Pmln Khalil Tahir Sindhu went Uk to meet his leader but Nawaz Sharif don’t meet low rank workers so he came back

Nawazcophansi76

Senator (1k+ posts)
Agaaya ummay ka puttar with his rant of the day.....abhey khotey ki aulaad.....he can't play the game (parliamentary system) so you wanna change the rules (presidential system).....
Oi Murabadi Nawaz k Nakus Tuttay baz. Chup Gandowah. Phaliamunth have pimps prostitutes, rapist sex offenders sodomite and your father a known child rapist sitting in it.

55% sugar mafia is this Phalimunt of kunjurs.

PRESIDENTIAL SYSTEM Gandowah serves Pakistan much better. Modi key Jhaant.
 

nasir77

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Meray pas tum ho ki kamyabi kay baad Meray pas tum kuan nahin ho.................. Corrupt Media Mafia watch dog of PM-LN will start barking soon......................
 

Vitamin_C

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Who cares who killed him. Good riddance that he couldn't inflict more damage to this country. Although we are yet to recover from the damage he had already inflicted.

IK has a tough task in-front of him to undo the sectarianism and divide created by Pakistan's Modi.
 

Democratic

Senator (1k+ posts)
UNZ is a antisemitic conspiracy theories magazine with no credibility. Mossad had nothing to do with Zia. He was most likely killed by the Russian KGB in collaboration with the then Al-Zulfiqar.
 

tahirmajid

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
It is all biggest drama, Nawaz is not sick, Dr. Asman is hero of Sharif family as he arranged fake reports in pakistan and create a hype in media for escape from Pakistan.
 

Nawazcophansi76

Senator (1k+ posts)
how about further glamorizing it and saying that Kuffar-e-Makkah Killed him? cmon yaar no bullshit. Be rational.
Dude, Question.. Why the first thing came out of your mouth is about Makkah? Why not Yahood a NY?

My comments are BASED on history and the conduct of Zionist Assassins.

By way of deception read it. How Jews killed the Egyptian scientist, in France.
His fault was he developed a Gun that can reach beyond ISRAHELL.


Who benefits? Always look. Sudan gone. Jews got that nigger as a slave.

Begin was a terrorist carmel Brigade killed British Lord. These death MERCHANTS have been killng A Rabs and non Arab equally.

Abu Abu Ghareeb prison in Iraq. these Jews raped Muslim women and children. Fact.
So before you open your trap educate yourself.
 

Khan125

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Who cares who killed him. Good riddance that he couldn't inflict more damage to this country. Although we are yet to recover from the damage he had already inflicted.

IK has a tough task in-front of him to undo the sectarianism and divide created by Pakistan's Modi.
Qadiani BOLA gutter khulla
 

Awan S

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
کیوں افوائیں پھیلاتے ہو یہ تو لندن جا کر ملنے کی بات ہے - میاں صاحب تو ورکرز کو پاکستان میں عزت دینے میں بہت مشهور ہیں - چھوٹے میاں صاحب شہباز شریف البتہ ورکرز کے ساتھ اچھا رویہ نہیں رکھتے وہ سخت گیر مشهور ہیں -
 

Nawazcophansi76

Senator (1k+ posts)
Who cares who killed him. Good riddance that he couldn't inflict more damage to this country. Although we are yet to recover from the damage he had already inflicted.

IK has a tough task in-front of him to undo the sectarianism and divide created by Pakistan's Modi.
Even more than Nawaz Dakoo? Modi ca yaar? C.. What ABOUT American Modi? Trump? Jewish Modi Adolf Natan Yahoo?
 

Vitamin_C

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
I don't support any of them.

As Jinnah said, when a ruler creates divisions in a country, that country becomes a slave.

British did divide and rule in India, Modi is dividing Muslims and Hindus. Altaf divided Mohajir and other Pakistanis.

Zia divided shia and sunni. Airlifted al-qaeda militants to Gilgit and order them to rape innocent Gilgit citizens while police and army was ordered not to intervene. (1988 Gilgit Massacre). Created laws that discriminate against minorities. The destruction that Zia caused in Pakistan is far greater than Modi, Nawaz, Shaitan Yaho or Trump.


Even more than Nawaz Dakoo? Modi ca yaar? C.. What ABOUT American Modi? Trump? Jewish Modi Adolf Natan Yahoo?
 

RAW AGENT

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Bergman’s long book contains thirty-five chapters of which only the first two cover the period prior to the creation of Israel, and if his notable omissions were limited to those, they would merely constitute to a blemish on an otherwise reliable historical narrative. But a considerable number of major lacunae seem evident across the decades that follow, though they may be less the fault of the author himself than the tight Israeli censorship he faced or the realities of the American publishing industry. By the year 2018, pro-Israeli influence over America and other Western countries had reached such enormous proportions that Israel would risk little international damage by admitting to numerous illegal assassinations of various prominent figures in the Arab world or the Middle East. But other sorts of past deeds might still be considered far too damaging to yet acknowledge.

In 1991 renowned investigative journalist Seymour Hersh published The Samson Option, describing Israel’s secret nuclear weapons development program of the early 1960s, which was regarded as an absolute national priority by Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion, There are widespread claims that it was the threatened use of that arsenal that later blackmailed the Nixon Administration into its all-out effort to rescue Israel from the brink of military defeat during the 1973 war, a decision that provoked the Arab Oil Embargo and led to many years of economic hardship for the West.

The Islamic world quickly recognized the strategic imbalance produced by their lack of nuclear deterrent capability, and various efforts were made to redress that balance, which Tel Aviv did its utmost to frustrate. Bergman covers in great detail the widespread campaigns of espionage, sabotage, and assassination by which the Israelis successfully forestalled the Iraqi nuclear program of Saddam Hussein, finally culminating in the long-distance 1981 air raid that destroyed his Osirik reactor complex. The author also covers the destruction of a Syrian nuclear reactor in 2007 and Mossad’s assassination campaign that claimed the lives of several leading Iranian physicists a few years later. But all these events were reported at the time in our major newspapers, so no new ground is being broken. Meanwhile, an important story not widely known is entirely missing.

About seven months ago, my morning New York Times carried a glowing 1,500 word tribute to former U.S. ambassador John Gunther Dean, dead at age 93, giving that eminent diplomat the sort of lengthy obituary usually reserved these days for a rap-star slain in a gun-battle with his drug-dealer. Dean’s father had been a leader of his local Jewish community in Germany, and after the family left for America on the eve of World War II, Dean became a naturalized citizen in 1944. He went on to have a very distinguished diplomatic career, notably serving during the Fall of Cambodia, and under normal circumstances, the piece would have meant no more to me than it did to nearly all its other readers. But I had spent much of the first decade of the 2000s digitizing the complete archives of hundreds of our leading periodicals, and every now and then a particularly intriguing title led me to read the article in question. Such was the case with “Who Killed Zia?” which appeared in 2005.

Throughout the 1980s, Pakistan had been the lynchpin of America’s opposition to the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan, with its military dictator Zia ul-Haq being one of our most important regional allies. Then in 1988, he and most of his top leadership died in a mysterious plane crash, which also claimed the lives of the U.S. ambassador and an American general.

Although the deaths might have been accidental, Zia’s wide assortment of bitter enemies led most observers to assume foul play, and there was some evidence that a nerve gas agent, possibly released from a crate of mangos, had been used to incapacitate the crew and thereby cause the crash.

At the time, Dean had reached the pinnacle of his career, serving as our ambassador in neighboring India, while the U.S. ambassador killed in the crash, Arnold Raphel, had been his closest personal friend, also Jewish. By 2005, Dean was elderly and long-retired, and he finally decided to break his seventeen years of silence and reveal the strange circumstances surrounding the event, saying that he was convinced that the Israeli Mossad had been responsible.

A few years before his death, Zia had boldly declared that the production of an “Islamic atomic bomb” was a top Pakistani priority. Although his primary motive was the need to balance India’s small nuclear arsenal, he promised to share such powerful weapons with other Muslim countries, including those in the Middle East.


Dean describes the tremendous alarm Israel expressed at this possibility, and how pro-Israel members of Congress began a fierce lobbying campaign to stop Zia’s efforts. According to longtime journalist Eric Margolis, a leading expert on South Asia, Israel repeatedly tried to enlist India in launching a joint all-out attack against Pakistan’s nuclear facilities, but after carefully considering the possibility, the Indian government declined.

This left Israel in a quandary. Zia was a proud and powerful military dictator and his very close ties with the U.S. greatly strengthened his diplomatic leverage. Moreover, Pakistan was 2,000 miles from Israel and possessed a strong military, so that any sort of long-distance bombing raid similar to the one used against the Iraqi nuclear program was impossible. This left assassination as the remaining option.

Given Dean’s awareness of the diplomatic atmosphere prior to Zia’s death, he immediately suspected an Israeli hand, and his past personal experiences supported that possibility. Eight years earlier, while posted in Lebanon, the Israelis had sought to enlist his personal support in their local projects, drawing upon his sympathy as a fellow Jew. But when he rejected those overtures and declared that his primary loyalty was to America, an attempt was made to assassinate him, with the munitions used being eventually traced back to Israel.

Although Dean was tempted to immediately disclose his strong suspicions regarding the annihilation of the Pakistani government to the international media, he decided instead to pursue proper diplomatic channels, and immediately departed for Washington to share his views with his State Department superiors and other top Administration officials. But upon reaching DC, he was quickly declared mentally incompetent, prevented from returning to his India posting, and soon forced to resign. His four decade long career in government service ended summarily at that point. Meanwhile, the US government refused to assist Pakistan’s efforts to properly investigate the fatal crash and instead tried to convince a skeptical world that Pakistan’s entire top leadership had died because of a simple mechanical failure in their American aircraft.

This remarkable account would surely seem like the plot of an implausible Hollywood movie, but the sources were extremely reputable. The author of the 5,000 word article was Barbara Crossette, the former New York Times bureau chief for South Asia, who had held that post at the time of Zia’s death, while the piece appeared in World Policy Journal, the prestigious quarterly of The New School in New York City. The publisher was academic Stephen Schlesinger, son of famed historian Arthur J. Schlesinger, Jr.

One might naturally expect that such explosive charges from so solid a source might provoke considerable press attention, but Margolis noted that the story was instead totally ignored and boycotted by the entire North American media. Schlesinger had spent a decade at the helm of his periodical, but a couple of issues later he had vanished from the masthead and his employment at the New School came to an end. The text is no longer available on the World Policy Journal website, but it can still be accessed via Archive.org, allowing those so interested to read it and decide for themselves.

The complete historical blackout of that incident has continued down to the present day. Dean’s detailed Times obituary portrayed his long and distinguished career in highly flattering terms, yet failed to devote even a single sentence to the bizarre circumstances under which it ended.

At the time I originally read that article a dozen or so years ago, I had mixed feelings about the likelihood of Dean’s provocative hypothesis. Top national leaders in South Asia do die by assassination rather regularly, but the means employed are almost always quite crude, usually involving one or more gunman firing at close range or perhaps a suicide-bomber. By contrast, the highly sophisticated methods apparently used to eliminate the Pakistani government seemed to suggest a very different sort of state actor. Bergman’s book catalogs the enormous number and variety of Mossad’s assassination technologies.

Given the important nature of Dean’s accusations and the highly reputable venue in which they had appeared, Bergman must certainly have been aware of the story, so I wondered what arguments his Mossad sources might provide to rebut or debunk them. Instead, I discovered that the incident appears nowhere in Bergman’s exhaustive volume, perhaps reflecting the author’s reluctance to assist in deceiving his readers.

I also noticed that Bergman made absolutely no mention of the earlier assassination attempt against Dean when he was serving as our ambassador in Lebanon, even though the serial numbers of the anti-tank rockets fired at his armored limousine were traced to a batch sold to Israel. However, sharp-eyed journalist Philip Weiss did notice that the shadowy organization which officially claimed credit for the attack was revealed by Bergman to have been a Israel-created front group used for numerous car-bombings and other terrorist attacks. This seems to confirm Israel’s responsibility in the assassination plot.

Let us assume that this analysis is correct and that there is a good likelihood that Mossad was indeed behind Zia’s death. The broader implications are considerable.

Excerpts from Peter Bergmens book.
LINK.

Article published in UNZ.

long live yahud o nasara .
long live israel the enemy of terrorism .
 

RAW AGENT

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Who cares who killed him. Good riddance that he couldn't inflict more damage to this country. Although we are yet to recover from the damage he had already inflicted.

IK has a tough task in-front of him to undo the sectarianism and divide created by Pakistan's Modi.

zia did enough damage ,it will take 100 years to recover .