کلبھوشن یادیو فیصلے کا ہیرو۔۔ خاورقریشی

Kashif Rafiq

Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
D_t4tF-XYAAWUN5.jpg

کلبھوشن یادیو کیس کا فیصلہ پاکستان کے حق میں آیا ہے تو اسکی ایک وجہ خاور قریشی کے دلائل ہیں۔

جب بھارت نے گواہی کے طور پر جب نواز شریف کی ویڈیو دکھائی جس میں نوازشریف ممبئی حملوں کا ذمہ دار اجمل قصاب کو کہہ رہے تھے تو خاور قریشی نے دلائل دیتے ہوئے کہا کہ ایک بد دیانت شخص کی گواہی کوئی حیثیت نہیں رکھتی جسے پاکستان کی سپریم کورٹ جھوٹ اور بددیانت قرار دے چکی ہے، یہ صادق اور امین نہیں ہے اور جیل میں کرپشن پر سزا کاٹ رہا ہے۔ جس پر بھارتی وکلاء سر پکڑ کر بیٹھ گئے تھے۔

خاورقریشی نے دلائل دیتے ہوئے کہا تھا کہ بھارتی جاسوس کی سرگرمیاں انفرادی طور پر نہیں تھیں وہ ایک نیٹ ورک کے طور پر کام کررہا تھا۔ ہ کلبھوشن یادیو پاکستان میں دہشت گردی کے منصوبوں میں ملوث رہا،وہ خاص طور پر سی پیک کو نشانہ بنانا چاہتا تھا،اس کے علاوہ تربت گوادر کو نقصان پہنچانے کا منصوبہ بھی بنایا گیا تھا۔ خاور قریشی نے بھارتی سرگرمیوں پر برطانوی رپورٹ بھی پیش کی جسے عدالت نے انٹرٹین کرلیا ۔۔ اس پر بھارت نے نوازشریف کے انٹرویو کو بطور حوالہ پیش کیا تو خاور قریشی نے یہ کہہ کر اس بھارتی موقف کی دھجیاں اڑادیں کہ نوازشریف کو تو پاکستانی سپریم کورٹ بددیانت اور جھوٹا کہہ چکی ہے


یہ واحد ثبوت تھا جسے استعمال کرکے بھارتی وکلاء نے کلبھوشن یادیو کو بچانے کی کوشش کی۔ دیکھئے خاورقریشی نے کیا دلائل دئیے تھے جس پر بھارتی وکلاء کی ایک نہ چلی اور سر پکڑ کر بیٹھے رہے



 
Last edited:

ranaji

President (40k+ posts)
Welldone Khawar Quraishi sahab
wrna to iss Nawaz Sharif Butt jaisay hram ke Pillaay Amrtsri Bharvay Dalaaay haaraan walaay ki Ghaleez Baqyat Nay apnay ghaleez aur Naapaak khoon ki wajjah saay Hrr mumkin koshish ki keh yeh kalboshn bach jaiey aur issi wastay murree mai khufia mulaqat bhi ki yeh noora butt Hram kaa Nutfaa Chor fradiyaa poori poori koshish krtaa raha apni maa ke khassam ko bachanay ki iss hram ke nutfay ko aaj tkk kisi international forum prr iss dehsht gardd kaa naam bhonknay ki bhi tofeeq nahi huwi thi naa hi Amrtsri Bhavay Dalaay Haaraan walaay Wald Naa maloiom gahak ki Baqyat ko iss Muamlay ko kisi International forum prr uthanay ki juratt huwi Yeh Haramion kaa Tbrr laannti Khanzeer Jinhon naay apnay Saay Ziada Hram ke Nutfaay aur Kanjar aur Dalon mulk dushmno yaani Khawaja Sraa Asif Choohoon jaisaay hram ke Nutfay Aur Zia Ke hrami Shoray safdarr hram zaday ke Ghaleez Khanzeer khoon ko wazeer bnaa krr inn hram ke nutfon saay indian narrative ke haq mai bhonknay ki duty di Jo Hram ke Nutfay Khanzeer ke Bachay Pakistan ke Moaqaf ke Khilaf Bhonk krr Apni m.... ch... krr Indian narrative ko support krtay rahay Gushti ke Bachay Hram ke Nutfaay Bdzaat nasal ke Aqama holder khanzeer baddboodar twaifon ki naslain jo pakistan ke Moaqaf ke Khilaf Bhonk krr Indian narrative ko support krtay rahay , aur Pakistan ke gharaeeb awaam ko loot tay rahay
 
Last edited:

khalid100

Minister (2k+ posts)
Not sure if he is a hero or not as he was just getting money for the job he was doing. He has represented india in the past too..


Khawar Qureshi represented India once in US case
NEW DELHI: There is a bit of history to the hyped fight between two legal experts — Harish Salve for India and Khawar Qureshi for Pakistan — in the International Court of Justice (ICJ), which is seized with the Kulbhushan Jadhav case.
At the moment Salve seems to have the upper hand in the case, with the ICJ staying Jadhav’s possible execution until a final judgement on the matter.
More than 15 years ago, there was a curious turn of events when India was forced to face arbitration at an international tribunal in the US initiated by Enron over the closure of the Dabhol power project. Millions of dollars were at stake for India. Salve, who had quit as solicitor general of India in November 2002, was retained as India’s counsel at the arbitration tribunal.
In 2004, the UPA government came to power as also a new team of law officers headed by attorney general Milon Banerjee. To manage the high-stakes arbitration over Dabhol against Enron, the government chose the Fox and Mandal law firm.
Government sources said Salve was sounded out whether he would continue as India’s counsel in the arbitration proceedings. Salve confirmed and informed the new government that he would continue to charge a concessional fee of Rs100,000 for a day’s hearing in the US-based tribunal.
However, there was a sudden change of heart and the Fox and Mandal firm was asked to hire Khawar Qureshi. India ultimately lost on both counts, the case to Enron and a lot of money that was paid to Qureshi as fees.
Salve confirmed to the Times of India that he had agreed to fight the case for India in the tribunal despite change of government. “It was a professional decision to defend India in the tribunal. But, I learnt from media reports later that Qureshi was hired and I could become his deputy.... So I decided to keep away, wishing India the best.” Salve refused to divulge any more details of how he was replaced by Qureshi in 2004.

An article from 2004 in The Lawyer, states that Serle Court chambers’ lawyer Qureshi had been appointed as counsel for the government of India. A host of UK firms had been invited to take India’s case.
A spokesperson for the previous law firm had said: “Following the appointment of the new attorney general, the entire legal team... was replaced.”
By arrangement with the Times of India
Published in Dawn, May 22nd, 2017
 

Raiwind-Destroyer

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Not sure if he is a hero or not as he was just getting money for the job he was doing. He has represented india in the past too..


Khawar Qureshi represented India once in US case
NEW DELHI: There is a bit of history to the hyped fight between two legal experts — Harish Salve for India and Khawar Qureshi for Pakistan — in the International Court of Justice (ICJ), which is seized with the Kulbhushan Jadhav case.
At the moment Salve seems to have the upper hand in the case, with the ICJ staying Jadhav’s possible execution until a final judgement on the matter.
More than 15 years ago, there was a curious turn of events when India was forced to face arbitration at an international tribunal in the US initiated by Enron over the closure of the Dabhol power project. Millions of dollars were at stake for India. Salve, who had quit as solicitor general of India in November 2002, was retained as India’s counsel at the arbitration tribunal.
In 2004, the UPA government came to power as also a new team of law officers headed by attorney general Milon Banerjee. To manage the high-stakes arbitration over Dabhol against Enron, the government chose the Fox and Mandal law firm.
Government sources said Salve was sounded out whether he would continue as India’s counsel in the arbitration proceedings. Salve confirmed and informed the new government that he would continue to charge a concessional fee of Rs100,000 for a day’s hearing in the US-based tribunal.
However, there was a sudden change of heart and the Fox and Mandal firm was asked to hire Khawar Qureshi. India ultimately lost on both counts, the case to Enron and a lot of money that was paid to Qureshi as fees.
Salve confirmed to the Times of India that he had agreed to fight the case for India in the tribunal despite change of government. “It was a professional decision to defend India in the tribunal. But, I learnt from media reports later that Qureshi was hired and I could become his deputy.... So I decided to keep away, wishing India the best.” Salve refused to divulge any more details of how he was replaced by Qureshi in 2004.

An article from 2004 in The Lawyer, states that Serle Court chambers’ lawyer Qureshi had been appointed as counsel for the government of India. A host of UK firms had been invited to take India’s case.
A spokesperson for the previous law firm had said: “Following the appointment of the new attorney general, the entire legal team... was replaced.”
By arrangement with the Times of India
Published in Dawn, May 22nd, 2017
naam hi kafi hai

Times of india and dawn what a great story