اور کمیشن بں گیا

PappuChikna

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
دل تو نھیں کرتا آج اس بارے بات کرںے کو لیکن

لوٹ جاتی ھے ادھر کو بھی ںظر کیا کیجے

اں بےشرم لوگو اب بھی ھوش نھی آیا.
ںا اس قوم کو.

کؤی چوری بےیمانی چھوڑںے کو تیار نهیں



مرو کمبخت و !

I dont blame judges for that.


چیف جسٹس انور ظہیر جمالی کی سربراہی میں عدالت عظمیٰ کے پانچ رکنی بینچ نے بدھ کو وزیرِ اعظم کے خلاف دائر درخواستوں کی سماعت کے دوران ریمارکس میں کہا کہ الزام لگانے والی پارٹی اور جس پر الزام لگایا گیا ہے دونوں نے جو دستاویزات عدالت میں جمع کرائی ہیں وہ کوئی بھی فیصلہ دینے کے لیے ناکافی ہیں، لہٰذا اِس معاملے کی تحقیق کے لیے کیوں نہ کمیشن بنا دیا جائے۔




http://www.bbc.com/urdu/pakistan-38233135
 
Last edited by a moderator:

dingdong

Banned
Aggar Judges koi faisla karnay ki slaahiyat nahi rakhtay to supreme Court ko tala laga dain aur jo judges faisla karnay ki slaahiyatt saay mahroom hain unko judgi saay marhoom karr diyaa jaiy takeh woh koi mehnat mazdoori karr ke halaal rizq saay bachon kaa pait paal sakain kyonkeh jiss cheez ki tankhwah milti ho aur woh kaam naa kiya jaiy to woh tankhah nahi haraam ki kamai yaa najaiz kamai hoti hai
 

PappuChikna

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
i dont agree missfit and dingdong.

PTI submitted bull in the court. judges kept telling them not to submit newspaper cuttings and speeches but this is all they had. No solid paper work.

I dont blame judges at all.
 

WatanDost

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
جیسا کہ کیس کے آغاز میں کسی سیانے ںے کہا تھا

پاناما کیس کا کؤی ںہ کوئ نتیجہ بہرحال نکلے گا

یا تو شریف خاندان ننگا ھو گا ، یا پھر سپریم کورٹ

مبارک ھو ننگی عوام ، کم از کم اس حمام میں تم اس کیس کے بعد
اکیلے ننگے نهیں رهو گے
 

values

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
اب سب حکمرانوں کو اجازت ہے کہ کھل کر لوٹ مار کریں ...
مبارک ہو عوام کو کہ وہ پھر سے داغے گئے ہیں ..چور سامنے ،چوری کا مال سامنے ،چور اسے اپنا مال بھی کہہ رہا ہے اور ادلے کہتی ہے ثبوت مکمل نہیں ..
لعنت نہ بھیجوں تو کیا تبرک بھیجوں ..
 

Okara

Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
What kind of papers PTI must provide?
When PM statement in National assembly become political and Qatri letter become proof then only way to prove such case is to handover Sharif family to SHO of a Punjab Police and in few hours you will have the results.
When Ishaq Dar admitted money laundering then what kind of proof we need?
i dont agree missfit and dingdong.

PTI submitted bull in the court. judges kept telling them not to submit newspaper cuttings and speeches but this is all they had. No solid paper work.

I dont blame judges at all.
 

PappuChikna

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
What kind of papers PTI must provide?
When PM statement in National assembly become political and Qatri letter become proof then only way to prove such case is to handover Sharif family to SHO of a Punjab Police and in few hours you will have the results.
When Ishaq Dar admitted money laundering then what kind of proof we need?



Confession
is not enough.

Court wants circumstantial evidence.
 

PappuChikna

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
For example?

bhai
jee, mein wakeel nahi.

but from court proceedings and remarks, it was clear PTI was not presenting the proofs court wanted.

They presented news paper cuttings and speeches which court clearly said is not enough.
 

PappuChikna

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
video recordings of sharifs saying that they committed the crime. wait those are also inadmissible in Pakistani "courts".

video recordings and confessions are insufficient in any court, not just pakistan.

You need proofs.
 

miafridi

Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
Doob marnay ka maqam hai, k Jinki properties hai woh khud koi saboot nahi de pa rahay..

Aesa toh tab hi hota hai, jab log Tajawazaaaaat par najaez qabza kartay hai..

Magar hairat hai kuch logo(jese k thread starter) ki besharmi par, Jo apni job k liye aaaaakhirat ko bhullll jatay hai...
 

PappuChikna

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
aur inn ko dekhoo..munafiq


اِس پر جماعت اسلامی کے وکیل نے کہا کہ تحریکِ انصاف کے علاوہ دیگر تمام درخواست گزار کمیشن کے قیام پر راضی ہیں۔
اِس پر جماعت اسلامی کے وکیل نے کہا کہ تحریکِ انصاف کے علاوہ دیگر تمام درخواست گزار کمیشن کے قیام پر راضی ہیں۔
 

Okara

Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
All I m saying what kind of proof is admissible in court?
The letter from Qatri resident is a proof?
Can Qatri family prove they bought these flats in 1993 and able to show money trail?

bhai
jee, mein wakeel nahi.

but from court proceedings and remarks, it was clear PTI was not presenting the proofs court wanted.

They presented news paper cuttings and speeches which court clearly said is not enough.
 

PappuChikna

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
i think pti screwed the case, but one thing that totally goes against shareefs and was probably sufficient for the court was shareefs were unable to provide a proper money trail.

lekin museebat yeh hai kay pm punjab sehai, iss liyay he is a farishta.
 

PappuChikna

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Doob marnay ka maqam hai, k Jinki properties hai woh khud koi saboot nahi de pa rahay..

Aesa toh tab hi hota hai, jab log Tajawazaaaaat par najaez qabza kartay hai..

Magar hairat hai kuch logo(jese k thread starter) ki besharmi par, Jo apni job k liye aaaaakhirat ko bhullll jatay hai...


bhai
jee, pet pooja bhi laazim hai.
 

PappuChikna

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Please share what exactly should be the proof in this case?


like I said, I am not wakeel. I can only read court remarks and it was clear that court was not getting what it wanted.
if shareefs have to demonstrate non-guilty then they must provide paper trail, which they did not I believe.
if pti had to proof money laundering took place then they should have provided some papers showing the money laundering and/or missing assets from shareefs returns. PTI did provide something but it was not black and white.

no doubt, shareefs case look very weak and I hope they are caught and insulted.