Statements of shehzada is not evidence in itself only a statement unless supported by proper evidence which is in this case is Bank statement.
You should read some material on evidences and law.
I have read more about law than you can imagine. The fact is that the Qatari ex-PM's statement was NOT recorded. This will be a critical (and perhaps technical) reason for rejecting the JIT's assessment on the Gulf Steel Mills issue. The JIT made a massive mistake by not recording his statement. Even if they thought Al-Ahli/Gulf Steel docs were fake, they could've still recorded the Qatari prince's statement. That would've given not even technical space for consideration of the bench.
I know I am saying something that is against everything that is being projected on the media (no channel is an exception). According to them, PM is about to be disqualified.
My take is that to disqualify the chief executive, you need ROCK SOLID evidence. Not even a 99% probability of the evidence against him can be used to DQ him. Anything less than 100% should NOT be grounds to disqualify the sitting PM of a government with a single majority (against whom not even a no-confidence motion has been entertained). I will be shocked if he will be DQ and I stand by my words and will gladly accept my error if the SC disqualifies him.
What I do see happening, though, is references in a trial court against Maryam and Hussain where the SC will direct NAB and the higher court to ascertain the authenticity of the trust deed and if it is found fake, then punishment will apply.
And for the PM, the only thing that will 100% prove he is worthy of disqualification is Capital FZE. If the records show that he took even one salary from 2013 May till the dissolving of the company (in 2014) then he will be disqualified. I am not privy to that information so I cannot comment.