Mahathir has turned his back or Poor diplomacy?

stoic

Minister (2k+ posts)
Malaysia has always had a somewhat neutral stance. I don't remember them saying anything in favour Kashmir. He maybe a good leader for his country but some how people like to portray him as a Muslim world leader which he clearly isn't.
 

آخر الزماں

MPA (400+ posts)
Malaysia has always had a somewhat neutral stance. I don't remember them saying anything in favour Kashmir. He maybe a good leader for his country but some how people like to portray him as a Muslim world leader which he clearly isn't.
so making him chief guest was not a good idea. China could have been better option.
 

RashidAhmed

Moderator
Staff member
Siasat.pk Web Desk
مہاتیر محمد کا موقف بالکل ٹھیک ہے۔ یہی ڈپلومیسی ہے۔۔ پاکستان ماضی میں روس امریکہ تنازع پر ایسی ڈپلومیسی اختیار نہ کرنے پر آج ان حالات کا شکار ہے
 

آخر الزماں

MPA (400+ posts)
مہاتیر محمد کا موقف بالکل ٹھیک ہے۔ یہی ڈپلومیسی ہے۔۔ پاکستان ماضی میں روس امریکہ تنازع پر ایسی ڈپلومیسی اختیار نہ کرنے پر آج ان حالات کا شکار ہے
then making him chief guest was not a good idea. we need to honour those who honour our agenda's
 

Ferrari

Senator (1k+ posts)
مہاتیر محمد کا موقف بالکل ٹھیک ہے۔ یہی ڈپلومیسی ہے۔۔ پاکستان ماضی میں روس امریکہ تنازع پر ایسی ڈپلومیسی اختیار نہ کرنے پر آج ان حالات کا شکار ہے

Well said... Free trade with everyone, but entangling alliances with no one. But I guess it's very hard for the traitorous GEO "journalists" to understand this.
 

آخر الزماں

MPA (400+ posts)
His presence had more to do with trade and investment then anything else. His comments were about Indian Pakistan conflict. Malaysia's stance on India and Pakistan conflict doesn't count for much.
my point is that we must give importance to those who goes with our agenda generally. Malaysia is clearly not the one who goes with us in many issues
 

آخر الزماں

MPA (400+ posts)
ڈاکٹر مہاتیر نے کونسی بات غلط کی ہے؟
کیا پاکستان کبھی ملائشیا اور چین کے درمیان کسی جنگ میں ایک فریق کا ساتھ دیگا یا غیر جانبدار رہیگا؟
جہاں تک مجھے یاد پڑتا ہے پاکستان اور عمران خان کی واضح پالیسی ہے کہ ہم کسی پرائی جنگ میں نہیں کودیں گے
نہ پاکستان کرائے کا ٹٹو بنے گا
ہم مہاتیر محمد سے اس کام کی امید کیوں رکھتے ہیں کہ جو ہم خود نہیں کرنا چاہتے؟
----------------------------
ہمیں دہشت گردوں کوروکناچاہیے: وزیراعظم ملائیشیامہاتیرمحمد

اس میں کیا غلط بات ہے؟

my point is that we must give importance to those who goes with our agenda generally. Malaysia is clearly not the one who goes with us in many issues
 

آخر الزماں

MPA (400+ posts)
Well said... Free trade with everyone, but entangling alliances with no one. But I guess it's very hard for the traitorous GEO "journalists" to understand this.
my point is that we must give importance to those who goes with our agenda generally. Malaysia is clearly not the one who goes with us in many issues. its not geo issue but we should focus on our priorities.
 

stoic

Minister (2k+ posts)
my point is that we must give importance to those who goes with our agenda generally. Malaysia is clearly not the one who goes with us in many issues. its not geo issue but we should focus on our priorities.
They are bringing in some investment and are the 3-4th largest foreign investor (as far as i rememeber) in Pakistan and currently our agenda is economic revival.
 

Kavalier

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Malaysia has always had a somewhat neutral stance. I don't remember them saying anything in favour Kashmir. He maybe a good leader for his country but some how people like to portray him as a Muslim world leader which he clearly isn't.

We must also consider Malaysia as being very diverse country, indians and hindus being in quite a good majority there, also other minorities. Malaysia portrays itself as an secular state with peace and equal opportunities for all and hence will not take a stance which creates any differences in its own population.
 

Two Stooges

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
We must also consider Malaysia as being very diverse country, indians and hindus being in quite a good majority there, also other minorities. Malaysia portrays itself as an secular state with peace and equal opportunities for all and hence will not take a stance which creates any differences in its own population.
سفارت کاری میں کوئی مامے، چاچے نہیں ہوتے
اور نہ ہی مذہب، اور زبان کا کوئی لحاظ ہوتا ہے

ورنہ عربی بولنے والے مسلم ممالک یوں
ایک دوسرے کو پیٹھ کئے نہ بیٹھے ہوتے
 

stoic

Minister (2k+ posts)
سفارت کاری میں کوئی مامے، چاچے نہیں ہوتے
اور نہ ہی مذہب، اور زبان کا کوئی لحاظ ہوتا ہے

ورنہ عربی بولنے والے مسلم ممالک یوں
ایک دوسرے کو پیٹھ کئے نہ بیٹھے ہوتے
True and they wouldn'y have invited Sushma Sewerage to OIC meetup at the height on Pak India conflict.