. He is also accusing PM Imran khan for it too when Imran khan probably doesn't even know about the bill at the moment. So like any responsible person we should be raising our voice first to make the responsible people know and understand the severity of the matter, but if even after listening to the voice they are reluctant to do anything about it then you have the right to accuse them of deliberately doing such thing.

 

[Sean]

بہت اچھا کیا ہے۔
ظلم کسی پر بھی نہیں ہونا چاہیے۔
رسول اللہ ص نے کب بچوں کو مارا تھا ؟
جعلی حدیثیں ڈال ڈال کر اسلام کو بدنام کر دیا ہے لوطی مولویوں نے۔

 

[FahadBhatti]

Deoband ke ulema pehle apne madrasson mein bachon ki bunden maarne ka kaam shuru kia hua hai usko dekhen. Masjidon aur madrasson mein quran ki mojoodgi mein ye loge kamsin aur baray students ka jasmani istehsaal kerte hen aur phir yehi tulba farighul tehsil ho ker mufti ban jaate hen .

 

[knowledge88]

بہت اچھا کیا ہے۔
ظلم کسی پر بھی نہیں ہونا چاہیے۔
رسول اللہ ص نے کب بچوں کو مارا تھا ؟
جعلی حدیثیں ڈال ڈال کر اسلام کو بدنام کر دیا ہے لوطی مولویوں نے۔

But even the parents will not be able to check their children's mobile phones. It will be considered a breach of privacy. And the parents can be arrested for doing so. see the explanation.

 

[knowledge88]

No harm in revisiting the clauses, or referring it to an Islamic body before passing any such bill. Doing so will only improve the bill as well as make it more beneficial and less controversial.

The bill has already been passed. Why to revisit? , It has been supported by all the major parties i.e. PTI, PMLN, and PPP.

 

[arifkarim]

The bill also prohibits a father from physically or verbally disciplining his child.

see this video

Yeh pti main do chaar haramzadiyan aur ppp ki westernised liberal
Ju kbhi Israel ku Tasleem krnay ki baat krti aur kbhi qadiyanion ku main stream Muslims main laanay ki baat krti hain
Tashadud bilkul khatam hona chahyay
Laikin jhagra kbhi aik fareeq shruu nahin krta
Agar ziadti ho rhi hay isko dekhna chahyay
Laikin aik blanket cover dena society ku westernised krnay Kay brabar hain

Also see this video

But even the parents will not be able to check their children's mobile phones. It will be considered a breach of privacy. And the parents can be arrested for doing so. see the explanation.

جب ضیا حدود آرڈیننس پار کر کے ملک کی خواتین اور بچوں پر ظلم کو قانونی تحفظ فراہم کر رہا تھا اس وقت یہ لوطی مولوی اسے عین اسلامی و شرعی بل قرار دے رہے تھے۔ ان حرامزادے لوطی مولویوں کا احتجاج کوئی معنی نہیں رکھتا۔ یہ ہر اس چیز کے خلاف ہیں جس میں ملک و قوم کا فائدہ ہے۔

 

[FahadBhatti]

in molana hazrat ka islam se koi taluq nahin , sab ziada se ziada chanda jama kerne , bachay gher ker apne madarris mein la ker unko g****u banane aur inteha pasand banane ki game hai.

 

[knowledge88]

جب ضیا حدود آرڈیننس پار کر کے ملک کی خواتین اور بچوں پر ظلم کو قانونی تحفظ فراہم کر رہا تھا اس وقت یہ لوطی مولوی اسے عین اسلامی و شرعی بل قرار دے رہے تھے۔ ان حرامزادے لوطی مولویوں کا احتجاج کوئی معنی نہیں رکھتا۔ یہ ہر اس چیز کے خلاف ہیں جس میں ملک و قوم کا فائدہ ہے۔

I have written many times against General Zia's Hudod Ordinance on siasat.pk. Specially Molana Munawar Hassan interview supporting Hudod ordinance was appalling.

 

[Rambler]

The bill also prohibits a father from physically or verbally disciplining his child.

see this video

You are a knowledgeable person and can read. Don't see videos rather read the bill first and then comment.

 

[Rambler]

No harm in revisiting the clauses, or referring it to an Islamic body before passing any such bill. Doing so will only improve the bill as well as make it more beneficial and less controversial.

At the same time Maulvis/Muftis, and anchors should refrain from false allegations/accusations as well else they are not following proper Islam either, which has bound us to refrain from such false accusations, just for example Maulvi Naeem Butt Sahab is accusing Sadiq Sanjrani for the bill when in fact he probably has no role in it and he is bound to pass a bill if majority supports it. He is also accusing PM Imran khan for it too when Imran khan probably doesn't even know about the bill at the moment. So like any responsible person we should be raising our voice first to make the responsible people know and understand the severity of the matter, but if even after listening to the voice they are reluctant to do anything about it then you have the right to accuse them of deliberately doing such thing.

If you read the bill, it is very reasonable and there is nothing in it that is against Islam. We as a nation must stop watching youtube videos and learn to read.

 

[cestmoi ✅️]

This is why MGTOW

 

[knowledge88]

You are a knowledgeable person and can read. Don't see videos rather read the bill first and then comment.

I have read the bill myself.

See the link for the bill and read it yourself. If you find anything contrary to what I claim, I will not hesitate to apologize.

http://www.senate.gov.pk/uploads/documents/1624355124_229.pdf