Ricky Ponting and the whole Australian team bullying Aleem Dar

sarmad

Senator (1k+ posts)
Ponting loses his cool as the match slips away

Australian Fan get upset with ponting

"Plenty of emails in about Ponting, pretty much can be summarised by this from Tim: "Ponting is an embarrassment. He MUST NOT be allowed to resign, he MUST be SACKED. Such a display of arrogance towards one of the best umpires in the game cannot go unpunished. Mr Crowe - you must invoke the full force of your position. My kids play cricket and this idiot is the one they are supposed to be looking up to." Anyway, the wicket has given us something else to focus on for now."


126302.2.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:

sarmad

Senator (1k+ posts)
Ponting loses his cool as the match slips away

Ricky Ponting finally cracked under the strain of impending Ashes defeat when he picked a series of arguments with the umpires and Kevin Pietersen after the batsman correctly survived a caught-behind referral. Ponting is likely to gain some attention from Ranjan Madugalle, the match referee, for his angry discussions with an ice-cool Aleem Dar early in the second session.

Numerous replays and Hotspot graphics showed no inside edge from Pietersen's push off Ryan Harris, but Ponting remained convinced there had been a mistake. Peter Siddle, who was not bowling at either end, began the animated protest to Dar by pointing at the video screen in the stands, convinced a mark had been made on Hotspot when the ball passed the bat. No highlight existed near the trajectory of the ball and the Snickometer supported the decision of Marais Erasmus, the third official.

Ponting is struggling for runs, carrying a fractured finger and seems only a couple of days from becoming the second Australian captain to lose three Test series against England. Until today he had remained calm under searing scrutiny, but he broke for the first time in public as he backed up his bowler.

The pair surrounded Dar in a scene more likely to occur in a soccer game after a disputed foul, although there was no contact with the official. Ponting then took over from Siddle as the lead prosecutor, standing with hands on hips and then pointing and waving his arms in an exchange that lasted for more than a minute. Dar stayed calm and appeared to indicate that the ball had not brushed the bat where the fielders thought there was a mark. That was clear to all those watching on television, but not to the Australians on the field.

Ponting's mostly one-way conversation carried on for so long that the crowd started to boo and Dar eventually ambled off to square leg to get into position for the next over. Pietersen, who was on 49, was then met by Ponting mid-pitch as the captain continued to vent. There was more booing when he stopped for another lengthy debrief with Tony Hill, the other on-field umpire.

Australia's batsmen lost their discipline on the first day when they were dismissed for 98 and today the captain's behaviour slipped. After the over Ponting, a man at the end of his tether and probably close to the end of his reign, sought out Dar again.

Initially the wicketkeeper Brad Haddin was the only one who thought Pietersen had edged behind, with Harris and Shane Watson, the first slip, not remotely interested. Ponting was swayed by Haddin's claim and called for the replay. The decision wasn't costly because of Ponting's smart call to bring on Siddle, who got one to keep low and had Pietersen lbw for 51.

Ponting's day grew worse when he thought his throw from deep midwicket resulted in the run-out of Jonathan Trott, but the replays forced the umpire to rule in favour of the batsman. After tea Matt Prior was given out caught behind off Mitchell Johnson on 6 and was saved when Dar asked for a replay that showed a no-ball.

Peter English is the Australasia editor of Cricinfo
RSS Feeds: Peter English

ESPN EMEA Ltd.
 

Star Gazer

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Imagine! if the mighty haughty australians had to face a day the way our team faces the baseless, malafide allegations and still manages to outshine!
 

Desienglishman

Senator (1k+ posts)
This is not enough!!! this cheat should be sacked- he is a disgrace to the gentlemans sport.

Ashes: Ricky Ponting fined by ICC after on-field row

Australia captain Ricky Ponting has been fined 40% of his match fee after an ugly row with umpire Aleem Dar on day two of the fourth Ashes Test.
Ponting spent more than a minute remonstrating with Dar after an unsuccessful review of a not out decision against Kevin Pietersen.
Ponting also exchanged words with Pietersen and umpire Tony Hill.
In a statement, the International Cricket Council said Ponting pleaded guilty to a Level 1 offence.
Level 1 of the ICC Code of Conduct relates to "arguing or entering into a prolonged discussion with the umpire about his decision".
And having pleaded guilty, match referee Ranjan Madugalle passed down his judgement without recourse to a full hearing.
Madugalle said: "Ricky's actions as captain of his country were unacceptable. A captain is expected to set the example and not get involved in a prolonged discussion with the on-field umpires and question their decision.
"While pleading guilty to the charge, Ricky understood that the discussion went far too long. He apologised for his action and stated that he has nothing but respect for the umpires and his on-field actions were not intended to show disrespect to Aleem Dar or Tony Hill."

However, Ponting can consider himself lucky he was not charged with a Level 2 offence, which refers to "dissent [which] contains an element of anger or abuse which is directed at the umpire or the umpire's decision or where there is excessive delay in resuming play [or] there is persistent re-reference to the incident over time". A Level 2 offence can lead to a 100% fine and/or a suspension.

Wicketkeeper Brad Haddin had launched a loud but lone appeal for caught behind, convinced Pietersen, who was on 49, had nicked the ball from seamer Ryan Harris.


If I was an adjudicator I'd find it a suspendable offence. It's not like it's the first thing that has happened with him - that's the thing
Former Australia captain Ian Chappell

A video review revealed no 'hot spot' where the ball passed Pietersen's bat but a furious Ponting, who was joined by finger-jabbing seamer Peter Siddle, argued long and hard with Dar, prompting jeers from sections of the Melbourne crowd.
Pakistani Dar, widely regarded as one of the best umpires in world cricket, later called on the technology at his disposal to save England's Matt Prior after he was caught behind.
Prior, who was on five, walked but was called back to the crease as Dar consulted the third umpire, whose review of the footage showed bowler Mitchell Johnson had delivered a no ball.
Pietersen made only two more runs after the first appeal before falling lbw to the fired-up Siddle but Prior went on to form a formidable partnership with Jonathan Trott as England finished the day on 444-5, 346 ahead of the hosts.
Siddle declined to comment on the incident, saying "it's just cricket", while Cricket Australia chief James Sutherland was reluctant to pass judgement on Ponting's behaviour.
However, former Australia skipper Ian Chappell, commentating for Test Match Special before the verdict was announced, suggested Ponting should have been suspended.
Chappell said: "You can't start arguing with umpires over a judgement call, and he then started saying something to Pietersen.
"I know if I'd have been Pietersen what I would have told him to do, go and jump in the lake, because it's none of his business.

"If the ICC are being serious they've got to do something about it because it's not the first time I've seen him arguing with umpires over judgement calls and you can't keep on allowing captains to do that.
"I would have thought a suspension would be in order because it went on for so long and he went to both umpires."


Ponting voiced his frustration over video referrals during the first Test in Brisbane, when England opener Alastair Cook refused to walk after Ponting took what he claimed was a fair catch low to the ground.
The Australia skipper's "catch", when Cook was on 209, was referred to the third umpire but television replays were inconclusive and the English opener went on to make an unbeaten 235.
Ponting said the referral of disputed catches to inadequate technology was a "blight on the game".



http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/england/9322256.stm
 
Last edited by a moderator:

harisuae

Senator (1k+ posts)
I think no action has been taken against ponting by match refree. If any Pakistani player has done this then he must be banned for few matches.
 

rana14801

Senator (1k+ posts)
action has been taken against Ponting.he has been fined a total of 40% match fee. it is debate able that whether this is enough or not. fact is that GORA BADSHA is unable to digest the truth about Aleem Daar that he is the best umpire being coloured and specially being a Pakistani.we may see some other blames or efforts by GORA BADSHAH to engage Aleem Daar in some sort of scandles in future as well. May Allah protact Aleem Daar. aameen.
 

khalid100

Minister (2k+ posts)
I think no action has been taken against ponting by match refree. If any Pakistani player has done this then he must be banned for few matches.

اب خُوش ہو ميرے بھائ

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/cricket/england/9322256.stm

Fourth Ashes Test: Australia 98 v England 444-5 (stumps, day two)
Venue: Melbourne Dates: 26-30 December Start time: 2330 GMT each day
Coverage: Live on Test Match Special on BBC 5 live sports extra, Radio 4 LW & online; TMS highlights online (UK only) and day's review on the TMS podcast; live text on BBC Sport website; live on Sky Sports 1; highlights on ITV4
_50585894_punter282.jpg
Ponting drew boos from the MCG crowd for remonstrating with Umpire Dar


Australia captain Ricky Ponting has been fined 40% of his match fee after an ugly row with umpire Aleem Dar on day two of the fourth Ashes Test.
Ponting spent more than a minute remonstrating with Dar after an unsuccessful review of a not out decision against Kevin Pietersen.
Ponting also exchanged words with Pietersen and umpire Tony Hill.
In a statement, the International Cricket Council said Ponting pleaded guilty to a Level 1 offence.
Level 1 of the ICC Code of Conduct relates to "arguing or entering into a prolonged discussion with the umpire about his decision".
And having pleaded guilty, match referee Ranjan Madugalle passed down his judgement without recourse to a full hearing.


Madugalle said: "Ricky's actions as captain of his country were unacceptable. A captain is expected to set the example and not get involved in a prolonged discussion with the on-field umpires and question their decision.
"While pleading guilty to the charge, Ricky understood that the discussion went far too long. He apologised for his action and stated that he has nothing but respect for the umpires and his on-field actions were not intended to show disrespect to Aleem Dar or Tony Hill."
However, Ponting can consider himself lucky he was not charged with a Level 2 offence, which refers to "dissent [which] contains an element of anger or abuse which is directed at the umpire or the umpire's decision or where there is excessive delay in resuming play [or] there is persistent re-reference to the incident over time". A Level 2 offence can lead to a 100% fine and/or a suspension.
Wicketkeeper Brad Haddin had launched a loud but lone appeal for caught behind, convinced Pietersen, who was on 49, had nicked the ball from seamer Ryan Harris.
o.gif
Tom Fordyce Blog
If I was an adjudicator I'd find it a suspendable offence. It's not like it's the first thing that has happened with him - that's the thing


Former Australia captain Ian Chappell

A video review revealed no 'hot spot' where the ball passed Pietersen's bat but a furious Ponting, who was joined by finger-jabbing seamer Peter Siddle, argued long and hard with Dar, prompting jeers from sections of the Melbourne crowd.
Pakistani Dar, widely regarded as one of the best umpires in world cricket, later called on the technology at his disposal to save England's Matt Prior after he was caught behind.
Prior, who was on five, walked but was called back to the crease as Dar consulted the third umpire, whose review of the footage showed bowler Mitchell Johnson had delivered a no ball.
Pietersen made only two more runs after the first appeal before falling lbw to the fired-up Siddle but Prior went on to form a formidable partnership with Jonathan Trott as England finished the day on 444-5, 346 ahead of the hosts.
Siddle declined to comment on the incident, saying "it's just cricket", while Cricket Australia chief James Sutherland was reluctant to pass judgement on Ponting's behaviour.
However, former Australia skipper Ian Chappell, commentating for Test Match Special before the verdict was announced, suggested Ponting should have been suspended.
Chappell said: "You can't start arguing with umpires over a judgement call, and he then started saying something to Pietersen.
"I know if I'd have been Pietersen what I would have told him to do, go and jump in the lake, because it's none of his business.
_50586503_mikegatting.jpg
Please turn on JavaScript. Media requires JavaScript to play.
</p>
_50586503_mikegatting.jpg
Click to play


Click to play




Gatting sympathises with fined Ponting

"If the ICC are being serious they've got to do something about it because it's not the first time I've seen him arguing with umpires over judgement calls and you can't keep on allowing captains to do that.
"I would have thought a suspension would be in order because it went on for so long and he went to both umpires."
Ponting voiced his frustration over video referrals during the first Test in Brisbane, when England opener Alastair Cook refused to walk after Ponting took what he claimed was a fair catch low to the ground.
The Australia skipper's "catch", when Cook was on 209, was referred to the third umpire but television replays were inconclusive and the English opener went on to make an unbeaten 235.
Ponting said the referral of disputed catches to inadequate technology was a "blight on the game".
 

Chaudhry_1960

Minister (2k+ posts)
I think no action has been taken against ponting by match refree. If any Pakistani player has done this then he must be banned for few matches.

Agreed, and it is because Pakistani cricket players have proved that they can sell their mother if the price is right. I am too disgusted with our cricket players after all the gambling and match fixing they have done in last 20 years. They dont respect their country, their people, the game of cricket. All they care about is money money money.
 

Saladin A

Minister (2k+ posts)
Aussies are bad losers and can not face defeat coming on their faces. Ponting is a nutter and always takes on his anger at non-white umpires. it is about time that he is sacked as a captiain.
 

younus

Senator (1k+ posts)
on the contrary, i think australians quite like Aleem dar thats why he is supervising virtually every aussies match. i think ponting was pissed because of everything going wrong and he did everything wrong. however i dont think he would have been trying to bully aleem dar or questioning his integerity so chill guys :P it happens in tough cricket
 

Night_Hawk

Siasat.pk - Blogger
Ponting fined over umpire row

Updated at 1930 PST Monday, December 27, 2010

12-27-2010_7817_l_u.jpg


MELBOURNE: Australian skipper Ricky Ponting was fined 40 percent of his match fee by the ICC on Monday after clashing with umpires over an unsuccessful video review during the fourth Ashes Test.

With his team struggling on the field against England, Ponting argued with umpire Aleem Dar and then spoke with the other official Tony Hill after Kevin Pietersen was adjudged not to have edged the ball to the wicketkeeper.

The International Cricket Council (ICC) said Ponting pleaded guilty to a charge of "arguing or entering into a prolonged discussion with the umpire about his decision."

Ponting's fine equates to around 5,400 Australian dollars (5,400 US dollars).

The ICC said the matter had been determined by match referee Ranjan Madugalle without the need for a full hearing.

"Ricky’s actions as captain of his country were unacceptable," Madugalle said in a statement.

"A captain is expected to set the example and not get involved in a prolonged discussion with the on-field umpires and question their decision.

"While pleading guilty to the charge, Ricky understood that the discussion went far too long.

"He apologised for his action and stated that he has nothing but respect for the umpires and his on-field actions were not intended to show disrespect to Aleem Dar or Tony Hill."

It was the fifth time Ponting, as Australian captain, has been fined by the ICC for dissent or his conduct in the last six years.

Pietersen was on 49 when wicketkeeper Brad Haddin persuaded Ponting to ask for a review of the decision to give him not-out, after a ball passed between the England talisman played and missed at a Ryan harris delivery.

But "hot spot" replays failed to show an edge and Pietersen stayed, much to the annoyance of Ponting, who argued with both umpires and exchanged sharp words with Pietersen about the decision, believing he had made contact with the ball.

Australian fast bowler Peter Siddle weighed in as Ponting clashed with Dar, wagging a finger at the Pakistani match official.
Pietersen only made two more runs before Siddle trapped him lbw.

http://www.thenews.com.pk/NewsDetail.aspx?ID=8140
 

shehreyar

MPA (400+ posts)
masha allah hamary aleem dar ka faysala hamisha hi perfact hota hay koi us ko chaleng nahi kar sakta ya azat may ray allah ki daein hay jis ka hum ko shokar ada karna chahiay.allah nay pori dunya maien aleem bhai ko azat bakhshi(amen)