When Hindus dug up Akbar the Great Tomb and desecrated his bones

Liberal 000

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
In 1685, Rajaram, a Jat zamindar at Sisini eight kilometers west of Agra strengthened fortress of hardened mud. Shileded by difficult terrain and bomboo/scrub forests these forts could beat off all but the most determined assaults. Already refusing to pay the revenue , Rajaram led his Jat clansmen to plunder traffic on Royal road. They even attempted to enter Sikandra to despoil Akbar’s tomb, but were driven back by the faujdar. Soon the overland route to Deccan was virtually closed. Even great nobles traveling with their entourages were not safe. In 1686, a Turani amir, Aghar Khan , who was marching from Kabul to Bijapur with his troops and household , tried to pursue the Jats who had plundered his baggage train. Outside the Jat fort he was killed along with his son-in-law and eighty of his followers.

In the late 1687 , Aurangzeb sent Bidar Bakht , his young grandson , north with troops to suppress the Jats. In the interim the newly appointed governor of the Punjab, Mahabat Khan, a former Hyderabad officer, had encamped near Sikandra on the Yamuna river. The Jats boldly attacked his camp in force and only retired after losing four hundred casualties.

Rajaram’s Jats outmaneuvered the local imperial forces and occupied Sikandra where they succeeded in looting Akbar’s tomb. According to Manucci,

“Already angered by the demands of the governors and faujdars for revenue , a great number of them (Jats) assembled and marched mausoleum of that great conqueror Akbar. Against him living they could effect nothing ; they therefore wreaked vengeance on his sepulchre. They began their pillage by breaking in the great gates of bronze which it had , robbing the valuable precious stones and plates…. of gold and silver , and destroying what they were not able to carry away. Dragging out the bones of Akbar, they threw them angrily into the fire and burnt them.”

The desecration of tomb was the greatest affront possible to the house and linage of Timur. After this incident Rajaram , the Jat leader , was killed by Mughal musketeer in a subsequent clash , but the Jat stronghold at Sinsini was untouched.

Aurangzeb responded to these events by commissioning the young Raja Bishun Singh Kachhwaha of Amber (Jaipur) as faujdar of Mathura and as jagirdar of Sinsai , the Jat stronghold. The new commander and his Rajput troops marched directly to the Jat stronghold and besieged it. After a four months siege, the Mughal troops laid a mine successfully , opened a breach and stormed the small fort. Fifteen hundreds Jats defenders and one thousand Mughal soldiers died in this battle. Another small fortress at Sogar fell to the Mughals. By January 1691, the Jat revolt around Agra was suppressed.

Source: The New Cambridge History of India, The Mughal Empire ,page 250-51
 

Liberal 000

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Hindus say Rajaram Jat did it to take the revenge of the merciless killing of his father Gokhal Jat during the 1st Hindu Jat revolt of 1669 by Aurangzeb.

During the Third Jat revolt, Taj Mahal was filled with hay to burn it down
and the beautiful gates of Agra fort were stolen, you can still see those gates installed at Jat fort at Deeg ,Rajastan.
 
Last edited:

Liberal 000

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Is this a cue in advance for the people to start planning to do the same treatment to the looter nawaz butt of jatti loharan's bones after he dies???

Just curious!

You know in 2006, RSS repeated the save story with the grave of a Muslim ruler in Orissa
 

Xiggs

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Aurangzeb was disappointed that his father and brother's bones weren't exhumed by jats. He would have made Rajaram the governor if he did that to shahjahan and Dara Shukoh.
 

Kingfisher

Minister (2k+ posts)
I write truth, truth hurts you . I always expose bad acts and attitude of all communities

The story I posted is from history of India by Cambridge university lol
Truth is you hindus were ruled by Muslims for 1000 years only 10% muslims :) were ruling this coward nation.and again will be ruled by them very soon after Ghazva hind
 

Liberal 000

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Muslims were ghulams or not of Turks ..but nyou were Slaves Ghulams of muslims for 1000 years. :) and still have inferority complex.

Personaly I think, Hindus are better than the Muslims of Turkistan, Egypt,Syria, Iraq, Iran,Afghanistan and Pakistan.

They still follow their religion their culture their languages. 800 years of Islamic rule failed to subsude them

While Iranian, Turks, Afghanis, Pakistaistanis (me included) and all others not only lost everything but became so despised of themselves and their blood that they desperatly started to claim their origin from Abraham.
Some claimed Arab origin and some claimed Jewish one

A Brahmin poet Allama Iqbal described Hindu civilisation in his couplets like this

Younan o Misro Ruma Sab Mit Gaye Jaha se

Qaim Magar hai ab tak namo nisha hamara

Kuch baat hai ky hasti mitti nahi hamari

Sadeon raha hai dushman dory e zama hamara

Ab mujy Hindu declare na ker dena